OUR BOOKING-OFFICE.

(_By Mr. Punch's Staff of Learned Clerks._)

There are few living writers of romance who can carry the sword and

doublet with the ease of Miss MARJORIE BOWEN. She has long

since proved herself a practised mistress of mediævalism, and _The

Carnival of Florence_ (METHUEN) finds her therefore on sure

ground. It is a pleasantly stimulating tale of love and adventure

in the days of SAVONAROLA. The heroine is one _Aprilis_, a

fair Florentine whose matrimonial affairs were complicated by the

fact that early in the story she had been abducted (strictly _pour

le bon motif_ in order to score off the gentleman to whom she was

then engaged) by the too notorious PIERO DEI MEDICI. The

unfortunate results were twofold, for though _Aprilis_ was returned

unharmed to her father's house her noble betrothed would have no more

of her, so she had to put up with another husband who took her for

charity, and to suffer in addition the pangs of unrequited love for the

Lord of Florence whom she was unable to forget. What happened--how the

MEDICI were turned from their heritage, and the part played in

all this by the grim Revivalist of San Marco--is the matter of a story

well worth reading. As is his way with tales in which he appears, the

figure of SAVONAROLA comes gradually to dominate the whole;

did he not even master GEORGE ELIOT? The present story is

dedicated "In Memory of Florence, Summer 1914." Presumably, therefore,

Miss BOWEN shares with me certain memories that have been very

vividly recalled by her pages--memories of a June evening when, as

in the days of which she writes, the Piazza della Signoria echoed to

the clash of swords and the tumult of an angry mob. That it has thus

reminded me of what would, but for greater happenings since, have been

one of my most thrilling chimney-corner reminiscences, is among the

pleasures that I owe to a stirring and successful novel.

* * * * *

Among my favourite gambits in fiction is the return to his impoverished

home of one who left it a supposed wastrel, and has now lots and lots

of money. Personally, if I have a preference, it is that my wanderer

should be at first unrecognised; but I am perhaps too fastidious.

Certainly I am not going to complain about _Big Tremaine_ (MILLS

AND BOON) just because when he came back to the Virginian township

that he had quitted as a bank thief his old coloured nurse saw through

him in once. There is, of course, Homeric precedent for the situation;

it is one that, deftly handled, can scarcely fail of its effect. And

the story of _Big Tremaine_ is very deftly handled almost all through.

MARIE VAN VORST evidently knows the gentle Southern life

thoroughly; her pictures of it have served to increase my conviction

that Virginia must be one of the pleasantest places on earth. Not less

true and delicate is her treatment of the relations between masterful

_Tremaine_ and the gently obstinate mother who turns so slowly from

distrust to adoration of her returned son. There are, in short, a great

many qualities in this story that I have found vastly agreeable. Also

what seems to me one big defect. But as this latter is so far essential

that without it there would be no story I am unable further to tell

you about it. Still, I am bound to say that its revelation was a nasty

shock to my admiration, which had been roused more than anything else

by the sincerity and unconventionality of the argument. This is a

matter on which you shall pass your own verdict. Mine would be "A Happy

Ending committed through unjustified fear of the libraries"; and in

view of the charm of her earlier chapters I should discharge the author

with a friendly caution.

* * * * *

Most of us might freely confess to some vagueness in our minds as to

"the social and economic state of things in the Prairie Provinces of

the Dominion," and not a few of us are ready to spend five shillings

and a leisure hour or two in finding out for certain, if only to be

prepared with a refuge in the event of England being Teutonised. Miss

E. B. MITCHELL, the author of _In Western Canada Before the

War_ (MURRAY), knows her subject at first hand and deals

with the right matter in the right manner for our purpose; that is to

say, she is discriminating in her selection of topics and is always

pleasant if never violently exciting or amusing in her treatment of

them. The book is short, as such books should be; it does not pretend

to be exhaustive, yet it leaves a very clear and precise impression

on the mind. But (and every intelligent reader will have been waiting

for this "but") why on earth should it be called _In Western Canada

Before the War_, seeing that it was clearly written without any thought

of the present European conditions and would have been published just

about this time even if we had been at peace with everybody everywhere?

The only reference in point which I can recall is a passing wonder

expressed in a few lines as to what, if any, effect Armageddon will

have in Canada; this is hardly enough, I fancy, to justify the topical

suggestion of the cover. I cannot help feeling that the object of the

last three words of that title was less literary than commercial.

[Illustration: _Voice on telephone (from Berlin)._ "WELL, HAVE YOU

DAMMED THE SUEZ CANAL YET?"

_Turk._ "YES--OFTEN!"]

_In the City of Under_ (ARNOLD) shows Miss EVELYNE

RYND to have quite a pretty talent in the not unattractive _genre_

of fantastic incoherence something after the pattern of _The Napoleon

of Notting Hill_, though in a less robustious mood. But I doubt if

talent (however pretty) is altogether sufficient to carry the reader

through three hundred pages with no possible clue as to what it is

really all about. All the same I do, in justice and most gladly, say

that the author keeps one piqued to the extent of wishing to find

out; one also loses all suspicion of its being an improving book,

and distinctly likes that uncharacteristic Cheltenham boy, _Augustus

Clickson_, who helps little _John Hazard_ to find a job. _John_ was

very small and ineffectual and engaging, and his V.C. father had left

the family wofully ill off, and _John_ felt it was up to him to do

something about it. He meets the _Hawker_, who has a comforting habit

of turning up at odd moments and assuring people that there's a way out

of every difficulty, whereas the old lady, _Mrs. Letitlie_, asserted

roundly and frequently that there was none. Then we have a nice wild

unpractical Professor and a perplexed archæologist who get tangled in

the skein; as also a spy, and, in fact, any old person and thing that

occurred to the writer. There's enough good stuff and good humour in

this queer patchwork to make me sure that any defect is one merely

of form, and I would wager that it was the Notting Hill hero, before

alluded to, that was responsible for setting our author on a dangerous

path.

* * * * *

_The Seventh Post Card_ (GREENING) was one of a series written

anonymously, as harbingers of sudden death, to motor-car drivers whose

bad luck or bad management had made them run over a fellow-creature

with capital consequences. Capital, also, for helping on the plot

of the story; for the sudden death really did come off in such a

considerable number of cases that we should have been quite justified

in feeling worried when the delightful _Joanna_, driving the car

belonging to her equally delightful _Jack_, was unfortunate enough to

knock down a tramp; even though the immediate consequences when _Jack_

found her awakening from unconsciousness by the roadside were--well,

delightful too, and such as could be expected. Indeed, the sadly-worn

word "delightful" seems somehow applicable to the entire string of

clues, deductions, inquests, murders and other horrid thrills, or, at

any rate, to Mr. FLOWERDEW'S telling of them. Is my capability

for melodramatic emotion declining, that I thread this maze of tragic

mystery in a mood no more intense than that of comfortable content?

Perhaps; or it may be only the soothing effect of the author's clean

English, coupled with the conviction that so long as he takes care to

keep _Sir Julian Daymont_--the famous novelist-detective--on their

side, no serious harm can come to the people we care about most. So,

although a really nasty charge of murdering his grandfather turns up

against the hero just when things (but for the number of pages left)

are beginning to look prosperous, I can defy you to get seriously

uneasy about his future; and, sure enough, _Sir Conan_--I mean _Sir

Julian_--solves the problem in convenient time to pack the lovers

safely off on their honeymoon. And, really, what more could you ask for?

Punch or the London Charivari, Vol. 148, February 10, 1915 · 第 58 / 58 题