Although uncooked cheese resembles meat in composition, cheese dishes

prepared after ordinary recipes, with milk and shortening, are likely

to contain more fat than meat dishes prepared in the usual ways.

When, therefore, such cheese dishes are served with other staple

foods the combination is likely to contain more fat than the usual

meal. If little fat is ordinarily used, this may be an advantage. If

a great deal of fat is ordinarily used, it may be desirable to lessen

the amount in the cheese dishes. This can readily be done by omitting

the shortening and using skim milk or water in the preparation of

such dishes, a change which also lessens their cost.

The fact that cheese, like meat, contains neither starch nor

cellulose suggests that, like meat, it should be combined with bread,

potatoes, and other starchy foods, with vegetables and with sweets.

The concentrated character of cheese and many cheese dishes suggests

the use of succulent fruits and vegetables with them. The high

percentage of fat in cheese suggests the use of correspondingly small

amounts of fat in the accompanying dishes, while the soft texture of

cheese dishes as compared with meat makes it reasonable to serve the

harder and crustier breads with them.

When cheese is not used as the chief nitrogenous food of a meal it

may be introduced into bills of fare in many incidental ways, and

thus add materially to that portion of the diet needed for building

and repairing body tissue.

Though cheese is so generally used in some way in most families,

yet the making of menus with cheese as a central dish is less well

understood than more usual food combinations, since there is less

experience to serve as a guide. More thought is therefore usually

required to arrange such cheese meals in order that they may be

palatable and at the same time reasonable in nutritive value.

In order that the diet may remain well balanced, cheese, if used in

quantity, should replace foods of similar composition rather than

supplement them. The builder who has a choice of materials must have

a knowledge of their relative properties if he wishes to use stone

instead of brick, or wood in place of iron. It is the same with the

housekeeper who wishes to use her available food supply intelligently

and whose choice of foods is influenced by their relative cost at a

given time or season. The woman who has a knowledge of the relative

food value of different articles of diet, and their real food

qualities as distinguished from their market value, who understands

good methods of cooking and serving foods, and who plans her meals

and other housework so that unnecessary labor and expense may be

avoided, is taking account of the things which make for economical

living as well as for good living.

Some persons seem to believe that cheese or fish or other food is

the ideal food for some particular circumstance and that there is

a special food or diet suited to each kind of work and to every

circumstance of our daily life, and that it would be a great

advantage if we could regulate our daily fare with the accuracy a

chemist uses in making an experiment. Work, recreation, the amount

of clothing we wear, and other details of our daily life are not

so regulated, and it is the belief of those who have studied the

subject that the best interests of persons living under normal

conditions are served if the ideal be rather the regulation of the

diet along general lines in accordance with good sense, the teachings

of experience, economy, and the available knowledge gained from

a scientific study of the subject, due care being taken that the

different staple foodstuffs are so combined that all the needs of

the body are provided, excessive waste is prevented, and that both

undernourishment and excess or overeating are avoided.

Dishes which are liked and the methods followed in preparing them

will vary in different countries and at different times, yet this

does not of necessity mean that the nutritive value of the diet

varies correspondingly. In the same way it is possible for us to

vary the selection of our foods and the character of our diet at

will, according to the demands of our taste and our purse, without

correspondingly changing its value for supplying the needs of the

body. This means that the housekeeper, in suitable ways, can use

cheese, meat, fish, eggs, and other foods of similar composition as

substitutes for one another, being governed by their relative market

value at different times and seasons, by the tastes of her family,

and similar considerations. If she uses the different foodstuffs with

reference to their nutritive value and is skillful in preparing foods

in appetizing ways and in serving them in attractive combinations,

the daily fare may be both adequate and pleasing, whether she selects

cheese or meat or fish or eggs or other foods to supply nitrogenous

material and fat. Here, as in all that pertains to housekeeping, true

economy is dependent upon a knowledge of materials and skill in using

them.

Transcriber’s Notes

pg 8 Removed repeated word the from: If cream is removed the the

cheese

pg 12 Changed brought about chiefly by the action of enzyms to:

enzymes

pg 15 Changed 90 per cent of the nitrogeous to: nitrogenous

pg 20 Changed the curd assumes a custardlike to: custard-like

pg 24 Added period after No in: Cheese Fondue No 1.

pg 24 Added period after: 1 tablespoonful of butter

pg 25 Changed Corn and Cheese Souffle. to: Soufflé.

pg 31 Added period after: Salt, cayenne pepper, and nutmeg

Cheese and its economical uses in the diet · 第 4 / 4 段