CHAPTER X

THE COUNTY

I

The “retired” sea-captain, if he had been too free-handed to grow

rich, or had missed his chance of success through practising small

shrewdnesses rather than large, often earned his living ashore as

postmaster, or “deepo-master,” or he ran the tavern, or the village

store that supplied the inhabitants with any obtainable commodity.

In any case, as gentleman farmer or one of lower social rank, he

fitted easily into the life at home which, in comparison with that of

an inland town, was cosmopolitan by reason of constant interchange

with countries beyond the sea. Men had a wider outlook: though they

might never “go to Boston,” which was the minimum adventure of the

community, they were familiar with far scenes discussed of an evening

among the frequenters of post-office or store. And if all sailors did

not become captains, though the contrary may seem to us to have been

the fact, it was the exception when an able-bodied male had not gone

at least one “voyage to sea.” The normal Cape Cod boy looked upon

the ocean as his natural theatre of action. If he could wheedle his

mother into consent, he was off at the tender age of ten, or as soon

thereafter as might be, to serve as cabin boy with their neighbor

the cap’n. It is even said of one child that by the time he had

reached his tenth birthday “he was old enough not to be seasick,

not to cry during a storm, and to be of some use about a ship.”

From the galley he might be promoted to the fo’c’s’le; from there,

if luck and temper served, to the quarter-deck. A captain’s letter

to his little daughter tells us something of the relation between

captain and crew. Discipline was strict, but “the old man” did not

forget that they were all neighbors at home. “We have plenty of

music in the forecastle,” he writes, “but I wish I had you all with

me and the seraphine and then we could have a good sing. There is a

violin-player and one of the best players on the accordion I ever

heard, and they go it some evenings, I tell you, and have a regular

good dance. They have their balls about twice a week, and I can hear

them calling off their cotillion and having a merry time of it. I

wish you could see them going it for awhile. Daniel plays the bones

and a young man from Barnstable is the musician. I like my crew very

much so far and hope they will continue the voyage and improve.”

As cabin boy, forem’st hand, able seaman, mate, or captain, on

merchant vessel or fisherman, every man Jack in the village was

pretty sure to have had his taste of the sea, and thereby was

equipped to contribute his story to the common fund of anecdote. With

truth he could say “I am a part of all that I have met.” And whether

they had followed the sea for one year or forty, or vicariously

through the experience of others, each of them had a tang of “the

old salt”; and their home was set in the ocean as surely as if Cape

Cod were another Saint Helena breaking the long Atlantic rollers

that come sweeping down the world. Many a time, indeed, it must have

seemed to swing to their stories like the deck of a ship, and the

dry land under foot to be stable only because one was braced to its

motion. For most of the men, all the sea ways about the world were

as familiar as the village road around the ponds. Daniel Webster

once wrote some friends in Dennis of a trial in their district when

question arose as to the entrance of the harbor of Owhyhee: “The

counsel for the opposite party proposed to call witnesses to give

information to the jury. I at once saw a smile which I thought I

understood, and suggested to the judge that very probably some of my

jury had seen the entrance themselves. Upon which seven out of the

twelve arose and said they were quite familiarly acquainted with it,

having seen it often.”

Every boy had some grounding in the common branches of study at the

schools which his Pilgrim ancestors had been at pains to establish;

but given the three R’s, his education was expanded in the larger

school of personal adventure. Rich gives a quick biography typical

of the Truro fisherman: “Till ten in summer—a barefoot boy, tough,

wide-awake—hoes, clams, fishes, swims, goes to the red schoolhouse

taught by the village schoolmarm. After ten, on board a fishing

vessel cooking for nine or ten men; at thirteen a _hand_; goes to the

same schoolhouse three months or less every winter till seventeen

or eighteen; graduates. At twenty-one marries; goes skipper;

twenty-five buys a vessel and builds a house, or has been looking

around the world to make a change. Whatever may be the experiences

of after life, the early history of Cape Cod boys could be summed

substantially as stated.”

This matter of an elementary education, in the early days, was

frequently undertaken by men whose work was cut out for them to keep

their own knowledge a little in advance of their scholars. There

was Mr. Hawes, schoolmaster of Yarmouth in the later years of the

eighteenth century, who gloried in the fact that

“The little learning I have gained,

Was most from simple nature drained.”

He had worked on the farm and managed his own schooling when the

only textbooks were the Bible and Catechism. “When the Spelling

Book was first introduced,” he remarks dryly, “the good old ladies

appeared to fear that religion would be banished from the world.”

Hawes, however, undertook the pursuit of the higher learning, and

once had a sum set him in the “Single Rule of Three” that cost him

three days’ work in the solving of it. “I went often to the woods

and gathered pine knots for candles,” he remembers. “At this time I

lived with my aged grandfather, who had a liberal education, but was

in low circumstances, and I could learn more in his chimney-corner

with my pine candle, in one evening, than I could at school in a

week.” Discipline was administered by means of an apple-tree branch,

and “as soon as the master retired from school, every instrument of

correction or torture would by the scholars be destroyed.” In the

Bible class, “while each scholar would mention the number and read

one verse,” the master would be making pens, and the other children

most likely “playing pins, or matching coppers.” Hawes, at the age

of seventeen, had “advanced in Arithmetic about as far as Square

and Cube Root,” and by his own industry “gained some knowledge of

Navigation,” when the Revolution interrupted his studies, and,

promptly enlisting, he served in the land force for three years, and

then took to the sea. He sailed in no less than five vessels that

were captured, but remarks that he was never prisoner more than two

months running; and at the close of the Revolution he felt qualified

to set up as schoolmaster ashore. His account probably gives an

accurate picture of the public education of the day. “I commenced

teaching school in Yarmouth,” he writes, “at seven dollars per

month, and boarded myself, which was then about equal to seaman’s

wages in Boston; and I occasionally taught town and private schools

in Barnstable and Yarmouth, when not at sea. The highest wages I

ever had was thirty-five dollars per month; and the last school I

taught was in Barnstable, and was then in my sixtieth year. Now

I will state my own method of school teaching with from sixty to

ninety pupils, viz: The first and last hours were generally spent

in reading, the middle hours in writing. Those in arithmetic would

read with the others when they pleased. Having one class in school,

every scholar, at my word ‘Next,’ would arise and read in his seat,

till I pronounced the word ‘Next,’ and I often stopped him in the

middle of a verse. After reading around, I would order another book,

more proper for the scholars present, as before, and then in four

or five different books till the hour expired. Then I gave out the

copies and made as many mend their pens as could. If they had no

ink-stands, which was the case with many, I would send one after

shells, and put cotton therein. The ink I found and charged it to the

school. I likewise set at auction who would make the fire cheapest,

say for one month, which would go at about one cent a day. While they

were writing in the second form, I would hear the little ones read

alone, who could not read in classes. Seventeen was the greatest

number I think I ever had of them. When school was about half done

one scholar was sent for a bucket of water,” and then, no doubt from

one dipper, did they all, girls first, then boys, unhygienically

drink. “Those in Arithmetic having books of different authors, got

their own sums, wrote off their own rules, &c. If they wanted to make

inquiries concerning questions,” Mr. Hawes goes on to say, “and the

scholar next him could show him, I would request him to; if not, if

I had time, I would explain the principles by which the sum was to

be done. If he then met with difficulty, I directed him to take it

home, and study late at night to have his answer in the morning. When

I dismissed the school I would examine each one’s writing book....

I was too much in favor of the Friends’ principles to require any

bowing, and left that discretionary with each scholar.”

In schools as rudimentary as this were trained the men whose energy

was to accomplish the greatest prosperity of the Cape. A majority of

the boys were too busily employed in helping to extract the family

livelihood from the soil and the sea to be allowed studies beyond

those useful for such a purpose; yet almost immediately the free

schools were supplemented, at Yarmouth and Sandwich and Barnstable,

by seminaries and academies, where Greek, Latin, French, and the

higher mathematics were taught. In 1840 the Truro Academy was founded

under the directorship of a wise teacher who raised the standard

of education in all the towns about. And there was the Pine Grove

Seminary, conducted by Mr. Sidney Brooks at Harwich, and beloved of

its scholars: for Mr. Brooks not only encouraged learning, but was a

promoter of innocent pleasure. His pupils were to remember Saturday

excursions to Long Pond, sailing there in summer and ice-boating in

winter; and Mr. Brooks permitted tableaux and dancing in the hall,

even were there a brisk revival in progress at the meeting-house

across the way. The pupils of Mr. Smith, of Brewster, who died in

1842, remember that he was “successful in making the dullest learn,”

and also recall that “Ferula disciplinæ sceptrum erat.”

The elegancies of the Early Victorian era—French, deportment, fine

needlework, sewing and embroidery, bead and shell work, the making

of wax flowers, sketching in pencil and watercolors—were taught the

young ladies by private instruction. Their culture was continued

in the Lyceum and Female Reading Society. Anne C. Lynch and Martin

Tupper were the fashion; and they read largely literature commended

in the “Lady’s Book,” to which every household with any pretension to

gentility subscribed. Mr. Godey averred that his magazine should be

“a shrine for the offerings of those who wish to promote the mental,

moral, and religious improvement of woman. For female genius it is

the appropriate sphere. It will contain a new and elegant engraving

in _every number_—also, music and patterns for ladies’ muslin work

and other embellishments.” The Cape Cod female mind took on with

some readiness this shining veneer, but its native vigor remained

unimpaired; and women conducted their domestic affairs, or their

social amenities at home and in foreign ports, as became the wives of

their sailor husbands. At Barnstable and thereabouts domestic service

was supplied sometimes by the village girls, sometimes by the Mashpee

Indians. An old lady remembers her nurse Dinah, a tall, handsome

creature belonging to the clan of “Judge” Greenough, who governed his

people with wisdom and good sense; and she recalls a story of the

days when the mail arrived by post-rider and an old squaw held up the

embarrassed carrier to beg a ride. He permitted her to mount, but,

putting his horse to the canter, hoped to shake her off before he

reached the town. To no end: she clung like a leech, and called out

cheerily, “That’s right, massa. Go it! When I ride I love to ride!”

It is easy to be diverted by such anecdotes. With all their seeming

primness, the people had a rollicking humor, of which countenances

hidden in coal-scuttle bonnets and chins rigid in portentous stocks

were no index.

Manners were at their finest and best, and the expression of them

often bears a charming simplicity of thought if not of word. Such

is Mr. Freeman’s memory of an old lady who had been kind to him.

In a footnote of his history he corrects a deplorable error in the

text: “We were led, by intelligence communicated in good faith by

one whose relations to the person gave to his announcement the

assurance of authority, to state that a venerable and most estimable

lady was deceased. We are grateful that it is an error. Long may

that excellent woman survive, the admiration of her friends. We have

remembered her with respect ever since the day she loaned to us,

then a little boy, a beautifully illustrated Natural History, kindly

proffered with commendations and other encouraging words; and had we

the skill of a limner, we could now portray those features marked

with intellectuality and benevolence when, with attaching manners,

she made her little friend so happy.” Freeman says elsewhere: “If

the manners of the age were simple, they were not rough; nor was the

rusticity of the less influential devoid of that polish which the few

who gave tone to society, unassuming and unenvied, diffused among the

masses.”

All through the clipper-ship era, the importance of the Cape steadily

grew. She built ships at her own wharves and docked them there,

and in the eighteen-forties she even had her own custom-house at

Barnstable, although it cleared but one ship, and the building was

turned into a town hall. Wharves, harbor improvements, lighthouses

were built where they were most needed. In 1830 the Union Wharf

was built at Pamet Harbor by the toil of the shareholders in the

enterprise, each of whom held but one share and each of whom must

wheel his proportion of sand to fill the bulkheads. A committee was

appointed to supervise the work and see that there was no shirking;

and Rich tells us that some of the younger members of the company

were “willing to work harder than wheeling sand” to invite the charge

of shirking and fasten that charge upon some man “who felt that

neglecting his duty was nearly a crime.” At any price they must have

their fun, and lampooned certain bumptious members of the company in

doggerel that followed them to their grave. In 1825 a flint-glass

factory that became famous for its beautiful output was founded at

Sandwich—“glass-works to improve its sand,” is Thoreau’s gibe. The

salt-works flourished, there were several cotton and woollen mills,

banks and insurance companies and newspapers were established.

But the Civil War put an end to this expansion: vessels that were

destroyed then or had rotted at the wharves through disuse were never

replaced; and in any event the war had but given the _coup de grâce_

to trade by sailing ships that the development of steam and rails was

sure to weaken. Cape Cod soldiers who had followed the sea returned

from the war to find their business gone, and many energetic men

had to look elsewhere for careers. They found them; and there is

hardly a great city in the country that does not owe something of its

prosperity to these men and their children. It is interesting that

to-day the old determination to succeed in the circumstances offered

is reviving, and men are beginning to see that they need not travel

far afield to make a living. There is one of the best intensive farms

in the State at Truro; a model farm of twelve thousand acres is

being developed at the other extremity of the Cape; there is a great

duck-raising farm, and asparagus farms at Eastham. And why should not

sheep-raising be revived on the moors of Truro, and Eastham become a

granary once more?

Those men who remained at home after the Civil War became again, for

the most part, farmers and fishermen, and the humble native cranberry

was to do as much for their prosperity as had the salt-works for

their fathers. Back in 1677 the Massachusetts colonists who had

taken it upon themselves to coin the “pine-tree shillings,” sought

to appease the displeasure of King Charles by sending him, with

two hogsheads of samp and three thousand codfish, ten barrels of

cranberries. But it was not until 1816 that their cultivation was

seriously undertaken. Then Henry Hall, of Dennis, first succeeded

with his artificial “swamp”; four men of Harwich closely followed,

and the business grew until thousands of acres were developed, and,

crowded on the Cape, it worked out to larger scope in Plymouth

County. The picture of these swamps, flat as a floor, intersected by

drainage ditches, surrounded usually by wild hedges that teem with

color, is one of the most familiar to the Cape. In winter, when they

are often flooded, they add countless little lakes to the number

summer gives us; or their vines offer the smooth red of eastern

looms to brighten the pale northern scene until spring turns them

green once more. A new swamp shows gleaming sand through the regular

planting of the vines; on one that “bears,” crimson berries, in early

autumn, hang thick on the glossy dark-green runnels. And then the

swamps are charming centres of activity: women in bright sunbonnets,

men in soft shirts and caps, move swiftly on their knees up the

roped-off aisles as they scoop the berries into shining tin measures,

and a good picker earns a considerable number of dollars in the day.

There is the sound of talk and laughter, and the patter of berries

as they are “screened” of refuse and swept into barrels. The sun

brings out the last tint of color, the atmosphere is like a crystal

goblet of heady wine: it is the homely festa of the Cape at its most

beautiful season of the year.

II

From the beginning of the nineteenth century the towns were drawn

into increasingly close connection with the larger world. The mails

came to them first a-horseback, then by stage, then by the railway

which gradually nosed its way to the tip of the Cape. Telegraph

followed railway, and then, until the late war, the great Marconi

station and the cable talked with countries oversea. Freeman

reflects upon the blessings of rapid transportation in his day

when “we are now, in 1859, in more intimate and close contact with

Berkshire and even Maine, in fact with New York and Pennsylvania,

than the Cape was with Plymouth during all the time that it remained

the seat of justice. It is easier from the extremest town on the

Cape now to visit Boston and return, than it was once to perform

the necessary act of domestic preparation by carrying a grist from

Sandwich to Plymouth to be ground. Nor have we forgotten that

important character, the post-rider, who took the entire mail in his

saddle-bags (and lean they were too) and occupied the week in going

down the Cape and returning. The clock could not better indicate the

hour of 5 P.M., than did the regular appearance of Mr. Terry on his

slow, but sure and well-fed horse (the horses of the Friends are

always well kept and sleek, and possibly their capacity for swiftness

of locomotion was never put to the test) with his diminutive

saddle-bags that seemed to challenge the observation of every one

touching the question of their entire emptiness, every Friday

afternoon. The facilities now afforded by railroads, stage-coaches,

cheap postage, &c., contrast strangely with former times.”

[Illustration: THE MEADOWS]

Mr. Swift, in his “Old Yarmouth,” tells us something of those

facilities: “The all-day’s journey from Boston to the Cape is

remembered with recollections of pleasure, in spite of its

inconvenience and wearisome length. Starting at early dawn, and the

parties made up of persons of all stations and degrees of social

life, the stage coach was a levelling and democratic institution. The

numerous stopping places, along the route, gave ample opportunity

for the exchange of news, opinions, and to partake of the good cheer

of the various taverns.” The liquid portion of that “good cheer,” by

the way, was only too liberally distributed, and in 1817 no less than

seventeen retailers were privileged to quench the thirst of northern

Yarmouth. Such abuse led to reform; and a temperance society was

founded whose pledge was not too exacting: no member, “except in case

of sickness, shall drink any distilled spirit or wine, in any house

in town except ... the one in which he resides.” And the town voted

“not to approbate a retailer, but to approbate one taverner for the

accommodation of travellers.”

Thoreau, on his famous journey to the Cape, when inclement weather

forced him to coach between Sandwich and Orleans, was pleased not at

all in respect of the utilities of the towns, but bears testimony, as

a philosopher, to the extenuating attributes of their inhabitants.

The opinion has been quoted often, and is worth quoting again: “I

was struck by the pleasant equality which reigned among the stage

company, and their broad and invulnerable good humor. They were what

is called free and easy, and met one another to advantage, as men

who had, at length, learned how to live. They appeared to know each

other when they were strangers, they were so simple and downright.

They were well met, in an unusual sense, that is, they met as well

as they could meet, and did not seem to be troubled with any

impediment. They were not afraid nor ashamed of one another, but were

contented to make just such a company as the ingredients allowed.

It was evident that the same foolish respect was not here claimed,

for mere wealth and station, that is in many parts of New England;

yet some of them were the ‘first people,’ as they were called, of

the various towns through which we passed. Retired sea-captains,

in easy circumstances, who talked of farming as sea-captains are

wont; an erect, respectable and trustworthy-looking man, in his

wrapper, some of the salt of the earth, who had formerly been the

salt of the sea; or a more courtly gentleman, who, perchance, had

been a representative to the General Court in his day; or a broad,

red-faced, Cape Cod man, who had seen too many storms to be easily

irritated.” In short, Thoreau’s Cape-Codders were cosmopolitan

creatures, men of the world that he was so ready to despise.

Until the railway was continued “down the Cape,” travellers there

were far more likely to make their journeys to and from Boston by the

packets than by stage. “For fifty years,” writes Swift, “the arrival

and departure of the packets was the important topic of North side

intelligence, which was communicated promptly to the dwellers on the

South side, that they might govern themselves thereby in arranging

their business or their travels.” There are pretty stories of voyages

on the packets: of the little girl, wide-eyed with expectation, in

big bonnet and mitts, and a flowered bandbox for luggage, who is

entrusted to the captain for safe delivery into the hands of her

kinsmen in Boston. One old lady, whose histrionic sense developed

early, remembered that once when she was visiting Boston as a child

there was a smallpox epidemic. “I couldn’t help laughing,” said she,

“to think if I had got it and died, how grand it would have been to

be brought home by the packet, me on board sailing up the harbor with

colors half-mast.” There were young ladies setting out for their

finishing-school in the metropolis. And on any trip there was sure

to be a deep-water captain starting out to “join his ship” at Boston

or New York for the longer voyage overseas; beside him, perhaps, his

wife companioning him as far as she might, and when he had sailed

returning to the children and the three years on the farm without

him. Then, when his ship had been spoken by a faster sailer, and

was due to “arrive,” she would go up to the city and wait sometimes

through anxious weeks until it was sighted down the harbor. Nor were

they likely to be idle weeks. “I am so busy I do not know how to

stop to write except it is absolutely necessary,” she might write to

the little flock at home. “It is a great misfortune to have such a

busy mother, but you must make the best of it. I am improving every

moment in sewing, looking forward to September when father’s home for

my leisure.” And, joy to read, she has decided to let them come to

town. “You must come by packet, and you better not make any visits

except to grandmother as you will need all your time to prepare.

Susan must have all her petticoats fresh starched; Joseph must get

his whitewashing done and his garden in perfect order. We shall want

lots of potatoes if father is at home next winter. How does my flower

garden flourish? Fix up the pigstye as I want it ready when I get

home. Fasten the gates strong so the cattle cannot get in, and see to

the water fence. Susan need not fetch a bonnet-box unless it rains

when she goes to the packet. Hang your bonnet up on board and wear

your sunbonnet. Put the things which you will need to put on when

you get here in the leather bag. Remember if it is evening, stay on

board all night unless there is some one on board you know to go with

you. You may think you know the way, but there have been a great many

changes since you were here, and the city looks very different in the

evening to what it does in the daytime.” There are portraits of Susan

and Joseph taken on this momentous visit: elusive daguerrotypes set

in elaborately worked gilt frames. Joseph, in roundabout and Eton

collar, and with the determined mien befitting a future master of

ships, is seated by a table ornately covered. The other half of the

old stamped-leather case, that may be securely clasped by a brass

hook, is occupied by Susan: Susan shy, yet determined, too, clutching

at the same table, her wool dress cut for the display of childish

collarbones, her thin little arms twitched slightly akimbo by their

short tight sleeves; but her necklace is picked out with gold, her

cheeks with pink, and Susan’s wide-set eyes under the primly parted

hair look at you straight, undaunted by the great world.

The captains of these packets that ran out of every town on the

north shore of the Cape had their fun racing one another from port

to port; it is probable some money was lost or won on the results.

Barnstable, even, produced a ballad to immortalize some of the

contestants:

“The Commodore Hull she sails so dull

She makes her crew look sour;

The Eagle Flight she is out of sight

In less than half an hour,

But the bold old Emerald takes delight

To beat the Commodore and the Flight.”

Other packets had the romantic names of Winged Hunter and Leading

Wind; the Sarah of Brewster was as familiar to her people as “old

Mis’ Paine” or “Squire Freeman.” Truro had the Young Tell, the Post

Boy and the Modena. The Post Boy may be said to have been queen of

the bay, luxuriously fitted out in mahogany and silk draperies, and

with a captain who had the reputation of knowing the way to Boston in

the darkest night, and being able to keep his passengers good-natured

in a head wind. Passengers by the Post Boy knew the quality of their

company, and that the run to Boston could never be so long as to

exhaust the fund of stories. “Each told his experience, or listened

with interest or pleasure to the rest, and all sought with unaffected

goodnature to please and profit.”

III

No picture of the Cape could be complete without some accent upon

its men of the learned professions. Teacher, doctor, parson, and

lawyer might or might not have shared the universal experience of the

sea: it depended, usually, upon whether they were importations or

native products. But certainly the memory of them adds another note

to the richness of the general hue. We have met good Deacon Hawes,

the Yarmouth schoolmaster, and the more elegant Sidney Brooks, of

Harwich: they exemplify, perhaps, the two types of early teachers.

Young collegians, working their way through the university, were

for a later generation; and very well, for the most part, did they

train the boys and girls of the district schools. They were absurdly

young, some of them lads not yet in their twenties; but they imparted

knowledge with the same clear-minded determination with which they

were pursuing their own education. Schools of the best quality

that offered, the people of any time were bound to have: Truro, as

early as 1716, placed schoolmaster before politician. They engaged

Mr. Samuel Spear “for the entire year” for the consideration that

he should receive forty pounds salary and “board himself”; then,

“determined to save in some way what they were compelled to spend for

schools,” they voted to send no representative to the General Court,

“because we are not obliged by law to send one, and because the Court

has rated us so high that we are not able to pay one for going.”

Later Mr. Spear served Provincetown as minister.

Of the early physicians Doctor Abner Hersey, of Barnstable, was,

perhaps, the most famous. He came there from Hingham in 1769 to study

medicine with a brother, who, however, died within the year of his

arrival. Very likely the general knowledge he had picked up in that

short association, supplemented by his native judgment and common

sense, his keen observation and power of correct deduction, served

his patients as well as would a more exact training in the science

of the day. He became the leading physician of the Cape, and on his

regular circuit through the towns, the sick were brought for his

healing to every crossroads and centre. He was brusque and uncertain

in temper, and was, withal, eccentric. Freeman judges him “subject

to hypochondriac affections.” “He rejected alike animal food and

alcoholic stimulants; his meals were fruit, milk, and vegetables.

Contemning the follies of fashion, his garments were peculiar to

himself—his overcoat to protect him in travel was made of seven

calfskins, lined with flannel.” As a further precaution against the

searching winter winds his chaise was entirely enclosed with leather

curtains, pierced by two loopholes for his eyes and the reins. There

is evidence that his bed was heaped high with “milled” blankets which

he manipulated, up or down, in accord with the temperature. He was

just, benevolent, shrewd, and his name lived after him. By his will

he left five hundred pounds to Harvard University to endow a chair

of anatomy and surgery; and after his wife’s death the residue of

his estate was to be held for the thirteen Congregational parishes

of the county, the income distributed in due proportion to the size

of his practice therein. And there opened the door of temptation to

the devout: for this sum, amounting to some four thousand pounds,

was to be managed by the deacons and the income expended for such

sound doctrinal books as Dodridge on the “Rise and Progress of the

Christian Religion,” and Evans on “The Christian Temper.” But the

deacons made such good cheer at their annual meetings, which held

over sometimes for two or three days at the comfortable tavern of

Mrs. Lydia Sturgis in Barnstable, that little of the income was left

for the purchase of godly literature. The matter became something of

a scandal, and after the lapse of thirty years the court settled the

estate and distributed the principal among the several parishes.

Doctor James Thacher, who studied with Hersey and served as a surgeon

in the Revolution, died, in 1844, at the age of ninety. Doctor

Leonard, of Sandwich, born in 1763 and practising for sixty years,

had the enviable reputation of being patient with chronic invalids,

prompt in epidemics or “occasional” diseases—in short, a good

Christian and a good doctor. He was succeeded by his son, who links

up the profession, in the memory of the living with Doctor Gould, of

Brewster. Vast, kindly, skilful, sympathetic with his patients to his

own hurt, rather silent, who can forget him on his errands of mercy

as he drove from house to house or town to town in the “sulky” that

was so exact a fit for his bulk the wonder was he must not always

carry it upon his back as the snail his shell. It was an ordeal then

for a child to be stood on a chair and have that Jovine ear applied

to back and chest in lieu of a stethoscope. “Have you a phial?”

inquired Jove of the parent after one such test. Later a terrified

infant was abstracted from the depths of a broom-cupboard. “O mother,

mother, what is a phial?” cried the victim of his fears.

The early parsons were often, as we have seen, of a fine type—English

university men usually, who had travelled far in their quest of

freedom. They were perforce, in the new country, farmers as well

as clergymen, and one of them, the Reverend John Avery, of Truro,

practised, in addition, the arts of doctor, lawyer, and smith. It is

written of him that he “manifested great tenderness for the sick,

and his people very seriously felt their loss in his death.” He came

to them in 1711, and lived active, beneficent years among them until

his death in 1754. These Cape pastorates frequently covered a great

span of years. In its first century the West Parish of Barnstable

had but two ministers. In 1828 died the Reverend Timothy Alden, of

Yarmouth, after a tenure of fifty-nine years. Alden was more truly

of the soil than many of his brethren, as he was in direct line

from John of the Mayflower. He was a man of wit in the choice of

his texts: “Where no wood is, there the fire goeth out,” brought

forth on the Monday his stipulated firewood that had been lacking;

and to a critic he gave answer on the following Sabbath: “The word

preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in them that

heard it.” Mr. Freeman remembers that Alden was the last to wear the

Revolutionary costume. As late as 1824 he saw him at an ordination:

“his antique wig conspicuous, in small clothes, with knee and shoe

buckles, and three-cornered hat lying nearby—objects of interest to

the young.” “He sat there as sometimes stands a solitary, aged oak,

surrounded by the younger growth of a later period. It was to us

the last exhibition of the great wigs and cocked hats; it left also

impressions of a bygone age long to be remembered.”

The pastorates of Mr. Avery, Mr. Upham, and Mr. Damon, of Truro,

covered one hundred and eighteen years. It was Mr. Upham who rebated

fifty pounds of his salary during the hard times of the Revolution,

and gave further evidence of public spirit by travelling to Boston

to aid in adjusting “the prices of the necessities of life.” His

people were ready to raise one hundred dollars for his expenses. Mr.

Upham “left behind him a poem in manuscript, the subject of which

was taken from the Book of Job. He was ever attentive to the real

good of his people, and exerted himself with zeal and fidelity in

their service.” The Reverend Jude Damon was ordained in 1786, and

some notion of the festivity may be gathered from the fact that

Captain Joshua Atkins was voted forty dollars (Spanish Milled) to

defray the expense of entertaining the council. Mr. Damon was voted

two hundred pounds “settlement,” and, annually, seventy-five pounds

specie, the use of the parsonage, fifteen cords of oak wood, three

of pine, and five tons of hay delivered at his door. And Mr. Damon’s

comments upon certain of his parishioners, deceased, are preserved

for our pleasure in his private memoranda. One Mary Treat, dead at

ninety-five, “came from England at the age of fourteen, and was a

person of fine mind and robust constitution. She gave me a tolerable

account of London and Westminster bridges, and likewise observed that

the distance from Dover to Calais was so small that in a very clear

day linen might be seen from one place to another.” Samuel Small

was “a pious and good man whose great desire was to be prepared for

another and better world and to have an easy passage out of this.”

Of the Widow Atkins her “usefulness and activity in sickness and

midwifery will be remembered, and her memory will be embalmed with

a grateful perfume in the minds of all who were within the circle

of her acquaintance.” Another “had a taste for reading both sacred

and profane history.” Another, of enterprising spirit, was “greatly

prospered in his secular affairs, tender-hearted to the poor.” Vivid

little portraits flash out from his page: the husband, “tender and

affectionate, as a father distinguished for his talent of governing

his children, tempering indulgence with prudence; as a neighbor

pleasant and obliging, as a magistrate he was a peacemaker, as a

deacon of the church he magnified his office. He came to his grave

in full age, like a shock of corn cometh he in season.” Mr. Damon

himself was beloved for his tolerance and sweet spirit: of a welcome

guest one could say no more than “I would as soon see Mr. Damon.” But

his memoranda reveal that Mr. Damon had a keen eye. Of one female

parishioner who in her last illness “frequently expressed her desire

to be with her Redeemer,” he remarks, “It is to be hoped she was

as really pious as she seemed.” And of one deceased “professor”

he wrote that he “was possessed of good abilities and powers of

mind. These were, however, much eclipsed by his selfish spirit

and avaricious disposition.” To Mr. Damon’s cure belonged a local

astronomer, unlettered and untaught, a dreamer, who loved the stars.

He knew them all and called them by name, and, meeting with scant

sympathy in his star-gazing, scorned not the humblest disciple. “I

swear,” he had been known to exclaim, “half the stars might go out of

the sky, and nobody here would know it, if it wasn’t for me and Aunt

Achsah.”

The pastorates of Mr. Dunster, Mr. Stone, and Mr. Simpkins in the

North Parish of Harwich included its transfer to Brewster, and

covered a span of one hundred and thirty-one years. Mr. Dunster

married Reliance, daughter of Governor Hinckley, who is said to have

been baptized on the day of the memorable “swamp fight” that ended

King Philip’s War, and received her name in “token of firm reliance

in Divine Power” held by her mother for the safety of the father who

was fighting that day. Mr. Stone, in 1730, inveighs against “a sad

failing in family government—a wicked practice of young people in

their courtships which I have borne my public testimony against”—an

allusion, no doubt, to the ancient betrothal custom of “sitting-up.”

There are interesting cases of parish discipline recorded. In Mr.

Dunster’s time, “the church met to hear a charge examined against

a sister, brought by another sister in the church, the pushing her

out of a pew, and hunching another in time of divine service in

the meeting-house.” And as late as 1820 a committee was appointed

“to keep the meeting-house clear of dogs, and to kill them if their

owners will not keep them out”; boys, likewise, the committee were

to “take care of and keep them still in time of meeting.” No light

task, we may guess, where the boys were segregated in a balcony apart

as if for the special incitement of mischief; nor were boys the only

ones who were irked by those long services. It was the sexton’s duty

to turn the glass at the beginning of the sermon, which must be

ended with the sand, and Freeman remembers the “early preparation

for a determined stampede from the meeting-house the moment that

the benediction was pronounced. Coats were buttoned, canes and hats

were taken in hand, pew-doors were unbuttoned, and diligent and full

preparation was made for a general rush to ensue as soon as the

closing Amen should begin to be articulated by the minister. And

such a babel of tongues and noisy scattering of devout worshippers

as followed was memorable.” Nor is it remarkable that men should

have welcomed the Amen as a blessed release when pews must have been

stools of penance for a full-bodied sailor, or for a child whose

short legs must dangle unsupported, so narrow was the seat, so hard

and straight did the back rise therefrom. Mr. Freeman recalls other

points of the service, that of the choir “tuning their voices—often

with the aid of the bass viol and sometimes violin, during the

reading of the psalm,” and the slamming of the hinged seats of the

pews when the congregation rose for the prayer. It would have been

papistical then to kneel in the house of God, and a man addressed his

Maker stoutly upon his feet; the monotony of the service was further

varied, when the last hymn was given out, by standing with backs to

the parson as if, his contribution duly delivered, full criticism

might be turned upon the choir.

Mr. Simpkins steered Brewster through the troubled times of the

Embargo War, and aided with his intercession the deliberations of

the town as to paying war tribute to the British. Grandmothers of

not many years ago could tell stories of Parson Simpkins, a stately

gentleman for whom the best New England rum was kept on the sideboard

to cheer his parochial calls. But the parson, on such visits, was not

infrequently the herald of disaster: for when a ship arrived with

captain or seaman missing, drowned or dead in some foreign port,

the minister was first notified, and even if his call were only for

pleasure, the wife or mother who saw him coming would have a pang of

dread, and the neighbors say: “There goes Mr. Simpkins—bad news for

some one.”

One of the last of these long cures, running through thirty-five

years, was that of the Reverend Thomas Dawes, worthy successor of

his prototypes, a fine, scholarly gentleman of the old school. The

rounded periods of his sermons were sometimes applied to the case of

his parishioners with a directness that offended sensitive ears, but

is valued rightly in the stock-in-trade of many an urban preacher

of to-day. “We of _Brewster_,” he would roll out with melodious

emphasis. His reading of hymn and Scriptures was a remembrance to

be treasured, his presence in the pulpit a benediction, and who

that had seen him there could forget the shining glory of his face

as he “talked with God.” For the children of his parish, through a

long season, he made Saul of Tarsus a living personality, and the

coasts of the Mediterranean as familiar to them as Cape Cod Bay. He

illustrated his instruction by crayon sketches in color, and the

scholars saw how Gamaliel’s pupils were grouped about their master’s

feet; they knew how a man should adjust his phylactery; and though

there were derision of the High Priest’s countenance, there was no

confusing the style of his breast-plate with that of a centurion. As

he aged, the good pastor became something of a recluse. He loved his

books, and through the years amassed in his little study a collection

that was typical of the best in his day and generation, with a queer

alien blot now and then: for it was said that he could never resist

the blandishments of the canvasser and the appeal of the book in his

hand. Dying, he left his treasure intact to the village library;

nor did he see the necessity for any such stipulation as old John

Lothrop’s that his books were only for those who knew how to use them.

The temporal affairs of these good men not infrequently needed

mending, nor, as time went on, were the clergy usually recruited from

among the natives: Cape Cod men, pursuing their vocations by land

and sea, were likely to depute to aliens the less lucrative cure of

souls. Versatile Mr. Avery, of Truro, seems to have come out well in

the struggle and to have bequeathed a tidy fortune to his heirs. But

Jonathan Russell and Timothy Alden, as we have seen, needed to have a

care to their firewood; and Oakes Shaw, the successor of Russell and

father of the great chief justice, even had recourse to the constable

to adjust the arrears of his stipend. Mrs. Shaw, debating with her

son his choice of a profession, was betrayed into some ironical

appreciation of the clergy which she was quick to regret. “I hope you

will not mistake your talent,” wrote she. “I could name several that

took upon them the sacred profession of divinity, this profession

so far from regulating their conduct, that their conduct would have

disgraced a Hottentot. Others we have seen in various professions who

have been an ornament to the Christian religion. I was not aware till

I had just finished the last sentence that you might construe it into

a discouragement of entering upon the study of divinity. This is not

my intention, for I do most sincerely hope that you will make it your

study through life whether you ever preach it or not.”

Her son chose the law, and gave us one of the two great men, both of

them lawyers, whom the Cape has produced. Palfrey quotes one who went

so far as to affirm that “no spot has made such a gift to the country

as Great Marshes in Barnstable.” There lived James Otis, chief

justice of the Court of Common Pleas in the troubled times of the

Revolution, and there James Otis the patriot was born. James Otis,

the younger, when he grew to maturity, removed to Boston, but he may

be counted a son of the Old Colony and an inheritor of its genius. He

was far more than a fiery orator whose eloquence was the inspiration

of other men’s work; but on a flood of enthusiasm induced by that

eloquence he was carried into the House of Representatives. “Out of

this election will arise a damned faction,” commented a royalist

judge, “which will shake this province to its foundation.” His

prediction fell ludicrously short of the event. Otis conducted the

patriots’ cause with such “prudence and fortitude, at every sacrifice

of personal interest and amidst unceasing persecution,” that the

“History of the Supreme Court of Massachusetts” can declare that:

“Constitutional government in America, so far as it is expressed in

writing, developed largely from the ideas expressed by James Otis and

the Massachusetts men who framed the Constitution of 1780.”

And the man who more than any other in Massachusetts was to perfect

their work, who stands beside the great Marshall in the history of

American jurisprudence, and by the wise decisions of a temperate

mind established the flow of justice through the channel of the

common law, was also a native of Great Marshes. There, in 1781,

when the work of the earlier patriots was accomplished, Lemuel

Shaw was born. Slowly, irresistibly, by sheer force of worth and

capacity, he advanced to fame. He was graduated from Harvard, he

entered the law, and for twenty-six years practised his profession

in Boston. At one time and another he served in the General Court,

he was firewarden, selectman, a member of the school committee,

and of the constitutional convention of 1820; and in 1830, when he

was appointed chief justice of the Supreme Judicial Court, his sane

inheritance, his tempered judgment, his wide experience of law and

of men, had forged a mind perfectly adapted to his opportunity.

In his thirty years upon the bench he enriched incalculably the

sparse records of the common law. In the opinion of a fellow jurist,

“The distinguishing characteristic of his judicial work was the

application of the general principles of law, by a virile and learned

mind, with a statesman’s breadth of vision and amplitude of wisdom to

the novel conditions presented by a rapidly changing civilization.”

The Pilgrims had brought here and practised the Anglo-Saxon

conception of such freedom as is commensurate with justice to all.

“They brought along with them their national genius,” wrote Saint

John de Crèvecœur in his “Letters from an American Farmer,” in

1782, “to which they principally owe what liberty they enjoy, and

what substance they possess.” It was the great American jurists who

developed and adapted that conception of justice for the due guidance

of the new nation.

Shaw lived in Boston, but, unlike James Otis, he never gave up

his hold upon his native town. He loved the village roads and

Great Marshes and the sea. And, curiously, as if again the magic

of the sea’s charm persisted in the fortunes of its children,

Shaw’s daughter married Herman Melville, the author of “Typee” and

“Omoo.” Shaw was fond of children, and used to drive his little

granddaughter about Boston in his old chaise; there is a story of

his being caught by a visitor at a game of bear with the children.

But he could be stern enough on the bench; and a sharp practitioner,

complaining of his severity, was tartly reminded by a fellow lawyer

that “while we have jackals and hyenas at the bar, we want the old

lion on the bench with one blow of his huge paw to bring their scalps

about their eyes.”

Shaw spoke again and again at local celebrations on the Cape. At

one such banquet he might have proposed, or answered, the toast to

“Cape Cod Our Home: The first to honor the Pilgrim ship, the first

to receive the Pilgrim feet; the first and always the dearest in the

memory of her children everywhere.” But it was at Yarmouth that he

expressed best, perhaps, the loyalties of his great heart: “There is

not one visitor here male or female whose heart is not penetrated

with the deep and endearing sentiment, at once joyous and sad, which

makes up the indescribable charm of home.”

Old Cape Cod · 第 10 / 11 章