THE RAILWAY WONDERS OF LAST YEAR.

The unblushing individual who inflated the first bubble prospectus in

the early days of Railway scheming must regard, if he be still in

existence (and we have good reason to believe that he lives, a

prosperous gentleman), with superlative amazement the last Report of Her

Majesty’s Railway Commissioners.

When in his dazzling document the preposterous “promoter” certified the

forthcoming goods transit at six times the amount his most sanguine

“traffic-taker” could conscientiously compute; when he quadrupled the

boldest calculations of the expected number of passengers—when, in

short, he projected his prognostics beyond the widest bounds of

probability, and then added a few cyphers at the end of each sum, to

make “round numbers”—he was not so mad as to believe that he lied in the

least like truth. Mad as he was _not_, he never could have supposed that

an after-time would come when his lying prospectus would be pronounced

as far short of, as his mendacious imagination endeavoured to make it

exceed, the Truth. But that time has arrived.

Let us suppose a friend of his, a far-seeing prophet, reading a proof of

the pet prospectus by the aid of magnifying glasses; let us figure the

statistical foreteller of future events assuring its author that, twenty

years thence, his immeasurable exaggerations would be out-exaggerated by

what should actually come to pass; that his brazen bait to catch

share-jobbers would shrink—when placed beside the Railway records of

eighteen-hundred-and-forty-nine—into a puny, minimised, understatement.

How he would have laughed! How immediately his mind would have reverted

from the sanguine seer to the terminus of flighty intellects known as

Bedlam. With what remarkable unction he would have said, “Phoo! Phoo! My

good fellow, you must be lapsing into lunacy. What! Do you mean to say I

have not laid it on thick enough? Why, look here!” and he turns to the

latest of the Stamp Office stage-coach returns: “Do you mean to tell

me—now that coach travelling has arrived at perfection, and that the

wonderful average of coach passengers is six millions a year—that,

instead of quadrupling the number of travellers who are likely to use my

line, I ought to multiply them by a hundred? Why, you may as well try to

persuade me that I ought to promise for our locomotives twenty, instead

of fifteen, miles an hour; which—Heaven forgive me—I have had the

courage to set down. Stuff! If I were to romance at that rate, we should

not sell a share.”

And our would-be Major Longbow would have had reason for the faith that

was in him. In his highest flights he dared not exceed too violently the

statistics of G. R. Porter, or have added too high a premium on the

expectations of George Stephenson. The former calculated that up to the

end of 1834, when not a hundred miles of Railway were open, the annual

average of persons who travelled by coach was about two millions, each

going over one hundred and eighty miles of ground in the year.[1]

Supposing each individual performed that distance in three journeys, the

whole number of _persons_ must have multiplied themselves into six

millions of _passengers_. As to speed, Mr. George Stephenson said at a

dinner-party given to him at Newcastle in 1844, that when he planned the

Liverpool and Manchester line, the directors entreated him, when they

went to Parliament, not to talk of going at a faster rate than ten miles

an hour, or he “would put a cross upon the concern.” Mr. George

Stephenson _did_ talk of fifteen miles an hour, and some of the

Committee asked if he were not mad! Mr. Nicholas Wood delivered himself

in a pamphlet as follows:— “It is far from my wish to promulgate to the

world that the ridiculous expectations, or rather _professions_, of the

_enthusiastic speculatist_ will be realised, and that we shall see

engines travelling at the rate of twelve, sixteen, eighteen, twenty

miles an hour. Nothing could do more harm towards their general adoption

and improvement than the promulgation of such NONSENSE!”

Footnote 1:

“Porter’s Progress of the Nation,” vol. ii. p. 22.

It would seem, then, that the Longbow of the aboriginal prospectuses was

actually modest in his estimate as to passengers and speed. But only a

few years must have made him utterly ashamed of his moderation and

modesty. How disgusted he must have felt with his timid prolusions, even

when 1843 arrived. For that year revealed travellers’ tales that

exceeded his early romances by what Major Longbow himself would have

called “an everlasting long chalk.” Within that year, seventy railroads,

constructed at an outlay of sixty millions sterling, conveyed

twenty-five millions of passengers three hundred and thirty millions of

miles, at an average cost of one penny and three quarters per mile, and

an average speed of twenty-four miles per hour, with but one fatal

accident.

But if our parent of railway proprietors were astonished at what

happened in 1843, with what inconceivable amazement he must peruse the

details of 1849! We should like to see the expression of his countenance

while conning the report of Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Railways for

last year. At the end of every sentence he would be sure to exclaim,

“Who _would_ have thought it?”

From this unimpeachable record of scarcely credible statistics, it

appears that at the end of 1849 there were, in Great Britain and

Ireland, five thousand five hundred and ninety-six miles of railway in

active operation; upwards of four thousand five hundred and fifty-six of

which are in England, eight hundred and forty-six in Scotland, and four

hundred and ninety-four in Ireland. Besides this, the number of miles

which have been authorised by Parliament, and still remain to be

finished is six thousand and thirty; so that, if all the lines were

completed, the three kingdoms would be intersected by a net-work of

railroad measuring twelve thousand miles: but of this there is only a

remote probability, the number of miles in course of active construction

being no more than one thousand five hundred, so that by the end of the

present year it is calculated that the length of finished and operative

railway may be about seven thousand four hundred miles, or as many as

lie between Great Britain and the Cape of Good Hope, with a thousand

miles to spare. The number of persons employed on the 30th of June,

1849, in the operative railways was fifty-four thousand; on the unopened

lines, one hundred and four thousand.

When the schemer of the infancy of the giant railway system turns to the

passenger-account for the year 1849, he declares he is fairly “knocked

over.” He finds that the railway passengers are put down at _sixty-three

million eight hundred thousand_; nearly three times the number returned

for 1843, and _a hundred times_ as many as took to the road in the days

of stage-coaches. The passengers of 1849 actually double the sum of the

entire population of the three kingdoms.

The statement of capital which the six thousand miles now being hourly

travelled over represents, will require the reader to draw a long

breath;—it is one hundred and ninety-seven and a half millions of pounds

sterling. Add to this the cash being disbursed for the lines in

progress, the total rises to two hundred and twenty millions! The

average cost of each mile of railway, including engines, carriages,

stations, &c., (technically called “plant,”) is thirty-three thousand

pounds.

Has this outlay proved remunerative? The Commissioners tell us, that the

gross receipts from all the railways in 1849 amounted to eleven

millions, eight hundred and six thousand pounds; from which, if the

working expenses be deducted at the rate of forty-three per cent. (being

about an average taken from the published statements of a number of the

principal companies), there remains a net available profit of about six

millions seven hundred and twenty-nine thousand four hundred and twenty

pounds to remunerate the holders of property to the amount of one

hundred and ninety-seven millions and a half; or at the rate, within a

fraction, of three and a half per cent. Here our parent of railway

prospectuses chuckles. _He_ promised twenty per cent. per annum.

In short, in everything except the dividends, our scheming friend finds

that recent fact has outstripped his early fictions. He told the nervous

old ladies and shaky “half-pays” on his projected line, that Railways

were quite as safe as stage-coaches. What say the grave records of 1849?

The lives of five passengers were lost during that year and those by one

accident—a cause, of course, beyond the control of the victims; eighteen

more casualties took place, for which the sufferers had themselves alone

to blame. Five lives lost by official mismanagement, out of sixty-four

millions of risks, is no very outrageous proportion; especially when we

reflect that, taking as a basis the calculations of 1843, the number of

miles travelled over per rail during last year, may be set down at eight

hundred and forty-five millions; or _nine times the distance between the

earth and the sun_.

Such are the Railway wonders of the year of grace, one thousand eight

hundred and forty-nine.

THE WATER-DROPS.

A FAIRY TALE.

Household words, No. 21, August 17, 1850 · 第 3 / 15 题