Total imports in 1855, $196,660,064.66

_Exports_.

By lake shipment, $34,817,716.32

" Canal, 79,614,042.70

" Railroads, 98,521,262.86

----------------

Total value of exports in 1855, $212,953,021.88

"Aggregate value of imports and exports at Chicago in the year 1855,

$409,613,086.54.[B]

[Footnote B: This is more than half of the value of all the exports and

imports of the Union in the year 1860, King Cotton included.]

"These statistics have been obtained by much labor and perseverance,

with a view to the strictest accuracy. The result has amply justified

the labor; for the published statistics of this commerce, which have

gone forth to the country through the newspaper-press of the city, fall

far short of its actual extent. On discovering this fact, I felt it to

be a matter of duty to obtain the information directly from the only

authentic sources, namely, the custom-house, mercantile, and warehouse

records.

"Such are the claims which, in a civil point of view, are presented in

behalf of the preservation of this harbor.

"There is still another, of not less magnitude, which is exclusively

national. It is the influence it would have on the military defence of

this part of our frontier, and the success of our arms in time of war. A

single glance at the general map of the United States will be sufficient

to show the importance of Chicago as a military position in conducting

our operations in defence of our northwestern frontier in time of war.

"The great depth to which Lake Michigan here penetrates into a populous

and fertile country totally devoid of fortifications would constitute an

irresistible inducement to an enemy to aim with all his strength at this

point, should he find it divested of any of the chief means of defence

which are by all nations accorded to maritime ports of chief importance,

He would find Chicago very much in such a state of weakness, if the

harborworks here are allowed to fall into a dilapidated condition; for

then our naval force would not itself be secure in hovering about this

port, or in cruising in its immediate vicinity for purposes of military

defence. There is scarcely a week in the year that a fleet might not

have occasion to take refuge from the lake-gales in a safe harbor.

Deprived of this advantage, the only resort would be to take the open

sea, and there buffet out the storms. On their subsiding, this defensive

fleet, on attempting to resume its proper position, might find it

occupied by an enemy, with all the advantages, in a combat, which ought

to be secured to our side.

"An enemy, once possessing this harbor, could by a powerful fleet cover

the landing of an army in pursuit of the conquest of territory, or

designing to lay heavy pecuniary contributions upon the inhabitants.

Peace is the proper time to prepare against such a catastrophe, and the

protection of the harbor is the first element in the military defence

that should be attended to. With the harbor secured permanently in good

condition, the port of Chicago, through the enterprise of the people

of Illinois and the surrounding States, will possess the elements of

military strength in perhaps a greater degree than any other seaport in

the Union.

"The immense reticulation of railroads, amounting to an aggregate length

of 2720 miles, which are tributary to this port, now daily brings into

Chicago the vast amount of agricultural produce exhibited in our tables.

These are their peace-offerings to other nations. In the emergency of

war, however, these railroads could in a single day concentrate at

Chicago troops enough for any military campaign, even if designed to

cover our whole northwestern lake-frontier. Besides this, they would be

the means of bringing here, daily, the munitions of war, and, above all,

the necessary articles of subsistence and forage, to sustain an army of

any magnitude, and to keep it in activity throughout any period that

the war might last. In other words, Chicago would be in time of war the

chief _point d'appui_ of military operations in the Northwest."

In regard to the military importance of the command of the Great Lakes,

history ought to teach us a lesson. At the breaking out of the War of

1812, this matter had been entirely neglected by our Government, in

spite of the earnest appeals of the officer in command in this quarter.

The consequence was the utter failure of the campaign against Canada,

and the capture of the principal posts in the Northwest by the British,

who had provided a naval force here, small, indeed, but sufficient where

there was no opponent. It was not until the naval force organized by

Commodore Perry swept the British from Lake Erie that General Harrison

was able to recover the lost territory. From these considerations, the

importance of strong fortifications in the Straits of Mackinac, to

command the entrance of our Mediterranean, would seem to be evident.

The early advocates in Congress of these lake-improvements had to

encounter a very violent opposition from various quarters.

First, the abstractionists of the Virginia school--men who "would cavil

for the ninth part of a hair"--affirmed in general terms, that this

Government was established with the view of regulating our external

affairs, leaving all internal matters to be regulated by the States; and

then, descending to particulars, declared, that, while Congress had the

power to make improvements on salt water, it could do nothing on fresh.

Furthermore, they argued, that, to give the power of spending money, the

water must ebb and flow, and that the improvement must be below a port

of entry, and not above. Another refinement of the Richmond sophists

was this:--If a river be already navigable, Congress has the power to

improve it, because it can "regulate" commerce; but if a sand-bar at

its mouth prevents vessels from passing in or out, Congress cannot

interfere, because that would be "creating," and not "regulating."

Other Southern orators and their Northern followers denounced these

appropriations as a system of plunder and an attack upon Southern

rights, forgetting the fact, that, in these harbor and coast

appropriations, the South, with a much smaller commerce than the North,

had always claimed the larger share of expenditure. Thus, from 1825 to

1831,

New England received $ 327,563.21

The Middle States, including

the Lakes, 982,145.20

The South and Southwest 2,233,813.18

Others joined in this opposition, from ignorance of the great commerce

growing up on the lakes; and frequently, where bills have been passed by

Congress, Southern influence has caused the Executive to veto them. In

spite of all these obstacles, however, this great interest forced itself

upon the attention of the country; and in July, 1847, a Convention,

composed of delegates from eighteen States, met in Chicago, to concert

measures for obtaining from Government the necessary improvements for

Western rivers and harbors. This body sent an able memorial to Congress,

and the result has been that larger appropriations have since been made.

Still, however, much remains to be done, and it appears by the last

Report of Colonel Graham, that his estimates for necessary work on lake

harbors and roadsteads amount to nearly three millions of dollars, to

which half a million should be added for the improvement of St. Clair

flats, making an aggregate of three and a half millions of dollars,

which is much needed at this time, for the safe navigation of the lakes.

It may be remarked, in tins connection, that the lakes, with their

tributary streams, are furnished with nearly a hundred light-houses,

four or five of which are revolving, and the remainder fixed

lights,--Lake Ontario having eight, Lake Erie twenty-three, Lake St.

Clair two, Lake Huron nine, Lake Michigan thirty-two, and Lake Superior

fourteen.

When we say that Chicago exports thirty millions of bushels of grain,

and is the largest market in the world, many persons doubtless believe

that these are merely Western figures of speech, and not figures of

arithmetic. Let us, then, compare the exports of those European cities

winch have confessedly the largest corn-trade with those of Chicago.

1854. Bushels of Grain.

Odessa, on the Black Sea, 7,040,000

Galatz and Bruilow, do., 8,320,000

Dantzic, on the Baltic, 4,408,000

Riga, do., 4,000,000

St. Petersburg, Gulf of Finland, 7,200,000

Archangel, on the White Sea, 9,528,000

----------

40,496,000

The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 07, No. 41, March, 1861 A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics · 第 18 / 37 题