His career, however, was almost as brief as if she had done so. That

same evening he robbed a mounted postman of his mail-bags--having first

ascertained that the postman was unarmed. And here Hudson came to the

end of his tether. The postman gave the alarm, and the robber was

arrested in Newcastle the following day, some of the property lost from

the mail-bags still in his possession. At his trial the following week

at Durham Assizes he did not attempt to make any defence, but after

conviction, by confessing where the booty was hid, he made what

reparation lay in his power. Poor wretch! He had not even the posthumous

satisfaction of going down to posterity as a bold, bad man, a hero of

the road. Not for him was it to emulate Jack Shepherd or Dick Turpin; he

was of feebler clay, unfitted to excel in evil-doing.

After the barbarous fashion of the day, they hanged his body in chains

on the scene of his poor, feebly-executed crimes; and there, on

Gateshead Fell, through many a dreary winter's night, fringed with

loathly icicles, lashed by rains, battered by hail, dangled that

pitiful, shrunken figure, creaking dolefully, as it swung to and fro in

the bitter blasts that come howling in from a storm-tossed North Sea.

And far from acting as the warning intended to others, so little was

this gruesome thing a "terror to evil-doers," that the vicinity of the

gibbet actually became a place noted for the frequency of crimes of

violence.

There have been others, of course, who might perhaps be recognised as

Border highwaymen, though not many of them could claim to have achieved

even moderate notoriety. Drummond, who was hanged at Tyburn in 1730,

certainly began his infamous career in the north, but that was quite a

petty beginning, and--at least after his return from transportation to

the Virginian Plantations--his chief haunts were Hounslow or Bagshot

Heaths, or other places in the neighbourhood of London.

But at least there was one Border highwayman--or is "footpad" here the

more correct term?--who, if the story is true, may surely claim to have

been the most picturesque and romantic of criminals. In this instance

the malefactor was a woman, not a man, and her name was Grizel Cochrane,

member of (or at least sprung from) a noble family, which later produced

one of the most famous seamen in the annals of naval history. Her story

is very well known, and it may therefore be sufficient to say here that

her father, having been concerned in one of the many political

conspiracies which in those days were judged to merit death, lay in

prison under sentence, and that, to save his life, the brave lady,

disguised as a man, on two separate occasions, on Tweedmouth moor,

robbed the mail by which her father's death warrant was being conveyed

from London to Edinburgh. Thus she twice prevented the sentence from

being carried out, and eventually the prisoner was pardoned.

The greater number of highway robberies in the Border, however, were

accomplished without the aid of a horse or the disguise of a crape mask.

The Border highwayman, as a rule, was no picturesque Claude Duval, no

chivalrous villain of romance who would tread a measure in the moonlight

with the lady whose coach he had plundered, thereafter returning her

jewels in recompense for the favour of the dance. He was much more often

of the squalid type--in a word, a footpad--frequently a member of some

wandering gipsy gang, who, attending country fair or tryst, had little

difficulty in ascertaining which one of the many farmers present it

would be easiest and most profitable to rob as he steered his more or

less devious course homeward in the evening across the waste. What the

farmer had that day been paid for his cattle or sheep he usually carried

with him, probably in the form of gold; for in those days there were of

course no country agencies of banks in which the money might be safely

deposited. Not unusually, too, the farmer had swallowed enough liquor to

make him reckless of consequences; and the loneliness of the

country-side, and the absence of decent roads, too often combined with

the condition of the farmer to make him an easy prey to some little band

of miscreants who had dogged him from the fair.

Frequently, too, these robbers were in league with the keepers of low

roadside public-houses, where passengers on their homeward way were

encouraged--nothing loth, as a rule--to halt and refresh steed and

rider, and possibly whilst they drank their pistols were tampered with.

Who does not remember the meeting of Harry Bertram and Dandie Dinmont in

such a place? And who has not read in the author's notes to _Guy

Mannering_, Sir Walter's account of the visit to Mump's Ha' of Fighting

Charlie of Liddesdale, and what befell him thereafter? In spite of a

head that the potations pressed on him by an over-kind landlady had

caused to hum like an angry hive of bees, Charlie had sense enough,

after he had travelled a few miles on his homeward way, to examine his

pistols. Finding that the charges had been drawn and tow substituted,

Charlie, now considerably sobered, carefully reloaded them, a precaution

which certainly saved his money, and possibly his life as well, for he

was presently attacked by a party of armed men, who, however, fled on

finding that "the tow was out."

Mump's Ha' was in Cumberland, near Gilsland. In olden days it was a

place of most evil repute, but one may question if in ill name it could

take precedence of a similar establishment which in the days of our

great-grandfathers stood on Soutra Hill, on the Lauder road. Travellers

had need to give this place a wide berth, for it was a veritable

den--indeed "Lowrie's Den" was the name by which it was known, and

feared, by every respectable person. Many a bloody, drunken fight took

place there, many were the evil deeds done and the robberies committed;

not even was murder unknown in its immediate vicinity.

Well for us that in our day we know of such places only by ancient

repute. When we talk regretfully of "the good old days," we are apt to

leave out of the reckoning those Mump's Ha's and Lowrie's Dens of our

forefathers' times; we forget to add to the burden of a journey such

items as indifferent roads and highway robbers, and the possibility of

reaching one's destination minus purse, watch, or rings. From an

encounter with highwaymen, few passengers emerged with flying colours,

having had the best of the deal. Not to many persons was such fortune

given as fell to the lot of a country lass near Kelso one winter's

evening. She had little enough to lose in the way of money or valuables,

and it was "bogles," more than the fear of footpads that disturbed her

mind as she stumped along that muddy road in the gathering gloom.

Consequently, after one terrified shriek, it was almost a relief to her

to find that the two figures which bounced out on her from the

blackness, demanding her money, were flesh and blood like herself, and

not denizens of another world. Five or six shillings was all that the

poor lass possessed, but they took that paltry sum. Only, when she pled

hard that they should leave her at least a trifle to take to her mother,

who was very poor, one of the footpads relented, and with a gruff, "Hey,

then!" thrust three coins back into her not unwilling hand. With a

mixture of joy and fear the girl fled into the darkness, but as she ran,

she thought she heard a shout, and soon, to her consternation, she made

certain that hurrying footsteps were coming up behind her. In dire

terror now, she left the road, and crept into some bushes in an adjacent

hollow. There, with thumping heart, she cowered whilst two men ran

past, and presently, whilst she still lay hid, they returned, vowing

loud vengeance on some person who had "done" them. It was long ere the

poor girl dared leave her shelter, late ere she got home to tell her

tale to an anxious mother. But when the three rescued shillings were

produced, the cause of the robbers' anger was not far to seek; they were

not shillings that came this time from the depths of a capacious pocket,

but three golden guineas.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

When the skipper of some small coastal trading craft is able to retire

from leading a sea-faring life, it is usually within close range of the

briny, tarry whiffs that with every breeze come puffing from the harbour

of some little port out of which he has formerly traded that he sets up

his shore-going abode. There, when he has paid off for the last time,

and everything, so to speak, is coiled down and made ship-shape, he

settles within easy hail of old cronies like himself; and if he should

chance to be one of those who have lived all their days with only their

ship for wife, then he not unnaturally falls easily into the habit of

dropping, of an evening, into the snug, well-lit bar-parlour of the

"Goat and Compasses" or the "Mariner's Friend," or some such house of

entertainment, with its glowing fire and warm, seductive, tobacco-and

grog-scented atmosphere, there to wile away the time swopping yarns with

old friends. Sometimes, if opportunity offer, he is not averse from a

mild game of cards for moderate points; and usually he takes, or at

least in old days he used to take, his liquor hot--and strong.

Captain Alexander Craes was one of those retired merchant skippers; but

he had not, like the majority of his fellows, settled near the

sea-coast. It was Kelso that had drawn him like a loadstone. An

inland-bred man, in his boyhood he had run away to sea, and the sea,

that had irresistibly woed his youthful fancy, had no whit fulfilled his

boyish dreams. It was not always blue, he found; the ship was not always

running before a spanking breeze; more kicks than ha'pence, more

rope's-endings than blessings, came his way during the first few years

of his sailor life. Perhaps it was because he had been ashamed to go

back and own himself beaten, or perhaps it was his native Border

dourness that had caused him to stick to it; but at any rate he did

stick to it--though, like most sailors, he growled, and even swore

sometimes, that he hated the life. And now, in the winter of 1784-5,

here he was in Kelso, stout, weather-beaten, grey-headed, over fifty,

living within earshot of the deep voice of flooded Tweed roaring and

fretting over the barrier with which the devil, at bidding of Michael

Scott the Wizard, long syne dammed its course. Many a time when the

captain's little vessel, close hauled, had been threshing through

leaden-grey seas under hurrying, leaden-grey skies and bitter snow

squalls, with a foul wind persistently pounding at her day after day, he

had thought, as some more than ordinarily angry puff whitened the water

to windward and broke him off his course, with the weather leech of his

close-reefed topsail shivering, how pleasant it must be to be a

landsman, to go where he pleased in spite of wind or weather. Ah! they

were the happy ones, those lucky landsmen, who could always do as they

chose, blow high, blow low.

Well, here he was at last, drinking in all a landsman's pleasures,

enjoying his privileges--and not too old yet, he told himself with

self-conscious chuckle, to raise a pleasant flutter of expectation in

the hearts of Kelso's widows and maidens. Not that he was a marrying

man, he would sometimes protest; far from it, indeed. Yet they did say

that the landlord of a rival inn was heard to remark that "the cauptain

gaed ower aften to Lucky G----'s howf. It wasna hardlys decent, an' her

man no deid a twalmonth." Maybe, however, the good widow's brand of

whisky was more grateful to the captain's palate, or the company

assembled in her snug parlour lightsomer, or at least less dour, than

was to be found at the rival inn, where the landlord was an elder of the

kirk and most stern opponent of all lightness and frivolity. Whatever

the cause, however, it is certain that the captain did acquire the habit

of dropping in very frequently at the widow's, where he was always a

welcome guest. And it was from a merry evening there that, with a

"tumbler" or two inside his ample waistcoat, he set out for home one

black February night when a gusty wind drove thin sleety rain rattling

against the window panes of the quiet little town, and emptied the

silent, moss-grown streets very effectively.

An hour or two later, it might be, two men, Adam Hislop and William

Wallace, were noisily steering a somewhat devious and uncertain course

homeward, when one of them tripped over a bulky object huddled on the

ground, and with an astonished curse fell heavily.

"What the de'il's that? Guide us, it's a man! Some puir body the waur o'

his drink, ah'm thinkin'. Haud up, maister! Losh! it's the cauptain," he

cried, as with the not very efficient aid of his friend he tried to

raise the prostrate man. But there was more than drink the matter here.

"There's bluid on him!" cried one who had been vainly essaying to clap a

battered hat on to the head of the form that lay unconscious in the mud.

A hard task it was presently, when his senses began to return, to get

the wounded sailor unsteadily on his legs; a harder to get him home. The

captain could give but a poor account of how he came to be lying there;

thickly and indistinctly he tried to explain that he had laid a course

for his own moorings, and had been keeping a bright look-out, when

suddenly he had been brought up all standing, and he thought he must

have run bows on into some other craft, for he remembered no more than

getting a crack over his figurehead. Morning was treading on the heels

of night before Hislop and Wallace had got the damaged man home and had

left him safely stowed in bed, and themselves were peacefully snoring,

unconscious of coming trouble.

A day or two passed quietly, and the damaged man already was little the

worse of his adventure. Then, however, the rumour quickly spread that

not only had the Captain been assaulted, but that he had been robbed.

Gossip flew from tongue to tongue, and folk began to look askance on

Wallace and Hislop, muttering that "they aye kenned what was to be the

outcome"; for who, thought they, but Wallace and Hislop could have been

the robbers? They had found him lying, the worse of liquor, having

damaged his head in falling, and they had robbed him, either then or

when they undressed him in his room, believing that he would have no

recollection of what money he had carried that night, nor, indeed, much

of the events of the entire evening. It was all quite plain, said those

amateur detectives. They wondered what the fiscal was thinking of that

he had not clapped the two in jail lang syne. So it fell out that,

almost before they realised their danger, the two men were at Jedburgh,

being tried on a capital charge.

The evidence brought against them was for the most part of no great

account, and the old sea captain was unable to say that either man had

assaulted him, or, indeed, that he had any clear recollection of

anything that had happened after he left the inn. They might have got

off--indeed they _would_ have got off--but for one unfortunate

circumstance, which in the eyes of the jury completely damned them. In

possession of one of them was found a guinea, which the captain had no

hesitation in identifying as a peculiarly-marked coin which he had

carried about with him for many years. That was enough for the jury.

They and counsel for the prosecution would credit no explanation.

The story told by Hislop and Wallace was that on the night of the

assault they had been drinking and playing cards in a public-house in

Kelso; that late in the evening a soldier had come in and had joined in

the game, losing a considerable sum; that in consequence of his losses

he had produced a guinea, and had asked if any of the company could

change it. Hislop had given change, and the guinea found in his

possession was that which he had got from the soldier. "A story that

would not for a moment hold water," said counsel, when the unfortunate

men failed to produce evidence in support of their story; and the judge,

in his summing up, agreeing with the opinion of counsel for the

prosecution, the jury brought in a verdict of guilty, and both men were

condemned to be hanged.

On May 17, 1785, this sentence was carried out. But here arose

circumstances which caused the credulous--and in those days most people

were credulous--first to doubt, and finally to believe implicitly in the

innocence of the convicted men. From first to last Wallace and Hislop

had both most strongly protested that they were entirely guiltless.

That, of course, went for nothing. But when, on the day of execution,

the ropes which were used to hang the poor creatures both broke; when

the man who ran to fetch sounder hemp fell as he hurried, and broke his

leg, then the credulous and fickle public began to imagine that

Providence was intervening to save men falsely convicted. Then, too, the

tale spread abroad among a simple-minded people how a girl, sick unto

death, had said to her mother that when Hislop's time came she would be

in heaven with him; and it was told that as Hislop's body, after

execution, was carried into that same tenement, in a room of which the

sick girl lay, her spirit fled. Judgment, also, was said to have fallen

on a woman who occupied a room in that house, and who had violently and

excitedly objected to the body of a hanged man being brought to defile

any abode which sheltered her. That same evening the body of her own

son, found drowned in Tweed, was carried over that threshold across

which she had tried to prevent them from bringing the corpse of Hislop.

All these events tended to swing round public opinion, and those who

formerly had been most satisfied of their guilt, now most strenuously

protested their entire belief in the innocence of the hanged men. The

years slipped away, however, and there had arisen nothing either to

confirm or to dissipate this belief; only the story remained fresh in

the minds of Border folk, and the horror of the last scene grew rather

than lessened with repeated telling.

But there is a belief--not always borne out by facts--that "murder will

out"; a faith that, "though the mills of God grind slowly, yet they

grind exceeding small." Ten years had passed, and the spring of 1795 was

at hand, when it chanced one day that a citizen of Newcastle, homeward

bound from Morpeth, had reached a point on the road near Gosforth; here,

without word or challenge, a footpad, springing on to the road, fired a

pistol at the postillion of the postchaise, knocking off the man's cap

and injuring his face. The frightened horses plunged, and dashed off

madly with the vehicle, leaving in the footpad's possession no booty of

greater value, however, than the postillion's cap.

Later in the same day the same footpad fired, without effect, on two

mounted men, who galloped off and gave the alarm, and a well-armed band

setting out from Gosforth soon captured the robber, still with the

incriminating postillion's cap in his possession. He was a man named

Hall, a soldier belonging to the 6th Regiment of Foot, of which a

detachment was then stationed in the district. And he was in uniform,

though, as a measure of precaution, and not to make himself too

conspicuous, he wore his tunic turned inside out--a disguise that one

would pronounce to be something of the simplest.

There was, of course, no possible defence--indeed, he owned up, and at

the next assizes was condemned to death. And here the link with the fate

of Wallace and Hislop came in. As he lay awaiting execution, Hall

confessed that it was he, that February night in 1785, who had stunned

and robbed Captain Craes. He had seen the old sailor making his not very

steady way homewards, and had followed him, and at the loneliest part of

the street, where no house showed a light, he came up behind and tripped

him; and as the captain essayed to get again on his feet, Hall had

struck him a violent blow on the head with a cudgel, stunning him. The

man told, too, how a little later he had gone into a public-house to get

a drink, and that there he found some men playing at cards; he had

joined them, and had lost money, and one of the men (Hislop, as he

afterwards understood) had changed for him a guinea which he had a

little time before taken from the pocket of the man he had stunned.

Thus were Wallace and Hislop added to the long list of the victims of

circumstantial evidence.

ILLICIT DISTILLING AND SMUGGLING

From about the close of the seventeenth until well on in the nineteenth

century, smuggling was carried on to a large extent in the Border

counties of England and Scotland, not only as regards the evasion of

customs duties on imported articles, but as well in the form of illicit

distillation.

In the good old times, better than half-way through the eighteenth

century, cargoes consisting of ankers of French brandy, bales of lace,

cases of tobacco, boxes of tea, and what not, were "run" almost nightly

on certain parts of the coasts of Berwick, Northumberland, and Galloway,

borne inland by long strings of pack-horses, and securely hid away in

some snug retreat, perhaps far up among the Border hills. Few of the

inhabitants but looked with lenient eye on the doings of the

"free-traders"; few, very few, deemed it any crime to take advantage of

their opportunities for getting liquor, tea, and tobacco at a cheaper

rate than they could buy the same articles after they had paid toll to

the King. Smuggled goods, too, were thought to possess quality and

flavour better than any belonging to those that had come ashore in

legitimate fashion; the smuggler's touch, perhaps, in this respect was--

"... sweeter than the lids of Juno's eyes

Or Cytherea's breath";

it imparted to the brandy, apparently, a vague, unnameable something

that tickled the palate of the drinker, to the tobacco an extra aroma

that was grateful to the nostrils of those who smoked it. Nay, the very

term "smuggled" raised the standard of those goods in the estimation of

some very honest folk, and caused them to smack their lips in

anticipation. Perhaps this superstition as to the supreme quality of

things smuggled is not even yet wholly dead. Who has not met the hoary

waterside ruffian, who, whispering low,--or at least as low as a throat

rendered husky by much gin _can_ whisper,--intimates that he can put the

"Captain" (he'd promote you to be "Admiral" on the spot if he thought

that thereby he might flatter you into buying) on to the "lay" of some

cigars--"smuggled," he breathes from behind a black and horny paw, whose

condition alone would taint the finest Havanna that ever graced the lips

of king or duke--the like of which may be found in no tobacconist's

establishment in the United Kingdom. There have been young men, greatly

daring, who have been known to traffic with this hoary ruffian, and who

have lived to be sadder and wiser men. Of the flavour of those weeds the

writer cannot speak, but the reek is as the reek which belches from the

Pit of Tophet. However, in the eighteenth century our forefathers, for a

variety of reasons, greatly preferred the smuggled goods, and many a

squire or wealthy landowner, many a magistrate even, found it by no

means to his disadvantage if on occasion he should be a little blind; a

still tongue might not unlikely be rewarded by the mysterious arrival of

an anker of good French brandy, or by something in the silk, or lace, or

tea line for the ladies of his household. People saw no harm in such

doings in those good old days; defrauding the revenue was fair game. And

if a "gauger" lost his life in some one or other of the bloody

encounters that frequently took place between the smugglers and the

revenue officers, why, so much the worse for the "gauger." He was an

unnecessarily officious sort of a person, who had better have kept out

of the way. In fact, popular sentiment was entirely with the smugglers,

who by the bulk of the population were regarded with the greatest

admiration. Smuggling, indeed, was so much a recognised trade or

profession that there was actually a fixed rate at which smuggled goods

were conveyed from place to place; for instance, for tea or tobacco from

the Solway to Edinburgh the tariff was fifteen shillings per box or

bale. A man, therefore, owning three or four horses could, with luck,

make a very tidy profit on the carriage, for each horse would carry two

packages, and the distances were not great. There was certainly a good

sporting chance of the convoy being captured in transit, but the

smugglers were daring, determined men, and the possibility of a brush

with the preventive officers merely added zest to the affair.

Stories of the Border Marches · 第 16 / 20 段