The history of the Communist Party in the United States since 1919 is

characterized by two main trends: (1) the development of a disciplined

Party structure or, in the words of William Z. Foster, “the building of

a Leninist Party of a new type,” and (2) the complete and unquestioning

subservience of the Party to Soviet Russia. Every word and deed, hope and

aspiration, of American communists over the years has promoted these two

objectives.

The conventions of the CLP and CP were over, but “civil war” continued.

Communists roamed the country, denouncing each other.

Just a few weeks after the Chicago conventions Charles Ruthenberg,

Executive Secretary of the Communist Party (the “American Lenin,” who

died in 1927 and whose ashes lie buried in the Kremlin), mounted a

platform in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

He began his address. The Communist Party was the heir of the

revolutionary spirit and its rival, the Communist Labor Party, was wrong.

The CLP, he charged, was “centrist,” a vile word to communists, just like

the Party in Germany where the communists had failed. But _his_ group,

the Communist Party, was without sin. It represented the thoughts of the

victorious Bolshevik Party of Soviet Russia.

When would the revolution come? Ruthenberg did not know; tomorrow or next

week. But he was optimistic. The communists, he said, had better hurry to

learn how to run the government.

Communist Labor Party orators replied in kind. They denounced their

opponents. They alone held the sacred communist truth. Splinter factions,

and they were many, raised their voices. They attacked everybody but

themselves. American communism in these early days was bedlam.

There were other complications. Just a few weeks after the founding

conventions, in the fall of 1919, the federal government and local

authorities initiated prosecutive action against the communists.

As a consequence the communist movement went underground. Comrades met in

secret hide-outs, maintained underground headquarters, and sent messages

by couriers. Hidden printing presses poured out propaganda.

Underground or not, the “civil war” continued. The cramped quarters

did not hinder the oratorical artillery. The inter-Party strife became

fantastically bitter.

Moscow did not like either this bickering or the enforced underground

work. The Kremlin wanted a single, unified Party, able to operate legally

(above ground) as well as illegally (underground). Communism simply could

not thrive on factional fights or in stuffy undercover cellars.

Moscow intervened through the Third International, an organization

designed by the Soviets to control Communist Parties in other nations and

to serve as an instrument of world revolution. The founding Congress of

the Comintern, which opened March 2, 1919, in the Kremlin, was a bizarre

affair.

The “delegates” were chiefly make-believe, picked from prisoners of war,

visitors in Moscow, or “rubber-stamp” friends. The main problem was to

find as many nationalities as possible. This was an “international”

organization. That these individuals were not truly representative of

their “home” groups did not matter. England was “represented” by a

Russian emigré; Hungary by a prisoner of war.

The proceedings were impromptu. It is related that Lenin, during one

session, sent Angelica Balabanoff (later to become General Secretary of

the Comintern) a note on a scrap of paper instructing her to take the

floor and announce the affiliation of the Italian Socialist Party with

the International. She replied that she could not. She had not been in

contact with Italian Socialists. They were “loyal.” There was no doubt of

that, but she could not speak for them.

Lenin’s answer was prompt, scribbled in another note: “You read _Avanti_

[their newspaper] and you know what is going on in Italy.”

The Comintern soon became a powerful weapon of communist control. The

Second World Congress of the Communist International, held in Russia

during July-August, 1920, adopted the notorious twenty-one points of

admission for Comintern membership. These were basic rules that every

Communist Party must accept before being admitted. The twenty-one points

established an ironclad discipline, a single type of Party structure from

which there could be no dissent. Here are some of the conditions:

—All party publications must have communist editors.

—If communists cannot carry out their work legally, “a

combination of legal and illegal work is absolutely necessary.”

—Vigorous and systematic communist propaganda must be carried

on in the army. If forbidden by law, it must be pursued

illegally.

—Each Communist Party must develop communist agitation in rural

areas, within trade unions, workers’ councils, and other mass

organizations.

—“Parties belonging to the Communist International must be

built upon the principle of democratic centralism,” that is,

“organized in the most centralized manner,” controlled by

“iron discipline,” and with a leadership possessing power and

authority.

—Parties operating legally must “make periodical cleanings” of

the membership to weed out dissenters.

—“Every party that desires to belong to the Communist

International must give every possible support to the Soviet

Republics in their struggle against all counter-revolutionary

forces.”

—“All decisions of the Congresses of the Communist

International, as well as the decisions of its Executive

Committee, are binding on all parties affiliated to the

Communist International.”

Here is the final, clinching point:

—“Members of the Party who reject the conditions and theses of

the Communist International, on principle, must be expelled

from the party.”

The Comintern made its position clear: either join on its terms,

involving complete surrender, or become a renegade. Later congresses

elaborated on this communist discipline. In July, 1921, for example,

an order was issued by the Comintern Executive Committee that national

congresses were to be held after the Comintern congresses so that they

could ratify decisions. The Fourth Congress (1922) ruled that all

Comintern delegates should arrive in Moscow uninstructed. Lenin was

determined to make the Comintern the iron fist that controlled communism

throughout the world.

The Third International exercised supervision not only by instructing

American communists who flocked to Moscow but by sending representatives,

or “reps” as they were called, to this country. These individuals would

openly sit in communist meetings, participate in decisions, and issue

orders. The “reps” represented Moscow, and that fact alone was proof of

their communist “divinity.”

The Comintern “reps” contributed to a picturesque period in the history

of American communism. Many were riffraff European Bolsheviks, of various

nationalities, themselves knowing little about communism, who were

hurriedly dispatched to the United States. Often, by their inept actions,

they made American leaders more confused than ever. To gain admittance

to the United States, they often used fake names, false passports, and

special “covers.”

This sounds like a crude system, and, in the light of present-day

communist “diplomacy,” it was. Nobody would imagine an official Soviet

representative so identified in today’s communist meetings or American

communists openly going to Moscow to receive instructions. This “crudity”

has been polished. The same channels of communication are still open, but

more “professional” ways of supervision have been perfected.

Soon after the 1919 founding conventions, the Executive Committee of the

Communist International sent a letter to the two underground Parties, the

CP and CLP. The split, said the Comintern, had harmed the communist cause

in the United States. Unity must be established “in the shortest possible

time.” The letter recommended the calling of a joint convention. The

condition for unity was acceptance of the program of the Comintern.

This meant that personalities must be submerged, cliques ousted, and a

uniform, standardized structure instituted. The concepts of a small,

tightly knit Party (as taught by Lenin) must be put into practice. The

Russian mentality must be imposed on _every_ Party member. The Comintern

was emphatic:

... unity is not only possible, but absolutely necessary. The

Executive Committee categorically insists on its immediate

realization.

In May, 1920, a “unity” convention of the Communist Labor Party and

a faction (led by Ruthenberg) of the Communist Party was secretly

held at Bridgman, Michigan, resulting in the formation of the United

Communist Party of America (UCP). The delegates, as a security measure,

used assumed names. _The Communist_, in a special convention issue,

was secretive: “Sometime recently, somewhere between the Atlantic and

Pacific, between the Gulf and the Great Lakes, two groups of elected

delegates assembled as the Unity Conference of the Communist Party and

the Communist Labor Party.” A Comintern “rep” was present.

Many elements of the Communist Party, however, refused to go along and

boycotted the new UCP. A chief point of dispute between the CP and

CLP was the position of the foreign-language federations: should they

be autonomous within the Party, having the right, if they desired, to

withdraw, or be completely subject to the will of the Party? This issue

touched the very heart of communist doctrine. No Communist Party could

ever allow a member the “right” to withdraw. The misguided members

seeking to retain some of these “rights” were swimming upstream, destined

to failure.

Finally in May, 1921, after another year of bickering, the UCP and the

remainder of the CP formed the Communist Party of America, Section of the

Communist International, at a secret two-week convention at Woodstock,

New York. The group’s program, among other things, provided that the

Communist Party would work for violent revolution, preparing “the workers

for armed insurrection as the only means of overthrowing the capitalist

state.” The convention officially accepted the twenty-one points for

admission to the Comintern. The CP was now a complete prisoner of Moscow.

By early 1921 an “outward” unity was achieved in the communist movement,

but the second problem still remained: bringing the Party into the open.

The Third Congress of the Comintern (June-July, 1921) defined the problem:

The Communist International draws the attention of the

Communist Party of America (unified) to the fact that the

illegalized organization must not only serve as the ground for

collecting and crystallizing the active Communist forces, but

that it is the Party’s duty to try all ways and means to get

out of the illegalized condition into the open, among the wide

masses.

The outline of the Party of today was beginning to take shape, the true

Party conceived by Lenin, having both a legal and illegal apparatus. The

legal aspect would be necessary to conduct communist propaganda among the

noncommunist masses, to infiltrate organizations and operate communist

fronts. But the underground must exist, for the revolution, the final

aim of the Party, could never be anything but illegal. The underground

apparatus would handle espionage, super-secret Party work, and would

always be ready to expand if the legal Party, because of “capitalist”

opposition, could not operate fully. The Communist Party at all times has

desired both an upper and a lower level.

In December, 1921, the Workers Party of America was formed, a “legal”

outlet for the underground Communist Party. The founding convention,

held in New York City, was organized, controlled, and directed by

Party leaders. Acting as a front for the underground communists, the

Workers Party set up “open” headquarters, issued a “public” paper, and

operated in full view. The communist movement now had a dual setup: the

underground Communist Party, affiliated with the Third International in

Moscow, commonly known among members as _Number One_, and the Workers

Party, not so affiliated, known as _Number Two_. They were, however, the

two faces of the same communist coin.

Those were turbulent days in the American communist movement. Party

leaders were grotesque characters, making speeches in underground

meetings, sitting in secret conventions (sometimes in the middle of

woods), or traveling to Moscow. They usually had several aliases for

use on fake passports and in Party correspondence or to be given to the

police if arrested.

Their obsessive love was Soviet Russia. Communists of all varieties

streamed to Moscow. William Z. Foster, Earl Browder, Jay Lovestone,

Benjamin Gitlow, John Reed, “Mother” Bloor visited there. Many had

business: to attend Comintern meetings, to serve as “representatives” of

the American Party, to enroll in a communist school. Others went as plain

sight-seers, to view at first hand this land of “paradise.” Sometimes

whole groups would go, as for example a delegation that sailed in 1927 to

celebrate the tenth anniversary of the revolution.

The visitors were received cordially and treated well unless reason

existed to the contrary. Some actually got to see the great Lenin.

William Z. Foster, telling of seeing Lenin for the first time in 1921,

commented that “It was one of the most inspiring moments” of his life.

They attended Comintern Congresses, talked to high Party officials,

looked around the town. They were being primed for their roles, puppets

to fight the communist battle in America.

Then back they came to tell their comrades of the marvels of this new

land. In speeches all over the country they shouted communist propaganda:

Russia is the only “real democracy” on earth; the working

people are better off in Russia than in America.

Never has the American communist movement expressed itself in more

revolutionary, violent, and bitter terms than in the early 1920’s. Party

leaders shunned the cautious, evasive double talk of today’s communists.

They believed in violent revolution and said so. The underground

communist press was filled with revolutionary statements. One journal

tried to outdo the other in the use of violent language.

The Party was controlled, just as it is today, by a very few. Moreover,

policy, at all times, was subject to the approval of the Kremlin, acting

through the Comintern. Loyal Americans should always remember that the

Communist Party, USA, has never existed as an independent organization.

Soviet control was instituted at the very beginning. Acceptance of the

twenty-one points confirmed the imprisonment.

Party business of the underground apparatus and the above-ground Workers

Party was supervised by the Secretariat, a group usually consisting

of three of the most trusted leaders. A larger group, the Political

Committee of some seven to ten comrades, handled many of the Party’s

day-to-day affairs, such as manipulating a strike, designating a new

Party official, planning infiltration tactics. The Secretariat, elected

by the Political Committee, however, handled the most confidential

matters, items not even brought to the attention of the Political

Committee: the safeguarding of records, receipt of subsidies from abroad,

maintaining contact with Russian espionage agents. These activities were

too confidential even to be mentioned in minutes.

Relations between the Comintern in Moscow and American communists were

almost like those between feudal lord and serf. Moscow wanted to know

everything: the background of Party leaders, how a certain strike was

getting along, the strength of the Party in various localities. The

“reps” did not hesitate to criticize. In one Political Committee meeting

a letter from the Comintern “rep” was read. It contained the following

criticisms:

—Lack of information received relative to the Party convention;

—The Party’s campaign on a certain issue, though going well,

was not strong enough. The “rep” recommended a pamphlet be

written;

—Editorials in the _Daily Worker_ [the Party’s newspaper] were

politically incorrect;

—The Party had not taken a correct position against certain

enemies of Russia.

The minutes of the meeting indicate that a motion made to accept the

letter was “carried unanimously.” The Comintern’s influence was felt in

practically every communist meeting. Every move of the American Party

was watched from Moscow. No wonder a joke making Party rounds went

as follows: Why is the Party like the Brooklyn Bridge? Because it is

suspended on cables!

Besides controlling its over-all policy, the Comintern used the Communist

Party in a variety of ways, especially to help the new Soviet government

in its work. In one instance the Comintern sent over a “rep” known as

Comrade Loaf. He sent a statement, which was read at the meeting of the

Political Committee in New York City presided over by Max Bedacht,

as Acting General Secretary, outlining his need for assistance in

collecting information on the American labor movement for the Communist

International. The Political Committee agreed to help.

In another instance, Moscow referred a request for a visa by an official

of the New York _Jewish Daily Forward_ to United States comrades. Moscow

in these years often used the Communist Party in the United States as a

consular clearinghouse, seeking its advice as to whether visas should

be granted or denied. In answering this request, the already inherent

anti-Semitism of communism dictated the decision. The Soviets were

advised that the visit of the _Jewish Daily Forward_ representative would

be detrimental to the Soviet Union and the communist movement.

On occasions, also, the Comintern helped the Party by arranging to

receive cordially American visitors sponsored by the Party, thereby

hoping to create a favorable impression of communism. A prominent

author, for example, desired to visit Russia for _The Modern Quarterly_.

The Political Committee instructed that a letter be written to Moscow

requesting that he be given a royal welcome. The Party wanted him to be

favorably impressed. Then, it hoped, he would “paint a glowing picture”

of the Soviet Union.

Russian control, moreover, was implemented through the operation of

another institution, the Lenin School in Moscow. This training center was

an adjunct to the Marxist-Leninist Institute. Founded in the 1920’s, the

Lenin School had for its purpose the training of an international corps

of communist leaders. These graduates, regardless of the country in which

they operated, acted in accordance with the discipline and policies of

the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.

Each Communist Party was assigned a quota of students. To be eligible,

students had to have a working-class background with experience in a

trade, shop, or union. They had to be under thirty-five years of age,

either a charter member or a member with at least five years’ experience

in Party work, and possess a “clean” Party record. The Comintern studied

the students’ background and approved those selected by the Party to

attend. As a general rule, students traveled to Moscow under assumed

names and with fraudulently obtained passports.

The original Lenin School was located in an old Czarist palace. Students

and faculty lived under strict security conditions. The curriculum

included not only Marxist-Leninist tactics but the theory and practice of

organization, underground and conspiratorial operations, and the tactics

of revolution and civil war. The students were taught how to erect stout

barricades, conduct guerrilla warfare, and handle firearms. The Soviets

wanted rough-and-ready revolutionists, men who would kill, murder, blow

up trains, and start revolutions.

Many of the top leaders in Communist Parties around the world are

graduates of the Lenin School. The National Committee of the Communist

Party in the United States today includes such graduates of the Lenin

School as Eugene Dennis, Claude Lightfoot, Carl Winter, Simon W. Gerson,

William Weinstone, Nat Ganley, Steve Nelson, and others. Former Lenin

School graduates also include such well-known communists as Betty

Gannett, Gus Hall, Albert Lannon, Phil Bart, Rose Wortis, Loretta Stack,

Henry Winston, and numerous others. The Lenin School became so notorious

that it, like the Comintern, was discontinued. After all, it had turned

out thousands of graduates, and the communists probably thought it had

fulfilled its usefulness.

The American Communist Party began to grow up. From an infant, mostly

mouth and little body, it gradually began to take on shape and form. It

was soon to increase its participation in American life.

5.

_The Party Grows Up_

Prior to 1921 communists in the United States had been so concerned with

their own private squabbles and organizational problems that they had

little time for external activities.

After the 1921 “unification,” however, the Party, although still

weak, emerged with greater stability. It was now being equipped with

two striking arms: (1) the underground Party apparatus and (2) the

above-ground, or “false-face,” apparatus of the Workers Party.

The time was ripe for communists to move in on American life and American

institutions. The first objective was organized labor. Later the

battlefront was to be extended to include all aspects of American life up

to and including activities of the federal government in Washington.

Prior to 1921, by their own admission, communists had not been

particularly effective among trade unions. True, William Z. Foster

had helped found the Trade Union Educational League in 1920, but this

communist-dominated group had made little headway. The Party at that

time had lacked the discipline and training to exploit strikes. Its aims

were usually visionary and, above all, too openly revolutionary. During

the 1919 steel strike, for example, the Communist Party had issued this

proclamation:

THE WORKERS MUST CAPTURE THE POWER OF THE STATE. THEY MUST

WREST FROM THE CAPITALISTS THE MEANS THROUGH WHICH CAPITALIST

RULE IS MAINTAINED.

The answer to the Dictatorship of the Capitalists is the

Dictatorship of the Workers.

No wonder the Party was left in complete isolation. Such impractical

statements were but noise and scared away normal trade-union people.

But the communists soon learned. Gradually they worked their way into

trade unions, and under the name of the Workers Party propagated their

program. Little by little they became more active above ground. In 1924

the Workers Party nominated, as candidates in the presidential elections,

William Z. Foster as President; Benjamin Gitlow, Vice-President. In 1925,

becoming still more bold, the Workers Party changed its name to the

Workers (Communist) Party. The underground Party in the sense of being

a separate organization was discontinued, although, as in all Communist

Parties, a small underground was maintained. In 1928 communist candidates

in the presidential elections polled almost 50,000 votes Finally, in

1929, by discarding the word “Workers,” the camouflage was dropped, and

the Party became known as the Communist Party of the United States of

America.

During these years the communists multiplied labor troubles and

participated in a number of strikes, such as the textile strikes in

Passaic, New Jersey (1926); New Bedford, Massachusetts (1928); and

Gastonia, North Carolina (1929); as well as the coal strike of 1922, the

railroad shopmen’s strike of 1922, and the New York furriers’ strike

of 1926. Moreover, they were becoming more active in other agitational

fields, such as economic problems, race relations, and nationality

groups. The Party, now becoming stronger, was testing its wings in mass

agitational work.

Masters of deceit · 第 4 / 27 段