CHAPTER IV

THE FIRST TWO IRISH NOVELS

Trollope’s first novel, _The Macdermots of Ballycloran_--“The best

Irish story that has appeared for half a century”--Clever effects

of light and shade--The story’s principal characters and their

allegorical significance--Typical sketches of Irish life and

institutions--The working of the spy system in detection of

crime--Some specimens of Trollopian humour--_The Kellys and the

O’Kellys_--Trollope’s second literary venture--Links with its

predecessor--Its plot and some of the more interesting figures--The

squire, the doctor, and the parson.

Had Anthony Trollope’s first novel found many Irish readers before the

trial in the Tralee courthouse, Isaac Butt might have based upon it some

more interrogatories or sarcasms than those recorded in the last

chapter, to prejudice his audience against its author. He would have

found his material in the trial scene at Carrick towards the story’s

close. In 1844, the year of his marriage, Trollope had been moved from

his station in western Ireland to Clonmel in the south. By this time he

had not only completed the plan, but had written a volume of his

earliest novels. In his _Autobiography_, as well as in the text itself

of _The Macdermots_, the circumstances out of which his first attempt at

fiction grew have been explained by the author in words that,

transferred to Mr. Thorold’s introduction,[5] need not be repeated here.

The book itself had been begun in September 1843. Finished at Clonmel,

it was taken by its author in 1845 to England. On this occasion he

approached no publisher directly, but placed the manuscript in his

mother’s hands, to do with it what she could. Her good offices secured

its publication on the half-profit system by Newby in 1847.

The critics were very generally against this initial venture, which, for

all practical purposes, fell indeed still-born from the Press. Naturally

the author considered it a failure. Here, however, he was less than just

to himself; for, if it had gone very wide of immediate success, it

belonged to that class of miscarriages which nevertheless to the

judicious seem as full of promise as Benjamin Disraeli’s maiden speech.

The collective wisdom of the Commons would have none of that; but

individual members, who were also seasoned and trustworthy judges,

predicted great things for the parliamentary _débutant_ on the strength

of those rhetorical extravagances which had been laughed down. So with

_The Macdermots of Ballycloran_. The professional reviewers had little

but what was contemptuous to say about it. There were others--reviewers

in their time--whose knowledge of literature generally and of Ireland in

particular made their opinion worth having. These soon recognised in the

book a true picture of the country, a correct insight into its people,

real felicity as well as power in seizing the genius of the place and

time, and bodying it forth in words. Such were William Gregory himself,

whose house had really been the cradle of the story, and his friend,

possessed of a literary taste not less sound than his own, Sir Patrick

O’Brien, M.P. for King’s County during most of the Victorian age. These,

and others equally competent to form an opinion in such a matter, did

not hesitate to call Anthony Trollope’s earliest work the best Irish

story that had appeared for something like half a century.

Maria Edgeworth’s _Castle Rackrent_ (1800) had introduced readers to the

first unconventional Irishman they had seen for generations. This was

Thady Quirk, who, unlike his predecessors in fiction, contrived to

express himself without a stage brogue, and supplied entertainment as

well as, when necessary, information, though not decorating every other

sentence with a bull. As a fact, Trollope probably borrowed nothing from

Miss Edgeworth. The only resemblance between _Castle Rackrent_ and _The

Macdermots_ is to be found in the truth to nature, the freshness, the

simplicity, and the strength common to each. Had he, however, incurred

such an obligation, he would but have followed the example of Sir Walter

Scott, who, it will be remembered, attributed his own _Waverley_ to the

inspiration of the Irish authoress. About the same time that Anthony

Trollope was busy on his first novel, Emily Brontë had been achieving

immortality with her single romance. _Wuthering Heights_ and _The

Macdermots of Ballycloran_ resemble each other in that they are moving

and powerful rather than pleasant reading. Both writers were possessed,

in a degree equally deep and overpowering, by their different subjects.

Gloom pervades the atmosphere of each. But whereas the sombreness of

_Wuthering Heights_ lacks relief throughout from any gleam of humour or

even light, the tragic effects of _The Macdermots_ are heightened by the

social incidents and conversational by-play that form the staple of

successive pages or even chapters, amid the squalor, the misery, the

sin, and the horrors following each other thick and fast as the story

approaches its blood-stained climax. Reading Shakespeare with her sons,

Frances Trollope had pointed out the art with which the coarse dialogue

of the watchmen in _Macbeth_, the grave-digger’s mirthful memories of

Yorick in _Hamlet_, and the nurse’s frivolities in _Romeo and Juliet_

are the skilfully planned preludes that, through force of contrast,

intensify the terror and melancholy of the appalling sequel. There is

something not unworthy to be called Shakespearean in the transitions

that mark Trollope’s first novel. The peasant marriage-junketings, the

race dinner with the ball to follow, contrast with and heighten those

later acts of the drama where the curtain rises on the battered and

bleeding body of the villain of the piece, while his avenging murderer

stands, a doomed man, at the gallows’ foot, and his victim succumbs to

the long drawn-out agonies of the ordeal which had deprived her of fair

fame, of home, of brother, as well as the, through all, blindly loved

author of her guilt.

Trollope’s first two novels, like a few more, following after a long

interval and to be examined in their proper place, dealt exclusively

with Ireland and the Irish as he had seen both during the earlier years

of his acquaintance with the country. The waste of gifts, of energies,

and the persistent refusal profitably to employ qualities and occasions

out of which fortunes might be made, had appealed to Trollope’s sense of

pathos, directly he began to know the country. Long after their crazy

roof-trees had ceased properly to shelter them from the wind and rain,

starving families refused to exchange their homes for the large

workhouses that now studded the land. The fortunes of men and women who

ought to have been leaders of the middle class were melting to

nothingness before the fire of failures and losses that seemed as

irresistible as fate. A sort of dry-rot, as Trollope put it, moral and

intellectual not less than material, seemed preying everywhere on the

vitals of the people. And this in a land whose men lacked few endowments

which, with due discipline and direction, would have brought them

success, and whose daughters abounded in the beauty, brightness, and

grace that are heaven’s best means for making homes happy and refined.

Miss Edgeworth in _Castle Rackrent_, it has been seen, tells her story

through the medium of an old dependent of the place before its fortunes

had quite gone. In the opening pages of _The Macdermots_, Trollope

employs for the same purpose the guard of the Boyle coach. His are the

reminiscences out of which the novelist manufactures the fall from their

high estate of a family boasting the inevitable Irish kings for their

ancestors. For the rest, the sketches of place and character are from

what Trollope saw with his own eyes while going his Post Office rounds,

or from what he had picked up while staying with his friends at Coole

Park.

The head of the household, Larry Macdermot, known only by his Christian

name to his children, to his tenants, who seldom pay their rents, and to

his creditors impatiently waiting to foreclose their mortgages, is a

whining, helpless imbecile, in years little, if at all, past middle age,

but, from the combined effects of misfortune and whisky-soaking,

already in his dotage. As a younger son, Larry’s father had inherited

some six hundred acres, let in small holdings, and a house recently

constructed for him by a builder named Flannelly, who has, of course, a

mortgage upon it. This roof, now sadly out of repair, just sheltered

Larry himself, his daughter Feemy, and his son Thady, who acted as his

bailiff. The young man keeps up the pretence of transacting the business

of the property by passing a few hours every morning in a tumble-down

room which he calls his office. Thady’s parts, like many of his

qualities, are naturally good. He is neither a profligate nor a

drunkard, but the poverty, squalor, and ignorance in which he has been

brought up have starved the energies that, in happier surroundings,

might have retrieved the fortunes of a race whose degradation, never out

of his sight or mind, keeps him in a chronic condition of grievance and

discontent. By a few quiet but skilful touches in Trollope’s best

manner, signs in Thady of sensitiveness to the jeopardised Macdermot

honour gradually reveal themselves. They mark the slow dawn of a

presentiment that he is the agent chosen by fate for punishing him who

has inflicted the one foul stain yet possible on the Macdermot honour.

Ballycloran itself, with its down-at-heel occupants, typifies

allegorically, with sustained power and rugged picturesqueness, the

agricultural and pastoral Ireland which Trollope had seen and studied in

all its varieties. Less indomitably idle than his drivelling father had

always been, as well as in all respects a better man, Thady might have

been trained to a life of family and national service. His habitually

dormant powers might at any time have been roused to vigorous, fruitful

action but for the deadening and demoralising influence of his

environment. Innocent and ignorant of the sins of cities, he was

comparatively free from the commonest vices of the country. Father

Mathew’s mission had not yet inflamed the Irish peasantry with a passion

for temperance; but without any such teaching, Thady Macdermot had never

fallen a victim to strong drink. His chief enemy was his own

temperament, which, when we first meet him, it is clear may, in some

unforeseen conditions, be suddenly and dangerously kindled into

ferocious passion. Less from any words escaping him on the subject than

his habitual air of sullen and silent preoccupation do we know that he

thinks of little else than his own decadence from his forefathers. He

had always felt that his family was sinking lower and lower daily,

without finding it in him to arrest the process for the future, or move

a finger in repairing the ruin of the past. Therefore he had only become

more gloomy, more tyrannical. His one companion and his only resource is

his pipe, his one employment to fill and refill it. Into such a lot

neither pleasure nor excitement could enter, and, especially for a Celt,

Trollope would have his readers feel, that way madness lies.

Thus, through the gradual development of the plot, we know instinctively

that some Nemesis will declare itself on an existence which has lost the

force or the desire to rise out of an atmosphere whose slow poison has

stunted and deformed its growth. In its joylessness as well as in its

decline from the better fortunes of earlier days, the picture of

Ballycloran not only reflected the prevailing depression, agricultural

and industrial, of the country, but harmonised with the lamentations

from fashionable lips over the final eclipse of the gaiety of its

capital. Irish society leaders of the good old days, when the sporting

season did not keep them to their castles in Connaught or Ulster, used

on a grand scale to keep up their houses in Fitzwilliam or Merrion

Square in their native metropolis. All that had gone. Huge, overgrown,

vulgar London had snuffed out select, elegant, and refined Dublin, whose

stately quadrangles and picturesque avenues were deserted by their

proper occupants for some spick-and-span new mansions which stared one

out of countenance in Tyburnia, or some more modest tenement in a dingy

angle of Mayfair. The glories of the Viceregal Court had long since

begun to pale. The impatiently waited royal visits that it was hoped

might bring compensation were as yet repeatedly delayed. In this way the

fair city on the Liffey had been largely shorn of its attractions and

pleasures, just as the rich soil of the surrounding country was

impoverished by ignorance and neglect. Some hint of this formed the

minor key in Trollope’s powerful and pathetic dirge over the progressive

extinction of the family lamps at Ballycloran. In certain details,

therefore, as well as in general idea, the Macdermots formed the

microcosm of an entire people. Its genius, always feminised as Erin, is

appropriately personified by the daughter of the ill-starred house, on

the common ruin of whose members the curtain falls. Trollope’s Irish

experiences, as has been already said, gave him some acquaintance with

the Young Ireland movement, and its combined appeals to the patriotic

and romantic sensibilities, as well as to the cupidity, of a populace

readily lending itself to the wiles of skilled agitators.

The oratorical or literary blandishments of Smith O’Brien’s

self-summoned and mercenary camp-followers caught their victims in

snares exactly paralleled by the novels with which Feemy had debauched

her imagination and by the appeals of the lover who wrought her

overthrow. Her picture given in the first chapter of the story is a

delineation of racial features not peculiar to any one epoch of Irish

narrative. The girl’s temperament is that of her nation; her form and

figure are the perennial attributes of those belonging to her sex and

class. Here is the daughter of the Macdermots, the incarnation of her

country. At the age of twenty, when the reader first sees her, Feemy was

a tall, dark girl, with that bold, upright, well-poised figure so

peculiarly Irish. She walked as if all the blood of the old Irish

princes was in her veins. Her step, at any rate, was princely. Feemy

also had large bright-brown eyes, and long, soft, shining, dark-brown

hair, which was divided behind, fell over her shoulders, or was tied

with ribbons. She had the well-formed nose common to all of those coming

of old families; and a bright olive complexion, only the olive was a

little too brown, the skin a little too coarse. Feemy’s mouth, moreover,

was half an inch too long. But her teeth were white and good, and her

chin was well turned, with a dimple large enough for any finger Venus

might put there. In all, Feemy was a fine girl to a man not too

well-accustomed to refinement. Her hands were too large and too red, but

if Feemy had got gloves enough to go to Mass with, it was all she could

do in that way. For the rest, she was as badly shod as gloved. She

shared, therefore, with her other beautiful countrywomen an entire

absence of the neatness whose attraction, did they but understand it,

for men might have prevented their appearing so often as poor Feemy too

usually appeared.[6] In the figure thus described, there lay energies

and passions as strong as those concealed in her brother, if only any

object stimulating their fair and wholesome exercise had presented

itself.

“Men, some to business, some to pleasure take,

But ev’ry woman is at heart a rake.”

By which familiar couplet Pope of course meant nothing more than that

the essentially feminine and, it may be, entirely blameless appetite for

enjoyment, for the most part only a love of change, is no more

eradicable from the sex than love of power.

This maiden scion of a decayed stock rebelled with the whole strength of

her being, not so much against the poverty or the meanness as against

the intolerably dull sameness of life in the jerry-built tenement, now

hardly fifty years old. The mortgage on this, held by its constructor

Flannelly, places at his mercy the doomed remnants of those who had once

owned the estate. Something has been already said about the popular

Irish murmurs at the waning splendours of the Viceregal Court. The

continuance of many material abuses might have been acquiesced in almost

without complaint if Dublin Castle had become once more the living and

shining centre of a social system ablaze with hospitalities, and

communicating a sense of importance, stir, and of quickly circulating

capital, such as would have gratified even those excluded from its

entertainments. The time nominally taken by Trollope for his story is

the nineteenth century’s third decade. He himself, we have seen, did not

reach Ireland till 1841, and drew only what he actually saw. Nor, since

his arrival, had anything happened to betray him into anachronism.

In the fifties, not less than they had done in the forties, the poets,

prophets, preachers, and teachers of _The Nation_ still expatiated in

glowing terms on the good time coming when, with the aid of republican

France, Ireland should receive from the statesmen who were her sons the

glories of a new birth, and Dublin should once again be as it was when

it had its own parliament sitting in St. Stephen’s Green. Like

expectations had been encouraged in Feemy by the literature she loved.

With the help of the saints and of luck, her novelists had taught her

that a lover, brave, handsome, gallant, and sufficiently well-to-do, who

would think of nothing else but pouring silver, gold, and precious

stones into his sweetheart’s lap, would yet appear to her at some

appointed time not known. For such a prospect she had fitted herself

with some accomplishments. She could play on an old spinet which had

belonged to her mother, she had made herself a good dancer, and found

herself lifted into another sphere when, with the help of the music and

the movement, she forgot in her partner’s arms the cares, the meanness,

and the gloom of the family hearthside.

When alone, however, she still fed her fancy with the cheap,

ill-printed, trashy, and mischievous books that were to the Irish

girlhood in her day what the penny novelette and the sixpenny shocker

have, since her time, become to readers of her age, sex, and condition

on both sides of St. George’s Channel. While Feemy’s town sisters might

have been in raptures over the broadsheets wherein an earthly paradise

was promised by writers who addressed with equal skill the romantic

taste of the kitchen and the political passions of the mob, Feemy was

giving her eyes, her heart and soul to _The Mysterious Assassin_, as her

only refuge from Thady Macdermot’s everlasting talk about potatoes,

oats, pigs, and from the dread, darkening the household like a cloud,

that, impatient for principal as well as interest, Mr. Joe Flannelly of

Carrick-on-Shannon might come down upon Ballycloran, to make himself

master of the place and all within it.

Well would it have been for the Macdermots had their fair representative

sought no further distraction from her dulness than the trivial and

vulgar reading that, whatever its faults, was not calculated to do more

lasting harm to the reader than was received by town labourers and rural

peasants from the tawdry sedition mongers of Gavan Duffy’s literary

staff. Writing in the earlier forties, Trollope economised his approval

of most English measures for reforming Irish abuses. Even when not bad

in themselves, those expedients might be corrupted by the human agents

to which they were entrusted. The establishment of an Irish constabulary

force dates from Liverpool’s administration and Wellington’s

Lord-Lieutenancy in 1823. Changes in that body continued to be made till

the consolidation of the various Acts connected with the subject had for

its sequel Sir Robert Peel’s establishment in 1836 of the Irish

Constabulary. Just a generation later, at Queen Victoria’s command, this

body became known by its present name, the Royal Irish Constabulary. The

duties of this imperial force, from the first, included certain civil

services not imposed upon policemen of the United Kingdom. Such are the

yearly collection of agricultural statistics, the management of the

decennial census, the conduct by auction sales of goods taken under

distress warrants, the inspection of weights and measures, the practical

administration of the Food, Drugs, and Explosives Acts. The Irish

Constabulary, too, are charged with the prevention of smuggling and of

illicit distillation. The officers of this force are now chosen by Civil

Service examinations. Vacancies for district inspectors are filled, one

half by cadets, and one half by selected constables of exceptional

merit.

To this body in its earlier days, as reconstituted by Peel, belonged the

evil genius of Trollope’s first novel, Myles Ussher. Captain Ussher was

his local title; for the revenue police were at that time organised as a

military force. He had of course received his appointment without

submission to any educational test. The natural son of a wealthy landed

proprietor in Ulster, he owed his appointment entirely to family

influence. He could read, write, knew something of figures, and had once

learned, but had long since entirely forgotten, some Latin grammar.

There are touches in the description of this man showing that the

novelist had profited by the _Ethics_, which, to quote Trollope’s words

to the writer, “at least helped me here, though they had not done so in

the Oxford scholarship examination for which I read them.” For Ussher’s

valour was the spurious courage that comes of ignorance, and arises in

equal parts from animal spirits and from not having yet experienced the

evil effects of danger rather than from real capabilities of enduring

its consequences. In other words, we are told, never having been hit in

a duel, he would have no hesitation in fighting one; never having had a

bad fall on horseback, he was a bold rider; never having had his head

broken in a row, he would readily go into one. To pain, if it were not

absolutely disabling, he was indifferent, because, not having yet

suffered its acute form, he lacked the imagination to make him realise

the possibility of sometimes experiencing it to such a degree. This kind

of courage is shrewdly declared by Trollope to be that by far the most

generally met with, as well as fully sufficient for the life Captain

Ussher had to lead. The quality that chiefly gave Ussher some vogue with

the better classes of his district, was his unfailing self-confidence

and unconcealed belief in his ability, whether in war or love, to carry

through any purpose he had taken up. His keen, calculating Irish brain

had taught him the universal readiness to accept men at their own

valuation of themselves. Acting on that principle, he had created for

himself an impression, strong everywhere but especially among women, of

being irresistible in whatever he might take up, and of having received

from fate itself a guarantee against failure, whether in things of

business or of the heart. Add to all this that, in a country where a

little money goes a long way, Ussher contrived to be always supplied

with ready cash.

What wonder therefore if in this favourite of destiny Feemy’s

novel-nourished, romance-excited, and ill-regulated fancy saw the

realisation of her fondest visions? Of course the mounted policeman,

with the graceful seat on his horse, the uniform which became his

handsome figure so well, became to her one of the knightly figures with

whom the writers that she loved had peopled her imagination. And then

his conversation, resembling Othello’s, about “most disastrous chances,

moving accidents by flood and field, and hair-breadth escapes” in the

regions where his duty lay, “of rough quarries, rocks, and hills whose

heads touch heaven.” Feemy probably had never read Shakespeare, or she

might have learned wisdom from Desdemona. A sense of Æschylean fate, no

more to be shunned than softened, runs through this tragedy, whose

closing acts are not without the strength and pathos of Dickens in

_Oliver Twist_, and at some points touch the Shakespearean level.

Feemy’s father may not, indeed, have loved Ussher, or even “oft invited

him.” But not on that account a less frequent or warmly received guest,

he rode from his barracks, three miles distant, at Mohill, to

Ballycloran to pass almost daily a whole morning or evening. Captain

Ussher’s local unpopularity as a Protestant and a remorselessly vigilant

official was nothing to his disadvantage in Feemy’s eyes. She saw in it

only a proof of her lover’s devotion to his duty, and of his heroic

determination of not flinching from any risk of life or limb in

fulfilling the obligations he had taken upon himself.

The one member of the Ballycloran household who sees through the

policeman’s designs upon the girl is Pat Brady, Thady Macdermot’s

counsellor, rent-collector, and factotum. Even Thady, but for hampering

considerations, would not lack the spirit to repel Ussher’s advances,

and by doing so secure his sister’s safety. What, however, he mentally

asks, can he do? The exciseman, on the strength of a mere vague

suspicion, is not to be forbidden the house. That at best would only

provoke his sister’s indignant disgust. Thady therefore remains

inactive, and the only effect of the vague hints and irresponsible

suggestions received from different quarters is to intensify a silent,

sullen hatred of the man. That, henceforth, by a series of slow

degrees--the description of which is Trollope’s earliest exhibition of

high literary art--becomes his ruling passion. Not that, even yet, he

has in his heart doomed Ussher to death for his intrusions upon the

fallen family’s hospitality, and for the scandalous gossip that is

raised against Feemy. Till the final stage comes within sight, Thady’s

detestation is for the most part speechless, except when the accident of

Ussher’s voice or presence rouses the young man to a passing fit of

uncontrollable fury. About this time Ussher made a professional _coup_

which, while more than ever concentrating upon himself the ill-will of

the district at large, and in particular of Thady Macdermot, showed such

adroitness and such contempt of personal danger combined as to deepen

poor Feemy’s admiration of her hero. A wretch named Cogan, a Government

spy, disclosed all the secrets of the trade in illicit potheen: the men

who chiefly conducted it, and the places where the run spirits were to

be found. The pauper peasants had been driven to this traffic because it

offered the only chance of avoiding starvation.

Ussher’s official triumph in running the “potheen men” to earth leads

directly up to the catastrophe. It secures the policeman’s promotion,

but inflames to madness his detestation by Thady, who, little better

than a peasant himself, sympathises with the peasantry that Ussher is

hunting down. Feemy, on the other hand, idolising her lover’s

intrepidity, ignores the local misery that is wrought by his daring

devotion to duty. She thus unconsciously widens the gulf between her

brother and herself. Trollope’s Post Office discipline, hardening his

sensibilities, and constantly giving a fresh edge to his natural acumen,

fitted him successfully to investigate in all its workings the

contraband spirits trade and the spy system used for its detection. This

fact gave more than an ordinary novelist’s value to what he had to say

on the subject. Among the lower classes, two typical specimens of the

human degradation it works are seen in Joe Reynolds and Pat Brady.

Reynolds is a mere desperado, waging a truceless war with the world and

with law. Brady has never been reduced to Reynolds’ straits for money

and food; indeed the occupation alone of squeezing arrears from the

Macdermot tenantry has always placed him a little above the dread of

starvation. Will the young master of Ballycloran be induced, through

Brady as the tool of Reynolds, to join the “boys” in exacting reprisals

for the harshness meted out to them by the law?

The “boys” are bent on drawing Thady into their schemes of revenge,

likely to prove murderous, upon two of his special abominations, not

only Ussher but the builder, Flannelly’s man of business, Keegan, who

aimed at himself possessing Ballycloran. With a sigh of relief, the

reader finds Thady resist the “boys’” overtures, and, for the time,

hopes he may yet be kept from the crowning crime which destiny had

seemed to reserve for him. One of Ussher’s most recent captures goes by

the name of Tim. This, on a much earlier page, has caused an ejected

cottager to anticipate the policeman’s end with the words: “I’d sooner

be in Tim’s shoes this night than in Captain Ussher’s, fine gentleman as

he thinks hisself.” So far, however, Thady holds aloof from any projects

of retribution, likely to involve bloodshed, against the men whose names

had become bywords throughout the countryside. Nevertheless, we are

still made to feel that, superhuman agencies, in the shape of

foreordained circumstances, will draw Thady’s neck into the hangman’s

noose.

What did Trollope, after careful inquiry, find the spy system, in its

social and moral consequences, to be? At the outset he admits that paid

informers frequently bring to justice criminals who would otherwise slip

through the meshes of the legal net. On the other hand, the system

involves not only the degradation of all concerned with it, but very

often the grossest miscarriages of justice. Chief among the villainies

of Irish espionage is the premium placed upon false informations by the

prospect of blood-money. Next to that evil comes the deliberate

manufacture of offences by those who have a money interest in

fabricating baseless charges against the innocent and unwary. Trollope

does not charge the Government with encouraging these informers, or even

recognising them. All he says is that those charged with the execution

of criminal laws do frequently secure their own advancement by the most

iniquitous and demoralising methods.[7]

The resistance offered by Thady Macdermot to the schemes of ruffians who

would stick at nothing fills many powerful pages in Trollope’s first

story. The young master of Ballycloran is preoccupied with the issues of

his sister’s fate, and maddened with the insinuations to which Ussher’s

visits gave the point. Ussher himself will die a violent death, but as

regards who is to deal the avenging blow the reader is kept in the

sustained agony of a trying and artistically prolonged suspense. Some of

those seized by Ussher for systematic evasion of the Excise duties

protest their innocence while, bound together in twos and threes with

cords, they are being huddled off to prison. To one of these Ussher

exclaimed: “You mean to threaten me, you ruffian.” “I doesn’t threaten

you”, was the answer, “but there is them as does; and it will be a black

night’s work to you for what you are doing with the boys, for trying to

make out the rint with the whisky, not for themselves but for them as is

your friends.” Thus dramatically is set forth the Irish question, as it

seemed to Trollope when he first knew the country. At the same time, the

followers of his narrative, their interest in the characters now fairly

roused, experience a sense of relief at discovering that they may think

that Thady at least will be no party in doing the execrated policeman,

or anyone else, to death.

The atmosphere at this point is so heavily charged with moral issues as

to be depressing almost beyond tolerance. After the example set in such

cases by Shakespeare, and indeed in a way Shakespeare might have

approved, Trollope at once relieves the situation and at the same time,

by the force of contrast, deepens its tragedy with humorous interludes

more illustrative of Irish character than descriptions that should run

to many pages. The peasants, whose inability to pay high rent for

miserably bad land, and who, in Trollope’s words, have had recourse to

illegal means for easing them of their difficulties, may have been

driven to become “ribbon men,” but, even when separated from ruin by

less than a step, throw themselves heart and soul into the noisy

hilarities of a wake or a wedding. The description of Pat Brady’s

marriage-feast, followed by the improvised cottage ball, might be the

letterpress written up to some painting from the brush of an Irish

Morland. Even the moody young master of Ballycloran, who is among the

guests, in spite of his scowling glances and his inaudible imprecations

on the policeman, has caught the contagious gaiety of the occasion.

Ussher, also of the company, leads out Feemy as his partner. The

prevailing merriment cannot indeed dispel the haunting thought that it

may prove to be a dance of death. But the party itself ends, as it

began, in whisky and in peace. Thady indeed, having taken more whisky

than is his wont, exchanges hot words with Ussher afterwards. But the

popular voice hints only, if at all, at what is to come in Brady’s

whisper to Joe Reynolds: “It’s little Mr. Thady loves the Captain, and

it’s little he ever will.”

This small melodramatic touch is followed by pen-and-ink pictures of

society and sport, again driving the figure of a skeleton at the feast

into the distant background. Carrick is to have some races, and

afterwards a race ball. The night before, there is a dinner; one of the

chief figures at this is a gentleman jockey, Bob Gayner, whose life is

spent in riding steeplechases, and consequently in reducing his weight

to the lowest possible figure. At this particular banquet he has not

swallowed a mouthful. Our last sight of him is, when the diners

disperse, standing against the fire-place sucking a lemon, with a large

overcoat on, and a huge choker round his neck.

Quick, however, on the heels of all this festivity comes the warning

that mischief more serious than ever is in the wind. The parish priest

in _The Macdermots_, Father John, never proselytises, never intrigues,

and only exacts from his flock alms enough to keep body and soul

together. His device, however, to keep Feemy out of danger by moving her

from Ballycloran to the care of Mrs. McKeon, together with her husband

touched off in one of Trollope’s happiest character miniatures, has

failed. The lover who, on one plea after another, had evaded Feemy’s

repeated request of marriage, thinks now of nothing less than of making

her his wife, but, being content to retain her as a possession, has no

objection to punish Thady Macdermot for his unmannerly speech by

carrying off his sister. How that design fails of execution, and how

Feemy is not abducted, but Ussher, at the instant of lifting her into

the carriage, is felled to the ground a corpse by Thady’s smashing

bludgeon, forms a scene comparable, for blood-curdling force of

description, with Nancy’s murder by Bill Sykes, and did indeed win from

Charles Dickens his earliest admission that Trollope had strength as

well as glibness. The long-drawn-out strain on her whole being of the

events thus summarised has caused Feemy’s days to be numbered. She dies

suddenly while waiting to give evidence at her brother’s trial. All that

remains now is the execution of the death-sentence on Thady. The last

words that he hears before the bolt is drawn are those of Father John’s

prayer that God will receive him into His mercy.

The scenes of violence and desolation on which the curtain falls may

almost be compared for impressiveness with any picture of the collective

ruin wrought by Nemesis in Greek drama, or as the close of _Hamlet_

itself. Yet the gloom which darkens the whole narrative derives at once,

for the moment, relief from lighter interludes. Bob Gayner in _The

Macdermots_ prepares the way for Dot Blake in _The Kellys and the

O’Kellys_. One chapter also in Trollope’s first novel so overflows with

comedy passing into farce as appropriately to presage the rich and

varied humour that is on the whole the dominant note of his second

effort. Among the magistrates whom Thady Macdermot’s crime have called

in solemn conclave together, are two, Jonas Brown of Brown Hall and Mr.

Webb of Ardrum. In all respects but social or official status, these

two form a complete contrast. The ungenial and unpopular Brown, one of

Ussher’s most habitual hosts, has from the first angrily maintained the

absence of any extenuating feature in the murder committed by Thady

Macdermot. Webb, on the other hand, naturally amiable and beloved

throughout his neighbourhood, almost goes so far as to deny Thady’s

moral criminality. In the attempt to rescue something of his sister’s

honour he merely committed justifiable homicide. His remarks on Thady’s

opponents had been so severe as to be taken for personal insults by the

Brown faction. The master of Brown Hall therefore demands from Webb a

written assurance that his words were pointed at no member of the Brown

family, but receives an answer regretting that he cannot comply with

such a request. This, it must be remembered, was in the days before the

duel had become obsolete.

Brown’s two sons, Fred and George, have from the first been spoiling for

a fight. “The sod’s the only place now, father,” each exultingly

exclaims, adding: “I like him the better for not recanting.” Fred takes

a more serious view, remarks that Webb is a cursed good shot, suggests

his father should make his will before he goes out. It would also be as

well, in case of accidents, to have a doctor handy, for, as one of the

sons thoughtfully remarks: “Though so vital a part as the head be not

touched, the body is all over tender bits,” devoutly adding, in words

that really have a touch of Dogberry or Shakespearean clown about them:

“May heaven always keep lead out of my bowels; I’d sooner have it in my

brains.” The father has fidgeted a good deal between these two fires of

filial thoughtfulness and counsel, but so far has said nothing. At the

last remark, his patience deserts him, and he exclaims: “D---- your

brains! I don’t believe you’ve got any,” presently adding that the

affair is one of which he has had some experience, while as yet neither

of the young men has been out. The preliminaries of the duel may be

comedy; the combat itself rises to farce. _The Macdermots_ contains, as

will have been seen, touches of more polished humour than this, though

in most cases it is broad enough to suggest Anthony Trollope’s

inheritance of the gift from his clever mother.

Such passages as that last dwelt upon in _The Macdermots_ prepared, as

had been suggested, the way for the transition to the next novel, _The

Kellys and the O’Kellys_. That story, indeed, is not without some

incidents only less sombre than those which diffuse their colour through

the earlier book. It is characteristic of Trollope’s novels that the

underplot is often of as much importance, and the source of as sustained

an interest, as the main plot itself. In _The Kellys and the O’Kellys_,

the secondary narrative not only keeps pace with the primary, but

reflects the general character of its interest and displays a parallel

for some of its occurrences. The period, a little later than the time

chosen for _The Macdermots_, is that of O’Connell’s agitation, trial,

and unimpaired ascendency. Among those brought to Dublin by the

Liberator’s appearance before his judges are two men. One is the head of

the O’Kelly, as of the Kelly clans, now Lord Ballindine; the other is a

young man of about his own age, a widow trader’s son, Martin Kelly, whom

the nobleman contemptuously acknowledges as a sort of fifteenth cousin.

This group is completed by the evil genius of the story, Dot Blake. Both

the peer and the peasant happen just now to be united by a similarity of

object, more closely binding them for the moment than the tie of remote

kinship. Fond of the turf, with one or two horses in training for the

English “classical” races, Viscount Ballindine is bent on improving his

finances by sharing his title with an heiress, Fanny Wyndham; her

guardian, the Earl of Cashel, having other views for her, is actively

concerned to prevent communications between his ward and her lover.

Now for Martin Kelly. Simeon Lynch, the Ballindine estate manager, under

the present Viscount’s father, has feathered his nest so well as to have

amassed a fortune that has raised his children far above the social

level of their birth. His son, Barry Lynch, has even been at Eton with

young Lord Ballindine; though in Barry’s case the “learning of the

humanities have not softened manners or prevented them from being

fierce.” His daughter Anastasia, known as Anty, divides the paternal

property with her brother. She is therefore a very considerable catch.

Nevertheless the plebeian Martin Kelly, with his Irish self-confidence,

has set his heart on winning her. That project is resisted as strongly,

by Anty’s brother, as Fanny Wyndham’s guardian objects to his ward’s

union with Ballindine. Lord Cashel does what he considers his duty to

the young lady in his charge shrewdly and, so far as her lover is

concerned, harshly. Much whisky, and a money greediness that has

swallowed up other passions, have gradually degraded Barry Lynch into a

ruffianly sot, with no other thought than, by foul means if fair fail,

to become master of his sister’s share in the property their father

divided equally by will between them. The brother’s drunken ferocity

proves the death-warrant to his schemes. Driven from home by Barry’s

barbarity, Anty Lynch finds a humble refuge beneath the roof of Mrs.

Kelly, Martin Kelly’s mother. To these extremities, the relations

between Fanny Wyndham and Lord Ballindine naturally present no parallel.

Even with them, however, the course of true love runs at least as

roughly as is its proverbial wont.

The figures gathered round the leading personages in this twin drama

illustrate the closeness with which Trollope studied every phase of

Irish life. They are as racy of the soil as Charles Lever himself. Their

truth and freshness indeed so much impressed Lever that they suggested

to him the new variety of Irish character to be met with in his latest

writings. The Irish squire who lives more by his wits than his land,

Walter Blake, might indeed, had he wanted such inspiration, have

supplied the germ of Dudley Sewell in _Sir Brook Fossbrooke_, and the

other products of the post-Lorrequer period. An effeminate, slightly

made man of about thirty, good-looking, gentlemanlike, with a cold,

quiet, grey eye, and a thin lip, infallible on racing matters, riding

boldly good horses, always drinking the very best claret that Dublin

could procure, a finished gambler, who makes his six hundred a year, as

to style of life, do the work of as many thousands. Here is a

description entirely in the later Leverian style, and with the Leverian

ring in the words of the well-bred, sporting adventurer, who plays his

own game with such an entire absence of scruple, and with such polished

serenity, that his friend Frank Ballindine has to thank some of Dot

Blake’s remarks to Lord Cashel for the temporary rupture of his

engagement with Fanny Wyndham. Lever’s first profession was medicine.

How well Trollope understood its Irish representatives may be seen from

his sketch of Doctor Colligan, who, attending Anty Lynch in the illness

brought on by her brother’s brutality, resents, by knocking him down, a

hint from Barry that he would make it worth the physician’s while to

contrive the patient’s death. Of special interest, in view of what

Trollope’s next novel was to be, is the Anglican clergyman on the

Ballindine property, George Armstrong, whose life is a battle with

tradesmen and tithe-payers, but who, though on one occasion Frank

Ballindine has to supply him with a suit of clothes before despatching

him on some errand to his lady-love, can always enjoy a good dinner when

he gets one, and pilots his sorry hunter so cleverly as generally to be

in at the death when out with hounds.

Anthony Trollope; His Work, Associates and Literary Originals · 第 4 / 16 章