The year 1703 produced a new source of amusement, which is noticed by

_Tutchin_ in the Observator: "But I have some Play-house news to tell

you: the great Play-house has calved a young one in Goodman's fields,

in the passage by the Ship Tavern betwixt Prescot and Chambers-street.

_Observator_--It is in a very good place in Rosemary-lane precinct; I

know no reason why the quality at both ends of the town should not have

the same diversions. This will be a great ease to the Ladies of Rag

Fair, who are now forced to trudge as far as Lincoln's-inn-fields to

mix themselves with quality. The mumpers of Knockvargis will now have

the Playhouse come to them, who were not able to stump it to the other

end of the town on their wooden legs: the Does in Tower-hill Park and

Rosemary-lane purlieu will be foddered nearer home this winter; and

the sailors will have better entertainment for their loose coins than

formerly."

The Grand Jury of Middlesex presented May Fair in November 1703. And

early in the ensuing year, the public mind had been so influenced by

the dreadful storm of November, the effects of which were felt in

every direction, that prelates, the clergy, authors, and in short all

men of virtue, joined in one grand exclamation against the obscenity,

the immorality, and the blasphemy of the stage, which its most ardent

admirers must admit to have arrived at such a height as fully warranted

an order from the Queen to restrain it. At the same period the Lord

Mayor and Aldermen issued a proclamation, forbidding the cruel practice

of throwing at Cocks on Shrove Tuesday; and the Tatler of April 18,

1709, mentions the total abolition of May Fair as far as related to the

exhibition of puppets, and similar contemptible traps for the vulgar.

The Theatre in the Haymarket was opened in 1705, when these strange and

almost impious lines were pronounced as part of the Prologue:

"Such was our Builder's art, that, soon as nam'd,

This fabrick, like the infant World, was fram'd:

The Architect must on dull order wait,

But 'tis the Poet only can create.

In the good age of ghostly ignorance,

How did Cathedrals rise, and zeal advance;

But now that pious pageantry no more,

And Stages thrive as Churches did before."

By Dr. GARTH.

The Theatre in Dorset Garden was taken down about 1709, and the site

immediately afterwards converted into a wood-yard and saw-pit.

Firing at marks formed part of the amusement of a certain class of

people in 1709; and prizes were offered of various descriptions,

particularly one at Islington of a pair of doe-skin breeches worth

3_l._ The terms for the privilege of firing were a subscription of one

shilling each by sixty men.

A most tragical occurrence happened in September 1709, at that polite

place of resort the Bear-garden at Hockley in the Hole. Christopher

Preston, keeper of the Garden, had taught his Bears every thing but

forgiveness of injuries; and this he experienced, at an unguarded

moment, by an attack from one, who not only killed, but almost devoured

him, before his friends were aware of the fact.

In 1710 the publick were offered an exhibition something similar to

the modern moving picture at Vauxhall; it was shown for sixpence and

a shilling opposite Cecil-street in the Strand, and represented ships

sailing out of port, a coach passing over a bridge leading to a city, a

cart drawn by two horses with a woman in it, and many other things.

Matches at Cricket were played for many years on Tuesdays, Thursdays,

and Saturdays, at the Duke of Ormond's head near Lamb's Conduit-fields.

The Tatler of April 25, 1710, advertises a Pastoral Mask to be

performed at York-buildings on the 27th, composed by Mr. Clayton, and

for his benefit, who is there said to have introduced the Italian Opera

into England.

Mr. Winstanley had a "_Water Theatre_," distinguished by a _Windmill_

on the summit in Piccadilly near Hyde-park, "wherein was shewn the

greatest curiosities in water-works, the like being never performed

by any." The hours of exhibition were from five to six o'clock every

evening in June and July 1710, for his widow's benefit. This gentleman

had a house at Littlebury, Essex, where some experiments in Hydraulicks

were exhibited for money.

The following notice was issued in August, "that a Gold Ring is to be

danced for on the 31st instant, and a Hat to be played for at skittles

the next day following, at the Green-gate in Gray's walks, near

Lambeth-wells."

The Bowling-green and Cockpit behind Gray's-Inn garden were advertised

for sale or to be let in 1710; but, though the publick seem thus to

have lost one place of resort, Punch's Opera, under the direction of

Powell, was opened at the same time at the _end_ of Lichfield-street,

where the prices of admission were, boxes 2_s._ pit 1_s._ gallery 6_d._

This exhibition must have been something like the modern Fantoccini;

the figures were dressed in character; and one of the performances was

"The History of chaste Susannah."

A new Cockpit and Bowling-green were opened in March 1711 behind

Gray's-Inn gardens; the Gentlemen of Essex against all Britain, at ten

guineas a battle, and 500 the odd battle.

That the reader may not be bewildered by my conjectures as to the real

nature of the entertainment described in the following advertisement,

I shall transcribe it _verbatim_ from the original Spectator, No. 46:

"Mr. Penkethman's (I suppose the actor of that time, 1711) wonderful

invention called The Pantheon, or the Temple of the Heathen Gods, the

work of several years and great expence, is now perfected; being a most

surprising and magnificent machine, consisting of five several curious

pictures, the painting and contrivance whereof is beyond expression

admirable: the figures, which are above an hundred, and move their

heads, legs, arms, and fingers so exactly to what they perform, and

setting one foot before another like living creatures, that it justly

deserves to be esteemed the greatest wonder of the age. To be seen

from ten in the morning till ten at night, in the Little Piazzas,

Covent-garden, in the same house where Punch's Opera is, price 1_s._

6_d._, 1_s._, and the lowest 6_d._"

The room in Spring-garden now used as a Toy-shop, and for various

exhibitions, was a Masquerade-room in 1711; which amusement was

afforded for half a guinea _per_ ticket, and a concert included. No

person admitted unmasked or armed.

St. George's-fields abounded with gardens, where the lower classes met

to drink and smoke tobacco; but those were not their only amusements.

Mr. Shanks near Lambeth-marsh contrived to assemble his customers

in 1711 with a grinning match. The prize was a gold-laced hat, and

the competitors were exhilarated by musick and dancing: the hour of

exhibition twelve at noon, and the admission 6_d._ At six o'clock

the same. And every evening another portion of the same class were

delighted with contortions of a different description, which had

however the sanction of antiquity; posture-masters are represented in

the illuminations of very antient MSS. and in attitudes described in

the following advertisement: "At the Duke of Marlborough's-head in

Fleet-street, in the great room is to be seen the famous Posture-master

of Europe, who far exceeds the deceased posture-masters Clarke and

Higgins; he extends his body into all deformed shapes, makes his hip

and shoulder-bones meet together, lays his head upon the ground, and

turns his body round twice or thrice without stirring his face from the

place; stands upon one leg, and extends the other in a perpendicular

line half a yard above his head, and extends his body from a table with

his head a foot below his heels, having nothing to balance his body

but his feet; with several other postures too tedious to mention."

Queen Anne was prevailed upon in 1711 to issue her proclamation to

the ensuing purport: "Whereas we are informed that the orders we have

already given for the reformation of the Stage, by not permitting any

thing to be acted contrary to Religion or good manners, have in great

measure had the good effect we proposed; and being further desirous

to reform all other indecencies and disorders of the Stage: Our will

and pleasure therefore is, and we do hereby strictly command, that no

person, of what quality soever, presume to stand behind the scenes, or

come upon the Stage, either before or during the acting of any Opera or

Play; and that no person come into either of our houses for Opera or

Comedy without paying first the established prices for their respective

places. All which orders we strictly command the managers of both

our Opera and Comedy to see exactly observed and obeyed; and if any

persons whatsoever shall disobey this our known pleasure and command,

we shall proceed against them as contemners of our Royal authority, and

disturbers of the public peace." _Gazette, Nov. 15, 1711._

It was in the latter part of the above year that the Spectator first

noticed the _Trunk-maker_, a person who appears to have possessed great

critical knowledge in theatrical affairs, which he evinced by violent

blows aimed at the benches and wainscot of the upper-gallery; in short,

according to the accounts of that valuable paper, his judicious manner

of bestowing approbation with his stick soon made him a popular leader

in criticism, and the arbitrator of applause.

The tradesmen who furnished the several materials necessary for

the performance of the Opera in the Haymarket 1710, supported by

a subscription from the Nobility, &c. were not paid their several

demands by December 1711; in consequence of which they advertised

an intended general meeting to concert measures for petitioning the

Lord Chamberlain, or commencing law-suits against the Manager, who

peremptorily refused payment, although the articles obtained were in

constant use.

The following advertisement appeared at the same time: "Mr. Rich and

others having petitioned her Majesty against an order for silencing of

acting Plays, Operas, &c. under the patents granted by King Charles

II. and touching a forcible entry made by Mr. Collier into the Theatre

Royal; the matters of which having been referred to her Majesty's

Attorney and Solicitor-general to examine; it is said they have made

their report of the facts, and of the right of Mr. Rich and other

petitioners under the Patents being a franchise in fee; and that

speedy application will be made to her Majesty in Council to determine

the same. The Town seems very desirous to have two companies, to

emulate one the other, and create more variety of theatrical diversions

without raising the price."

Almost immediately after Messrs. Clayton, Haym, and Dieupart, prevailed

upon the Authors of the Spectator to insert the ensuing notice, from

which it may be inferred that they had in some degree baffled their

own designs in introducing the Italian Opera: "Mr. Spectator, You will

forgive us professors of musick, if we make a second application to

you, in order to promote our design of exhibiting entertainments of

musick in York-buildings. It is industriously insinuated, that our

intention is to destroy Operas in general; but we beg of you to insert

this plain explanation of ourselves in your paper. Our purpose is only

to improve our circumstances by improving the art which we profess; we

see it utterly destroyed at present, and as we were the persons who

introduced Operas, we think it a groundless imputation that we should

set up against the Opera in itself: what we pretend to assert is,

that the songs of different authors injudiciously put together, and a

foreign tone and manner which are expected in every thing now performed

amongst us, has put musick itself to a stand; insomuch that the ears

of the people cannot now be entertained with any thing but what has

an impertinent gaiety without any just spirit, or a languishment of

notes without any passion or common sense. We hope those persons of

sense and quality who have done us the honour to subscribe will not be

ashamed of their patronage towards us; and not receive impressions that

patronising us is being for or against the Opera, but truly promoting

their own diversions in a more just and elegant manner than has been

hitherto performed."

There was an established Cockpit in Prescot-street, Goodman's-fields,

1712: there the Gentlemen of the East entertained themselves, while

the Nobles and others of the West were entertained by the edifying

exhibition of the agility of their running footmen. His Grace of

Grafton declared _his_ man was unrivaled in speed; and the Lord

Cholmondeley betted him 500 guineas that _his_ excelled even the

unrivaled: accordingly the ground was prepared for a two-mile heat in

Hyde-park; the race was run, _and one of the parties was victor_, but

_which_ my informant does not say.

In the same month a curious Brass Gun was advertised to be shot for at

Hoxton: it was in the shape of a walking-cane, and might be used as gun

or pistol, contained a telescope, a dial on the head, and a perpetual

almanack.

The Spectator, No. 436, enables us to form a correct idea of the brutal

sports of the Bear-garden--the Theatre for the double exhibition of

natural brutes and the degeneracy of human nature. The ridiculous

movements of the bear appear to have been too innocent an amusement

for the populace; they therefore gave place to pugilism and fighting

with swords: the latter _diversions_ were certainly countenanced by the

customs of the Antients; but the tyranny of their government and the

ferocious nature of their people were palliatives that Englishmen could

not plead. Their emperors and senates erected stupendous amphitheatres

for public games; youths were tutored from infancy for gladiators, and

slaves fought for the entertainment of their masters; the populace

were used to see gashes, blood, and death, nay to see criminals rot in

their streets; and the males hardened female feelings by their military

plunder of and cruelty to the surrounding nations. But the British

populace knew not of those horrible proceedings; and most probably

Miller and Buck were ignorant that a Roman state ever existed. We

therefore cannot but be surprised, that so many years were suffered to

elapse before the vigilance of the Magistracy was roused to suppress

the hateful wickedness of a few miscreants who had it in their power to

attract men around a stage to view their fellow-citizens endeavouring

to maim each other; but, however disgusting the recollection that such

things have been, we must rejoice that no Serjeant _now_ dare offer, or

Human Butcher receive, a challenge similar to the following:

"I James Miller, serjeant (lately come from the frontiers of Portugal),

master of the noble science of defence, hearing in most places where I

have been of the great fame of Timothy Buck of London, master of the

said science, do invite him to meet me, and exercise at the several

weapons following: back-sword, sword and dagger, sword and buckler,

single falchon, case of falchons, quarter-staff."

The author of the above paper declares he witnessed the combat the

challenge occasioned; and I shall endeavour to shew it to the reader

in its true colours, divested of that romantic and chivalric air with

which it is glossed in the paper alluded to. Two drummers, whose bodies

were disfigured by the wounds they had received in battle, preceded the

challenger, a stout athletic man with a blue ribband tied round his

right arm, accompanied by a fell dæmon, a _second_ or friend, one who

is described as bearing in his breast that malice which darted amongst

the crowd through his organs of sight, the _crowd_ whose eagerness had

arisen to frenzy; keen expectation marked their features and convulsed

their limbs, motion impelled motion, the stout overwhelmed the weak,

the tallest the short, impatience and anger prompted removals, and

instantly a grand transfer of places ensued: the spectators rushed

from the gallery into the area, and from the area into the gallery;

and confusion reigned triumphant till Buck appeared, when all was

hushed. Now observe the picture: the combatants, stripped to their

shirts, _shake hands_ to show that they kill each other in _good will_,

and prepare to injure and defend. Turn to the spectators, examine their

breasts, what is the result?--Humanity? Pity? Fear? Horror? No: those

passions would have rendered the Bear-garden desolate. The painter

finds but one dreadful chaos, a compound of features expressive of

eagerness, partiality, and hope; not that Miller or Buck may escape

injury, but that Buck may conquer Miller, or Miller Buck. Mark the

issue: Miller has received a dreadful cut in the forehead, and his eyes

stream with blood. Who leaps upon the stage to staunch it, or part the

fiends?--no one. What then succeeds?--a _yell of satisfaction, a huzza

from the crowd_. But, not to dwell on this horrible scene, a gash on

Miller's left leg terminated the combat. "The wound was exposed to the

view of all who could delight in it, _and sewed up on the stage_." One

solitary female shed tears for Miller, and hid her face; but, my author

seems to hint, her humanity was selfish.

A far more innocent amusement was announced directly after the

battle, in No. 533. Mr. Clinch of Barnet entertained the publick at

the Queen's-arms tavern, Ludgate-hill, for one shilling each, by

imitations with his voice of the Flute, double Curtel, the Organ with

three voices, the Horn, Huntsman, and Pack of Hounds, the Bells, &c. &c.

Dawks's News-letter of April 2, 1713, has the following article:

"Yesterday a trial of skill was fought at the Bear-garden between

Henry Clements and Parks of Coventry, _where there was good sport,

hacking and hewing_. It is thought they got 50_l._ apiece, the French

ambassador being there, _and giving them money very liberally_." Soon

after three bouts "at threshing flail" were announced; and a flourish

of "no cut, no bout."

A Renter's share in Drury-lane Theatre was advertised for sale June

1714 (a 36th) the terms 170_l._ for 23 years: 2_s. per_ night for

acting days, and free admission.

The Weekly Packet of Nov. 6 says, "Christopher Rich, Esq. the patentee

of the Playhouse, and a great encourager of poetical performances, died

two days since without seeing his new Theatre in Lincoln's-inn-fields

perfected, which is left to the care, with other legacies, of his

eldest son Mr. John Rich." The same paper adds, Nov. 13, that Mr. Rich,

driven from the Theatre of Drury lane by his rebellious subjects, was

buried at St. Andrew's Holborn from his house adjoining the King's

Theatre, accompanied by several of those who had resisted his authority

when living.

And in the publication of December 18, is the following paragraph:

"This day the new Playhouse in Lincoln's-inn-fields is to be opened,

and a comedy acted there called _The Recruiting Officer_ by the company

that act under the patent, though it is said that some of the gentlemen

who have left the house in Drury-lane for that service are ordered

to return to their colours, upon pain of not exercising their lungs

elsewhere; which may in time prove of ill service to the patentee, that

has been at vast expence to make his Theatre as convenient for the

reception of an audience as any one can possibly be."

The King and his Family were either really or _politically_ partial to

Drury-lane, in preference to the Italian Opera; and visited the former

frequently.

The King's licence under the great seal was granted, in January 1715,

to Richard Steele, Esq. to form and keep a company of Comedians, to be

styled "The Royal Company of Comedians."

The Evening Post of March 19, 1715, announced, "On Monday next the 21st

of March the Bowling-green at Mary-le-bon will be opened, by order of

the Nobility and Gentry."

The Weekly Packet of June 25, 1715, shews in few words the extravagant

patronage bestowed on the Italian actors at that time: "Seignior

Nicolini's quail pipe continues to _lug_ the nobility and gentry by

the ears, who have gone very far on his last benefit night towards

equipping him for another purchase at Venice, he having already built

a stately edifice there near the Rialto, upon which is written, in

characters of gold, _Villa Britannica_, as a testimony that Scaliger's

saying that we are _hospitibus feri_ is a downright untruth, and

falsely imputed to our Nation."

George I. seems to have been partial to aquatic excursions. On the

22d of August, 1715, the King, Prince, and Princess of Wales, and a

numerous party of Nobility, went with musick on board their barges from

Whitehall to Limehouse. When they returned in the evening, the captains

of the shipping suspended lanterns in their rigging, and the houses

on both sides of the river were illuminated; an incredible number of

boats filled with spectators attended the Royal party, and cannon

were continually fired during the day and evening. This amusement is

repeatedly noticed in the papers.

Several years elapsed without the least notice of Bartholomew Fair;

but Dawks's News-letter of August 27, 1715, mentions, "On Wednesday

Bartholomew Fair began, to which we hear the greatest number of black

cattle was brought that ever was known. It seems there is not a public

licence for booths and plays as formerly; but there is one great

play-house erected in the middle of Smithfield for the King's players

(as they are called). The booth is the largest that ever was built,

and abundance of puppet-shews and other shews are set out in the houses

round Smithfield, and public raffling and gaming in the Cloisters

(of St. Bartholomew's Hospital), so that the Fair is almost as much

resorted to as formerly."

I have hitherto described the amusements of the Londoners on _terra

firma_; the frost of 1715-16 enables me to shew how they gamboled on

the Thames when frozen. The following advertisement leads the way:

"This is to give notice to gentlemen and others that pass upon the

Thames during this frost, that over against Whitehall-stairs, they may

have their names printed, fit to paste in any book to hand down the

memory of the season to posterity.

You that walk there, and do design to tell

Your Children's children what this year befel,

Go print your names, and take _a dram_ within;

For such a year as this has seldom been."

Dawks's News-letter of Jan. 14 says, "The Thames seems now a solid

rock of ice; and booths for the sale of brandy, wine, ale, and other

exhilarating liquors, have been fixed there for some time. But now it

is in a manner like a town: thousands of people cross it, and with

wonder view the mountainous heaps of water that now lie congealed

into ice. On Thursday a great Cook's-shop was erected there, and

gentlemen went as frequently to dine as at any ordinary. Over against

Westminster, Whitehall, and Whitefriars, printing-presses are kept upon

the ice, where many persons have their names printed, to transmit the

wonders of the season to their posterity."

Coaches, Waggons, Carts, &c. are said to have been driven over it; and

an Enthusiast preached to a motley congregation _on the mighty waters_,

with a zeal fiery enough to have thawed himself through the ice, had

it been susceptible of religious warmth. This and other diversions

attracted the attention of many of the Nobility, and even tempted the

Prince of Wales to visit _Frost Fair_.

On that day there was an uncommonly high spring tide, which overflowed

the cellars on the borders of the River, and raised the ice full

fourteen feet without interrupting the people from their pursuits.

The Protestant Packet of this period observes, that the Theatres were

almost deserted.

The News-letter of February 15 announces the dissolution of the

ice, and with it the "baseless fabrick" on which Momus had held his

temporary reign. The above paper enables me to conclude this article,

as I began it, with a scrap of doggrel:

Anecdotes of the Manners and Customs of London during the Eighteenth Century; Vol. 2 (of 2) Including the Charities, Depravities, Dresses, and Amusements etc. · 第 7 / 24 段