But one day there had been a dog show near us, and after the booths had

been taken down, and the exhibits gone, one poor spaniel was discovered

who had lost his friends, and appealed to us for sympathy; so we

invited him to afternoon tea in the garden. Watch came to tea as usual;

but when he saw the other dog, he suddenly became demonstratively

affectionate. This was quite appreciated; but the other dog was not

therefore neglected. So Watch bit him. This was not appreciated at all.

We told Watch so, but he only sat down and turned his back to us, and

gave the family five minutes for repentance; and as they did not fall

on their knees, and beseech his forgiveness, he solemnly marched away

into the house and lay in his master’s study, quite alone, sulking. I

am sorry to say, too, that he conceived occasionally the most violent

antipathies to the most delightful and well-intentioned people. There

was a friend of ours, devoted to dogs in general, and to him in

particular, whom he would not allow to touch him; he would not take

food from her hand; once, when he had accepted from some one else the

food he had refused from her, he stopped eating it because he heard her

laugh. Once he was the victim of uncontrollable fascination. A girl

came to tea, at whose greeting he growled; then he lay down in a corner

with his eyes fixed on her. She went on talking and taking no notice of

him, and he came out into the room, little by little, looking at her,

till he finally sat straight in front of her, with his eyes fixed on

hers; and there he remained until she went away.

Watch had become identified with the family, to the extent of being

called “Watch Benson” by many friends. His English vocabulary was

wonderfully large. I remember the surprise of one gentleman who came

to talk business with my father. Watch was in the room, and, hearing

our voices outside, suddenly started to the door, which was shut. “Why

don’t you go out of the window, then?” my father said, quite quietly,

and Watch in a moment ran to the window and jumped out.

I never quite knew what Watch’s position was towards religious

exercises. I think he approved of them, but disapproved of our

exclusiveness about them. So he pretended altogether to despise

church. He was depressed on Sunday morning, came to the garden gate to

congratulate us when church was over, and pretended to be sleepy when

the time for evening church drew near. But I think that was because he

was not allowed to go; for he took up a very different position about

prayers; he insisted on coming; he had his own stall in a window;

though occasionally, when strangers were there, and he could not be

turned out, he suddenly decided to leave it for the softer rugs in the

middle of the chapel. There was one memorable occurrence, when the 26th

chapter of St. Matthew was read, and Watch got more and more excited

as he heard his own name repeated more and more emphatically, until

at the final, “I say unto all, _Watch_,” he ran eagerly out into the

middle--such exciting, personal prayers!

But he made a great point of attending; for when we changed our

house, and came to the conclusion that his presence would no longer

be appreciated, his efforts to attend prayers were quite pathetic.

Sometimes he scratched at the door, or pushed it open, and marched in

in the middle; sometimes he slunk in when we went into the chapel, and

sometimes ran in first and tried to hide. He had a vague idea in his

mind, that it was some special privilege, some special identification

with the family.

Now that we were in London half the year, Watch could not be with us

constantly. For one thing his dirty paws were such a mortification to

him, and we thought he would die from the amount of soot he licked

off. And he could not go walks, for he would stand smiling at us in

the middle of the street, with a tram, two omnibuses, a cart, and four

hansoms, bearing down upon him. So he went to stay with friends, or

down to the farm in the country.

That last was often necessary, but not a great success. Watch was

very exclusive; he never would go walking with servants, except when

everyone else was--not out, for he might have met them--but away

from home. The one exception was when the servants were nurses with

children. He was fond of children, and did not think it _infra dig._ to

play with them. In the same way he despised everyone at the farm, and

had to be treated in a very special manner, quite different from all

other dogs. “Why can’t Watch live like any of the other dogs?” one of

the children asked. “Oh, my dear, Watch is much too good for us,” his

mother told him, with a deep sarcasm. No other dog could come on the

rug when Watch was lying there. The cat might come and was welcome, and

liked the benevolent old gentleman. Just as one would not like anybody

to come and take half of one’s armchair, but might be rather flattered

if a cat or a little dog jumped up to settle itself there. Cats were

only cats, and fit subjects for philanthropy, but other dogs were his

own ill-bred relatives. As some one summed it up, “Watch doesn’t care

for dogs.”

The other dogs could not be expected to appreciate this, and Watch’s

airs provoked at last one outburst from King, the steady old

patriarchal collie of the farm. King flew upon him one fine day to

have it out, and all the other dogs, seeing that King “had taken out a

free ticket,” as the bailiff phrased it, flew to avenge their private

grievances. Watch was very nearly killed, but he kept his airs to

the last. Such strong arguments were brought to bear upon King, that

ever after, when Watch crossed the yard, King retired promptly to his

kennel. He could not trust his own self-control, and fled temptation.

Poor King! he had a sad end. He and a young golden collie called Pat

went out together in some woods--poachers, I fear. Towards evening Pat

came back in a fearful state of agitation, trembling. The dog must

have longed for words to tell what he had seen! But they guessed it.

The gamekeeper was known to have a grudge against King, and he was

never heard of again from that day to this.

Watch had a very different end. He grew old and blind. He had to live

altogether at the farm now, but he did not mind that. He had two great

friends. One was the bailiff’s daughter, and one the niece of the

landlady at the “Cricketers,” over the way. The first nursed Watch,

the second he went to see every day. But the niece got married, and

Watch never crossed the road again, but transferred all his affection

to Katie. He was nearly blind now, quite deaf, and very rheumatic. He

had not much emotion left; it soon wearied him. I remember while he

was still at the house, that when we all came home at the end of the

holidays in two detachments, he greeted the first-comers effusively,

and then retired under the sofa, and took no notice of the second batch

until they had been in the house about an hour; then, his emotions

being rested, he came out and greeted them too with affection.

But two loves remained to the end; his love for Katie and his love

for milk pudding--and Katie generally gave him the milk pudding. He

hobbled about after her as long as he could, and sat in her room. Once

they thought him dying. He lay on Katie’s bed, and Katie was away--was

coming back that evening. His head lay on the pillow and his eyes were

closed, and they thought him dead, when Katie came upstairs and spoke

to him; and the life came back to him, and she fed him, and he lived a

few days more. Then he died, this time with Katie close to him.

He is buried by the gold-fish pond under a cedar, and he has a

tombstone and an epitaph, “_Esne Vigil_.” And the other day I passed

by, and freshly-gathered daisies were lying on it. I think Katie must

have put them there.

[Illustration]

IX

KIDS OF THE GOATS

They were Zoe and Marcianus Capello (but she was no kid), and Capricorn

and his brother, and Chat and Tan. I did not possess them all at the

same time; in fact, I never had more than three at one time, and that

was because Marcianus Capello had twins.

Zoe was the first. When she came to us she was a little white kid, just

taken from her mother; she was very pretty, with a dark mark down her

back and two little tassels of hair on her neck. But, as I say, she was

only just taken from her mother, and the first evening was full of much

trouble and care, for we could not find anything she would eat, and

we thought she would be starved. She would not be fed, moreover, with

milk, and we were in despair until we thought of trying if she would

eat the tender sprouts of may. It was early spring, and for a day or so

all her meals were taken in our arms, as we held her up to nibble at

the hawthorn hedge.

But she soon grew less fastidious, and, as goats do, would eat

anything, from garden flowers, laurel leaves, and cabbages, down to

paper and bread. She was tethered in the field, and this was very

necessary, for if she was free she would follow us everywhere, would

go walks with us out of doors, and would come into the house after us.

The chief difficulty with kids is superabundant affection; they wail

pitifully when one leaves them alone, and cannot be persuaded that

their presence is not always desirable. Some friends of ours--they were

Quakers too--used to dress up a stick with a waterproof and hat to

keep their kid company. It satisfied her completely; but was it quite

consistent with the Friends’ idea of truth?

Zoe nearly had a bad accident once, in consequence of her fondness

for coming into the house. I was sitting on the steps at the door

and playing with her, when suddenly she bounced away from me and

ran into the drawing-room. I pursued her, and she, knowing she was

wrong, ran farther, saw a way of escape, and jumped straight through a

large plate-glass window. I thought she would be cut to pieces, and

in agonies rushed outside, where I found her making the most of her

opportunities by devouring our best rose trees under the window.

Zoe lived with us for a year. Then I was kept indoors by a bad cold and

throat, and I heard that the kid was sympathising with me by having a

bad throat also. But alas, poor Zoe! her throat was much worse than

mine, and though we strapped a little blanket on her back to keep her

warm, and though the gardener and the cowman poured gruel down her

throat, when she could hardly swallow, she got thinner and weaker, and

one morning she died. I sobbed audibly all through prayers that morning.

Then a friend of mine told me that some cousins of hers were anxious

to part with a goat they had, and Marcianus Capello, otherwise called

Marcap, arrived. She was not at all like Zoe; she was a large, dull,

elderly, brown and white goat. She did not want to make friends at all;

she chiefly wanted to eat. But there was one great advantage about

her, for a few weeks after I had her she gave birth to two little twin

billygoats--two fluffy black-and-white creatures with huge legs.

Marcap was, like Zoe, tethered in the field, and it was supposed that

filial affection would keep the kids near her. The kids had a fine

time in consequence. One morning one heard a rattling over the roof of

the nursery, and found the kids were playing King of the Castle on the

house-top. Another time they came skipping out of a yard where building

was going on, covered with lime to the tops of their legs; and for some

little time we were terribly afraid that the smallest kid would lose

his eyesight, as he had splashed lime up into his eyes, and that they

both would come out of it with skinny hairless legs. A procession,

of my nurse holding a cup of milk and water, myself and my youngest

brother (who was too naughty to be left alone), could be seen crossing

the field three times a day to bathe the kid’s eyes.

When the kids were old enough to do without their mother, we gave

Marcap away. I did not mind parting with Marcap; I never should have

got fond of her, for she had no idea of intimacy. But to part with a

kid was a different matter; it took us a long time to decide that it

would be better to keep the biggest and strongest kid, Capricorn; and

we gave away the little one.

Capricorn proved just a little more warlike than it is quite convenient

for a kid to be, if you are in the habit of taking it out for walks.

In the first place, if he met a flock of sheep in a field, he would at

once begin to drive them away, running and butting after them. In the

second place, if he met cows, he would invariably have a pitched battle

with them, unless he was dragged away by main force. I have seen him in

the middle of a ring of cows, knocked down by them, and getting up to

butt them again. Thirdly, if he met a donkey, even in a cart, he would

go for it, which sometimes caused the drivers of the cart to swear.

Lastly, if he met children, he would try to awe them by standing on his

hind-legs. His wickedness gradually developed with his growth. Before

he was grown up he was a very affectionate kid. Once, when I turned

back in a walk, the rest of my family had the greatest difficulty in

inducing Capricorn to go with them. He got on very well with our wise

collie. Watch was useful in fetching him up, if he lagged behind in a

walk to carry out some of his evil designs. I had a little cart for

Capricorn, too, and made him pull up stones for a rockery we were

making; this was a good outlet for his energies, and he had less time

to be wicked.

But he finally got too fierce for us to keep him any longer. If I was

running down a hill by his side he would try to hook me with his horns,

and he was not at all to be trusted with children. I gave him away

reluctantly, and it was some consolation to hear that he nearly killed

his new master, who came upon him suddenly in the dark. Since then I

found out that it was not individual wickedness, but, so to speak,

class wickedness, and that it is rarely safe to keep a billygoat when

he grows up.

Then for some time I had no kid. After a while a lady near who kept

goats gave me two kids.

These were very pretty kids; one was quite white, the other fawn

colour, and very graceful. They would follow me everywhere; but, as I

could not keep two, Chat, the white one, was given away.

It was considerably easier to take Tan walks than it had been to take

Capricorn; for Tan did not want to fight every beast or child she met.

Watch was useful in fetching her as he had been with Capricorn. Long

afterwards, when the acquaintanceship between them was a thing of the

past, to say, “Watch, fetch the kid,” would bring her hurrying up to

us. Tan was the only one of my goats who ever learnt a trick, but I

taught her to shake hands in exchange for leaves or oats.

Then we moved from the place where we were living, and I left Tan

behind me for a child of the family who were coming into our old house.

I heard no more of her for a year, and then they wrote to me to say

that Tan was pining, and they wished that I would send for her. So she

came up by train, and the first moment she saw me she remembered me,

and we shook hands.

Tan is still alive. On misty summer mornings, one sees her pass the

windows heading a herd of cows; she is much too proud to walk with

sheep; and though she will condescend to go with cows, she keeps

herself to herself, never talks to any of them, but preserves a proud

and solitary position. On rare occasions a sudden burst of friendship

or curiosity will induce her to come into the house with me.

But my friendship with Tan, I must confess it, is not what it was;

perhaps it might never have waned if I had not consented to the year’s

separation. But although occasionally we bleat to each other from a

distance, though we shake hands over a few oats, she no longer runs

to meet me if I come near, she no longer cries out with a wailing

bleat when I go away, she no longer has to be tied up to prevent

her following me. And I do not think it is age that has made this

difference, I think it was worked by that year of separation.

[Illustration]

Passing through the farmyard on a cold day, I found Tan in the corner

where the dead leaves had blown up, and lay a foot or more deep. She

was standing in the deepest part of the heap, which came up to the top

of her legs, and had secured herself, as it were, a good hot bottle for

the night.

In conclusion, I would say that there are no pets more enchanting

than kids. They will give you as much amusement as kittens or

puppies; while they are as intelligent as grown-up dogs, and even more

wildly devoted. But there are two things you must never expect of a

goat,--neither the least unselfishness in their affection, nor the

smallest spark of benevolence.

X

COMMUNITY LIFE

Our old cowman Callaway was Cornish; he taught me to milk; he took a

fatherly interest in my animals; he talked Cornished English, and I

understood about a quarter of what he said. He had a wife who worked in

the house of a neighbour of ours, and a very elegant daughter. I never

could imagine how her hats and jackets and dresses got into the hovel

in which the family lived; however, I suppose they must have got into

it, for they certainly came out.

[Illustration]

The wife’s employer’s daughter kept guinea-pigs; and Callaway promised

to get us a white one. In due time he appeared with it. But to our

delight, when the box was opened, out came two little white creatures,

with shining red eyes, not weak bluish-pink eyes, but real good red

ones like little jewels. They were named Ixtlilxochitl and Atahualpa,

and installed in a wooden house with a wired-in yard under the laurel

trees of the drying-ground. Here they rapidly became naturalised;

burrowing under their wire fence, they found the way to the long,

fresh grass beyond, and enjoyed as much liberty as they wished till

nightfall, when the wooden slide of their house shut them safe from

dogs and rats and cats.

I had many sympathisers in my amusements. Not only was there Callaway

the cowman, who became house-builder to the community, but my old nurse

used to take the guinea-pigs a breakfast of soaked bread every morning;

and we had a butler sagacious about animals, to appeal to as a highest

authority on all difficult questions. So when, one morning, I opened

the slide, to find two new white things about as big as large mice

gaily running about, the first thing I did was to run to the servants’

hall and summon the butler to advise in this difficult and delicate

situation. Ixtlilxochitl was sent to a new hutch, hastily erected for

him, and Atahualpa kept house for the babies.

This was very good for the development of Ixtlilxochitl’s character.

He became very tame, learnt to sit up with his forepaws on my finger,

and to “lie dead” on his back with his little pink hands and feet in

the air; guinea-pigs’ forefeet are really small pink hands, with short

claws on the fingers, and a rudimentary thumb.

Guinea-pigs grow up very soon; they have no helpless infancy at all.

I have heard of a guinea-pig eating bran twenty minutes after it was

born. I know we used to carry the infants about and let them run up our

sleeves till they stuck, and had to be pulled back by their hind-legs;

and though I would not recommend this practice, they never seemed to

take any harm from it. Then, when they are about three months old they

become heads of families. At first the family only consists of one or

two members, but they increase in number until each family numbers

seven or eight. You may expect a new family once every six or eight

weeks. There is a nice sum in geometrical progression! And after this

general statement of the matter you will hardly expect me to give

you a history of each individual, though I made a chart of their

genealogies. I will, however, give a short biographical notice of the

most interesting characters.

The first two were Ulfias and Brastias. Ulfias was a nice, comely

guinea-pig; he took after his father, and had brown whiskers. Brastias

had pink ears, which were generally much bitten, and fierce red eyes;

he was an ill-conditioned, cross little beast, and a great fighter.

Moreover, he was a murderer.

[Illustration]

It is the funniest thing in the world to see guinea-pigs fighting.

They stand on the tips of their toes and raise their noses, until they

present the chin only to their adversaries; then they begin to dance

round, always chin to chin, gnashing their teeth; when they see a good

opportunity they fly in and bite. It is a scientific way of fighting,

like wrestling or fencing--quite different from the indiscriminate

plunge of a cat, who rolls round in a heap with her adversary.

After these two came Enid, Elaine, and Geraint. Enid was the first to

have a baby, and she had only one--a fat round one, which grew and

prospered until one day when he suddenly disappeared. We searched and

hunted with anxious hearts, but with no result. After a time we wanted

to move the hutches to a new place, and when we took up that in which

poor Enid and the baby lived, there was a hole under it--a rat’s hole,

and at the end of the hole, as we peered down, we saw a little white

thing--the skin and bones of a baby guinea-pig. Enid never had another

baby; she grew sad and thin and pined away, and at last she died.

Then Elaine had a baby--two; but one was deformed, completely paralysed

in his hind-legs, and I felt that the kindest thing to do would be to

destroy him. So I took out a bottle of laudanum, and prepared to begin

the hari-kari. Poor little guinea-pig! it was already very ill, and I

could with difficulty get its little rabbit-like mouth open. What a

tiny throat! could it swallow even enough poison to end its panting

little life? When I laid it down again there was very little change,

and I did not know what to do; then the pink nose, the hands and feet,

began to have a slightly blue tinge. I could not disturb it again to

open its mouth, so I poured a little more laudanum on its mouth and

nose, and the limbs got bluer, and the breathing became harder, and at

last ceased. It was a dreadful thing to do. However, on the whole, it

was less dreadful than drowning it. Once I had to drown a bat.... We

will draw a veil over that.

However, to proceed with the guinea-pigs. The baby that was not

deformed was a very nice little pig--small but comely. He grew up and

was called Jim.

There is an individuality about guinea-pigs, not explicable but to be

apprehended intuitively. Jim was quite individual. You would have known

that if you had only seen him sitting upright at his mother’s side to

nibble out of the hay trough.

The guinea-pigs lived in a large estate fenced in by wire; inside the

yard were various settlements, bedrooms, all with free access to the

yard, and usually to the ground beyond, for they made holes under the

wire and disported themselves outside. They had a beautiful rack to

hold their hay, saucers for bran, and were given a breakfast of soaked

bread every morning. At breakfast-time shrill whistles might be heard

from the guinea-pig yard. Most people think guinea-pigs have only

one noise, but in reality they have, quite clearly defined, three

fundamental notes, of desire, contentment, and anger. They whistle when

they are hungry, make what are called “guinea-pig noises” when they are

well content--for ordinary conversation, and they gnash their teeth

when they are angry.

About this time, when the colony was not too large, I used to take them

out for picnics.

Opposite the front door, at the corner of the lawn, there is a large

escalonia tree; on warm summer evenings it sheds a delicious fragrant

smell from leaves and flowers. Opposite this there is a stile made to

get into the fields. The stile is made in such a manner as to be a very

comfortable seat. Here, under the escalonia, I used to turn out the

guinea-pigs for a day in the country, while I read a book on the stile,

and Watch was put to guard them; if any little pig strayed too far, he

saw where it went to, and helped me to find it again.

But, in time, the colony grew too large for this, and at last it began

to increase with a rapidity that alarmed me; for, as you see, it is not

a case of the simple geometrical progression of creatures which have

the same number in every family; but, as guinea-pigs get older, each

family gets larger, so that it is like a sum in compound interest, at

an accelerating rate of interest. I began to be frightened when the

“five Mitchinsons” were born, and the next family was larger still.

In fact, they would have eaten us out of garden and farm, if it had not

been for what political economists call “violent checks”; these violent

checks were kidnapping, nepoticide, and massacre.

Subject to Vanity · 第 3 / 4 段