FOSSIL IMPRESSIONS.--I.

Ichnology, a newly created branch of science, takes its name from the

Greek word _ichnos_, a _track_ or _footstep_, and the tracks

themselves have been denominated Ichnites, or, when they refer to

birds only, Ornithichnites, from _ornis_, a _bird_. And this last term

has by custom been generally applied to ancient impressions, though

not correctly.

Geology has revealed to us not only the remains of animals and

vegetables, but the impressions made by them during their lives, and

even the impressions of unorganized bodies. The first notice of these

appearances was, as often happens, regarded with indifference or

scepticism; but their number and variety enlightened the public mind,

and opened a new source of information and improvement.

The first remarkable observation made on fossil footsteps was that of

the Rev. Dr. Duncan, of Scotland, in 1828. He noticed, in a _new red

sandstone_ quarry in Dumfriesshire, impressions of the feet of small

animals of the tortoise kind, having four feet, and five toes on each

foot. They were seen in various layers through a thickness of forty

feet or more.

Sandstone, in which these impressions are principally discovered, is a

rock composed chiefly of siliceous and micaceous particles cemented

together by calcareous or argillaceous paste, containing salt, and

colored with various shades of the oxide of iron, particularly the

red, gray, brown. It has been remarked by Prof. H. D. Rogers, that the

perfection of the surface containing fossil footmarks is often

attributable to a micaceous deposit. The layers of sandstone have been

formed by deposits from sea-water, dried in succession; such layers

are also seen in the roofing slate. These deposits on the shores of

the ocean, having in a soft condition received the impressions of the

feet of birds, other animals, vegetables, and also of rain-drops,

under favorable circumstances dried, hardened, and formed a rock of

greater or less solidity. Our colleague, Dr. Gould, has exhibited to

us a specimen of dried clay from the shores of the Bay of Fundy,

containing beautiful impressions, recently made, of the footsteps of

birds. The particles brought by the waves, and deposited in the manner

described, were derived from the destruction of other rocks previously

existing, particularly granite and flint, or silex, the shining atoms

of which compose no small part of the sandstone rock.

It is easy to conceive, that, while these deposits were taking place

in the soft condition, portions of vegetable matters might become

intermixed; and that these, with the impressions of the feet and other

parts of animals and unorganized substances, might be preserved by the

process of desiccation. The agency of internal heat may have also been

employed in some cases in baking and hardening these crusty layers.

The sandstone rock, though in some places actually in a state of

formation at the present time, lies in such a manner in the earth's

crust as to indicate an immense antiquity. The age of these beds

varies in different situations. The sandstone rocks which contain the

greater part of the impressions are called _new red sandstone_, to

distinguish them from the _old red_, which is of a greater age. The

deposits on Connecticut River may not be attributed to the action of

this river, but are of higher antiquity, probably, than the river

itself, and proceeded from the waves of an ancient sea, existing in a

state of the surface of the globe very different from that of the

present day.

In 1834, tracks were discovered near Hildberghausen in Saxony, to

which Prof. Kaup, of Darmstadt, gave the name of Chirotherium, from

the resemblance to the impressions of the human hand. On a subsequent

examination, Prof. Owen preferred the name of Labyrinthodon, from the

resemblance of the folds in the teeth to the convolutions of the

brain.

Various other instances of impressions were seen; and, in the year

1835, Dr. Deane and Mr. Marsh, residents of Greenfield, noticed

impressions resembling the feet of birds in sandstone rocks of that

neighborhood. These observations having come to the knowledge of

President Hitchcock, of Amherst College, that gentleman began a

thorough investigation of the subject, followed it up with unremitted

ardor, and has, since 1836 (the date of his first publication), laid

before the public a great amount of ichnological information, and

really created a new science. Dr. Deane, on his part, has not been

idle: besides making valuable discoveries, he has written a number of

excellent papers to record some portion of his numerous observations.

In 1837, at the request of my friend Dr. Boott, I carried to London,

for the Museum of the Royal College of Surgeons, various scientific

objects peculiar to this country; among which were a number of casts

of Ornithichnites.

These casts were kindly furnished me by President Hitchcock, and the

Government of the Royal College thereon voted to present to President

Hitchcock and Amherst College casts of the skeleton of the famous

Megatherium of South America. These casts were packed, and sent to be

embarked in a ship destined for Boston, but were unluckily delivered

to a wrong shipping house in London, and I lost sight of them for some

time. They were at length discovered. After remaining in this

situation for more than a year, they were sold at public auction; and,

notwithstanding many efforts on my part, I was unable to obtain and

transmit them to Amherst College.

The fossil impressions which have been distinguished in various places

in the new red sandstone are those of birds, frogs, turtles, lizards,

fishes, mollusca, crustacea, worms, and zoophytes. Besides these, the

impressions made by rain-drops, ripple-marks in the sand, coprolites

or indurated remains of faeces of animals, and even impressions of

vegetables, have been preserved and transmitted from a remote

antiquity. No authentic human impressions have yet been established;

and none of the mammalia, except the marsupials.(?) We must, however,

remember that, although the early paleontology contains no record of

birds, the ancient existence of these animals is now fully

ascertained. Remains of birds were discovered in the Paris gypsum by

Cuvier previous to 1830. Since that time, they have been found in the

Lower Eocene in England, and the Swiss Alps; and there is reason to

believe that osseous relics may be met with in the same deposits which

contain the foot-marks. Most of the bird-tracks which have been

observed, belong to the wading birds, or Grallae.

The number of toes in existing birds varies from two to five. In the

fossil bird-tracks, the most frequent number is three, called

tridactylous; but there are instances also of four or tetradactylous,

and two or didactylous. The number of articulations corresponds in

ornithichnites with living birds: when there are four toes, the inner

or hind toe has two articulations, the second toe three, the third toe

four, the outer toe five. The impressions of the articulations are

sometimes very distinct, and even that of the skin covering them.

President Hitchcock has distinguished more than thirty species of

birds, four of lizards, three of tortoises, and six of batrachians.

The great difference in the characters of many fossil animals from

those of existing genera and species, in the opinion of Prof. Agassiz,

makes it probable that in various instances the traces of supposed

birds may be in fact traces of other animals, as, for example, those

of the lizard or frog. And he supports this opinion, among other

reasons, by the disappearance of the heel in a great number of

Ornithichnites.

D'Orbigny, to whom we are indebted for the most ample and systematic

work on Paleontology ("Cours Elementaire de Paleontologie et de

Geologie," 5 vols. 1849-52), does not accept the arrangement of

President Hitchcock. He objects to the term Ornithichnites, and

proposes what he considers a more comprehensive arrangement into

organic, physiological, and physical impressions. _Organic

impressions_ are those which have been produced by the remains of

organized substances, such as vegetable impressions from calamites,

&c. _Physiological impressions_ are those produced by the feet and

other parts of animals. _Physical impressions_ are those from

rain-drops and ripple-marks; and to these may be added coprolites in

substance. This plan of D'Orbigny seems to exclude the curious and

interesting distinctions of groups, genera, and species; in this way

diminishing the importance of the science of Ichnology.

Fossil impressions have been found on this continent in the

carboniferous strata of Nova Scotia, and of the Alleghenies; in the

sandstone of New Jersey, and in that of the Connecticut Valley in a

great number of places, from the town of Gill in Massachusetts to

Middletown in Connecticut, a distance of about eighty miles.

A slab from Turner's Falls, obtained for me by Dr. Deane in 1845,

measuring two feet by two and a half, and two inches in thickness,

contains at least ten different sets of impressions, varying from five

inches in length to two and a half, with a proportionate length of

stride from thirteen inches to six. All these are tridactylous, and

represent at least four different species. In most of them the

distinction of articulation is quite clear. The articulations of each

toe can readily be counted, and they are found to agree with the

general statement made above as to number. The impressions are

singularly varied as to depth; some of them, perfectly distinct, are

superficial, like those made by the fingers laid lightly on a mass of

dough, while others are of sufficient depth nearly to bury the toes;

some of the tracks cross each other, and, being of different sizes,

belong to animals of different ages or different species. There is one

curious instance of the tracks of a large and heavy bird, in which,

from the softness of the mud, the bird slipped in a lateral direction,

and then gained a firm footing; the mark of the first step, though

deep, is ill-defined and uncertain; the space intervening between the

tracks is superficially furrowed; in the settled step, which is the

deepest, the toes are very strongly indicated. On the same surface are

impressions of nails, which may have belonged to birds or chelonians.

The inferior surface of the same slab exhibits appearances more

superficial, less numerous, but generally regular. There are three

sets of tracks entirely distinct from each other; two of them

containing three tracks, and one containing two,--the latter being

much the largest in size. In addition, there is one set of tracks,

which are probably those of a tortoise. These marks present two other

points quite observable and interesting. One is that they are

displayed in relief, while those on the upper surface are in

depression. The relief in this lower surface would be the cast of a

cavity in the layer below; so the depressions in the upper surface

would be moulds of casts above. The second point is the

non-correspondence of the upper and lower surfaces; i.e. the

depressions in the upper surface have not a general correspondence

with the elevations on its inferior surface. The tracks above were

made by different individuals and different species from those below.

This leads to another interesting consideration, that in the thickness

of this slab there must be a number of different layers, and in each

of them there may be a different series of tracks.

To these last remarks there is one exception: the deep impression in

which the bird slipped in a lateral direction corresponds with an

elevation on the lower surface, in which the impression of these toes

is very distinctly displayed, and even the articulations. Moreover,

one of the tracks on the inferior surface interferes with the outer

track in the superior, and tends in an opposite direction, so that

this last-described footstep must have been made before the other. It

is also observable, that, while all the other tracks are superficial,

this last penetrates the whole thickness of the slab; thus showing

that the different deposits continued some time in a soft state.

On the surfaces of this slab, particularly on the upper, there are

various marks besides those of the feet, some of which seem to have

been made by straws, or portions of grass, or sticks; and there is a

curved line some inches in length, which seems to have arisen from

shrinkage.

In the collection of Mr. Marsh,[B] there were two slabs of great size,

each measuring ten by six feet, having a great number of impressions

of feet, and about the same thickness as the slab under examination.

One of these presented depressions; and the other, corresponding

reliefs. These very interesting relations were necessarily parted in

the sale of Mr. Marsh's collection; one of them being obtained for the

Boston Society of Natural History, and the other for the collection of

Amherst College.

[Footnote B: Mr. Marsh was a mechanic of the town of Greenfield,

and procured his subsistence by his daily labor. Being employed by

Dr. Deane in obtaining the sandstone slabs of Ornithichnites, he

acquired a taste for the pursuit, entered into it with

extraordinary ardor, and accumulated by his own labors a great

collection of fine specimens. He unfortunately fell into a

consumption, and died in 1852. The collection was sold at public

auction for a sum between two and three thousand dollars. The

specimens were purchased by the Boston Society of Natural History,

by Amherst College, and by varioud colleges and scientific

associations in this country.]

The _Physical Impressions_, according to Professor D'Orbigny, are

of three kinds, viz.: 1st, Rain-drops; 2d, Ripple-marks; and 3d,

Coprolites. I have a slab which exhibits two leptodactylous

tracks very distinct, about an inch and a half long, surrounded

by impressions of rain-drops and ripple-marks. Another specimen

exhibits the impressions of rain in a more distinct and remarkable

manner. The imprints are of various sizes, from those which might

be made by a common pea to others four times its diameter; some

are deep, others superficial and almost imperceptible. They are

generally circular, but some are ovoid. Some have the edge equally

raised around, as if struck by a perpendicular drop; and others

have the edge on one part faintly developed, while another part is

very sharp and well defined, as if the drop had struck obliquely.

It has been suggested, that these fossil rain-drops may have been

made by particles of hail; but I think the variety of size and

depth of depression would have been more considerable if thus

made.

Although we have necessarily treated the subject of fossil

footmarks in a very brief way, sufficient has been said to show

that this new branch of Paleontology may lead to interesting

results. The fact that they are, in some manner, peculiar to this

region, seems to call upon our Society to obtain a sufficient

number of specimens to exhibit to scientific men a fair

representation of the condition of Ichnology in this quarter of

our country; and we have therefore great reason to congratulate

ourselves, that, through the vigilance and spirit of our members,

the Society has the expectation of obtaining a rich collection

of ichnological specimens.

Remarks on some fossil impressions in the sandstone rocks of Connecticut River · 第 4 / 18 题