THE BOSTON MASSACRE

The impartial student is fully impressed with the fact that, as his

investigations approach the period just preceding the American

Revolution, the claims of the New England people become more prominent.

Here again, if the writers of our histories and especially of our school

books have not given undue credit to those who were the chief actors in

New England at this period, they have at least uniformly failed to do

full justice to those who were quite as active in the cause in other

colonies.

[Illustration:

Account of Negro School-House Cost

]

Resistance to the Stamp Act had been quite general throughout the

country and the Sons of Liberty in New York were particularly vigilant

in seeing that the Non-importation Act was fully observed, although many

of the merchants did not sympathize with the move. British soldiers were

stationed in all the larger towns and they, taking their cue from those

in authority, showed their enmity towards the people on all occasions.

Particularly marked was this condition of affairs in the city of New

York.

On the night of January 16th, 1770, the soldiers succeeded in destroying

the Liberty pole in this city after having failed in several previous

attempts, in which they had been driven off by the people. On the

following day a public meeting was called, which at least three thousand

sympathizing citizens attended. Resolutions were passed condemning the

hiring of soldiers for divers purposes by the people, since this custom

worked to the disadvantage of the laboring classes who were thus

deprived of steady employment. A protest was also entered against

allowing armed soldiers to wander freely about the city when off duty.

The soldiers promptly resented this action of the people and a number of

brawls took place in various parts of the town. At length the people

concentrated their strength and, after disarming a number of the

soldiers, drove them into barracks. The encounter in which the largest

number on both sides was engaged, took place on what was called Golden

Hill, a place situated on John Street between William and Cliff Streets.

Miss Mary L. Booth, who wrote a most painstaking and reliable history of

the city of New York, previous to the beginning of the Civil War, refers

to this matter as follows: “Thus ended the battle of Golden Hill, a

conflict of two days duration, which, originating as it did in the

defense of a principle, was an affair of which New Yorkers have just

reason to be proud, and which is worthy of far more prominence than has

usually been given it by standard historians. It was not until nearly

two months after that the “Boston Massacre” occurred, a contest which

has been glorified and perpetuated in history; yet this was second both

in date and in significance to the New York Battle of Golden Hill.”

It would be difficult to find a better illustration than this of the

subject under consideration. The “Boston Massacre” was at best nothing

more than a street brawl, in which five unarmed spectators were shot

down without the slightest resistance having been made on their part; an

affair with which at the time the people at large of Boston had nothing

whatever to do. It was simply a brutal and dastardly act on the part of

the soldiers, in retaliation for the annoyance offered by one or two

irresponsible boys who had been throwing snow balls. Yet this affair has

been magnified to such a degree of importance that if the Battle of

Bunker Hill had not been fought in the same neighborhood, this

occurrence would doubtless have been placed in history as the most

important event in the Revolution. On the other hand, the conflict in

New York, which lasted for over two days, was the first stand, and a

successful one, made by the people against the British soldiers. It was

an event of very great importance indeed, for not only was blood first

shed but in it was life first lost for the Cause. Yet how little

importance has any New England writer in the past ever attached to it!

It has certainly never been pointed out that the “Battle of Golden

Hill,” in contra-distinction to the “Boston Massacre,” was the beginning

of the struggle.

In _Parker’s New York Gazette or Weekly Post-Boy_ for Monday, February

5th, 1770, a full and detailed account of the Battle of Golden Hill can

be found. The file of this paper is now in the Lenox Library and this

special issue has been reproduced in fac-simile for the author; but it

is so voluminous that it can not be given here as an illustration.[1]

If the quartering of troops in one section of the Colonies, rather than

in another, may be accepted as evidence of disaffection among the people

and of organized resistance to the acts of the British Government, then

again full justice has not been done to New York. According to Bancroft

British troops had already been quartered in this city as early as

December, 1766, and were not sent to Boston until at least two years

later.

The magazine of history with notes and queries (Vol. I, No. 2) · 第 13 / 85 题