For example, in the following couplet:--

"In vain the fickle demon sports

With fetid remnants of decay."

[Illustration]

He quite failed to discover what particular--or rather anything _but_

particular--demon is referred to, or why he should amuse himself in so

eccentric and unpleasant a manner.

Nor, my Baronite says, was his conception of contentment greatly

assisted by this somewhat complicated comparison:--

"Contentment is a love-commissioned barque

Sailing a self-less sea--a sea whose flood

Is ordered alway by the laughing guns

Of Virtue's fortalice, whose armament,

Primed with rose-petal powder, doth discharge

In generous rounds of sympathy with all,

Scattering happiness, whose smile betrays

The pangless hurt."

But that, he is quite willing to admit, may be rather the fault of his

own imagination than the poet's. Again, in a poem entitled "Love's

Messengers," the author writes:--

"Flit thou along on softly feathered feet,

Noiseless, thou shadowy-pinioned minister,

And gently fan, _with midnight gale_, my sweet,

Lest thou awaken her."

Which, to my Baronite, suggests the difficulty that, if the minister

fans the lady with his shadowy pinions "gently," he will fail to

produce anything resembling a "midnight gale"; on the other hand, if he

performs the part of invisible punkah so energetically as to suggest

a gale, he can hardly help awakening her unless she is a very heavy

sleeper indeed--and _might_ give her a cold in the head. Surely this is

rather an unfair dilemma on which to place a feathered minister of any

denomination.

But after all, poetry, as my Baronite fully recognises, is not meant to

be judged by so literal a standard, and it may be cheerfully conceded

that there are many people who make a less profitable use of their

"Leisure Time" than Mr. MAVOR has done. In which opinion

concurs

Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 109, August 10, 1895 · 第 12 / 26 题