CHAPTER XXVI.

JESUS IN THE TOMB.

It was about three o'clock in the afternoon, according to our manner

of reckoning,[1] when Jesus expired. A Jewish law[2] forbade a corpse

suspended on the cross to be left beyond the evening of the day of the

execution. It is not probable that in the executions performed by the

Romans this rule was observed; but as the next day was the Sabbath,

and a Sabbath of peculiar solemnity, the Jews expressed to the Roman

authorities[3] their desire that this holy day should not be profaned

by such a spectacle.[4] Their request was granted; orders were given

to hasten the death of the three condemned ones, and to remove them

from the cross. The soldiers executed this order by applying to the

two thieves a second punishment much more speedy than that of the

cross, the _crurifragium_, or breaking of the legs,[5] the usual

punishment of slaves and of prisoners of war. As to Jesus, they found

him dead, and did not think it necessary to break his legs. But one of

them, to remove all doubt as to the real death of the third victim,

and to complete it, if any breath remained in him, pierced his side

with a spear. They thought they saw water and blood flow, which was

regarded as a sign of the cessation of life.

[Footnote 1: Matt. xxvii. 46; Mark xv. 37; Luke xxiii. 44. Comp. John

xix. 14.]

[Footnote 2: _Deut._ xxi. 22, 23; Josh. viii. 29, x. 26, and

following. Cf. Jos., _B.J._, IV. v. 2; Mishnah, _Sanhedrim_, vi. 5.]

[Footnote 3: John says, "To Pilate"; but that cannot be, for Mark (xv.

44, 45) states that at night Pilate was still ignorant of the death of

Jesus.]

[Footnote 4: Compare Philo, _In Flaccum_, § 10.]

[Footnote 5: There is no other example of the _crurifragium_ applied

after crucifixion. But often, in order to shorten the tortures of the

sufferer, a finishing stroke was given him. See the passage from

Ibn-Hischâm, translated in the _Zeitschrift für die Kunde des

Morgenlandes_, i. p. 99, 100.]

John, who professes to have seen it,[1] insists strongly on this

circumstance. It is evident, in fact, that doubts arose as to the

reality of the death of Jesus. A few hours of suspension on the cross

appeared to persons accustomed to see crucifixions entirely

insufficient to lead to such a result. They cited many instances of

persons crucified, who, removed in time, had been brought to life

again by powerful remedies.[2] Origen afterward thought it needful to

invoke miracle in order to explain so sudden an end.[3] The same

astonishment is found in the narrative of Mark.[4] To speak truly, the

best guarantee that the historian possesses upon a point of this

nature is the suspicious hatred of the enemies of Jesus. It is

doubtful whether the Jews were at that time preoccupied with the fear

that Jesus might pass for resuscitated; but, in any case, they must

have made sure that he was really dead. Whatever, at certain periods,

may have been the neglect of the ancients in all that belonged to

legal proof and the strict conduct of affairs, we cannot but believe

that those interested here had taken some precautions in this

respect.[5]

[Footnote 1: John xix. 31-35.]

[Footnote 2: Herodotus, vii. 194; Jos., _Vita_, 75.]

[Footnote 3: _In Matt. Comment. series_, 140.]

[Footnote 4: Mark xv. 44, 45.]

[Footnote 5: The necessities of Christian controversy afterward led to

the exaggeration of these precautions, especially when the Jews had

systematically begun to maintain that the body of Jesus had been

stolen. Matt. xxvii. 62, and following, xxviii. 11-15.]

According to the Roman custom, the corpse of Jesus ought to have

remained suspended in order to become the prey of birds.[1] According

to the Jewish law, it would have been removed in the evening, and

deposited in the place of infamy set apart for the burial of those who

were executed.[2] If Jesus had had for disciples only his poor

Galileans, timid and without influence, the latter course would have

been adopted. But we have seen that, in spite of his small success at

Jerusalem, Jesus had gained the sympathy of some important persons who

expected the kingdom of God, and who, without confessing themselves

his disciples, were strongly attached to him. One of these persons,

Joseph, of the small town of Arimathea (_Ha-ramathaïm_[3]), went in

the evening to ask the body from the procurator.[4] Joseph was a rich

and honorable man, a member of the Sanhedrim. The Roman law, at this

period, commanded, moreover, that the body of the person executed

should be delivered to those who claimed it.[5] Pilate, who was

ignorant of the circumstance of the _crurifragium_, was astonished

that Jesus was so soon dead, and summoned the centurion who had

superintended the execution, in order to know how this was. Pilate,

after having received the assurances of the centurion, granted to

Joseph the object of his request. The body probably had already been

removed from the cross. They delivered it to Joseph, that he might do

with it as he pleased.

[Footnote 1: Horace, _Epistles_, I. xvi. 48; Juvenal, xiv. 77; Lucan.,

vii. 544; Plautus, _Miles glor._, II. iv. 19; Artemidorus, _Onir._,

ii. 53; Pliny, xxxvi. 24; Plutarch, _Life of Cleomenes_, 39;

Petronius, _Sat._, cxi.-cxii.]

[Footnote 2: Mishnah, _Sanhedrim_, vi. 5.]

[Footnote 3: Probably identical with the ancient Rama of Samuel, in

the tribe of Ephraim.]

[Footnote 4: Matt. xxvii. 57, and following; Mark xv. 42, and

following; Luke xxiii. 50, and following; John xix. 38, and

following.]

[Footnote 5: Dig. XLVIII. xxiv., _De cadaveribus puntorum_.]

Another secret friend, Nicodemus,[1] whom we have already seen

employing his influence more than once in favor of Jesus, came forward

at this moment. He arrived, bearing ample provision of the materials

necessary for embalming. Joseph and Nicodemus interred Jesus according

to the Jewish custom--that is to say, they wrapped him in a sheet with

myrrh and aloes. The Galilean women were present,[2] and no doubt

accompanied the scene with piercing cries and tears.

[Footnote 1: John xix. 39, and following.]

[Footnote 2: Matt. xxvii. 61; Mark xv. 47; Luke xxiii. 55.]

It was late, and all this was done in great haste. The place had not

yet been chosen where the body would be finally deposited. The

carrying of the body, moreover, might have been delayed to a late

hour, and have involved a violation of the Sabbath--now the disciples

still conscientiously observed the prescriptions of the Jewish law. A

temporary interment was determined upon.[1] There was at hand, in the

garden, a tomb recently dug out in the rock, which had never been

used. It belonged, probably, to one of the believers.[2] The funeral

caves, when they were destined for a single body, were composed of a

small room, at the bottom of which the place for the body was marked

by a trough or couch let into the wall, and surmounted by an arch.[3]

As these caves were dug out of the sides of sloping rocks, they were

entered by the floor; the door was shut by a stone very difficult to

move. Jesus was deposited in the cave, and the stone was rolled to the

door, as it was intended to return in order to give him a more

complete burial. But the next day being a solemn Sabbath, the labor

was postponed till the day following.[4]

[Footnote 1: John xix. 41, 42.]

[Footnote 2: One tradition (Matt. xxvii. 60) designates Joseph of

Arimathea himself as owner of the cave.]

[Footnote 3: The cave which, at the period of Constantine, was

considered as the tomb of Christ, was of this shape, as may be

gathered from the description of Arculphus (in Mabillon, _Acta SS.

Ord. S. Bened._, sec. iii., pars ii., p. 504), and from the vague

traditions which still exist at Jerusalem among the Greek clergy on

the state of the rock now concealed by the little chapel of the Holy

Sepulchre. But the indications by which, under Constantine, it was

sought to identify this tomb with that of Christ, were feeble or

worthless (see especially Sozomen, _H.E._, ii. 1.) Even if we were to

admit the position of Golgotha as nearly exact, the Holy Sepulchre

would still have no very reliable character of authenticity. At all

events, the aspect of the places has been totally modified.]

[Footnote 4: Luke xxiii. 56.]

The women retired after having carefully noticed how the body was

laid. They employed the hours of the evening which remained to them in

making new preparations for the embalming. On the Saturday all

rested.[1]

[Footnote 1: Luke xxiii. 54-56.]

On the Sunday morning, the women, Mary Magdalen the first, came very

early to the tomb.[1] The stone was displaced from the opening, and

the body was no longer in the place where they had laid it. At the

same time, the strangest rumors were spread in the Christian

community. The cry, "He is risen!" quickly spread amongst the

disciples. Love caused it to find ready credence everywhere. What had

taken place? In treating of the history of the apostles we shall have

to examine this point and to make inquiry into the origin of the

legends relative to the resurrection. For the historian, the life of

Jesus finishes with his last sigh. But such was the impression he had

left in the heart of his disciples and of a few devoted women, that

during some weeks more it was as if he were living and consoling them.

Had his body been taken away,[2] or did enthusiasm, always credulous,

create afterward the group of narratives by which it was sought to

establish faith in the resurrection? In the absence of opposing

documents this can never be ascertained. Let us say, however, that

the strong imagination of Mary Magdalen[3] played an important part in

this circumstance.[4] Divine power of love! Sacred moments in which

the passion of one possessed gave to the world a resuscitated God!

[Footnote 1: Matt. xxviii. 1; Mark xvi. 1; Luke xxiv. 1; John xx. 1.]

[Footnote 2: See Matt. xxviii. 15; John xx. 2.]

[Footnote 3: She had been possessed by seven demons (Mark xvi. 9; Luke

viii. 2.)]

[Footnote 4: This is obvious, especially in the ninth and following

verses of chap. xvi. of Mark. These verses form a conclusion of the

second Gospel, different from the conclusion at xvi. 1-8, with which

many manuscripts terminate. In the fourth Gospel (xx. 1, 2, 11, and

following, 18), Mary Magdalen is also the only original witness of the

resurrection.]

The Life of Jesus · 第 26 / 28 章