QUEST. LXVI. _What is that union which the elect have with Christ?_

ANSW. The union which the elect have with Christ, is the work of

God’s grace, whereby they are spiritually and mystically, yet really

and inseparably joined to Christ, as their head and husband, which

is done in their effectual calling.

We have, in the foregoing part of this work, considered man as made

upright at first; but not continuing in that state, plunged into those

depths of sin and misery, which would have rendered his state altogether

desperate, without the interposition of a Mediator; whose designation to

this work, his fitness for, and faithful discharge thereof, have been

particularly considered in several foregoing answers, wherein we have

had an account of his Person as God-man; his offices of Prophet, Priest,

and King, his twofold estate, to wit, of humiliation and exaltation; and

the benefits which accrue to the church thereby. This church has also

been considered as _visible_ or _invisible_; and the former of these, as

enjoying many privileges which respect, more especially, the ordinary

means of salvation.

We are now led to consider the benefits which the members of the

_invisible_ church, to wit, the whole number of the elect, who have

been, are, or shall be gathered into one, under Christ, their head,

enjoy by him. And these are contained in two general heads; namely,

union and communion with him in grace and glory; which comprise in them

the blessings of both worlds, as the result of their relation to, and

interest in him. First, they are united to him, and then made partakers

of his benefits. All grace imparted to us here, is the result thereof;

as the apostle says, _Of him are ye in Christ Jesus, who of God is made

unto us wisdom, and righteousness, and sanctification, and redemption_,

1 Cor. i. 30. And elsewhere our Saviour says, _He that abideth in me,

and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit_, John xv. 5. And the

contrary hereunto is inconsistent with the exercise of any grace:

_Without me ye can do nothing_.

Moreover, that communion which the saints have with Christ in glory,

whereby they who are brought to a state of perfection, participate of

those graces and comforts which flow from their continued union with

him; and the first fruits, or foretastes of glory, which they have in

this world, are also founded on it. Thus the apostle calls Christ in his

people, _The hope of glory_, Colos. i. 27. and speaking of his giving

eternal life to them, he considers them as being _in his hand_, from

whence _none shall pluck them out_, John x. 28. or separate them from

him. So that they shall enjoy everlasting happiness with him, inasmuch

as they shall _be found in him_, Phil. iii. 9. which leads us more

particularly to consider,

What this union with Christ is. The scripture often speaks of Christ’s

being, or abiding in his people, and they in him; and assigns it as an

evidence of their interest in the blessings he has purchased for them:

and, indeed, it is from hence that all internal and practical godliness

is derived.

This privilege argues infinite condescension in him, and tends to the

highest advancement of those who are the subjects thereof. Now that we

may understand what is intended thereby, let us take heed that we do not

include in it any thing that tends to extenuate it on the one hand; or

to exalt those who are made partakers of it above the station or

condition into which they are brought thereby, on the other.

It is not sufficient to suppose that this union contains in it no more

than that his people have the same kind of nature with him, as being

made _partakers of flesh and blood_; he having _himself taken part of

the same_, Heb. ii. 14. He is indeed allied to us, as having all the

essential perfections of our nature: and this was an instance of

infinite condescension in him, and absolutely necessary to our

redemption: nevertheless, this similitude of nature; abstracted from

other considerations, accompanying or flowing from his incarnation,

contains in it no other idea of union, between Christ and his people,

than that which they have with one another; nor is it a privilege

peculiar to believers, since Christ took on him the same human nature

that all men have, though with a peculiar design of grace to those whom

he came to redeem. This I the rather take notice of, because the

Socinians, and others, that speak of this privilege, inasmuch as it is

often mentioned in scripture, appear to have very low thoughts of it,

when they suppose nothing more than this to be intended thereby.

Again, this union includes in it more than what is contained in that

mutual love that is between Christ and believers, in that sense in which

there is an union of affection between those who love one another; as it

is said, _The soul of Jonathan was knit with the soul of David; and

Jonathan loved him as his own soul_, 1 Sam. xviii. 1. In which respect

believers are united to one another; or, as the apostle expresses it,

their hearts are _knit together in love_, Col. ii. 2. _being like

minded, having the same love, being of one accord, of one mind_, Phil.

ii. 2. or, as he adds, _Let this mind also be in you, which was also in

Christ Jesus_, ver. 5. I say it includes more than this, which is rather

the fruit and consequence of our union with Christ, than that wherein it

principally consists.

Moreover we must take heed that we do not, in explaining this union

between Christ and believers, include more in it than what belongs to

creatures infinitely below him, to whom they are said to be united:

therefore we cannot but abhor the blasphemy of those who speak of an

essential union of creatures with God; or, as though they had hereby

something derived to them in common with Christ the great Mediator.[1]

But passing by this method of accounting for the union between Christ

and believers, there are two senses in which it is taken in scripture;

one is, that which results from Christ’s being their federal head,

representative, or surety; having undertaken to deal with the justice of

God in their behalf, so that what he should do, as standing in this

relation to them, should be placed to their account, as much as though

it had been done by them in their own persons: this is what contains in

it their concern in the covenant of grace, made with him in their

behalf; of which something has been said under a foregoing answer;[2]

and it is the foundation of their sins being imputed to him, and his

righteousness to them; which will be farther considered, when we treat

of the doctrine of justification under a following answer.[3]

Therefore this union with Christ, which is mentioned in the answer we

are now explaining, is of another nature, and, in some respects, may be

properly styled a _vital union_, as all spiritual life is derived from

it; or a _conjugal union_, as it is founded in consent, and said to be

by faith. Now there are two things observed concerning it.

1. It is expressed by our being spiritually and mystically joined to

Christ: it is styled a _spiritual_ union, in opposition to those gross

and carnal conceptions which persons may entertain concerning things

being joined together in a natural way; and, indeed, whatever respects

salvation is of a spiritual nature.

It is moreover called a _mystical_ union, which is the word most used by

those who treat on this subject; and the reason is, because the apostle

calls it _a great mystery_, Eph. v. 32. by which we are not to

understand the union there is between man and wife, as contained in the

similitude by which he had before illustrated this doctrine, as the

Papists pretend,[4] but the union that there is between Christ and his

church. And it is probably styled _a mystery_, because it could never

have been known without divine revelation: and as Christ’s

condescension, expressed herein, can never be sufficiently admired; so

it cannot be fully comprehended by us. This is such a nearness to him,

and such a display of love in him _as passeth knowledge_. However, there

are some similitudes used in scripture to illustrate it. As,

(1.) The union that there is between the _vine_ and the _branches_, John

xv. 1, 2, 5. whereby life, nourishment, growth and fruitfulness are

conveyed to them: in like manner all our spiritual life together, with

the exercise and increase of grace, depend on our union with, abiding

in, and deriving what is necessary thereunto, from him.

(2.) It is also compared to the union there is between the _head_ and

_members_, as the apostle farther illustrates it, when he styles _him

the head, from which all the body, by joints and bands, having

nourishment ministered, and knit together, increaseth with the increase

of God_, Col. ii. 19. which is a very beautiful similitude, whereby we

are given to understand, that as the head is the fountain of life and

motion to the whole body, as the nerves and animal spirits take their

rise from thence, so that if the communication that there is between

them and it, be stopped, the members would be useless, dead, and

insignificant: so Christ is the fountain of spiritual life and motion,

to all those who are united to him.

(3.) This union is farther illustrated, by a similitude taken from that

union which there is between the foundation and the building; and

accordingly Christ is styled, in scripture, _the chief corner stone_,

Eph. ii. 20. and a _sure foundation_, Isa. xxviii. 16. And there is

something peculiar in that phrase which the apostle uses, which is more

than any similitude can express; when he speaks of Christ as the _living

stone_, or rock, on which the church is built; and of believers, as

_lively stones_, 1 Pet. ii. 4, 5. to denote, that they are not only

supported and upheld by him, as the building is by the foundation, but

enabled to put forth living actions, as those whose life is derived from

this union with him.

(4.) There is another similitude taken from that nourishment which the

body receives, by the use of food; and therefore our Saviour styles

himself the _bread of life_, or the _bread which cometh down from

heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not die_; and proceeds to speak

of his _giving his flesh for the life of the world_; and adds, _he that

eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him_,

John vi. 48-56.

(5.) There is another similitude, by which our being united to Christ by

faith, is more especially illustrated, taken from the union which there

is between man and wife; accordingly this is generally styled, a

conjugal union, between Christ and believers. Thus the prophet says,

_Thy Maker is thine Husband, the Lord of hosts is his name; and thy

Redeemer, the holy One of Israel_, Isa. liv. 5. And the apostle,

speaking of a man’s _leaving his father and mother, and being joined

unto his wife, and they two being one flesh_, Eph. v. 31, 32. applies

it, as was before observed, to the union that there is between Christ

and the church; and adds, that _we are members of his body, of his

flesh, and of his bones_, ver. 30. which expression, if not compared

with other scriptures, would be very hard to be understood; but it may

be explained by the like phraseology, used elsewhere. Thus, when God

formed Eve at first, and brought her to Adam, and thereby joined them

together in a conjugal relation: he says upon this occasion, _This is

now bone of my bone, and flesh of my flesh_, Gen. ii. 23. And we find

also, that other relations, which are more remote than this, are

expressed by the same mode of speaking. Thus Laban says to Jacob,

_Surely thou art my bone and my flesh_, Gen. xxix. 14. And Abimelech

pleading the relation he stood in to the men of Shechem, as a pretence

of his right to reign over them, tells them, _I am your bone and your

flesh_, Judges ix. 2. Therefore the apostle makes use of the same

expression, agreeably to the common mode of speaking used in scripture,

to set forth the conjugal relation which there is between Christ and

believers.

The apostle, indeed, elsewhere alters the phrase, when he says, _He that

is joined to the Lord is one Spirit_, 1 Cor. vi. 17. which is so

difficult an expression, that some who treat on this subject, though

concluding that there is in it something that denotes the intimacy and

nearness of this union, and more than what is contained in the other

phrase, of their _being one flesh_, nevertheless, reckon it among those

expressions which are inexplicable; though I cannot but give into the

sense in which some understand it; namely, that inasmuch as the same

Spirit dwells in believers that dwelt in Christ, though with different

views and designs, they are hereby wrought up, in their measure, to the

same temper and disposition; or as it is expressed elsewhere, _The same

mind_ is in them _that_ was _in Christ_, Phil. ii. 5. which is such an

effect of this conjugal relation that there is between him and them, as

is not always the result of the same relation amongst men. The reason

why I call this our being united to Christ, by faith, is because it is

founded in a mutual consent; as _the Lord avouches them_ on the one

hand, _to be his people_, so they, on the other hand, _avouch him to be

their God_, Deut. xxvi. 17, 18. the latter of which is, properly

speaking, an act of faith; whereby they give up themselves to be his

servants, to all intents and purposes, and that for ever.

It is farther observed in this answer. That union with Christ is a work

of God’s grace: this it must certainly be, since it is the spring and

fountain from whence all acts of grace proceed; and indeed, from the

nature of the thing, it cannot be otherwise: for if there be a wonderful

instance of condescending grace in God’s conferring those blessings that

accompany salvation; this may much more be deemed so. If Christ be

pleased to _dwell_ with, and _in_ his people, and to _walk_ _in_ them, 2

Cor. vi. 16. or as it is said elsewhere, to _live in them_, Gal. ii. 20.

as a pledge and earnest of their being forever with him in heaven; and

if, as the result hereof, they be admitted to the greatest intimacy with

him; we may from hence take occasion to apply what was spoken by one of

Christ’s disciples, to him, with becoming humility and admiration; _how

is it that thou wilt manifest thyself unto us, and not unto the world?_

John xiv. 22. Is it not a great instance of grace, that the Son of God

should make choice of so mean an habitation, as that of the souls of

sinful men; and not only be present with, but united to them in those

instances which have been before considered?

2. It is farther observed in this answer, that we are united to Christ

in effectual calling; which leads us to consider what is contained in

the two following answers.

Footnote 1:

_The first that seems to use this unsavoury mode of speaking, is

Gregory Nazianzen; who did not consider how inconsistent some of those

rhetorical ways of speaking, he seems fond of, are with that doctrine,

which, in other parts of his writings, he maintained. Those words_

Χριστοποιειν, _and_ θεοποιειν, _which he sometimes uses to express the

nature, or consequence of this union between Christ and believers, are

very disgustful. In one place of his writings, (Vid. ejusd. Orat. 41.)

exhorting Christians to be like Christ, he says, That because he

became like unto us_, γενωμεθα Θεοι δι αυτον, efficiamur Dii propter

ipsum; _and elsewhere, (in Orat. 35. de Folio.) he says_, Hic homo

Deus effectus postea quam cum Deo coaluit ἱνα γενωμαι τοσουτον θεος

ὁσον εκ εινοc ανθρωπος εγενηθη, ut ipse quoque tantum Deus efficiar

quantum ipse homo. _And some modern writers have been fond of the same

mode of speaking, especially among those who, from their mysterious

and unintelligible mode of expressing themselves, have rather exposed

than defended the doctrines of the gospel. We find expressions of the

like nature in a book put forth by Luther, which is supposed to be

written by Taulerus, before the Reformation, called Theologia

Germanica, and some others, since that time, such as Parcelsus,

Swenckfelt, Weigelius, and those enthusiasts, that have adhered to

their unintelligible and blasphemous modes of speaking._

Footnote 2:

_See Vol. II. Quest. 31. page 167._

Footnote 3:

_Quest. 70._

Footnote 4:

_This is the principal, if not the only scripture, from which they

pretend to prove marriage to be a sacrament, and they argue thus. The

Greek church had no other word to express what was afterwards called a

sacrament by the Latin church, but_ μυστηριον, a mystery: _therefore

since the apostle calls marriage, as they suppose, a mystery, they

conclude that it is a sacrament; which is a very weak foundation for

inserting it among those sacraments which they have added to them that

Christ had instituted; for the sacraments are no where called

mysteries in scripture: and therefore we are not to explain doctrines

by words which were not used till some ages after the apostles’ time:

and if there were any thing in their argument_, viz. _that that which

is called a mystery in scripture, must needs be a sacrament, it does

not appear that the apostle calls marriage_ a great mystery, _but the

union that there is between Christ and his church; as he expressly

says in the following words_; I speak concerning Christ and the

church.

Quest. LXVII., LXVIII.

A Body of Divinity, Vol. 3 (of 4) Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger Catechism · 第 45 / 123 题