Waverley Novels 78,270 sets

Poetical Works 41,340 ”

Prose Works 8,260 ”

_Life_ by Lockhart 26,060 ”

_Tales of a Grandfather_

(as a separate work) 22,190 ”

Selections 7,550 ”

and, as a test of the popularity of the _People’s Edition_ of the

writings and _Life_, he states that the following numbers originally

printed in weekly sheets were issued:

Novels 7,115,197

Poetry 674,955

Prose 269,406

Life 459,291

----------

Total Sheets 8,518,849

Robert Cadell died on January 21st, 1849, after a long career rendered

prosperous by this splendid property, and on March 26th, 1851, the

novels, poems, prose works, and the “Life” by Lockhart were put up to

auction at the London Coffee House by Mr. Hodgson. The sale brought

together the largest “trade” gathering that has ever been witnessed;

there were publishers from the “Row” and Albemarle Street, booksellers

from Ave Maria and Ivy Lanes, and speculators from every corner of

the kingdom. The stock had been valued at £10,193 3_s._, a very low

figure, and it was announced that this would be sold only with the

copyrights, and that the trustees retained the right of bidding. After

much disputing as to these restrictions £5000 was offered, and quickly

rose by leaps of £500 to £10,500, when Mr. Bohn and the “Row” retired,

and the struggle lay between Mr. Virtue and some imaginary bidder,

visible only to the eyes of the auctioneer. At £13,500 the copyright

was “bought in” making the price, including the stock, £23,693 3_s._

This afforded a wonderful contrast to the former sale at £8500, more

especially when we consider that the copyright of the earlier novels

had only five or six years more to run.

In a few weeks after this it was announced in the _Scotsman_ that

the whole of the copyrights were transferred to the hands of another

eminent publishing firm in Edinburgh--Messrs. A. and C. Black, who, in

conjunction with their friends, Messrs. Richardson Brothers, became the

possessors at the price of £27,000.

Leaving the Waverley Novels for a time, it will be necessary to bring

up the narrative of the career of Mr. Adam Black to the period when he

was able to become the owner of the most valuable literary property

that has ever existed.

Adam Black, the son of Charles Black, a builder of Edinburgh, was born

in that town in the year 1784, and was educated primarily at the High

School, on his entrance as a pupil at which, tradition says, he was

accompanied by his father, who, having just left his employment for

the purpose, appeared in full working garb, the mason’s white leathern

apron included. At the University his talents speedily procured him

admittance into that clique of young Liberals who were afterwards to

effect such a change in Edinburgh, indeed in cosmopolitan politics.

After serving his apprenticeship to the book trade, in partnership

with his nephew, the bookselling business of Adam and Charles Black

was founded. In 1817 he married Isabella, only daughter of James Tait,

architect (sister of William Tait, the well-known originator of _Tait’s

Magazine_), and at the time of Constable’s failure was in a steady and

prosperous way of business. This disaster was the means of making many

fortunes, and in 1826 the _Edinburgh Review_ appeared under the joint

proprietorship of Thomas Norton Longman and Adam and Charles Black.

As we have followed the career of the _Review_ in our history of the

Longman family, it will be unnecessary to enter fully into the changes

of management and the success of later numbers.

Another work, however, afterwards thrown on the market, which also

became the property of Messrs. A. and C. Black, is of such literary

importance that we must again for a moment retrace our steps, in order

to keep up the proper sequence of our narrative.

The idea of a compilation that should embrace all human knowledge is of

very great antiquity. Pliny, in fact claims the name of “Encyclopædia”

for his _Natural History_; but it was not till the sixteenth century

that any attempt was made at arranging the matter in a systematic

manner, though the Arabians are said to have had a true _Encyclopædia_

centuries before that date. It was long, however, before the idea

occurred of employing the lexographic plan as a basis of a universal

_répertoire_ of learning, and the first great step in advance was

the _Lexicon Technicum_ of Dr. Harris, completed and published at

London in the year 1710. The _Cyclopædia_ of Ephraim Chambers, with

which we have previously dealt, appeared in 1728, and for a long time

was the supreme authority; through its success at home and abroad a

new impulse was given to the desire for such publications. In France

the _Encyclopédie_ was projected by the Abbé de Gua, and was based

originally on an unpublished translation of Chambers’s _Cyclopædia_,

made by an Englishman named Mills. In consequence of a quarrel with the

publishers, De Gua threw it up, and it was then transferred to Diderot

and D’Alembert; to become the text-book of the French philosophers.

The publication of the seventeen volumes extended from 1751 to 1765,

and six years after the latter date appeared the first volume of the

_Encyclopædia Britannica_.

The plan and all the principal articles of this now important work were

in this first edition devised and written by William Smellie.

Smellie began life as a compositor, and he used to lay down his

composing-stick for an hour or two daily to attend the classes of the

Edinburgh University. At the age of nineteen he was engaged by Murray

and Cochrane as corrector of their press in general and conductor and

compiler of the _Scots Magazine_ at a salary of sixteen shillings a

week. If the saying that “Edinburgh never had a Grub Street” is true,

it must have arisen rather from the perseverance of the writers than

from the uniform generosity of the publishers.

The agreement upon which the _Encyclopædia_ was undertaken was still in

existence when Kerr wrote Smellie’s _Life_; as a literary curiosity we

quote it:--

“Mr. Andrew Bell to Mr. William Smellie.

“SIR,--As we are engaged in publishing a ‘Dictionary of the

Arts and Sciences,’ and as you have informed us that there

are fifteen capital sciences, which you will undertake for,

and write up the sub-divisions and detached parts of them,

conforming to your plan, and likewise to prepare the whole work

for the press, &c., &c. We hereby agree to allow you £200 for

your trouble.”

The first proprietors were Andrew Bell, engraver, and Colin

Macfarquhar, printer. The publication was commenced in weekly numbers

in 1771, and completed in 1773, by which time the bulk in all consisted

only of three small quarto volumes. A second edition was called for in

1776, and Smellie was offered a share in the property, but he declined

to have anything more to do with it, as upon the recommendation of “a

very distinguished nobleman” it was resolved to introduce a complete

system of biography. The proprietors engaged, instead, James Tytler, a

laborious miscellaneous writer, and a man of extraordinary knowledge.

A large proportion of the additional matter, by which the work was

extended from three to ten volumes, was due to his pen, but the payment

for this labour is said to have been very small, and the unfortunate

author was not able to support his family in a style superior to that

of a common labourer. At one time, during the progress of the work, he

lived at the village of Duddingston, in the house of a washerwoman,

whose tub inverted formed the only desk at his disposal, and one of his

children was frequently despatched with a parcel of “copy” upon which

their next meal depended.

This second edition consisted of 1500 copies, and extended to ten

volumes quarto. The third edition, to which Tytler also contributed,

was commenced in 1789. Till then it had been considered in the south as

“a Scots rival of little repute” (to Chambers’s _Cyclopædia_), but in

this edition, beside the method and comprehensiveness of the plan, it

rose greatly above its former level in its practical and speculative

departments. It was completed in 1797, in eighteen volumes, to which

Professor Robison supplied two supplementary volumes to complete the

series he had commenced when the principal work was far advanced.

The sale of this edition extended to ten thousand copies, and the

proprietors are said to have netted £42,000 of clear profit, besides

being paid for their respective work--the one as printer, the other as

engraver. Much of this, of course, was due to poor Tytler’s labours,

who was still living in the utmost penury. He was, however, perfectly

regardless about poverty, having no desire to conceal it from the

world. He would finish his frugal meal of a cold potato before the eyes

of a stranger with as much nonchalance as if it had been a sumptuous

repast. He had that contentment with poverty which is so apt to make

it permanent, and this, in addition to his imprudent and intemperate

habits, cut off all chance of a higher social position. As a proof of

his extraordinary stock of general knowledge, his biographer relates a

characteristic anecdote.

“A gentleman in this city of Edinburgh once told me he wanted as much

matter as would form a junction between a certain history and its

continuation to a later period. He found Tytler lodged in one of those

elevated apartments called _garrets_, and was informed by the old woman

with whom he resided, that he could not see him, as he had gone to

bed rather the worse for liquor. Determined, however, not to depart

without his errand, he was shown into Mr. Tytler’s apartment by the

light of a lamp, where he found him in the situation described by the

landlady. The gentleman having acquainted him with the nature of the

business which brought him at so late an hour, Mr. Tytler called for

pen and ink, and in a short time produced about a page and a half of

letterpress, which answered the end as completely as if it had been the

result of the most mature deliberation, previous notice, and a mind

undisturbed by any liquid capable of deranging its ideas.”

On the death of Macfarquhar the whole work became the property of

Andrew Bell.

The fourth edition, augmented to twenty volumes, was completed in 1810,

under the able superintendence of Dr. James Millar; but the editor

was prevented from availing himself of Professor Robison’s excellent

supplementary articles by a temporary separation of that property from

that of the principal work. This issue consisted of three thousand five

hundred copies.

With the completion of this edition the progress of improvement was

for a time suspended; but in 1814 the copyright of the work was

purchased by Archibald Constable, who, with the enterprise that always

distinguished him, at once projected a supplement, which extended to

six volumes. It was placed under the skilful management of Professor

Macney Napier, and the publication lasted from 1815 to 1824. Many

very distinguished authors were engaged as contributors, among whom

we may specially mention Arago, Biot, and Dugald Stewart; and all the

resources of the proprietors were devoted to this favourite undertaking.

In 1829 the whole of the copyrights (including that of Professor

Robison’s supplementary articles) passed into the hands of Messrs. A.

and C. Black, assisted by their friends; and we are now able to resume

our narrative at the point we left it.

The property was at first a joint stock concern, resembling the

original proprietorship, and was, we believe, owned in equal shares

by Mr. Abraham Thomson, as the binder; Mr. Thomas Allan, as the

printer; and Messrs. A. and C. Black, as publishers. Mr. Thomson died

shortly afterwards, and the Messrs. Black became the possessors of his

interest in the work. Some years afterwards, the share held by Mr.

Allan, who was a banker in Edinburgh, and also printer and proprietor

of the _Caledonian Mercury_, also fell into the hands of the Messrs.

Black. At this time the new edition was in midway progress, and the

enormous expense necessary to complete the work rendered the venture

single-handed something more than hazardous. But the ability, tact,

immense energy, and unceasing labour of Mr. Adam Black, then in the

prime of life, proved equal to the task he had undertaken, and in

this case it may truly be said that for years he went on literally

scattering bread upon the waters, and most deservedly did he obtain his

reward. Previously, we believe, to the completion of this edition, Mr.

Charles Black, who had long been in delicate health, died.

Upon Jeffrey’s retirement in 1829, Macney Napier, Professor of

Conveyancing in the University of Edinburgh, was promoted to the

editorship of the _Edinburgh Review_, and Mr. Black also secured

his services for the management of the seventh edition of the

_Encyclopædia_. Napier was assisted by James Brown, LL.D., as

sub-editor, and on his shoulders most of the hard work fell. Brown,

who was trained as an advocate at the Scottish bar, relinquished this

for literature. His thorough scholarship enabled him to undertake

almost any department of literary work, and rendered him invaluable

for the revisal of such a work as the _Encyclopædia_. He was also a

ready and slashing political writer, at a time when political feeling

was rampant. Remarkable alike for his mental activity and his personal

irascibility, the one great difficulty lay in managing the Doctor. As

an instance of this, the article “Alphabet” was entrusted to Brown for

the new edition of the _Encyclopædia_. He was at the same time editor

of the _Caledonian Mercury_, and on the appearance of something in that

paper which led to a quarrel with Mr. Allan, the proprietor, who was

also a shareholder in the _Encyclopædia_, Brown declined to go on with

“Alphabet.” The part in which this was to appear was due, and Brown

was inflexible. The subject was a difficult one, peculiarly suited to

Brown’s abilities, and it was not easy elsewhere to find so competent

a writer. In these circumstances, Mr. Black adopted the experiment

of passing over that part and bringing out the succeeding one. Thus

circumvented, Brown came to terms, and things again went on smoothly.

But, notwithstanding his proverbial kindliness of disposition, he

was hasty in coming to conclusions, and was always getting into

scrapes of one kind or another; and a duel, in which he and Charles

Maclaren, editor of the _Scotsman_, figured as principals, furnished

the Edinburgh _gamins_ with a popular street song. He escaped all

duellistic dangers, however, but his unremitting labours brought on a

stroke of apoplexy, of which he died in 1841.

The great feature of the new edition was the preliminary

“Dissertations,” which were commenced by Professors Stewart and

Playfair, who were both carried off in the midst of their labours. Sir

James Mackintosh, who undertook to complete his friend’s “History of

Ethical and Political Philosophy” (the Metaphysical portion had been

completed by Stewart) was also summoned from his labours before the

Political division was commenced; and the “History of the Physical

Sciences” was brought down by Professor Leslie to the commencement of

this century.

“The ‘Dissertations’ produced by these four extraordinary men are still

regarded with peculiar pride in Scotland; indeed, few nations can boast

of such an intellectual group living at the same time, and adorning the

same society; and yet, with powers of mind not far from equality, how

various were their gifts, and how diversified their genius!”[14]

The seventh edition was commenced in monthly parts in March, 1830, and

finished in January, 1842. Of its success it is almost unnecessary to

speak; with confidence reposed in the proprietors sufficient to command

the services of such writers as Young, Malthus, Macculloch, Mill,

Roget, Wilson, Empson, De Quincey, and Tytler, while the editor can

count on the aid of friends like Scott, Playfair, Stewart, Leslie, Lord

Jeffrey, Sir William Hamilton, and Sir John Barrow, it is not difficult

to anticipate the result. The mere cost of presentation copies

amounted to £416 16_s._, and the amount of duty on the paper employed

exceeded £6000; while, to go into heavier matters, the total expense

of the twenty-one quarto volumes was, in a trial in the Jury Court of

Scotland, proved to have been no less a sum than £125,667 9_s._ 3_d._

This amount, of course, includes every item of expenditure, among which

the following are the most important:--

£ _s._ _d._

Contributions and Editing 22,590 2 11

Printing 18,610 1 4

Stereotyping 3,317 5 8

Paper 27,854 15 7

Bookbinding 12,739 12 2

Engraving and Plate-printing 11,777 18 1

The literary contributions to the first volume of “Dissertations” alone

cost upwards of £3450.

The work was eminently successful, and this immense expenditure shows

us something of what “success” means in this instance. The commercial

management of an undertaking like this was sufficient to occupy the

attention of a man of extraordinary diligence; but Mr. Black found

time, not only to contribute several articles to his _Encyclopædia_,

but to take a very warm and prominent interest in the government of his

native city; and from 1843 to 1848 he occupied the highest position to

which a citizen of Edinburgh can aspire--that of Lord Provost.

Enterprise and success, more especially when they are mingled with

real desert, and caused by honest service, are qualities of which the

Scotch, perhaps more than any other nation, are peculiarly proud; and

when the representation of Edinburgh became vacant in 1856, a large and

influential party at once nominated Mr. Adam Black to fill the post.

Mr. Adam Black was a thorough-going Liberal and a Nonconformist, and

a party of the electors received his nomination in a spirit of the

greatest bitterness, and an opposition candidate was brought forward.

The election came off on the 8th February, 1856, and Mr. Black, the

friend of political freedom when friends were few, the champion of

religious charity and goodwill when enemies were many, was rewarded for

his consistency and his many services by a larger number of votes than

had been polled for twenty years--no weak test of popular approbation.

As a contemporary opinion, we may quote the _Scotsman_ of that

date:--“Honour to the candidate! Sincerely reluctant to compete for the

honour, no sooner was he embarked, and saw that the great principles

and the reputation of the city were concerned and imperilled in his

person, than he threw himself into the work with a vigour that made

even the youngest and most energetic of his supporters stand aside. We

don’t care who knows it: Mr. Black was the most effective member of his

own committee--in word and in act, by day and by night, the veteran was

ready with guidance and warning and incentive. In all his many battles

in the public cause, he never made a better fight than when achieving

this victory which so gloriously crowns his career.”

In the House Mr. Black distinguished himself by his assiduity to

business, and in 1864 he introduced his Copyright Bill, which, though

it contained much that was good, was ultimately thrown out.

Upon completion of the seventh edition, a number of cheap reprints were

issued of the most famous articles of the “Encyclopædia,” and met with

a very favourable reception.

We have seen that in 1851 the Messrs. Black, in conjunction with

Messrs. Richardson Brothers, became possessed of the Waverley Novels.

Ultimately, the Messrs. Black purchased, it is said, the Messrs.

Richardsons’ share, and are now believed to be the sole proprietors of

Sir Walter Scott’s works. In the management of this property Mr. Adam

Black exhibited the same rare sagacity, and reaped the same successful

reward as in the former important work. In the middle of 1852, he

announced that 120,000 complete sets of the Waverley Novels had been

sold in this country alone since their first publication; and in 1858

an ingenious mathematician computed that the weight of the paper used

for them was upwards of 3500 tons.

Among the most important editions issued by Messrs. Black we may

instance the following:--

£ _s._ _d._

A History of Booksellers, the Old and the New · 第 8 / 28 题