From a painting by M. Melingue.]

One of the most recent of the works on the great cardinal, that of the

Abbé Lacroix, presents us with a Richelieu but little known,

administering his diocese of Luçon, at the age of twenty-two, firmly and

justly, regular in his habits and conciliatory in his character,

ambitious, preparing himself, during eight years of obscure study and

skilful intrigue, for his accession to power, and having already

selected the men whom he would designate to carry out his great designs.

"The bishop prepared the minister," says this biographer.

It was no part of his plans to have the Parlement oppose them, and that

body was forced, during this reign, to swallow some of its bitterest

mortifications. In 1631, having refused to verify a royal decree, the

king returned from Fontainebleau hastily, and ordered the members to

present themselves in a body at the Louvre, the greffier bringing with

him the register of their debates; in the grand gallery of the palace

they were obliged to kneel before the throne, and the monarch, rising,

took the register which was presented to him, tore out the page on which

was the record of their deliberation, and ordered that there should be

inserted in its place the decree of the royal council which had been

refused the _enregistrement_. Ten years later, in the midst of the

Thirty Years' War, the magistrates having declined to approve of certain

new taxes, Louis XIII held a "bed of justice," and again brought them

to terms. The Parlement was formally forbidden to put forth any

remonstrances regarding the edicts which concerned the government and

the administration of the State. Only on those relating to the financial

decrees were they to be permitted to have a voice. These wearisome

episodes were repeated at intervals during the reigns of all the later

kings of France.

Neither was there any contemplation of the _États Généraux_ in the

administration of the king and his minister. A few assemblies of

notables were held, one in 1625 on the subject of the Valteline and the

rupture with the Pope, and another in the latter part of the following

year, to which were admitted only magistrates, ecclesiastics,

councillors of State, and the _prévôt_ of the merchants of Paris.

Against Mazarin, minister and cardinal, but not a priest, the Parlement

was more successful in its long contest. Entrenched in their office,

rendered hereditary by the establishment of the _paulette_ (so named

from the contractor Paulet, who suggested it to Sully in 1604), the

magistrates had acquired a spirit of independence and pride which led

them to style themselves "the born protectors of the people," and to

assert their right to assume the _rôle_ of the _États Généraux_, and to

play the part of the Parliament of England, which at that hour was

accomplishing a revolution, and to which, indeed, Mazarin compared them.

In January, 1646, they proclaimed the cardinal a disturber of the public

peace, an enemy of the king and the State, and directed him to leave the

court immediately, and the kingdom within a week. In February, 1651, he

was again banished, he, his family, his adherents, and his foreign

servants, and this decree, promulgated to the sound of the trumpet in

all the quarters of Paris, was greeted by the populace with noisy

exclamations of joy. In March and in June these orders were repeated,

the wily favorite of Anne d'Autriche seeking every opportunity of

regaining his power. It was these triumphs of the Fronde that inspired

the despotic Louis XIV with that dislike for the city of Paris which he

cherished all his life,--these, and the too-frequent public monuments

which spoke of other crowned heads than his own!

The nation had already entered that period of incredible distress and

degradation which was to lead to the Revolution, and on the surface of

which the so-called splendor of the court glittered with a species of

decaying phosphorescence which blinds the eyes of grave historians to

this day. In 1646 there were in the jails of the kingdom twenty-three

thousand eight hundred persons, confined for non-payment of taxes, five

thousand of whom died there. "_Tout le royaume_," said Omer Talon, two

years later, "is sick with exhaustion. The peasant no longer possesses

anything but his soul, because he has not yet been able to put that up

for sale." No prince, in the judgment of Saint-Simon, possessed the art

of reigning in a higher degree than did Louis XIV. "Louis Quatorze is

certainly not a great man," says Duruy, "but he is very certainly a

great king, and the greatest that Europe has seen." And yet the latter

quotes from the _Mémoires_ which the king demanded from his intendants

on the condition of their provinces for the instruction of his grandson,

the Duc de Bourgogne: "The wars, the mortality, the lodging and the

continual passage of armed forces, the military regulations, the heavy

taxes, the withdrawal of the Huguenots, have ruined this country.... The

bridges and the roads are in a deplorable state, and commerce is

abolished. The frontier provinces are the most completely crushed by the

requisitions, the pillaging of the soldiers, who, receiving neither pay

nor provisions, pay themselves with their own hands. In the district of

Rouen, out of seven hundred thousand inhabitants, six hundred and fifty

thousand have for bed a bundle of straw. The peasant in certain

provinces is returning to a state of savagery,--living, for the most

part, on herbs and roots, like the beasts; and, wild as they are,

fleeing when any one approaches." "There is no nation as savage as these

people," says the intendant of Bourges of those under his

administration; "there may be found sometimes troops of them seated in a

circle in the middle of a field and always far from the roads; if they

are approached, this band immediately disappears."

At this great king's death, he left France, says M. Duruy himself, "in a

prodigious state of exhaustion. The State was ruined, and seemed to have

no other resource than bankruptcy. Before the War of Succession, Vauban

had already written: 'Nearly the tenth part of the people are reduced to

beggary; of the nine other portions, five cannot give any alms to the

mendicants, from whom they differ but slightly; three are very much

distressed; the tenth part do not include more than one hundred thousand

families, of which not ten thousand are comfortably situated.' This

poverty became especially terrible in 1715, after that war in which it

was necessary to borrow money at four hundred per cent., to create new

imposts, to consume in advance the revenues of two years, and to raise

the public debt to the sum of two milliards four hundred millions, which

would make in our day nearly eight milliards!"

[Illustration: AFTER THE CAPTURE OF THE BASTILLE, JULY 14, 1789. From a

painting by François Flameng.

Paris, From the Earliest Period to the Present Day; Volume 2 · 第 18 / 60 题