A NEW THEORY OF POCKETS.

DEFINITION _Pocket_, s. the small bag inserted into

clothes.--WALKER (_a new edition, by Hookey_).

We are great on the subject of pockets--we acknowledge it--we avow it.

From our youth upwards, and we are venerable now, we have made them the

object of untiring research, analysis, and speculation; and if our

exertions have occasionally involved us in contingent predicaments, or our

zeal laid us open to conventional misconstructions, we console ourselves

with Galileo and Tycho Brahe, who having, like us, discovered and arranged

systems too large for the scope of the popular intellect, like us, became

the martyrs of those great principles of science which they have

immortalized themselves by teaching.

The result of a course of active and careful (s)peculations on the

philosophy and economy of pockets, has led us to the conviction that their

intention and use are but very imperfectly understood, even by the

intelligent and reflective section of the community. It is, we fear, a

very common error to regard them as conventional recesses, adapted for the

reception and deposit of such luxurious additaments to the attire as are

detached, yet accessory and indispensable ministers to our comfort. Now

this delusive supposition is diametrically opposed to the truth. Pockets

(we must be plain)--pockets are not made _to put into_, but to _take out

of_; and, although it is of course necessary that, in order to produce the

result of withdrawal, they be previously furnished with the wherewithal to

withdraw, yet the process of insertion and supply is only carried on for

the purpose of assisting the operation of the system.

And having, we trust, logically established this point, we shall hazard no

incautious position in asserting that the man who empties a pocket,

fulfils the object for which it was founded and established. And although,

unhappily, a prejudice still exists in the minds of the uneducated, in

favour of emptying their own pockets themselves, it must be evident that

none but a narrow mind can take umbrage at the trifling acceleration of an

event which must inevitably occur; or would desire to appropriate the

credit of the distribution, as well as to deserve the merit of the supply.

We perceive with concern and apprehension, that pockets are gradually

falling into disuse. To use the flippant idiom of the day, they are going

out! This is an alarming, as well as a lamentable fact; and one, too,

strikingly illustrative of the degeneracy of modern fashions. Whether we

ascribe the change to a contemptuous neglect of ancestral institutions, or

to an increasing difficulty in furnishing the indispensable attributes of

the pocket, it is alike indicative of a crisis; and we confess that it is

matter of astonishment to us, that in these days of theory and hypothesis,

no man has ventured to trace the distress and the ruin now impending over

the country, to the increasing disrespect and disuse of--pockets.

By way of approving our conjecture, let us contrast the garments of the

hour with those of England in the olden time--long ago, when boards smoked

and groaned under a load of good things in every man's house; when the

rich took care of the poor, and the poor took care of themselves; when

husband and wife married for love, and lived happily (though that must

have been very long ago indeed); the athletic yeoman proceeded to his

daily toil, enveloped in garments instinct with pockets. The ponderous

watch--the plethoric purse--the massive snuff-box--the dainty

tooth-pick--the grotesque handkerchief; all were accommodated and

cherished in the more ample recesses of his coat; while supplementary fobs

were endeared to him by their more seductive contents: _as_ ginger

lozenges, love-letters, and turnpike-tickets. Such were the days on which

we should reflect with regret; such were the men whom we should imitate

and revere. Had such a character as we have endeavoured feebly to sketch,

met an individual enveloped in a shapeless cylindrical tube of pale

Macintosh--impossible for taste--incapable of pockets--indefinite and

indefinable--we question whether he would have regarded him in the light

of a maniac, an incendiary, or a foreign spy--whether he would not have

handed him immediately over to the exterminators of the law, as a being

too depraved, too degraded for human sympathy. And yet--for our prolixity

warns us to conclude--and yet the festering contagion of this baneful

example is now-a-days hidden under the mask of fashion. FASHION! and has

it indeed come to this? Is fashion to trample on the best and finest

feelings of our nature? Is fashion to be permitted to invade us in our

green lanes, and our high roads, under our vines and our fig-trees,

without hindrance, and without pockets? For the sake of human nature, we

hope not--for the sake of our bleeding country, we hope not. No! "Take

care of your pockets!" is one of the earliest maxims instilled into the

youthful mind; and emphatically do we repeat to our

fellow-countrymen--Englishmen, take care of your pockets!

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 1, September 18, 1841 · 第 30 / 48 题