Unanswered Prayers
The many letters which report that prayers have not been answered made
the examination into that department of the investigation to be most
discouraging until the testimonies were read the second or third time.
Slowly it dawned on the reader that the writers did not know, after all,
whether their prayers were answered or not. A bright light was let in on
the subject by the expression of one who stated that he had prayed for
the means to pay off a mortgage on his home until he had abandoned all
hope and had decided to sell his house to the railroad company for a
siding. In answer to a later inquiry the discouraged petitioner stated
that the jury, to which by contract both parties agreed to leave the
assessment of the "land damages," had given him money enough to buy a
much finer home away from the continual annoyance of passing trains.
Many of the wholly disappointed petitioners closed their complaints or
doleful faultfinding outbursts with the stereotyped quotation,
"nevertheless, not my will, but Thine be done!" To some "the heavens are
as brass"; to others, their prayers did not go "higher than their
heads," and to still others their prayers became meaningless and like
"words called into the thin air." This phase of our topic could not be
followed up as far as a careful investigator could wish, because it
involved so much correspondence and so much delay. But a general
statement of the conclusions reached by those whose prayers had,
seemingly, not been answered can be safely made. They all naturally and
necessarily formed a concept of God by imagining him to be an all-mighty
and all-good man. The human mind seems incapable of forming any other
idea of God than can be obtained from a human model, greatly enlarged.
Jesus knew what was in man when he taught his disciples to say, "Our
Father." Human kings, human fathers, human saints human sinners are
really pictured in the minds of all who strive to visualize the
Almighty, or his Son, or the angels. No Hindu can even think Nirvana. No
mind can meditate on nothing. Everything conceived in the mind must be
like something else. Reasoning from "the known to the unknown," or "the
lesser to the greater," is the only possible process by which man can
know God. So all those seemingly defeated ones had looked up to God as
to a great man, and when he seemed to do nothing in answer to their
requests they concluded that he either did not hear or that he would not
even reply. They did not think, however, of their heavenly Father as
they would of an earthly father who was perfectly good. A good and wise
father must often deny his child the article for which he asks, but he
will not dismiss the matter with a curt denial. He will try to find
something else for his child, as has been already stated in a previous
chapter. The testimonies which asserted that the all-good God had denied
or ignored the requests of his followers were the strongest proofs of
the fact that God had granted their requests. The father who would not
give a stone to his child who asked for bread would not give a stone to
his starving child who asked for a stone. In those seasons when the
attention of the people was centered specially on the results of prayer
there was often heard the expression, "Perhaps He sees that it is best
for me that I should not get the blessing for which I asked." But a
consensus of opinion taken from the mass of correspondence showed a
general belief that there are no unanswered prayers. They believed that
in some other way which was better and wiser God sent his child a more
valuable token of his love.
Those reports gave the student an insight into the popular religious
beliefs of the common people. The theological creeds and formulas which
are found in the libraries are written by talented, studious scholars
who put their own conclusion into print and do not attempt to set out
the opinions retained by the masses. Often a silent congregation retains
a strong belief in some theological idea which the preacher does not
recognize. Often the minister of a church, having the reputation of
being firmly orthodox, teaches theories which are not accepted by his
hearers. Hence, the scrutiny of all that correspondence covering so many
years gave an insight into the faith of the everyday Christian which was
enlightening and helpful.
The testimony came from a much wider circle than the actual membership
of that church, as visitors at the Temple from other quarters of the
earth sent in their accounts of the way the Lord had answered their
prayers. In those letters some remark or some statement often
unconsciously disclosed this belief relating to prayer. Their beliefs
concerning death, the Judgment, the future life, the methods used by
the Lord in his administration, and the occupations of the saints in
heaven most strangely harmonized when a careful digest was made. The
divine plan of salvation and the Creator's purpose revealed in natural
law were sometimes quite at variance with the dogmas of the pulpit. But
the common theories came out so distinctly that a statement of them is a
matter of no difficulty.
The common people connected directly or indirectly with the Christian
churches believe:
That every person lives on as an individual after the body dies.
That the life on earth determines the state of happiness or misery
in the spiritual existence.
That the soul is of the same substance as that of the angels.
That the occupation of the redeemed in the spirit world is the same
as that of the angels.
That the departed persons know one another and keep company with
those they have loved and known on earth.
That they serve God as his messengers to the inhabitants of the
earth.
That they cannot be called nor can they visit the earth unless
especially sent by the Almighty.
That the condition of the wicked or of those unfit for God's
service in heaven is unknown.
That after the Judgment there may come the annihilation of the
wicked.
That heaven is a condition of everlasting progress in knowledge.
That salvation depends on the intrinsic character, and that a
conversion to Christ is a conversion to a godly character.
That many of the ceremonies of the churches are useless, and that
the various denominations should endeavor to unite in some one
federation.
That God is gradually building up a perfect human race on earth.
That he commands his servants to come to his aid in securing that
end.
That the best or only way to fit ourselves for heaven is in the
practice and discipline of helping humanity in the development of a
higher race.
That Christ is a divine Spirit, existing from everlasting to
everlasting, and that his atonement for sinners is a part of God's
great purpose to people earth and heaven with perfect beings.
But the consensus of the opinion which related to prayer and the methods
the Lord adopts to convey his answers should have special notice here.
There was a decided agreement in their imaginative conception of the
way the Lord arranged for the conveyance of his decisions to those who
call upon him.
They hold in common that God is "immanent" in nature, and his replies to
our requests may come as quietly and mysteriously as God's answer to the
farmer who, in an act which is a prayer, places a seed in the ground.
Many testified to their belief that "all things work together" in
producing the effects of prayer on those who love God. Nearly all, also,
believed that God often called an angel to him when the prayer of faith
came to him from the earth, and that he gave the angel personal
instructions to visit the petitioner and aid him or her. The views of
the Bible and its doctrines, according to the general opinion, appear to
be that it is the best book ever written, and that it was inspired by a
purpose so pure and unselfish as to be divine. One old lady expressed
the general sentiment of the entire body when she wrote that, "the
Bible is the best book I know of, and it is the only one which tells me
about heaven, and I don't let any fool of a scholar argue it out of my
life."
The feeling of the average reader of the Bible is decidedly in favor of
the King James translation of the Bible, with the introductive address
to the king omitted. The division of that old translation into short
verses was of great assistance to the memory, and was generally quoted
by all classes. But when the new translation was set solidly in type it
decidedly changed the appearance of the book and added emphasis to an
impression that a new and different book had taken the place of the
Bible. The Bible was largely discarded by the common people wherever the
new version was forcibly introduced. The old translation, with
explanatory notes in the margin, was the ideal Bible for the masses, and
had it been retained the general disappearance of the Bible from the
homes and libraries would have been avoided. The so-called authorized
version was followed by many versions privately translated to emphasize
some creed or belief and added much to the confusion of the common
people. The changes in the wording of the new translation were
sufficient also to make those who had quoted the old version with
confidence doubt the correctness of their previous knowledge, and led,
naturally, to the discontinuance of Bible quotations by those who knew
the Bible best. The popular opinion appears to be that the new
translation was a great hindrance to the use of the English Bible.
The number of readers of the Bible, however, is much larger than the
estimate which many modern writers give. The Sabbath school and
haphazard pulpit essays have not so completely supplanted the home study
of the Scriptures, as has been so often stated. The use of the Bible as
the standard of moral character continues to be the practice of millions
who may not study it closely or may not read it at all. That
miracle-working Book is still a most powerful moral force in all
departments of our civilized life. No patriot or respectable scholar can
ignore the value of the Bible as the highest literature or as the
foundation for all just human laws. The people do believe in it.