I cannot believe, then, that the Christian religion is true.

I cannot believe that the Bible is the word of God. For the word of God

would be above criticism and beyond disproof, and the Bible is not above

criticism nor beyond disproof.

I cannot believe that any religion has been revealed to Man by God.

Because a revealed religion would be perfect, but no known religion

is perfect; and because history and science show us that the known

religions have not been revealed, but have been evolved from other

religions. There is no important feature of the Christian religion

which can be called original. All the rites, mysteries, and doctrines of

Christianity have been borrowed from older faiths.

I cannot believe that Jehovah, the God of the Bible, is the Creator of

the known universe. The Bible God, Jehovah, is a man-made God, evolved

from the idol of an obscure and savage tribe. The Bible shows us this

quite plainly.

I cannot believe that the Bible and the Testament are historically true.

I regard most of the events they record as fables, and most of their

characters as myths.

I cannot believe in the existence of Jesus Christ, nor Buddha, nor

Moses. I believe that these are ideal characters constructed from still

more ancient legends and traditions.

I cannot believe that the Bible version of the relations of man and God

is correct. For that version, and all other religious versions known

to me, represents man as sinning against or forsaking God, and God as

punishing or pardoning man.

But if God made man, then God is responsible for all man's acts and

thoughts, and therefore man cannot sin against God.

And if man could not sin against God, but could only act as God ordained

that he should act, then it is against reason to suppose that God could

be angry with man, or could punish man, or see any offence for which to

pardon man.

I cannot believe that man has ever forsaken God. Because history shows

that man has from the earliest times been eagerly and pitifully seeking

God, and has served and raised and sacrificed to God with a zeal akin to

madness. But God has made no sign.

I cannot believe that man was at the first created "perfect," and

that he "fell." (How could the perfect fall?) I believe the theory of

evolution, which shows not a fall but a gradual rise.

I cannot believe that God is a loving "Heavenly Father," taking a tender

interest in mankind. Because He has never interfered to prevent the

horrible cruelties and injustices of man to man, and because He has

permitted evil to rule the world. I cannot reconcile the idea of

a tender Heavenly Father with the known horrors of war, slavery,

pestilence, and insanity. I cannot discern the hand of a loving Father

in the slums, in the earthquake, in the cyclone. I cannot understand the

indifference of a loving Father to the law of prey, nor to the terrors

and tortures of leprosy, cancer, cholera, and consumption.

I cannot believe that God is a personal God, who intervenes in human

affairs. I cannot see in science, nor in experience, nor in history any

signs of such a God, nor of such intervention.

I cannot believe that God hears and answers prayer, because the universe

is governed by laws, and there is no reason to suppose that those laws

are ever interfered with. Besides, an all-wise God knows what to do

better than man can tell Him, and a just God would act justly without

requiring to be reminded of His duty by one of His creatures.

I cannot believe that miracles ever could or ever did happen. Because

the universe is governed by laws, and there is no credible instance on

record of those laws being suspended.

I cannot believe that God "created" man, as man now is, by word of mouth

and in a moment. I accept the theory of evolution, which teaches that

man was slowly evolved by natural process from lower forms of life, and

that this evolution took millions of years.

I cannot believe that Jesus Christ was God, nor that He was the Son of

God. There is no solid evidence for the miracle of the Incarnation, and

I see no reason for the Incarnation.

I cannot believe that Christ died to save man from Hell, nor that He

died to save man from sin. Because I do not believe God would condemn

the human race to eternal torment for being no better than He had made

them, and because I do not see that the death of Christ has saved man

from sin.

I cannot believe that God would think it necessary to come on earth as

a man, and die on the Cross. Because if that was to atone for man's

sin, it was needless, as God could have forgiven man without Himself

suffering.

I cannot believe that God would send His son to die on the Cross.

Because He could have forgiven man without subjecting His son to pain.

I cannot accept any doctrine of atonement. Because to forgive the guilty

because the innocent had suffered would be unjust and unreasonable, and

to forgive the guilty because a third person begged for his pardon would

be unjust.

I cannot believe that a good God would allow sin to enter the world.

Because He would hate sin and would have power to destroy or to forbid

it.

I cannot believe that a good God would create or tolerate a Devil, nor

that he would allow the Devil to tempt man.

I cannot believe the story of the virgin birth of Christ. Because for a

man to be born of a virgin would be a miracle, and I cannot believe in

miracles.

I cannot believe the story of Christ's resurrection from the dead.

Because that would be a miracle, and because there is no solid evidence

that it occurred.

I cannot believe that faith in the Godhood of Christ is necessary to

virtue or to happiness. Because I know that some holding such faith are

neither happy nor virtuous, and that some are happy and virtuous who do

not hold that faith.

The differences between the religious and the scientific theories, or,

as I should put it, between superstition and rationalism, are clearly

marked and irreconcilable.

The supernaturalist stands by "creation"; the rationalist stands by

"evolution." It is impossible to reduce these opposite ideas to a common

denominator.

The creation theory alleges that the earth, and the sun, and the moon,

and man, and the animals were "created" by God, instantaneously, by word

of mouth, out of nothing.

The evolution theory alleges that they were evolved, slowly, by natural

processes out of previously existing matter.

The supernaturalist alleges that religion was revealed to man by God,

and that the form of this revelation is a sacred book.

The rationalist alleges that religion was evolved by slow degrees and

by human minds, and that all existing forms of religion and all existing

"sacred books," instead of being "revelations," are evolutions from

religious ideas and forms and legends of prehistoric times. It is

impossible to reduce these opposite theories to a common denominator.

The Christians, the Hindoos, the Parsees, the Buddhists, and the

Mohammedans have each their "Holy Bible" or "sacred book." Each religion

claims that its own Bible is the direct revelation of God, and is the

only true Bible teaching the only true faith. Each religion regards all

the other religions as spurious.

The supernaturalists believe in miracles, and each sect claims that the

miracles related in its own inspired sacred book prove the truth of that

book and of the faith taught therein.

No religion accepts the truth of any other religion's miracles. The

Hindoo, the Buddhist, the Mohammedan, the Parsee, the Christian each

believes that his miracles are the only real miracles.

The Protestant denies the miracles of the Roman Catholic.

God and My Neighbour · 第 22 / 80 题