PUNCH AT THE ART-UNION EXHIBITION AGAIN

Limited space in our last number prevented our noticing any other than the

Sleeping Beauty; and, as there are many other humorous productions

possessing equal claims to our attention in the landscape and other

departments of art, we shall herein endeavour to point out their

characteristics--more for the advantage of future purchasers than for the

better and further edification of those whose meagre notions and tastes

have already been shown. And as the Royal Academicians, par courtesy,

demand our first notice, we shall, having wiped off D. M'Clise, R.A., now

proceed, baton in hand, to make a few pokes at W.F. Witherington, R.A.,

upon his work entitled "Winchester Tower, Windsor Castle, from Romney

Lock."

This is a subject which has been handled many times within our

recollection, by artists of less name, less fame, and less pretensions to

notice, if we except the undeniable fact of their displaying infinitely

more ability in their representations of the subject, than can by any

possibility be discovered in the one by W. F. Witherington, R.A. If our

remarks were made with an affectionate eye to the young ladies of the

satin-album-loving school, we should assuredly style this "a duck of a

picture"--one after their own hearts--treated in mild and undisturbed

tones of yellow, blue, and pink--and what yellows! what blues! and what

pinks! Some kind, superintending genius of landscape-painting evidently

prepared the scene for W.F. Witherington, R.A. It displays nothing of the

vulgar every-day look of nature, as seen at Romney Lock, or any other

spot; not a pebble out of its place--not a leaf deranged--here are bright

amber trees, and blue metallic towers, prepared gravel-walks, and figures

nicely cleaned and bleached to suit; it is, in truth, the most genteel

landscape ever looked on. Nothing but absolute needlework can create more

wonderment. Fie! fie! get thee hence, W.F. Witherington, R.A.

Just placed over the last-mentioned picture, and, doubtlessly so arranged

that the gentle R.A. should find that, although his bright specimen of

mild murder may be adjudged the worst in the collection, still there are

others worthy of being classed in the same order of oddities. Behold No.

19, entitled, "Landscape--Evening--J.F. Gilbert," and selected by Mr. John

Bullock from the Royal Academy. "What's in a name?" In the charitable hope

that there is a chance of this purchaser being toned down in the course of

time, after the same manner that pictures are, and, by that process,

display more sobriety, we most humbly offer to Mr. B. our modest judgment

upon his selection (not upon his choice, but upon the thing chosen). That

it is a landscape we gloomily admit; but that it represents "Evening" we

steadily deny. The exact period of the day, after much puzzling and

deliberation, we cannot arrive at; one thing yet we are assured of--that

it has been painted in company with a clock that was either too fast or

too slow. The composition, which has very much the appearance of the

by-gone century, is a prime selection from the finest parts of those very

serene views to be found adorning the lowest interiors of wash-hand

basins, with a dash from the works of Smith of Chichester, whose mental

elevation in his profession was only surpassed by the high finish of his

apple-trees, and the elaborate nothingness of his general choice of

subject. In the foreground of the picture, the artist has, however, most

aptly introduced the two vagabonds invariably to be seen idling in the

foregrounds of landscapes of this class--two rascally scouts who have put

in appearance from time immemorial; they are here just as in the works

alluded to, the one sitting, the other of course standing, and courteously

bending to receive the remarks of his friend. By the side of the stream,

which flows through (or rather takes up) the middle of the picture, and

immediately opposite to the two everlastings, is a little plain-looking

agriculturist, who appears to be watching them. He is in the careless and

ever-admitted picturesque position of leaning over a garden fence; but

whether the invariables are aware of the little gentleman, and are

consequently conversing in an undertone, we leave every beholder to

speculate and settle for himself. Behind the worthy small farmer, and

coming from the door of his residence, most cleverly introduced, is his

wife (we know it to represent the wife, from the clear fact of the lady's

appearance being typical of the gentleman's), who is in the act of

observing that the children are waiting his presence at table, and adding,

no doubt, that he had better come in and assist her in the

cabbage-and-bacon duties of the repast, than lose his time and annoy the

family.

We must now draw the spectator from the above-mentioned objects to a

little piscatorial sportsman, who, apart from them, and in the retirement

of his own thoughts upon worms, ground-bait, and catgut, lends his aid,

together with a lively little amateur waterman, paddling about in a little

boat, selfishly built to hold none other than himself--a hill rising in

the middle ground, and two or three minor editions of the same towards the

distance, carefully dotted with trees, after the fashion of a ready-made

portable park from the toy _depot_ in the Lowther Arcade--two bee-hives, a

water-mill, some majestic smoke, something that looks like a skein of

thread thrown over a mountain, and the memorable chiaro-scuro, form the

interesting episodes of this glorious essay in the epic pastoral.

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 1, September 18, 1841 · 第 28 / 48 题