Efficiency, per cent. 65.9 81.6 93.5 71.6

M. Hagenbach's dynamometric measurements were made by the aid of a brake.

After each experiment on the electric machine, he applied the brake to the

engine which he employed, taking care to make it run at precisely the same

speed, with the same pressure of steam, and with the same expansion as

during experiment. It would certainly be better to measure the force

expended during and not after the experiment, by means of a registering

dynamometer. Moreover, M. Hagenbach writes that his measurements by means

of the brake were very much prejudiced by external circumstances; doubtless

this is the reason of the divergences between the results obtained.

About the same time Dr. Hopkinson communicated to this institution the

results of some very careful experiments made on a Siemens machine. He

measured the force expended by means of a registering dynamometer, and

obtained very high coefficients of efficiency, amounting to nearly 90 per

cent. M. Hagenbach also obtained from one machine a result only a little

less than unity. Mechanical generators of electricity are certainly

capable of being improved in several respects, especially as regards their

adaptation to certain definite classes of work. But there appears to

remain hardly any margin for further progress as regards efficiency. Force

transformed into electricity in a generator may be expressed by i [omega] M

C; [omega] being the angular velocity of rotation; M the magnetism of one

of the poles, inducing or induced, which intervenes; and C a constant

specially belonging to each apparatus, and which is independent of

the units adopted. This constant could not be determined except by

an integration practically impossible; and the product, M C, must be

considered indivisible. Even in a magneto-electric machine (with permanent

inducing magnets), and much more in a dynamo-electric machine (inducing by

means of electro-magnets excited by the very current produced) the product,

M C, is a function of the intensity. From the identity of the expressions,

i²R and i [omega] M C we obtain the relation M C = IR/[omega] which

indicates the course to be pursued to determine experimentally the law

which connects the variations of M C with those of i. Some experiments made

in 1876, by M. Hagenbach, on a Gramme dynamo-electric machine, appear to

indicate that the magnetism, M C, does not increase indefinitely with the

intensity, but that there is some maximum value for this quantity. If,

instead of working a generator by an external motive force, a current is

passed through its circuit in a certain given direction, the movable part

of the machine will begin to turn in an opposite direction to that in which

it would have been necessary to turn it in order to obtain a current in the

aforesaid direction. In virtue of this motion the electro-magnetic forces

which are generated may be used to overcome a resisting force. The machine

will then work as a motor or receiver. Let i be the intensity of the

external current which works the motor, when the motor is kept at rest. If

it is now allowed to move, its motion produces, in virtue of the laws of

induction, a current in the circuit of intensity, i1, in the opposite

direction to the external current; the effective intensity of the current

traversing the circuit is thus reduced to i - i1. The intensity of the

counter current is given, like that of the generating current, by the

equation, i1²R = i1 [omega]1 M1 C1, or i1R = [omega]1 M1 C1, the index, 1,

denoting the quantities relating to the motor. Here M1 C1 is a function of

i - i1, not of i. As in a generator the force transformed into electricity

has a value, i [omega] M C, so in a motor the force developed by

electricity is (i - i1) [omega]1 M1 C1. On account, however, of the losses

which occur, the effective power, that is the disposable power on the shaft

of the motor, will have a smaller value, and in order to arrive at it a

coefficient of efficiency, K1, must be added. We shall then have W1 = K1

(i-i1) [omega]1 M1 C1. The author has no knowledge of any experiments

having been made for obtaining this efficiency, K1. Next let us suppose

that the current feeding the motor is furnished by a generator, so that

actual transmission by electricity is taking place. The circuit, whose

resistance is R, comprises the coils, both fixed and movable, of the

generator and motor, and of the conductors which connect them. The

intensity of the current which traverses the circuit had the value, i, when

the motor was at rest; by the working of the motor it is reduced to i - i1.

The power applied to the generator is itself reduced to W-[(i-i1)[omega]

M C]/K. The prime mover is relieved by the action of the counter current,

precisely as the consumption of zinc in the battery would be reduced by the

same cause, if the battery was the source of the current. The efficiency

of the transmission is W1/W. Calculation shows that it is expressed by the

following equations:W1/W = K K1 [([omega]11 M1 C1)/([omega]1 M C)], or = K

K1 [([omega]11 M1 C)/([omega]11 M1 C1 + (i-i1) R)]; expressions in which

it must be remembered M C and M1 C1 are really functions of (i-i1). This

efficiency is, then, the product of three distinct factors, each evidently

less than unity, namely, the efficiency belonging to the generator, the

efficiency belonging to the motor, and a third factor depending on the rate

of rotation of the motor and the resistance of the circuit. The influence

which these elements exert on the value of the third factor cannot be

estimated, unless the law is first known according to which the magnetisms,

M C, M1 C C1, vary with the intensity of the current.

Scientific American Supplement, No. 275, April 9, 1881 · 第 46 / 67 题