AN ENTIRELY NEW WOMAN.

Sir,--As a lawyer, I hold that the contract into which a woman enters at

marriage to obey her husband, being one made "under duress," is entirely

void. She is compelled to take the vow, otherwise she could not be

married at all. But, in order to make her position still clearer, I

should advise that, before repeating the words of the clergyman, she

should say to him, "Am I to understand that unless I repeat this formula

you will decline to marry me?" He may be a little surprised, but is sure

to answer in the affirmative. Then she should reply, "Very well; then I

repeat it under protest, and without prejudice," and the ceremony could

thereafter go on as usual. There might also be inserted, after the

announcement of the wedding in the papers, the words "No obedience,"

like "No cards," in which case no doubt whatever could be raised as to

the wife's true legal position. I shall be happy to advise farther, if

necessary, and meanwhile remain,

Yours toutingly,

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 107, October 13, 1894 · 第 30 / 37 题