CHAPTER XXIV

THE UPTILT OF THE LAND AT THE CLOSE OF THE ICE AGE

=The response of the earth’s shell to its ice mantle.=—There is now

good reason to believe that the earth’s outer shell makes a response by

oscillations of level due to the loading by ice, on the one hand, and

to the removal of this burden upon the other. We know, at least, that

both in northern Europe and in North America areas which have undergone

depression during and elevation after the ice age, correspond closely

to the regions which were ice covered. Wherever in these regions there

was high relief before the advent of the ice, river valleys were

drowned at the land margins and were also gouged out into troughs

through erosion by the outlet tongues upon the margin of the ice sheet.

Such furrowed and half-submerged valleys have a characteristic U-shaped

section, so that their walls rise precipitously from the sea. From

their typical occurrence in Scandinavian countries the name _fjord_ has

been applied to them.

It is now no less clear that the removal of the ice blanket brought

from the earth a relatively quick response in uplift, which began

before the ice front had retired across the present international

boundary of the United States, and that this uplift continued until the

final disappearance of the ice. A far slower elevation of a somewhat

different nature has continued, even to the present day.

It is obvious that at the time of their formation all shore lines

referable to the work of waves must have been horizontal, and hence

any variations from a perfect level which they reveal to-day must

indicate that a tilting movement of the ground has occurred since the

waters departed from their basins. We have thus provided for us in the

positions of these ancient water planes, particularly because of their

wide extent, a complete record the refinement of which is not easily

overstated. Interpreting this record, we find that it was the uptilt

of the land to the northward which brought the glacial lake history to

an end and inaugurated the present system of St. Lawrence drainage. The

outlet of the Nipissing Great Lakes is to-day more than a hundred feet

above the level of the outlet at Port Huron, where the upper lakes are

now discharging their waters, and this difference in level can only

be ascribed to an upward tilting of the land since the latest of the

glacial lake stages.

=The abandoned strands as they appear to-day.=—The traveler by steamer

upon the upper lakes, as he comes within view of each rocky headland,

may note how the profile against the horizon is notched by a series of

steps or terraces (Fig. 368), and if he has followed the discussion in

previous chapters, he will suspect that these terraces mark the now

abandoned shore lines which have come to their present position through

a series of uplifts of the ground accompanied by earthquake shocks. As

his steamer skirts the shore he may chance to note a cave within the

rock cliff which represents the now elevated sea-arch of an ancient

shore.

[Illustration:

FIG. 368.—The notched rock headland of Boyer Bluff between Green Bay

and Lake Michigan (after Goldthwait).]

Disembarking from the steamer and traveling inland at any point where

the shores are high, the traveler is certain to come upon still more

convincing proofs of the ancient strands; perhaps in a storm beach of

the unmistakable “shingle”, half buried though it may be under dunes

of newly drifted sand, or possibly at higher levels the highway has

been cut through a shingle barrier as fresh and unmistakable as though

formed upon the present shore. Sometimes it is the rock cliff and

terrace, at other times barrier ridges of shingle, or, again, it is the

sloping cliff and terrace cut in the drift deposits; but of whatever

sort, if studied with proper regard to the topography of the district,

the evidence is clear and unmistakable.

=The records of uplift about Mackinac Island.=—Nowhere are the records

of the recent uplift of the lake region more easily read than about

Mackinac Island in the straits connecting Lake Michigan with Lake

Huron. Approaching the island by steamer from St. Ignace, its profile

upon the horizon is worthy of remark (Fig. 369). From a central crest

broken by minor irregularities and bounded on all sides by a cliff, the

island profile slopes gently away to a still lower cliff, below which

is another terrace.

[Illustration:

FIG. 369.—View of Mackinac Island from the direction of St. Ignace.

The irregular central portion is the only part of the island that was

not submerged in Lake Algonquin. The terrace at its base is the old

shore line of Lake Algonquin, and the lower terrace the strand of Lake

Nipissing (after a photograph by Taylor).]

[Illustration:

FIG. 370.—The “Sugar Loaf”, a stack near the shore of Lake Algonquin,

as it is seen from the observatory upon Mackinac Island (after a

photograph by Taylor).]

When we have reached the island and have climbed to the summit, we

there find the surface which is characteristic of erosion by running

water, whereas at lower levels are found the forms carved or molded

by the action of waves. This central “island”, superimposed upon the

larger island, is all that rose above Lake Algonquin, the earliest of

the glacial lakes in this northern district; and as we look out from

the observatory upon the summit, it is easy to call up a picture of the

country when the lake stood at the base of this highest cliff. To the

northward one sees the “Sugar Loaf” rise out of a sea of foliage, as it

formerly did from the waters of Lake Algonquin (Fig. 370). It is a huge

stack near the former island shore. If we turn now to the southward and

direct our gaze toward the Fort, we encounter a veritable succession of

beach ridges formed of shingle and ranged like a series of waves within

the cleared space of the “Short Target Range” (Fig. 371). These ridges

mark each a stage within a series of successive uplifts which have

brought the island to its present height.

[Illustration:

FIG. 371.—View from the observatory upon Mackinac Island across the

“Short Target Range” toward the Fort. Beach ridges appear in succession

within the cleared space (after a photograph by Rossiter).]

[Illustration: FIG. 372.—Notched stack of the Nipissing Great Lakes at

St. Ignace (after a photograph by Taylor).]

[Illustration:

FIG. 373.—Series of diagrams to illustrate the evolution of ideas

concerning the uplift of the lake region since the ice age. _A_,

simple northerly up-canting (Gilbert): _B_, northerly acceleration of

the up-canting (Spencer and Upham); _C_, northerly “feathering out”

of beaches (Spencer and Upham); _D_, hinge, line of up-canting found

within the lake region (Leverett); _E_, multiple and northwardly

migrating hinge lines of up-canting (Hobbs).]

If now we descend from our position and visit the “battlefield”, we

find there a great ridge of level crest, behind which the British

force was stationed in its defense of the island in 1812. Near by in

the woods is Pulpit Rock, a strikingly perfect stack of the Nipissing

Lake. Across the straits at St. Ignace is an even finer example of the

notched stack (Fig. 372). Other less prominent beaches, but all later

than the Nipissing Lakes, intervene between this level and the present

shore to mark the stages in the continued uplift of the land.

=The present inclinations of the uplifted strands.=—It is not enough

that we should have recognized the marks of former shores now at

considerable elevations above the existing lakes; if we are to know

the nature of the uplift, we must prepare accurate maps based upon

measurements by precise leveling at many localities. Such methods are,

however, of comparatively recent application in this field; and, as in

the investigation of so many other problems, the earlier observations

were largely of the nature of reconnaissances with the elevation of

beaches estimated by comparatively crude methods only. The evolution of

ideas concerning the uptilt has, therefore, been a gradual one.

[Illustration:

FIG. 374.—Map of the Great Lakes region to show isobases and hinge

lines of uptilt. _a_, isobase of the Chicago outlet; _b_, main hinge

line of the Lake Whittlesey beach (Leverett); _b^1_, hinge line of the

Lake Warren beach (Taylor); _c_, isobase of the Port Huron outlet; _d_,

main hinge line of highest Algonquin beach (Goldthwait); _e_, _f_,

_g_, _h_, additional hinge lines of Algonquin beaches in Door County

peninsula (Hobbs); _l_, isobase of the Lake Superior outlet for the

Algonquin beaches (Leverett): _m_, isobase of the same outlet for the

Nipissing beaches (Leverett).]

It was early observed that the beaches corresponding to a given

lake stage were higher to the northward and northeastward, and the

natural conclusion from this was that the earth’s crust had here been

canted like a trap door (Fig. 373, _A_). As we are to see, this but

half-correct assumption has led to a striking prophecy relating to

future changes within the lake region which we now know to be without

warrant in the facts. Later it was learned that the uptilt of the lake

beaches is much accelerated to the northward (Fig. 373, _B_), and that

new beaches make their appearance from beneath others as we proceed in

this direction—there is a “feathering out” of beaches to the northward

(Fig. 373, _C_).

=The hinge lines of uptilt.=—Still later in the study of the region,

it was learned that the axis or fulcrum about which the region has been

uptilted, instead of lying to the southward of the lake district, as

had been assumed by Gilbert, lay within the region and about halfway up

the basin of Lake Michigan (Fig. 373, _D_, and Fig. 374). Similarly, in

the uptilt which followed the ice retreat in northern Europe a definite

hinge line of movement has been discovered.

Lastly, it has been shown, as a result of the use of precise leveling

methods, that not one but several hinge lines of movement lie within

the region, and that the separate sections into which they divide the

area are each in turn characterized by increased up-cant as we proceed

to the northward (Fig. 373, _E_ and Fig. 374).

[Illustration:

FIG. 375.—Series of idealistic diagrams to indicate the nature of the

quick recovery of the crust by uplift in blocks unloaded of the ice in

succession. A further and slower uptilt, added after the completion of

the first movement, is brought out in the last diagram (_b_´).]

The beaches of Lake Maumee, the earliest of the series of lakes within

the Huron-Erie lobe and within the extreme southern portion of the

Great Lakes area, show only the slightest possible northerly uptilt,

and the well-marked hinge line disclosed in the Whittlesey beach is

evidence that the elastic recoil, as it were, from the weight of

the mantling glacier did not begin until after the draining of Lake

Whittlesey. The determination by Taylor that there is a similar initial

hinge line in the Warren beach—that this strand begins its uptilt some

fifteen miles farther northeast than does the Whittlesey beach—is

one of the greatest importance in obtaining a correct idea of the

recent uplift; for it shows that the draining of Lake Whittlesey was

followed by a period of quick uplift and seismic activity, that the

stage of Lake Warren was one of comparative stability of the land,

and, lastly, that the draining of Lake Warren was followed by a second

period of rapid uplift and earthquake disturbance. The strongly marked

hinge lines, additional to the initial one indicated for the Algonquin

beaches in the profiles by Goldthwait from the west shore of Lake

Michigan, when considered in the light of this northeasterly migration

of the still earlier hinge line in the southern district, are best

explained through the assumption of a succession of quick recoveries of

the crust by uplift, separated by periods of relative stability, and

brought on by the removal in turn of the ice burden from successive

blocks of the shell which are separated by the several hinge lines

(Fig. 375).

The elaborate study of erosion in the outlet of Lake Agassiz had

indicated identical interruptions in the up-canting process for that

basin.

=Future consequences of the continued uptilt within the lake

region.=—One of the most distinguished of American geologists, Dr.

G. K. Gilbert, in order to determine whether the uptilt revealed by

canted beach lines is still in progress, carried out an elaborate

study upon the gauge records preserved at the various gauging stations

about the Great Lakes. Upon the basis of these studies, he concluded

that the uplift continues, that the axes of equal uplift (isobases)

take their course about fifteen degrees north of west, so that the

lines of greatest uptilt should be perpendicular to this direction,

or fifteen degrees east of north. He further believed that the basin

was undergoing an up-cant in the simple manner of a trap door, the

hinge of which lay to the southward of Chicago, and the study of the

gauge records led him to believe that “the rate of change is such

that the two ends of a line one hundred miles long and lying in a

south-southwest direction are relatively displaced four tenths of a

foot in one hundred years.”

=Gilbert’s prophecy of a future outlet of the Great Lakes to the

Mississippi.=—The _natural_ rock sill, over which the waters of Lake

Chicago once flowed to the Mississippi, is to-day but eight feet above

the common mean level of Lakes Michigan and Huron, and if the tilting

of the lake region were to continue upon Gilbert’s assumption of a

canting plane with the hinge of the movement to the south of Chicago, a

time must come when the “Chicago outlet” will again come into use and

the lakes once more drain to the Mississippi and the Gulf. Upon the

basis of his measurements, Gilbert ventured the prophecy that the first

high-water discharge into the Mississippi should occur in from five

hundred to six hundred years, and for continuous discharge in fifteen

hundred years. In twenty-five hundred years Niagara Falls should at low

water stages be dry from this cause, and in thirty-five hundred years

it should have become extinct.

This prophecy, emanating from a high scientific authority and relating

to changes of such profound economic and commercial importance,

has been often quoted and has taken a firm hold upon the popular

imagination. Obviously, it depends upon the now exploded theory that

the lake basin has been canted _as a plane_ and that the axis of uptilt

lies somewhere to the southward of the lake region, or, in any event,

to the southward of the present Port Huron outlet. We know to-day that

instead of being uniformly distributed over the entire lake region,

the uptilting goes on at a much higher rate within the northern areas,

and that since the early stage of Lake Whittlesey the hinge line of

uplift has been steadily migrating northward with the retreat of the

ice and is now well to the northward of the present outlet. There is,

therefore, no known uptilt of the district which separates the present

from the former Chicago outlet, and there is no apparent natural

cause which should result in the reoccupation of the old outlet to

the Mississippi. The prophecy must be regarded as one that has been

outgrown with the progress of science.

=Geological evidences of continued uplift.=—It has recently been

claimed, on the basis of a reëxamination of Gilbert’s study of the

lake gauge records, that his methods are open to serious criticism and

that in reality the figures afford no evidence of continued uplift

of the region. However this may be, there are not lacking geological

evidences which do not admit of doubt, and these are in a striking way

confirmatory of the latest conclusions upon the manner of the recent

uplift.

If our conclusions have been correct, the several lake basins should

now be behaving in different ways as regards the changes upon

their shores. If it is true that the lines of greatest uptilt run

north-northeasterly, there should be, speaking broadly, a “spilling

over” of waters upon the south-southwesterly shores and a laying bare

of the north-northeasterly shore terraces of the basins. This should,

however, be true only of basins whose outlets are to the northeastward

of the existing main hinge line of uptilt. Lake Huron, having its

outlet at the southern margin of its basin, should not have its waters

encroaching upon the southern shore, for the simple reason that any

continued uptilt of the basin can only have the effect of pouring more

water through the outlet. Lake Michigan and Saginaw Bay, which are

arms of the Huron basin, ought, however, to become flooded upon their

southern shores, _were it not that the hinge line of uptilt to-day lies

to the northward of the outlet at Port Huron, and, further, that the

two connecting channels still have their beds lower than the sill of

the outlet channel_. Now the evidence goes to show that no encroachment

of waters is occurring upon the Chicago shore of Lake Michigan, and

although the shores of Saginaw Bay are so excessively flat as to reveal

slight changes of level by large migrations of the strand, yet the

ancient meander posts fixed by the early surveys are still found near

the water’s edge.

=Drowning of southwestern shores of Lakes Superior and Erie.=—Within

the basins occupied by Lakes Superior and Erie, a wholly different

condition is found. In each case the outlet is found to the

northeastward (Fig. 374, p. 345), and the northwesterly trend of the

isobases from these outlets is responsible for a continued elevation

from uptilt of the outlets with reference to the western and southern

shores. In consequence, the waters are encroaching upon these shores,

and rivers which there enter the lake are drowned at their mouths, with

the formation of estuaries. Upon Lake Superior these changes are very

marked near Duluth and particularly in the St. Louis River, within

which, since the early treaty with the Indians, certain rapids have

disappeared and submerged trunks of trees are now found in the channel

of the river. As far east as Ontonagon essentially the same conditions

are found.

Upon the shores within the Porcupine Mountain district, the waters are

clearly rising. Here old cedar trees may be seen, in some cases dead

but still upright and standing in from six to eight inches of water a

number of feet out from the present shore, while others near the shore,

but upon the land and still living, are washed by the waves, and losing

their lower bark in consequence. An old road along the shore has had to

be abandoned because of the encroaching water.

Upon the opposite or northeastern shore of the lake, on the other hand,

the land is everywhere rising out of the water, and the waves are now

building storm beaches well out upon the wave-cut terrace. Here the

streams, instead of forming estuaries by drowning, drop down in rapids

to the level of the lake.

[Illustration:

FIG. 376.—Portion of the Inner Sandusky Bay, to afford a comparison of

the shore line of 1820 with that of to-day (after Moseley).]

At the southwestern margin of Lake Erie there is everywhere evidence of

a rapid encroachment by the water. In the caves of South Bass Island

stalactites, which must obviously have formed above the lake level, are

now permanently submerged. It is, however, about Sandusky Bay upon the

southwest shore that the most striking observations have been made.

Moseley has collected historical records of the killing of forest

trees through a submergence which was the result of an advance of the

water upon the shores. It seems to be proven from his studies that the

water is now rising in Sandusky Bay at a rate of about 2.14 feet per

century. In Fig. 376 there is a comparison of the shores of the inner

bay separated by an interval of about ninety years.

READING REFERENCES FOR CHAPTER XXIV

Uptilt in basin of Lake Agassiz:—

WARREN UPHAM. The Glacial Lake Agassiz, Mon. 25, U. S. Geol. Surv.,

pp. 474-522.

Uptilt in Laurentian Basin:—

G. K. GILBERT. Recent Earth Movement in the Great Lakes Region, 18th

Ann. Rept. U. S. Geol. Surv., 1898, Pt. ii, pp. 595-647.

J. W. SPENCER. Deformation of the Algonquin Beach, etc., Am. Jour.

Sci. (3), vol. 41, 1891, pp. 14-16.

F. B. TAYLOR. The Highest Old Shore Line of Mackinac Island, Am. Jour.

Sci. (3), vol. 43, 1892, pp. 210-218.

A. C. LAWSON. Sketch of the Coastal Topography of the North Side of

Lake Superior, with reference to the abandoned strands, etc., 20th

Ann. Rept. Geol. and Nat. Hist. Surv. Minn., 1893, pp. 181-289, pls.

7-12.

J. B. WOODWORTH. Ancient Water Levels of the Champlain and Hudson

Valleys, Bull. 84, N.Y. State Mus., 1905, pp. 265, pls. 28.

E. L. MOSELEY. Formation of Sandusky Bay and Cedar Point, Proc. Ohio

State Acad. Sci., vol. 4, 1905, Pt. v, pp. 179-238.

F. E. WRIGHT. Rept. Geol. Surv. Mich. for 1903, 1905, p. 37.

J. W. GOLDTHWAIT. The Abandoned Shore Lines of Eastern Wisconsin,

Bull. 17, Wis. Geol. and Nat. Hist. Surv., 1907, pp. 134, pls. 37; A

Reconstruction of Water Planes of the Extinct Glacial Lakes in the

Lake Michigan Basin, Jour. Geol., vol. 16, 1908, pp. 459-476; Isobases

of the Algonquin and Iroquois Beaches and their Significance, Bull.

Geol. Soc. Am., vol. 21, 1910, pp. 227-248, pl. 5; An Instrumental

Survey of the Shore Lines of the Extinct Lakes Algonquin and Nipissing

in Southwestern Ontario, Mem. 10, Dept. of Mines, Canada, 1910, pp.

57, pls. 4.

WILLIAM H. HOBBS. The Late Glacial and Post-glacial Uplift of the

Michigan Basin, Pub. 5, Mich. Geol. and Biol. Surv., 1911, pp. 68,

pls. 2.

LAWRENCE MARTIN. [Post-glacial Modifications in and Around the Great

Lakes], Mon. 52, U. S. Geol. Surv., 1911, pp. 455-459.

Uptilt in northern Europe:—

G. DE GEER. Quaternary Changes of Level in Scandinavia, Bull. Geol.

Soc. Am., vol. 3, 1892, pp. 65-68, pl. 2.

H. MUNTHE. Studies in the Late Quaternary History of Southern Sweden,

paper No. 25, Livret Guide, Cong. Géol. Intern., 1910, pp. 96, many

plates and maps.

Earth Features and Their Meaning An Introduction to Geology for the Student and the General Reader · 第 24 / 32 章