MORAL CAUSES OF DREAMING.

“I have had a dream, past the wit of man to say what dream it

was. Man is but an ass, if he go about to expound this dream.”

MIDSUMMER NIGHT’S DREAM.

EV. Listen,—it is my turn to speak.

Like confirmed insanity, the essence of the dream is usually _a want of

balance between the representative faculty and the judgment_; being

produced, directly or indirectly, by the excitement of a chain of ideas,

rational or probable in parts, but rendered in different degrees

extravagant, or illusive, by imperfect association,—as in the dream of

the “Opium Eater:”—“The ladies of Charles I.’s age danced and looked as

lovely as the court of George IV.; yet I knew, even in my dream, that

they had been in the grave for nearly two centuries.”

The relative complexity of these combinations includes the two divisions

of dreams,—the _plain_, θεωρηματικοι; and the _allegorical_, or images

presented in their own form, or by similitude.

If we grant that certain faculties or functions of the mind are the

result of nervous influence, we can as readily allow that an

_imperfection_ of these manifestations shall be the result of

derangement of equilibrium in this influence, as the _material_ function

of muscle shall be disturbed by primary or secondary disease about the

brain; of which we have daily examples among the spasmodic and nervous

diseases of the body.

Referring to the calculation of Cabanis, on the falling to sleep of the

senses, I can readily carry on this analogy to the faculties of mind. We

may suppose that the faculty of judgment, as being the most important,

is the first to feel fatigue, and to be influenced in the mode which I

have alluded to by slumber. It is evident, then, that the other

faculties, which are still awake, will be uncontrolled, and an

_imperfect association_ will be the result.

Thus the ideas of a dream may be considered as a species of delirium;

for the figures and situations of both are often of the most

heterogeneous description, and both are ever illusive, being believed to

be realities, and not being subject to the control of our intellect.

Yet, if the most absurd dream be _analyzed_, its constituent parts may

consist either of ideas, in themselves not irrational, or of sensations

or incidents which have been individually felt or witnessed.

So the remembered faces and forms of our absent friends, faithful though

a part of the likeness may be, are associated with the grossest

absurdity.

“Velut ægri somnia, vanæ

Fingentur species, ut nec pes nec caput uni

Reddatur formæ.”

The Philosophy of Mystery · 第 44 / 72 题