Moliere's comedy is by no means mere farce. Farces he wrote,

undoubtedly; and some element of farce, perhaps, entered to qualify

nearly every comedy that flowed from his pen. But it is not for his

farce that Moliere is rated one of the few greatest producers of

literature. Moliere's comedy constitutes to Moliere the patent that it

does, of high degree in genius, not because it provokes laughter, but

because, amid laughter provoked, it not seldom reveals, as if with

flashes of lightning--lightning playful, indeed, but lightning that

might have been deadly--the "secrets of the nethermost abyss" of human

nature. Not human manners merely, those of a time, or a race, but human

attributes, those of all times, and of all races, are the things with

which, in his higher comedies, Moliere deals. Some transient whim of

fashion may in these supply to him the mould of form that he uses, but

it is human nature itself that supplies to Moliere the substance of his

dramatic creations. Now and again, if you read Moliere wisely and

deeply, you find your laughter at comedy fairly frozen in your throat,

by a gelid horror seizing you, to feel that these follies or these

crimes displayed belong to that human nature, one and the same

everywhere and always, of which also you yourself partake. Comedy,

Dante, too, called his poem, which included the _Inferno_. And a

Dantesque quality, not of method, but of power, is to be felt in

Moliere.

This character in Moliere the writer accords with the character of the

man Moliere. It might not have seemed natural to say of Moliere, as was

said of Dante, "There goes the man that has been in hell." But Moliere

was melancholy enough in temper and in mien to have well inspired an

exclamation such as, "There goes the man that has seen the human heart."

A poet as well as a dramatist, his own fellow-countrymen, at least,

feel Moliere to be. In Victor Hugo's list of the eight greatest poets of

all time, two are Hebrews (Job and Isaiah), two Greeks (Homer and

AEschylus), one is a Roman (Lucretius), one an Italian (Dante), one an

Englishman (Shakespeare)--seven. The eighth could hardly fail to be a

Frenchman, and that Frenchman is Moliere. Mr. Swinburne might perhaps

make the list nine, but he would certainly include Victor Hugo himself.

Curiously enough, Moliere is not this great writer's real name. It is a

stage name. It was assumed by the bearer when he was about twenty-four

years of age, on occasion of his becoming one in a strolling band of

players--in 1646 or thereabout. This band, originally composed of

amateurs, developed into a professional dramatic company, which passed

through various transformations, until, from being at first

grandiloquently self-styled, L'Illustre Theatre, it was, twenty years

after, recognized by the national title of Theatre Francais. Moliere's

real name was Jean Baptiste Poquelin.

Young Poquelin's bent, early encouraged by seeing plays and ballets, was

strongly toward the stage. The drama, under the quickening patronage of

Louis XIII.'s lordly minister, Cardinal Richelieu, was a great public

interest of those times in Paris. Moliere's evil star, too, it was

perhaps in part that brought him back to Paris, from Orleans. He admired

a certain actress in the capital. She became the companion--probably not

innocent companion--of his wandering life as actor. A sister of this

actress--a sister young enough to be daughter, instead of

sister--Moliere finally married. She led her jealous husband a wretched

conjugal life. A peculiarly dark tradition of shame, connected with

Moliere's marriage, has lately been to a good degree dispelled. But it

is not possible to redeem this great man's fame to chastity and honor.

He paid heavily, in like misery of his own, for whatever pangs of

jealousy he inflicted. There was sometimes true tragedy for himself

hidden within the comedy that he acted for others. (Moliere, to the very

end of his life, acted in the comedies that he wrote.) When some play of

his represented the torments of jealousy in the heart of a husband, it

was probably not so much acting, as it was real life, that the

spectators saw proceeding on the stage between Moliere and his wife,

confronted with each other in performing the piece.

Despite his faults, Moliere was cast in a noble, generous mold, of

character as well as of genius. Expostulated with for persisting to

appear on the stage when his health was such that he put his life at

stake in so doing, he replied that the men and women of his company

depended for their bread on the play's going through, and appear he

would. He actually died an hour or so after playing the part of the

Imaginary Invalid in his comedy of that name. That piece was the last

work of his pen.

Moliere produced in all some thirty dramatic pieces, from among which we

select a few of the most celebrated for brief description and

illustration.

The "Bourgeois Gentilhomme" ("Shopkeeper turned Gentleman") partakes of

the nature of the farce quite as much as it does of the comedy. But it

is farce such as only a man of genius could produce. In it Moliere

ridicules the airs and affectations of a rich man vulgarly ambitious to

figure in a social rank too exalted for his birth, his breeding, or his

merit. Jourdain is the name under which Moliere satirizes such a

character. We give a fragment from one of the scenes. M. Jourdain is in

process of fitting himself for that higher position in society to which

he aspires. He will equip himself with the necessary knowledge. To this

end he employs a professor of philosophy to come and give him lessons at

his house:

_M. Jourdain._ I have the greatest desire in the world to be learned;

and it vexes me more than I can tell, that my father and mother did

not make me learn thoroughly all the sciences when I was young.

_Professor of Philosophy._ This is a praiseworthy feeling. _Nam sine

doctrina vita est quasi mortis imago._ You understand this, and you

have, no doubt, a knowledge of Latin?

_M. Jour._ Yes; but act as if I had none. Explain to me the meaning of

it--

_Prof. Phil._ The meaning of it is, that, without science, life is an

image of death.

_M. Jour._ That Latin is quite right.

_Prof. Phil._ Have you any principles, any rudiments, of science?

_M. Jour._ Oh, yes! I can read and write.

_Prof. Phil._ With what would you like to begin? Shall I teach you

logic?

_M. Jour._ And what may this logic be?

_Prof. Phil._ It is that which teaches us the three operations of the

mind.

_M. Jour._ What are they--these three operations of the mind?

_Prof. Phil._ The first, the second, and the third. The first is to

conceive well by means of universals; the second, to judge well by

means of categories; and the third, to draw a conclusion aright by

means of the figures Barbara, Celarent, Darii, Ferio, Baralipton, etc.

_M. Jour._ Pooh! what repulsive words! This logic does not by any

means suit me. Teach me something more enlivening.

_Prof. Phil._ Will you learn moral philosophy?

_M. Jour._ Moral philosophy?

_Prof. Phil._ Yes.

_M. Jour._ What does it say, this moral philosophy?

_Prof. Phil._ It treats of happiness, teaches men to moderate their

passions, and--

_M. Jour._ No, none of that. I am devilishly hot-tempered, and,

morality or no morality, I like to give full vent to my anger whenever

I have a mind to it.

_Prof. Phil._ Would you like to learn physics?

_M. Jour._ And what have physics to say for themselves?

_Prof. Phil._ Physics is that science which explains the principles of

natural things and the properties of bodies; which discourses of the

nature of the elements, of metals, minerals, stones, plants, and

animals; which teaches us the cause of all the meteors, the rainbow,

the _ignis fatuus_, comets, lightning, thunder, thunderbolts, rain,

snow, hail, and whirlwinds.

_M. Jour._ There is too much hullaballoo in all that, too much riot

and rumpus.

_Prof. Phil._ Very good.

_M. Jour._ And now I want to intrust you with a great secret. I am in

love with a lady of quality; and I should be glad if you would help me

to write something to her in a short letter which I mean to drop at

her feet.

_Prof. Phil._ Very well.

_M. Jour._ That will be gallant, will it not?

_Prof. Phil._ Undoubtedly. Is it verse you wish to write to her?

_M. Jour._ Oh, no! not verse.

_Prof. Phil._ You only wish prose?

_M. Jour._ No. I wish for neither verse nor prose.

_Prof. Phil._ It must be one or the other.

_M. Jour._ Why?

_Prof. Phil._ Because, sir, there is nothing by which we can express

ourselves except prose or verse.

_M. Jour._ There is nothing but prose or verse?

_Prof. Phil._ No, sir. Whatever is not prose, is verse; and whatever

is not verse, is prose.

_M. Jour._ And when we speak, what is that, then?

_Prof. Phil._ Prose.

_M. Jour._ What! when I say, "Nicole, bring me my slippers, and give

me my nightcap," is that prose?

_Prof. Phil._ Yes, sir.

_M. Jour._ Upon my word, I have been speaking prose these forty years

without being aware of it; and I am under the greatest obligation to

you for informing me of it. Well, then, I wish to write to her in a

letter, "Fair Marchioness, your beautiful eyes make me die of love";

but I would have this worded in a gallant manner, turned genteelly.

_Prof. Phil._ Say that the fire of her eyes has reduced your heart to

ashes; that you suffer day and night for her the torments of a--

_M. Jour._ No, no, no, I don't wish any of that. I simply wish what I

tell you--"Fair Marchioness, your beautiful eyes make me die of love."

_Prof. Phil._ Still, you might amplify the thing a little.

_M. Jour._ No, I tell you, I will have nothing but these very words in

the letter; but they must be put in a fashionable way, and arranged as

they should be. Pray show me a little, so that I may see the different

ways in which they can be put.

_Prof. Phil._ They may be put first of all, as you have said, "Fair

Marchioness, your beautiful eyes make me die of love;" or else, "Of

love die make me, fair Marchioness, your beautiful eyes;" or, "Your

beautiful eyes of love make me, fair Marchioness, die;" or, "Die of

love your beautiful eyes, fair Marchioness, make me;" or else, "Me

make your beautiful eyes die, fair Marchioness, of love."

_M. Jour._ But of all these ways, which is the best?

_Prof. Phil._ The one you said--"Fair Marchioness, your beautiful eyes

make me die of love."

_M. Jour._ Yet I have never studied, and I did all right off at the

first shot.

The "Bourgeois Gentilhomme" is a very amusing comedy throughout.

From "Les Femmes Savantes" ("The Learned Women")--"The Blue-Stockings,"

we might perhaps freely render the title--we present one scene to

indicate the nature of the comedy. There had grown to be a fashion in

Paris, among certain women high in social rank, of pretending to the

distinction of skill in literary criticism, and of proficiency in

science. It was the Hotel de Rambouillet reduced to absurdity. That

fashionable affectation Moliere made the subject of his comedy, "The

Learned Women."

In the following extracts, Moliere satirizes, under the name of

Trissotin, a contemporary writer, one Cotin. The poem which Trissotin

reads, for the learned women to criticise and admire, is an actual

production of this gentleman. Imagine the domestic _coterie_ assembled,

and Trissotin, the poet, their guest. He is present, prepared to regale

them with what he calls his sonnet. We need to explain that the original

poem is thus inscribed: "To Mademoiselle de Longueville, now Duchess of

Namur, on her Quartan Fever." The conceit of the sonneteer is that the

fever is an enemy luxuriously lodged in the lovely person of its victim,

and there insidiously plotting against her life:

_Trissotin._ Sonnet to the Princess Urania on her Fever.

Your prudence sure is fast asleep,

That thus luxuriously you keep

And lodge magnificently so

Your very hardest-hearted foe.

_Belise._ Ah! what a pretty beginning!

_Armande._ What a charming turn it has!

_Philaminte._ He alone possesses the talent of making easy verses.

_Arm._ We must yield to _prudence fast asleep_.

_Bel._ _Lodge one's very hardest-hearted foe_ is full of charms for

me.

_Phil._ I like _luxuriously_ and _magnificently_: these two adverbs

joined together sound admirably.

_Bel._ Let us hear the rest.

_Triss._ Your prudence sure is fast asleep,

That thus luxuriously you keep

And lodge magnificently so

Your very hardest-hearted foe.

_Arm._ _Prudence fast asleep._

_Bel._ _To lodge one's foe._

_Phil._ _Luxuriously_ and _magnificently_.

_Triss._ Drive forth that foe, whate'er men say,

From out your chamber, decked so gay,

Where, ingrate vile, with murderous knife,

Bold she assails your lovely life.

_Bel._ Ah! gently. Allow me to breathe, I beseech you.

_Arm._ Give us time to admire, I beg.

_Phil._ One feels, at hearing these verses, an indescribable something

which goes through one's inmost soul, and makes one feel quite faint.

_Arm._ Drive forth that foe, whate'er men say,

From out your chamber, decked so gay--

How prettily _chamber, decked so gay_, is said here! And with what wit

the metaphor is introduced!

_Phil._ Drive forth that foe, whate'er men say.

Ah! in what an admirable taste that _whate'er men say_ is! To my mind,

the passage is invaluable.

_Arm._ My heart is also in love with _whate'er men say_.

_Bel._ I am of your opinion: _whate'er men say_ is a happy expression.

_Arm._ I wish I had written it.

_Bel._ It is worth a whole poem.

_Phil._ But do you, like me, thoroughly understand the wit of it?

_Arm. and Bel._ Oh! Oh!

_Phil._ Drive forth that foe, whate'er men say.

Although another should take the fever's part, pay no attention; laugh

at the gossips.

Drive forth that foe, whate'er men say,

Whate'er men say, whate'er men say.

This _whate'er men say_, says a great deal more than it seems. I do

not know if every one is like me, but I discover in it a hundred

meanings.

_Bel._ It is true that it says more than its size seems to imply.

_Phil._ (_to Trissotin._) But when you wrote this charming _whate'er

men say_, did you yourself understand all its energy? Did you realize

all it tells us? And did you then think that you were writing

something so witty?

_Triss._ Ah! ah!

_Arm._ I have likewise the _ingrate_ in my head--this ungrateful,

unjust, uncivil fever that ill-treats people who entertain her.

_Phil._ In short, both the stanzas are admirable. Let us come quickly

to the triplets, I pray.

_Arm._ Ah! once more, _what'er men say_, I beg.

_Triss._ Drive forth that foe, whate'er men say--

_Phil., Arm., and Bel._ _Whate'er men say!_

_Triss._ From out your chamber, decked so gay--

_Phil., Arm. and Bel._ _Chamber decked so gay!_

_Triss._ Where, ingrate vile, with murderous knife--

_Phil., Arm., and Bel._ That _ingrate_ fever!

_Triss._ Bold she assails your lovely life.

_Triss._ _Your lovely life!_

_Arm. and Bel._ Ah!

_Triss._ What! reckless of your ladyhood,

Still fiercely seeks to shed your blood--

_Phil., Arm. and Bel._ Ah!

_Triss._ And day and night to work you harm.

When to the baths sometime you've brought her,

No more ado, with your own arm

Whelm her and drown her in the water.

_Phil._ Ah! It is quite overpowering.

_Bel._ I faint.

_Arm._ I die from pleasure.

_Phil._ A thousand sweet thrills seize one.

_Arm._ _When to the baths sometime you've brought her._

_Bel._ _No more ado, with your own arm._

_Phil._ _Whelm her and drown her in the water._

With your own arm, drown her there in the baths.

_Arm._ In your verses we meet at each step with charming beauty.

_Bel._ One promenades through them with rapture.

_Phil._ One treads on fine things only.

_Arm._ They are little lanes all strewn with roses.

_Triss._ Then, the sonnet seems to you--

_Phil._ Admirable, new; and never did any one make any thing more

beautiful.

_Bel._ (_to Henriette_). What! my niece, you listen to what has been

read without emotion! You play there but a sorry part!

_Hen._ We each of us play the best part we can, my aunt; and to be a

wit does not depend on our will.

_Triss._ My verses, perhaps, are tedious to you.

_Hen._ No. I do not listen.

_Phil._ Ah! Let us hear the epigram.

But our readers, we think, will consent to spare the epigram. They will

relish, however, a fragment taken from a subsequent part of the same

protracted scene. The conversation has made the transition from literary

criticism to philosophy, in Moliere's time a fashionable study, rendered

such by the contemporary genius and fame of Descartes. Armande resents

the limitations imposed upon her sex:

_Arm._ It is insulting our sex too grossly to limit our intelligence

to the power of judging of a skirt, of the make of a garment, of the

beauties of lace, or of a new brocade.

_Bel._ We must rise above this shameful condition, and bravely

proclaim our emancipation.

_Triss._ Every one knows my respect for the fairer sex, and that, if I

render homage to the brightness of their eyes, I also honor the

splendor of their intellect.

_Phil._ And our sex does you justice in this respect; but we will show

to certain minds who treat us with proud contempt, that women also

have knowledge; that, like men, they can hold learned

meetings--regulated, too, by better rules; that they wish to unite

what elsewhere is kept apart, join noble language to deep learning,

reveal nature's laws by a thousand experiments; and, on all questions

proposed, admit every party, and ally themselves to none.

_Triss._ For order, I prefer peripateticism.

_Phil._ For abstractions, I love platonism.

_Arm._ Epicurus pleases me, for his tenets are solid.

_Bel._ I agree with the doctrine of atoms; but I find it difficult to

understand a vacuum, and I much prefer subtile matter.

_Triss._ I quite agree with Descartes about magnetism.

_Arm._ I like his vortices.

_Phil._ And I, his falling worlds.

_Arm._ I long to see our assembly opened, and to distinguish ourselves

by some great discovery.

_Triss._ Much is expected from your enlightened knowledge, for nature

has hidden few things from you.

_Phil._ For my part, I have, without boasting, already made one

discovery; I have plainly seen men in the moon.

_Bel._ I have not, I believe as yet, quite distinguished men, but I

have seen steeples as plainly as I see you.

_Arm._ In addition to natural philosophy, we will dive into grammar,

history, verse, ethics, and politics.

_Phil._ I find in ethics charms which delight my heart; it was

formerly the admiration of great geniuses; but I give the preference

to the Stoics, and I think nothing so grand as their founder.

"Les Precieuses Ridicules" is an earlier and lighter treatment of the

same theme. The object of ridicule in both these pieces was a lapsed and

degenerate form of what originally was a thing worthy of respect, and

even of praise. At the Hotel de Rambouillet, conversation was cultivated

as a fine art. There was, no doubt, something overstrained in the

standards which the ladies of that circle enforced. Their mutual

communication was all conducted in a peculiar style of language, the

natural deterioration of which was into a kind of euphuism, such as

English readers will remember to have seen exemplified in Walter Scott's

Sir Piercie Shafton. These ladies called each other, with demonstrative

fondness, "Ma precieuse." Hence at last the term _precieuse_ as a

designation of ridicule. Madame de Sevigne was a _precieuse_. But she,

with many of her peers, was too rich in sarcastic common sense to be a

_precieuse ridicule_. Moliere himself, thrifty master of policy that he

was, took pains to explain that he did not satirize the real thing, but

only the affectation.

"Tartuffe, or the Impostor," is perhaps the most celebrated of all

Moliere's plays. Scarcely comedy, scarcely tragedy, it partakes of both

characters. Like tragedy, serious in purpose, it has a happy ending like

comedy. Pity and terror are absent; or, if not quite absent, these

sentiments are present raised only to a pitch distinctly below the

tragic. Indignation is the chief passion excited, or detestation,

perhaps, rather than indignation. This feeling is provided at last with

its full satisfaction in the condign punishment visited on the impostor.

The original "Tartuffe," like the most of Moliere's comedies, is written

in rhymed verse. We could not, with any effort, make the English-reading

student of Moliere sufficiently feel how much is lost when the form is

lost which the creations of this great genius took, in their native

French, under his own master hand. A satisfactory metrical rendering is

out of the question. The sense, at least, if not the incommunicable

spirit, of the original, is very well given in Mr. C. H. Wall's version,

which we use.

The story of "Tartuffe" is briefly this: Tartuffe, the hero, is a pure

villain. He mixes no adulteration of good in his composition. He is

hypocrisy itself, the strictly genuine article. Tartuffe has completely

imposed upon one Orgon, a man of wealth and standing. Orgon, with his

wife, and with his mother, in fact, believes in him absolutely. These

people have received the canting rascal into their house, and are about

to bestow upon him their daughter in marriage. The following scene from

act first shows the skill with which Moliere could exhibit, in a few

strokes of bold exaggeration, the infatuation of Orgon's regard for

Tartuffe. Orgon has been absent from home. He returns, and meets

Cleante, his brother, whom, in his eagerness, he begs to excuse his not

answering a question just addressed to him:

_Orgon (to Cleante)._ Brother, pray excuse me: you will kindly allow

me to allay my anxiety by asking news of the family. (_To Dorine, a

maid-servant._) Has every thing gone on well these last two days? What

has happened? How is every body?

_Dor._ The day before yesterday our mistress was very feverish from

morning to night, and suffered from a most extraordinary headache.

_Org._ And Tartuffe?

_Dor._ Tartuffe! He is wonderfully well, stout, and fat with blooming

cheeks and ruddy lips.

_Org._ Poor man!

_Dor._ In the evening she felt very faint, and the pain in her head

was so great that she could not touch any thing at supper.

_Org._ And Tartuffe?

_Dor._ He ate his supper by himself before her, and very devoutly

devoured a brace of partridges and half a leg of mutton hashed.

_Org._ Poor man!

_Dor._ She spent the whole of the night without getting one wink of

sleep: she was very feverish, and we had to sit up with her until the

morning.

_Org._ And Tartuffe?

_Dor._ Overcome by a pleasant sleepiness, he passed from the table to

his room and got at once into his warmed bed, where he slept

comfortably till the next morning.

_Org._ Poor man!

_Dor._ At last, yielding to our persuasions, she consented to be bled,

and immediately felt relieved.

_Org._ And Tartuffe?

_Dor._ He took heart right valiantly, and fortifying his soul against

all evils, to make up for the blood which our lady had lost, drank at

breakfast four large bumpers of wine.

_Org._ Poor man!

_Dor._ Now, at last, they are both well: and I will go and tell our

lady how glad you are to hear of her recovery.

Tartuffe repays the trust and love of his benefactor by making improper

advances to that benefactor's wife. Orgon's son, who does not share his

father's confidence in Tartuffe, happens to be an unseen witness of the

man's infamous conduct. He exposes the hypocrite to Orgon, with the

result of being himself expelled from the house for his pains; while

Tartuffe, in recompense for the injury done to his feelings, is

presented with a gift-deed of Orgon's estate. But now Orgon's wife

contrives to let her husband see and hear for himself the vileness of

Tartuffe. This done, Orgon confronts the villain, and, with just

indignation, orders him out of his house. Tartuffe reminds Orgon that

the shoe is on the other foot; that he is himself now owner there, and

that it is Orgon, instead of Tartuffe, who must go. Orgon has an

interview with his mother, who is exasperatingly sure still that

Tartuffe is a maligned good man:

_Madame Pernelle._ I can never believe, my son, that he would commit

so base an action.

_Org._ What?

_Per._ Good people are always subject to envy.

_Org._ What do you mean, mother?

_Per._ That you live after a strange sort here, and that I am but too

well aware of the ill-will they all bear him.

_Org._ What has this ill-will to do with what I have just told you?

_Per._ I have told it you a hundred times when you were young, that in

this world virtue is ever liable to persecution, and that, although

the envious die, envy never dies.

_Org._ But what has this to do with what has happened to-day?

_Per._ They have concocted a hundred foolish stories against him.

_Org._ I have already told you that I saw it all myself.

French Classics · 第 6 / 29 段