CHAPTER XVI.

1773.

ABOLITION OF THE ORDER.

After the death of Clement XIII., all the influence of the house of

Bourbon was employed to secure that the choice of the College of

Cardinals should fall on a man adverse to the Company of Jesus, as all

the efforts of the members of that body were directed to bring about

the contrary result. While D’Aubeterre, the French ambassador, speaking

also in the name of Spain and Naples, was reiterating that an election

contrary to the wishes of the house of Bourbon would lead to the ruin of

the Roman See, thus endeavouring to intimidate the more pusillanimous of

the cardinals, Ricci was hurrying about from place to place, imploring

the one, threatening the others with the wrath of God, and freely

distributing presents and money when necessary. At daybreak he was on

foot, traversing every quarter of the city, and mixing with all classes

of the people. He visited their eminences, their confessors, their

varlets, not omitting some of the fashionable ladies, the——spiritual

friends of the Eminentissimi! He and Torrigiani gave out, and repeated

with great indignation and affected dignity, that it would be to the

eternal shame and confusion of the Sacred College to renounce their

independence, and submit to the demands of the imperious sovereigns.

The Court of Rome was divided at the time into two parties;—the Zelanti,

who laboured to maintain all the privileges of the Church in their

integrity and full extent; and the Regalisti, or the adherents of the

crowns, who considered that the welfare of the Church must be sought in

wise conciliation. Thirteen days after Clement’s demise, the Conclave

assembled, and the Zelanti, notwithstanding D’Aubeterre’s insinuations

and menaces, attempted to elect a Pope before the arrival of the French

and Spanish cardinals. They nearly succeeded in their attempt. Cardinal

Ghigi, one of them, having missed his nomination only by two votes. Then

the struggle for the nomination began again more seriously. Choiseul, and

still more than he, Charles III., being determined on the abolition of

the Jesuits, were resolved not to give their assent to the election of

a Pope, unless they should have a good assurance that he would abolish

the Society. The French and Spanish ambassadors in Rome, and above all,

the French and Spanish cardinals, were ordered to endeavour to effect

this result. But the person to whom was assigned, by the Bourbons, the

most prominent part in the Conclave, was Cardinal de Bernis. Bernis

was a man endowed with many noble qualities, but vain, ostentatious,

and devoured above all with the desire of playing a conspicuous part.

He had been first minister of Louis XV., had been supplanted by his

protégé Choiseul, who sent him back to his Bishopric of Alby, and who

now intrusted to him the delicate mission of choosing a successor to St

Peter. We say _choosing_, because, to flatter his vanity, Choiseul told

him that such would certainly be his mission, and the cardinal entered

the Conclave fully convinced that on him alone rested the choice of the

future pontiff. He was confident that the authority of the monarchs of

the house of Bourbon, and his own pleasing and insinuating manner, would

be irresistible. “His affability,” says St Priest, “which was a little

theatrical, but always winning, seemed to transport the Court of Louis

XV. into the midst of the gloomy apartments of the Vatican.” On entering

the Conclave, Bernis, in the most courteous and modest manner, and

without shewing any pretension of a desire to exercise any empire over

the holy College, said to his colleagues, “France has only the desire of

seeing raised to the papal throne a wise and temperate prince, who may

entertain the respect due to the great powers. The choice of the Sacred

College can only rest upon virtue, since it shines forth in each one

of its members. But virtue alone is not sufficient. Who could surpass

Clement XIII. in religion and purity of doctrine? His intentions were

excellent; nevertheless, during his reign, the Church was disturbed and

shaken to its centre. Let your eminences restore concord between the Holy

See and the Catholic States, and bring back peace to Christendom, and

France will be content.”[360] As an inducement to the cardinals to comply

with the wishes of the sovereigns, Bernis had permission to promise in

their names the restitution of Avignon, Pontecorvo, and Benevento; and it

may be well supposed that he made the most of the permission. To this,

the Zelanti and the Jesuit party answered, that in the election of the

supreme chief of the Church, no considerations should be regarded but the

good of religion, and that the electors ought to listen to no advice, but

implore fervently the Holy Ghost, and follow his inspiration. De Bernis’

position became rather embarrassing. Charles III., it seems, proposed

to bind the future Pope by a _written promise_ to abolish the order of

the Jesuits. But when D’Aubeterre proposed to Bernis this arrangement,

the cardinal drew back; his conscience would not allow him to be an

accomplice in lowering so much the Tiara. He refused to make any such

proposals, adding, with justice, that nothing could secure the execution

of the contract, and that a cardinal who was capable of pledging himself

beforehand to such a contract, would dishonour his future pontificate,

as everything must ultimately come to light;[361] and although the

ambassadors insisted anew with more pressing instances, Bernis remained

firm in his opinion, that such conduct was disgraceful and illegal.

Aubeterre endeavoured to overcome his repugnance by all sorts of

arguments, and in a letter addressed to him on the 11th of April, we find

the following passage: “I know well that I am unable to be the _casuist_

of your eminence; but let your eminence consult Cardinal Ganganelli, one

of the most celebrated theologians of this country, and who has never

been accused of professing a lax morality.”[362]

While the cardinals were thus engaged in the supreme and all-important

affair of choosing the chief of their Church, they, the Jesuits, the

ambassadors, and all Rome, were on a sudden thrown into a state of

anxiety and expectation. Joseph II., Emperor of Germany, accompanied by

his brother Leopold, Grand Duke of Tuscany, arrived in Rome. Possessed of

real personal merit, Joseph disdained ostentation, and appeared among the

citizens of the eternal city with all the studied and striking contrast

of an incognito, of which he was the inventor, under the modest title of

Count of Falkestein. He mixed among the Romans without a suite, wearing

no decoration, and without any pomp. Yet his presence in Rome produced a

great sensation.

There are in almost every nation certain traditions, which are

transmitted from generation to generation, tacitly without any apparent

effort by any person to transmit them, which, however, pass to the

remotest posterity as if by intuition, and form part of the moral life

of a people. Such is in Rome the tradition, more or less correct, of

a republic, and of emperors, which is at the bottom of the heart of

every inhabitant of the metropolis of the world. Very few people are

recorded in history to have fought as we Romans lately did. But I doubt

much that we would have so fought even for the same prize—liberty and

independence—in the name of prince or king, or any title in Christendom,

or, indeed, in any name except that of the republic, and it may be that

of an emperor.[363] Joseph, although a Roman Catholic, and anxious to

respect the scruples of his mother, Maria Theresa, was a philosopher,

meditating already part of those reforms he shortly after effected; and

the moment he came within sight of Rome, he decided upon humbling her

pride, and putting some restraint upon her immoderate pretensions. When

in Rome, as may be imagined, he was courted by all parties, and his

support was eagerly sought by every one, and especially by the Zelanti

and the Jesuits. Every one waited with impatience to see the part he

would take in the contest. But the young prince was, or affected to

be, indifferent to the paltry question of the Jesuits, which was then

paramount; and in speaking of it, he often repeated that he wondered

that the fate of some thousand monks should cause so much uneasiness

to such powerful sovereigns. Although he spoke of the Jesuits with

the greatest contempt, nevertheless the fathers hoped that they might

claim him as their partisan; an opinion which Joseph took care soon

to dissipate. While visiting the different monuments of Rome, he went

also to the _Gesù_, the principal and most magnificent establishment of

the order. The fathers soon gathered round him in the most respectful

and humble attitude; and the General, approaching him, and prostrating

himself at the emperor’s feet with the most profound humility, was going

to address him, when Joseph, without allowing him to go on, abruptly

asked him when he was going to relinquish his habit. Ricci turned pale,

and muttered some inarticulate words; he confessed that the times were

very hard for him and for his brethren, but that they trusted in God

and in the future holy Father, whose infallibility would be for ever

compromised if he destroyed an order which had received the sanction

of so many of his predecessors. The emperor smiled; and being then in

the church, and chancing at the moment to fix his regards on a statue

of Ignatius of massive silver, and glittering with precious stones,

exclaimed against the prodigious sum it must have cost. “Sire,” stammered

the Father General, “this statue has been erected with the money of the

friends of the Society.” “Say rather,” replied Joseph, “with the profit

of the Indies,” and departed, leaving the fathers in the utmost grief

and dejection.[364] Joseph, assuming, on the other hand, a marked tone

of superiority over the sovereigns of the house of Bourbon, affected the

same indifference as to the election of a Pope, which he considered, as

he said, of little moment, and unworthy of occupying the attention of a

monarch of the eighteenth century; and, to prove by deeds the sincerity

of his words, he gave orders to the Cardinal Pozzo-Bonelli, his minister,

neither to support nor oppose any candidate.

The cardinals were distressed at this marked indifference of the only

Catholic sovereign of rank who was then on good terms with Rome; and

wishing to try whether they could not attract the young prince to the

Holy See, by shewing him some extraordinary mark of respect and devotion,

in general so flattering to the youthful mind, they, violating all

their rules and regulations, invited the emperor to do them the honour

of visiting the Conclave. Joseph went thither, and was met by all the

cardinals in a body, one of whom took him by the hand, and introduced

him within those precincts which no man can enter or leave from the

commencement of the meeting till a Pope has been elected. The emperor

received all those extraordinary advances with cold dignity. He addressed

Bernis with rather condescending affability, which much flattered the

vanity of the cardinal. But when Torrigiani was presented to him, he

merely observed, “I have heard much of you,” and inquired immediately

for the Cardinal of York. “Le voici,” answered the grandson of James

II. Joseph saluted the last of the Stuarts with a marked expression of

feature, and requested to be admitted to his cell. “It is very small for

your highness,” said the emperor, after having visited it.[365]

When the emperor was on the point of leaving the Conclave, the

demonstrations of the cardinals increased. “Sire,” cried they, “we trust

that your imperial majesty will protect the new Pope, that he may put

an end to the troubles of the Church.” The emperor replied, that the

power to accomplish this rested with their eminences, by choosing a Pope

who should imitate Benedict XIV., and not require too much; that the

spiritual authority of the Pope was incontestable, but that he ought to

be satisfied with this; and that, above all, in treating with sovereigns,

he ought never to forget himself so far as to violate the rules of policy

and good-breeding.[366] So saying, he left the Conclave, and even

abandoned Rome the same evening, and set out for Naples to avoid the

fêtes prepared for him.

The cardinals, when the agitation produced by the visit of the emperor

was a little subdued, returned to their party intrigues, and vainly

endeavoured, during three long months, to give a successor to St Peter.

At last the Spanish cardinals, who seem to have purposely delayed their

voyage till that moment, in order to decide by their votes and their

influence a contest which must have by this time tried both parties,

arrived in Rome, and entered the Conclave. La Ceda and De Solis, the

latter Archbishop of Seville, and possessing Charles III.’s confidence,

began at once to explore the ground, and to take all the necessary

measures to succeed in their purpose, Bernis still pretending to be the

negotiator of the Conclave. The Spaniards, leaving him to rejoice in this

opinion, set themselves quietly to work, and soon succeeded in bringing

the matter to a conclusion, by the choice of a candidate who was accepted

by both parties. This candidate was Cardinal Ganganelli, of whom we must

give some account before proceeding further.

Lorenzo Ganganelli was born in the town of St Arcangelo, on the 30th of

October 1705, of a plebeian family, his father being a labourer. Like his

predecessor, the goatherd of Montalto, Lorenzo entered at a very early

age the order of St Francis (the Cordeliers),[367] and distinguished

himself by a constant application, by the love of solitude, and by a

calm, equal, and placid conduct. His principal occupation was the study

of theology, in which he became a proficient and able professor. But

his long meditation upon this science did not inspire him with a spirit

of fanaticism and persecution, but, on the contrary, with a spirit of

tolerance and love for his fellow-men; and, what appears still more rare,

he did not in the least alter his jovial and agreeable manners. Nor did

he, plunged as he was in the study of divinity, become insensible to the

charms of nature, or to the attractions of the fine arts. He delighted

in natural history, and spent many of his leisure hours in dissecting

insects, or in collecting plants. He cultivated literature with some

success; and if he was not a judicious connoisseur, he certainly was a

warm protector of the fine arts, and was passionately fond of music.[368]

One of his masters had once said of him in this particular, “No wonder he

loves music, seeing that everything in his mind is in harmony.”[369] From

his earliest youth, Lorenzo conceived hopes of rising to an extraordinary

station in life; and his ambition, which was ardent and persevering,

persuaded him that he was destined by Providence to perform extraordinary

deeds; which persuasion gave to all his conduct the characteristic turn

of a mysterious reliance on the future. When his parents dissuaded him

from entering the cloister, Lorenzo, although he was then very young,

answered that a monk’s frock had often preceded the purple, and that the

two last Sistuses had issued from the convents of St Francis. Indeed,

he cherished the memory of Padre Felice, of that Sistus who, even in

our own day, is remembered by all the Italians, but, above all, by

the lowest classes, with a loving veneration. Like Sistus, Ganganelli

shewed little inclination for the aristocracy, and courted the favour

of the multitude. Ganganelli, even after he had ascended to the highest

dignity, remained an unpretending and popular monk. He was ambitious,

and extremely jealous of real authority, but disdained the shows and

appearance of it. “Notwithstanding his elevation, Ganganelli preserved

his former simple habits. Pomp and ceremony were less to his taste than

a frugal meal, long rides into the campagna of Rome, the friendship

of Francesco,[370] the visit of a few well-informed strangers, and,

above all, the conversation of the fathers of the convent of the Holy

Apostles.”[371]

These were, indeed, very amiable and noble qualities, and assuredly

Clement XIV. proved one of the most enlightened and well-intentioned

Popes that ever ascended the pontifical chair. But almost all the

historians, many of them influenced no doubt by the fact that he was the

suppressor of the order of the Jesuits, have exaggerated the virtues

and merits of Ganganelli, and made of him, either as monk or as Pope,

an irreproachable and unexceptionable personage, gifted with almost

supernatural qualities.[372] We are not quite so partial to him, and,

while we give him credit for his many superior good qualities, we cannot

overlook his faults, nor declare his conduct free from reproach. Thus,

for example, it is evident that Ganganelli, as a thorough good Franciscan

(an order from the first to the last inimical to the Company), and as

a tolerant and conciliating man, could not be the friend, or have any

regard for the Jesuits; and yet, perceiving how influential the fathers

were under Rezzonico, Padre Lorenzo courted their favour, obtained

the protection of Ricci, who presented him to the Pope’s nephew, and

by their joint interest the poor monk was made an eminentissimo. This

certainly does not prove much in favour of his straightforwardness; and

his whole conduct during the Conclave proves also that Ganganelli was not

over-scrupulous as to the means he adopted to satisfy his deeply-rooted

ambition. Gioberti, his warm apologist, seeing that it would be rather

difficult to exonerate him from the reproach of ambition, admits that

he was indeed an ambitious man, but he says, “If it is true, according

to St Paul, that the man who desires the office of a bishop desires a

good work,[373] why will it not be permitted in certain cases to wish

to obtain the Popedom, which is the supreme priesthood?”[374] And he

(Gioberti) proceeds to prove that such ambition is permitted when the

man seeks not his own but the public welfare, when he is sure that he is

qualified for the task, and when he does not make use of any unworthy

means to obtain the object of his ambition; and he pretends that

Ganganelli fulfilled all these conditions. We, too, give credit to the

poor cordelier for having fulfilled the two first, and we believe that,

in aspiring to the supreme See, he had in view the public advantage, the

welfare of the Church, and that, moreover, he thought himself perfectly

qualified to be a Pope; but we shall leave our readers to judge whether

all the means he resorted to were unexceptionable and honest.

During the Conclave of all the cardinals, Cardinal Ganganelli appeared

the most unconcerned and indifferent as to the supremely important matter

they were engaged in. He kept aloof from the intrigues of all parties,

so that each might have considered him as one of its adherents. He

ingratiated himself with the party of the sovereigns, by repeating often

in public, but with the utmost timidity, just as an observation to be

taken into consideration, “Their arms are very long, they reach beyond

the Alps and the Pyrenees;” while to the partisans of the Jesuits he

repeated, “We must no more think of destroying the Society of Jesus than

of pulling down the dome of St Peter’s.”[375] It has been insinuated, and

even asserted, by many historians, that while Ganganelli was speaking so

ambiguously in public, he had secretly assured the French minister of

his adverse disposition towards the Jesuits, and that France, from the

beginning, had chosen him as her candidate. St Priest positively denies

that this was the case, and affirms that Ganganelli was by no means the

man upon whom France rested her confidence. “The cardinal was indeed

mentioned in the list of _bons sujets_, that is to say, of persons who

would not be unacceptable to the Bourbons; but his name, as well as that

of many others, was accompanied with notes of reservation.”[376] And the

French historian proceeds to say that France, far from preferring him to

the rest of the candidates, suspected him of intrigues and duplicity;

and Ganganelli’s conduct might have well given cause for such suspicion.

He had been previously intimate with the French cardinals, and shewed

himself rather favourable to their interests, but during the sitting of

the Conclave had affected to shun them, evidently with the intention of

not giving offence to the other party. He lived alone, shut up in his

cell, and seemed as if what was going on did not concern him in the least.

How, then, did it happen that he was chosen to the vacant throne?

The Jesuits have accused him of _simony_, and have asserted that, in

exchange for a written promise to suppress their order, the Spanish

cardinals gave him all the votes that were at the disposal of the house

of Bourbon.[377] The admirers of Clement have, on the other hand,

indignantly denied the ignominious traffic, and affirm that he was chosen

as the most moderate, tolerant, and virtuous of all the cardinals, and

as one who could alone heal the wounds of the Church; and the fact is,

that neither party may be said to be altogether wrong in their assertion.

It rests on many good authorities; and in our eyes the fact admits of no

doubt, that Ganganelli, two or three days before the scrutiny for the

nomination of a Pope, gave a written note to De Solis, conceived in the

following terms:—“I admit that the Sovereign Pontiff may in conscience

abolish the Society of the Jesuits, without violating the canonical

regulations.”[378] Now, how far this proceeding may constitute the sin of

simony, we do not pretend to decide. Evidently, in the strictest sense

of the word, here is no specified contract constituting simony. In this

note Cardinal Ganganelli expresses his opinion, as a theologian, that

the Supreme Pontiff may, in perfect safety of conscience, abolish the

Order of Jesus; and this opinion is perfectly sound and orthodox. But,

as plain matter of fact, it may be asked, was this answer intended to

win for the adviser the support of Spain, who was firmly resolved not to

consent to any nomination without having obtained from the future Pope

a written promise to suppress the Society of Jesus? It seems that the

Spanish cardinals, with whatever intention Ganganelli may have given

the note, took it not as the opinion of the theologian, but as the

solemn engagement of the future Pope, so that, soon after the note was

written, as if the Holy Ghost had of a sudden decided on the choice, and

suggested to the electors the same name, Ganganelli was elected to the

chair of the apostles.

However, between the negotiation of the Spanish ministers with Ganganelli

and the scrutiny for the nomination, Bernis, who saw that all opinions

were growing warm in favour of the Franciscan, and perceived that he had

been played upon by his Castilian colleagues, since all had been done

without his participation, to save at least appearances, hastened to

the probable candidate, and boasted to him that his election would be

due to the influence of France. The Spaniards willingly allowed him to

play this specious part, so suited to his ostentatious character, and

Ganganelli, who perhaps felt embarrassed as to how he should express his

pretended gratitude, answered in these strange words, “I bear Louis XV.

in my heart, and the Cardinal de Bernis in my right hand.”[379] Bernis

then, with a sort of diplomatic importance, requested distinctly to know

Ganganelli’s opinions with respect to the Jesuits, and the affair of the

Infant of Parma. On the latter point the future Pope answered in the most

satisfactory manner, and promised not only to recall the _monitorium_,

but to consecrate himself, in the Basilica of St Peter, the duke’s

approaching marriage. But on the Jesuit question he was not so explicit;

he admitted that their suppression appeared to be necessary, and that

most likely the future Pope would not be satisfied with mere words; and,

“in short,” says St Priest, “Ganganelli promised De Bernis all that he

desired.”[380] This being so arranged, and the Austrian party, to which

also adhered that of the Jesuits, having accepted the candidature of

Ganganelli, he was, as we have said, elected Sovereign Pontiff, and

assumed the name of Clement XIV.

Ganganelli having at last attained the summit of his ambition, enjoyed

for a short moment with rapture his good fortune, and the immense

popularity which immediately surrounded him, and gave way to all the

naturally good impulses of his heart. On the day of his coronation,

upon entering the Basilica of the Vatican, his eye fell upon a stone on

which he had once stood when a simple monk, to see the cortege of Pope

Rezzonico pass by. “Look,” said he, pointing it out to one of his suite,

“from that stone I was driven ten years ago.”[381] The very commencement

of his pontificate gave great satisfaction to the sovereigns, and to all

the friends of a liberal and tolerant policy. He began by prohibiting

the reading of the Bull _in coena Domini_, so offensive to all monarchs;

he suspended the effect of the _monitorium_ against the Duke of Parma;

he declared that he would send a nuncio to Portugal; and he extended

some concessions made by Benedict XIV. to the King of Sardinia, and

which his predecessor had refused to recognise. Had not the question of

the Jesuits been at issue, there is no doubt that Ganganelli would have

given general satisfaction, and he himself have lived and died a happy

and honoured Pope. But this unfortunate affair poisoned all his joy

from the commencement of his reign. To whatever side he turned himself,

he saw nothing but almost insurmountable obstacles. On the one hand,

the sovereigns demanded imperatively the abolition of the order, and

Clement had to fear that his refusal to comply would divest Rome not

only of the valuable possessions of Avignon and Benevento, but also of

the filial obedience of Spain, France, and Portugal. On the other hand,

how could he, the supreme chief of the Roman Catholic Church, abolish an

order which had been considered the firmest bulwark of this same Church,

and, as such, recognised and approved by many of his predecessors?

What would be the judgment of posterity and of the followers of his

creed? Would they ratify his sentence, and ascribe to him the gift of

infallibility at the expense of the other mistaken pontiffs? or would he

be accounted peccable, and his predecessors infallible? In both cases

the Papal infallibility would be greatly damaged, and the authority it

gave to the decisions of the Holy See greatly diminished, which neither

Ganganelli nor any other Pope ever wished that it should be; because it

is a remarkable fact, that the Popes, elective sovereigns, and who alone

of such have no hope whatever of transmitting to their issue or their

relatives any portion of their power, have always been, and still are,

scrupulously careful not to diminish the splendour and glory of the Papal

chair, although they may sometimes foresee that after their death it

will be occupied by their bitterest enemy. What then could the poor Pope

do in these critical circumstances? Although he liked to be compared to

Sistus V., whose memory he dearly worshipped, he was far from possessing

the firmness of character and the indomitable energy of the _quondam_

goatherd of the Abruzzi. He did not act as Sistus would have done; like

all persons without energy, in perilous and difficult emergencies, he

took no decisive measure, but directed all his efforts and artifices

to gain time, incessantly promising to the sovereigns to come to a

determination, and always evading the fulfilment of his promises at the

decisive moment.

To obtain some delay from France, he thought that the best he could do

was to flatter the vanity of De Bernis, now the accredited ambassador

of the court of Versailles, and to render him an unwilling accomplice

in his dilatory system; and Bernis, although an intelligent and shrewd

man, was so blinded by his vanity, as to be easily duped by his arts. St

Priest has given, from Bernis’ letters to Choiseul, a relation of some

interviews which took place between the Pope and the cardinal. “When

the cardinal went to pay his respects to the Pope, the latter would

not accept the customary homage; he forbade his genuflexion, repeatedly

he offered him his snuff-box, and even compelled him to be seated in

his presence. Bernis retired with every mark of profound respect, but

Clement said, in a familiar tone, ‘We are alone, and no person sees

us; let us dispense with etiquette, and resume the old equality of the

cardinalate.’”[382] A few days afterwards, when Bernis presented a letter

from Louis XV., Clement seized and kissed it with transport, exclaiming,

“I owe all to France. Providence has chosen me among the people like St

Peter, and the house of Bourbon has, under Providence, been the means

of raising me to the chair of the prince of the Apostles. Providence,

too, has permitted,” he added, embracing Bernis, “that you should be the

minister of the king at the Papal court. I place unlimited confidence in

you, my dear cardinal; let there be no indirect intercourse, no mystery,

between us.”[383]

These assurances flattered the vanity of Bernis, who was continually

asking his court to sanction the delays which the dignity of the Pope

rendered necessary, and which he represented to be inevitable in matters

affecting ecclesiastical discipline. These representations had some

influence upon the mind of Louis XV., who in his profligacy was often

assailed by transitory fits of remorse; and he prevailed upon the King

of Spain, though with some difficulty, to be a little more patient, and

to grant to the Pope some reasonable delay for the settlement of the

question.

Clement’s joy at the good success of his policy was irrepressible. Not

only did he feel proud of his own cleverness, but he hoped to be able

to find fresh pretexts for an indefinite delay. This brief moment of

illusion was the happiest in all his pontificate; indeed it was the

only happy one. His countenance beamed with contentment, his manner

became still more amiable, and nothing could exceed his good-humour. To

wrap himself in his happiness, he went to the enchanting residence of

Castel-Gandolfo, and spent many happy hours on the charming shore of the

Lake of Albano, with no other witness or suite than the old friend of his

youth, the poor lay brother, Francesco.

But the felicity was of short duration. Scarcely had Ganganelli returned

to Rome, when all his illusion vanished. Ardent and restless in the

furtherance of his projects, Charles III. was impatient to see the

destruction of the Jesuits accomplished; and seeing that no progress

was made towards this end, he accused Bernis to Choiseul either of

incapacity, or of connivance with Clement. Choiseul, to whom Charles left

all liberty to act as he pleased in the general policy of Europe, was

very anxious to comply with his wishes in this affair. He had already,

some time before, written to Bernis a letter full of remonstrances, and

ending thus:—“And if I was ambassador at Rome, I should be ashamed to see

Father Ricci the antagonist of my master.”[384] But now he pressed the

cardinal more and more strongly to bring the Pope to a speedy decision.

The Spanish king, on his part, not content with stimulating Choiseul, was

pressing the Pope harder and harder. First he held out a menace against

the Court of Rome; then, when Clement represented that there was some

danger that the measure of suppression would cause an outbreak, or the

interference of other monarchs, or of the pious friends of the Jesuits,

he proposed to land at Civita Vecchia 6000 men to defend the Pope against

his enemies; and, to frighten Ganganelli still more, he publicly and

explicitly denounced Cardinal de Bernis to the Court of France, and asked

for his recall.

Bernis was stunned by the shock, and felt as if his embassy, the thing

of all things dearest to his heart, for the pomp and power which it

imparted, had already been torn from him. The sympathy which he had for

Clement, the desire to be agreeable to him, and to repay the Pope for

the confidence which he thought his Holiness placed in him, vanished

at once, and all his thoughts were directed to find out how he could

constrain the Sovereign Pontiff, his spiritual and immediate chief, to

obey his temporal masters, and thus maintain himself in his embassy.

Instead of his previous easy acquiescence, he now became stern and

exacting; and not seeing any more efficient step to take to calm Charles

III.’s impatience, he urged the Pope to write to the king, and to make

peace with him.[385] Ganganelli, overjoyed to escape the present evil,

consented inconsiderately to what was asked of him, without reflecting

that, by pledging himself in writing, he rendered his position still

more difficult and perilous for the future. In his letter to the Spanish

king, declining the assistance offered by his Catholic majesty, he

requested time to accomplish the suppression of the Jesuits, admitting,

at the same time, that this measure was indispensable, and announcing,

in plain terms, that “_the members of the Society had merited their

fall from the restlessness of their spirit, and the audacity of their

proceedings_.”[386] This letter, which was written in 1770, has been

denied by some, and by others confounded with the more vague note which,

as we have seen, it was asserted that Ganganelli had written previous

to his ascension to the pontificate. This is a grave error; and, to

dispel any doubt, we shall quote the words of Cardinal Bernis himself,

in his despatch of April 29, 1770. They are, as will be seen, of the

gravest importance:—“The question is not whether the Pope would wish

to suppress the Jesuits; but whether, after the formal promises he has

given in writing to the King of Spain, his Holiness can for a moment

hesitate to fulfil them? This letter, which I have induced him to write

to his Catholic majesty, binds him so firmly, that, unless the court of

Spain should alter its opinions, the Pope will be obliged to complete

the undertaking. By gaining him, it is true, he might effect something,

but the power of delay is limited. His Holiness is a man of too much

clear-sightedness not to perceive that, should the King of Spain cause

his letter to be printed, he would lose his character as a man of honour,

if he hesitated to fulfil his promise, and suppress the Society, a plan

for whose destruction he had promised to communicate, and whose members

he considered as dangerous, discontented, and turbulent.”[387]

On the existence of this letter, to which they wrongly assign, as we

have said, a date anterior to the election of Ganganelli, the Jesuits

have founded their system of defence. They have asserted that the Pope

was compelled to the act of abolishing their Society, which act Clement

personally did not consider either just or necessary; and it cannot be

denied that the sovereigns exercised a kind of constraint upon him. But

was, then, Ganganelli favourable to the order, and would he, if left to

himself, have let the Jesuits live in peace, and protected them against

a great part of Europe conspiring for their destruction? No! undoubtedly

no. We have already observed that Ganganelli could not be the friend of

the Jesuits. The man who took Sistus V. and Benedict XIV. for his models,

and with whom he had so many points of resemblance, could only have

wished what these his predecessors wished and attempted to do, namely, to

put a stop to the Jesuits’ pride and arrogance. But we say more. Had not

Clement been pressed too hard by the sovereigns, we are convinced that

he would have acted more energetically and with more decision. We must

remember that Ganganelli, though little exacting in regard to outward

shows of pomp and power, had the highest opinion of the dignity with

which he was invested, and was by no means disposed to see the tiara

lowered or dishonoured in his person. Once, when Florida Blanca, the

Spanish ambassador, in order to support his argument, suggested to the

Pope that immediately after the publication of the Brief of Suppression,

Avignon and Benevento would be restored to the Holy See, Clement answered

with majestic dignity, “Remember that a Pope governs the Church, but does

not traffic in his authority,”[388] and, breaking short the conference,

retired in indignation. Besides, Ganganelli, though wanting in energy,

and though he may be reproached with somewhat equivocal conduct in order

to satisfy his ambition, was a man too religious and too noble-hearted,

of too sound principles of morality and honesty, to subscribe to a

measure which he considered unjust. He would have preferred every

inconvenience, martyrdom itself, to such iniquitous and dishonourable

conduct. Why, then, did he hesitate so long to accomplish a measure which

he considered useful and just? Let Clement answer for himself first, and

we shall give our reasons afterwards. In the Brief of Suppression the

Pope says: “We have omitted no care, no pains, in order to arrive at a

thorough knowledge of the origin, the progress, and the actual state

of that regular order commonly called the Company of Jesus.”[389] And

Ranke, whom the Jesuits often quote as authority, and who seems to be

rather partial to them, says, “Clement applied himself with the utmost

attention to the affairs of the Jesuits. A commission of cardinals was

formed, the archives of the Propaganda were examined, and the arguments

of both sides were deliberately considered.”[390] It is evident, then,

that Clement wished to give a judgment with a perfect knowledge of the

affair. It must be remembered that there is a wide distance between the

opinion that Ganganelli might have entertained of the Jesuits, and the

fact of the Supreme Pontiff, the chief of the religion, condemning, by

a solemn irrevocable act, a religious order approved and protected by

thirteen former Popes. It must be remembered that Clement was himself a

monk, and that, at the very beginning of the Brief of Suppression, he

informs us what his sentiments were towards the monastic communities.

“It is beyond doubt,” says the Brief, “that among the things _which

contribute to the good and happiness of the Christian Republic, the

religious orders hold the first place_. It was for this reason that the

Apostolic See, _which owes its welfare and support to these orders_, has

not only approved, but endowed them with many exemptions, privileges, and

faculties.”[391] Besides these powerful and principal reasons, many other

secondary ones must have induced Clement to defer the all-important act.

It was repugnant to his mild, benevolent, and conciliating character to

have recourse to harsh and severe measures. The nobleness and generosity

of his heart, on another side, suggested to him, that to the Jesuits,

perhaps, he was indebted for the supreme dignity he had obtained,

since it was by their influence that he had been named cardinal; and

this leads us to believe that, had the measure been less urgent and

indispensable to the welfare of the Church and Christianity, he, in

memory of past benefits, would never have suppressed the order. As a

last, not least reason, for Ganganelli’s hesitation, it may be adduced

that the Roman Catholic world would have received it with astonishment,

and not without murmurs, if he had abolished a society for which his

benefactor, Rezzonico, whose ashes were yet warm, had nourished such a

particular affection, and which he had taken under the protection of his

infallibility—an infallibility which, though Clement never spoke, he no

doubt would not have liked that others should have called in question.

In one word, in judging of Ganganelli’s conduct, the different parties

have too often forgotten that he was a Pope and a monk.

All the motives we have adduced to explain and excuse Clement’s delay

in suppressing the order, were noble and praiseworthy; but it must be

confessed that with them was mingled one that was less noble, and not so

creditable to the Pope’s character. He was afraid lest the Jesuits should

assassinate or poison him; and his fears were not, as we shall see,

without foundation.

The Jesuits, it may be imagined, had spared no pains to influence

Clement’s mind, and to deprecate the scheme of their destruction. At

first they set at work all the influences they still possessed. In

Rome, above all, they were as yet all-powerful among the nobility.

They were the agents of the husbands, the confessors of the wives, the

tutors of the children; and by means of these nobles they endeavoured

to influence the Pope in their favour. But as Ganganelli received few

persons of that rank, and listened to none, this expedient of the

fathers proved abortive. They obtained afterwards from the sovereigns

of Austria, Bavaria, Poland, and Sardinia, letters of recommendation

to the Holy Father; and when they perceived that even these proved

ineffectual, they had recourse to threats, and, by many ingenious and

sly contrivances, conveyed to Clement’s mind the persuasion that they

would take away his life, whatever precautions he should take. To make

a still stronger impression upon his mind, they had his death predicted

by a set of impostors, whose predictions were, as is generally the

case, readily believed by the people; and the Jesuits took good care to

strengthen this belief. Bernardina Renzi, a peasant of Valentano, giving

herself out as a prophetess, predicted the vacancy of the Holy See by

the mysterious initials P. S. S. V. (presto sarà sede vacante). Another

Pythoness of Montefiascone also put forth similar strange and mysterious

predictions.[392] The Pope was too enlightened, too religious, to believe

in such impostures; but, just because he did not believe in them, he

feared them the more, knowing that those who had put them forth would

find the means to accomplish them. Two Jesuits, Fathers Coltraro and

Venizza, along with the confessor of Bernardina, were thrown into prison,

as having been suspected of being the advisers of the prophetess. In the

various circles of society, almost publicly and aloud, the Jesuits and

their partisans accused and cursed Clement, heaping reproaches on his

name, and even insinuating the possibility of a deposition. Insulting

images and hideous figures were put forth, announcing an approaching

catastrophe, under the form of vengeance of Providence. Father Ricci,

far from feeling any repugnance to the support of such shameless

deception, did not even shrink from an interview with the sorceress of

Valentino.[393]

Surrounded as he was by treachery, Ganganelli could not long resist the

impressions which such a state of things was calculated to make upon him.

His natural gaiety gave way; his health became impaired; and evident

signs of weariness were stamped on the whole of his countenance. He lived

more secluded than ever, and would not taste of any dishes but those

prepared by his faithful Francesco, or by his own hands.

On the other hand, the sovereigns became more and more urgent. To Anzpurù

succeeded, as Spanish ambassador, that same Muniño who, in his capacity

of magistrate, had assisted D’Aranda in the mysterious examination of

the Jesuits’ conduct, after the _émeute_ of 1766, and who was now the

Count of Florida Blanca. He was stern and inflexible, and pressed hard

the poor Pope to take the dangerous leap. The transitory, delusive hope

which the Jesuits had enjoyed, of escaping ruin, after the disgrace

of Choiseul, and the paramount influence which had been acquired over

the king by their friend Madame Dubarry, the successor of Madame de

Pompadour, soon vanished. D’Aiguillon, to deprecate the anger of Charles

III. for the fall of his friend Choiseul, seconded the Spanish king

vigorously in his cherished project of obtaining the Suppression; and,

as Austria had abandoned the cause of the order,[394] the ruin of the

Jesuits became inevitable. Yet Clement resisted all those importunities

and menaces, and held firm, till, after a long and protracted

investigation, his conscience was satisfied that the act he was called

upon to perform was an act of supreme justice and of immense advantage

to Christianity. Then, although he felt sure that he should forfeit his

life, he decided upon sacrificing it to the fulfilment of a duty, which

gives to the act a more imposing and solemn gravity. On the 23d July

1773, he affixed his signature to the Brief, saying, in the very act of

writing his name, “We sign our death”—Sottoscriviamo la nostra morte.[395]

We shall now lay before our readers a great part of this Brief, which we

should wish them to attentively read and consider, because, as a Roman

Catholic priest observes, “It is undoubtedly one of the most beautiful

and honourable of the Roman Church; and so much so, that I dare assert

that there is no ecclesiastical ordinance where shines more brightly the

wisdom, the holiness, the moderation, and the true philosophy of the

apostolic chair. The idea which is predominant in the Brief is, that of

the unity and peace which the Man-God brought to mortals, by establishing

his religion,” &c.[396] In fact, the Brief is extremely remarkable in all

its parts, and shews with what accuracy, with what patience, Clement had

examined the question. It begins by pronouncing a high eulogium on the

monastic orders, and on the good intentions of Loyola in founding that of

the Jesuits. It then points out many of these orders which were abolished

by different Popes. It recapitulates all the favours that the Holy See

had bestowed on the Jesuits. Then, in a rapid sketch of the history of

the order, it shews in it the principle of discord, of schism; of a

continual war waged by it against all other religious communities; the

dissensions it excited in various Catholic countries; the obstinacy of

the Jesuits in persisting in their reprehensible conduct, notwithstanding

a number of briefs and admonitions of the Supreme Pontiff; and, finally,

concludes by declaring it TO BE IMPOSSIBLE THAT THE CHURCH COULD RECOVER

A FIRM AND DURABLE PEACE, SO LONG AS THE SAID SOCIETY SUBSISTED. Here

follows this memorable document,[397] which we give at length, as the

most correct epitome of the history of the Company, written by the most

high and competent authority:—

“_Brief for the effectual Suppression of the Order of Jesuits._

“CLEMENT XIV., Pope, &c.

“Jesus Christ, our Saviour and Redeemer, was foretold by the

prophets as the _Prince of Peace_: the angels proclaimed him

under the same title to the shepherds at his first appearance

upon earth; he afterwards made himself known repeatedly as

the _sovereign pacificator_; and he recommended peace to his

disciples before his ascension to heaven.

“Having reconciled all things to God his Father, having

pacified by his blood and by his cross everything which is

contained in heaven and in earth, he recommended to his

apostles the ministry of reconciliation, and bestowed on them

the gift of tongues, that they might publish it; that they

might become ministers and envoys of Christ, who is not the God

of discord, but of peace and love; that they might announce

this peace to all the earth, and direct their efforts to this

chief point, that all men, being regenerated in Christ, might

preserve the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace; might

consider themselves as one body and one soul, as called to one

and the same hope, to one and the same vocation, at which,

according to St Gregory, we can never arrive, unless we run in

concert with our brethren. The same word of reconciliation,

this same ministry, is recommended to us by God in a particular

manner. Ever since we were raised (without any personal merit)

to the chair of St Peter, we have called these duties to mind

day and night; we have had them without ceasing before our

eyes; they are deeply engraven on our heart; and we labour to

the utmost of our power to satisfy and to fulfil them. To this

effect we implore without ceasing the protection and the aid of

God, that he would inspire us and all his flock with counsels

of peace, and open to us the road which leads to it. We know,

besides, _that we are established by the Divine Providence over

kingdoms and nations, in order to pluck up, destroy, disperse,

dissipate, plant, or nourish_, as may best conduce to the right

cultivation of the vineyard of Sabaoth, and to the preservation

of the edifice of the Christian religion, of which Christ is

the chief corner-stone. In consequence hereof, we have ever

thought, and been constantly of opinion, that, as it is our

duty carefully to plant and nourish whatever may conduce in

any manner to the repose and tranquillity of the Christian

republic, so the bond of mutual charity requires that we be

equally ready and disposed to pluck up and destroy even the

things which are most agreeable to us, and of which we cannot

deprive ourselves without the highest regret and the most

pungent sorrow.

“It is beyond a doubt, that _among the things which contribute

to the good and happiness of the Christian republic, the

religious orders hold, as it were, the first place_. It was

for this reason that the Apostolic See, which _owes its lustre

and support to these orders_, has not only approved, but

_endowed them with many exemptions, privileges, and faculties_,

in order that they might be so much the more excited to the

cultivation of piety and religion; to the direction of the

manners of the people, both by their instructions and their

examples; to the preservation and confirmation of the unity

of the faith among the believers. But if, at any time, any of

these religious orders did not cause these abundant fruits

to prosper among the Christian people, did not produce those

advantages which were hoped for at their institution; if at any

time they seemed disposed rather to trouble than maintain the

public tranquillity; the same Apostolic See, which had availed

itself of its own authority to establish these orders, did not

hesitate to reform them by new laws, to recall them to their

primitive institution, or even totally to abolish them where it

has seemed necessary.”

[Here follows a long list of religious orders suppressed by different

Popes, without giving them the opportunity of clearing themselves from

the accusations brought against them. It then proceeds as follows:—]

“We, therefore, having these and other such examples before our

eyes, examples of great weight and high authority—animated,

besides, with a lively desire of walking with a safe conscience

and a firm step in the deliberations of which we shall speak

hereafter—_have omitted no care, no pains, in order to arrive

at a thorough knowledge of the origin, the progress, and the

actual state of that regular order commonly called ‘The Company

of Jesus_.’ In the course of these investigations, we have seen

that the holy founder of the order did institute it for the

salvation of souls, the conversion of heretics and infidels,

and, in short, for the greater advancement of piety and

religion. And, in order to attain more surely and happily so

laudable a design, he consecrated himself rigorously to God, by

an absolute vow of evangelical poverty, with which to bind the

Society in general, and each individual in particular, except

only the colleges in which polite literature and other branches

of knowledge were to be taught, and which were allowed to

possess property, but so that no part of their revenues could

ever be applied to the use of the said Society in general. It

was under these and other holy restrictions that the Company

of Jesus was approved by the Pope Paul III., our predecessor

of blessed memory, by his letter _sub plumbo_, dated 27th

September 1540.”

[Here Clement enumerates the other Popes who had either confirmed the

privileges already granted to the Society, or had explained and augmented

them.]

“Notwithstanding so many and so great favours, it appears

from the apostolical Constitutions, that, almost at the very

moment of its institution, there arose in the bosom of this

Society divers seeds of discord and dissension, not only among

the companions themselves, but with other regular orders, the

secular clergy, the academies, the universities, the public

schools, and lastly, even with the princes of the states in

which the Society was received.

“These dissensions and disputes arose sometimes concerning

the nature of their vows, the time of admission to them, the

power of expulsion, the right of admission to holy orders

without a sufficient title, and without having taken the solemn

vows, contrary to the tenor of the decrees of the Council of

Trent, and of Pius V., our predecessor; sometimes concerning

_the absolute authority assumed by the General of the said

order_, and on matters relating to the good government and

discipline of the order; sometimes concerning different

points of doctrine concerning their schools, or such of their

exemptions and privileges as the ordinaries and other civil or

ecclesiastical officers declared to be contrary to their rights

and jurisdiction. In short, accusations of the greatest nature,

_and very detrimental to the peace and tranquillity of the

Christian republic, have been continually received against the

said order_. Hence the origin of that infinity of appeals and

protests against this Society, which so many sovereigns have

laid at the foot of the throne of our predecessors Paul IV.,

Pius V., and Sixtus V.

“Among the princes who have thus appealed, is Philip II.,

King of Spain, of glorious memory, who laid before Sixtus

V. not only the reasons of complaint which he had, but also

those alleged by the inquisitors of his kingdom, against

the _excessive privileges_ of the Society, and the form of

their government. He desired likewise that the Pope should

be acquainted with the heads of accusation laid against the

Society, and confirmed by some of its own members remarkable

for their learning and piety, and demanded that the Society

should undergo an apostolic visitation. Sixtus V., convinced

that these demands and solicitations of Philip were _just and

well founded, did, without hesitation, comply therewith_; and,

in consequence, named a bishop of distinguished prudence,

virtue, and learning, to be apostolical visitor, and at the

same time deputed a congregation of cardinals to examine this

matter.

“But this pontiff having been carried off by a premature

death, this wise undertaking remained without effect. Gregory

XIV. being raised to the supreme apostolic chair, approved,

in its utmost extent, the institution of the Society, by

his letter, _sub plumbo_, dated the 28th of July 1591. He

confirmed all the privileges which had been granted by any

of his predecessors to the Society, and particularly the

power of expelling and dismissing any of its members, without

any previous form of process, information, act, or delay;

upon the sole view of the truth of the fact, and the nature

of the crime, from a sufficient motive, and a due regard

of persons and circumstances. He ordained, and that under

pain of excommunication, that all proceedings against the

Society should be quashed, and that no person whatever should

presume, directly or indirectly, to attack the institution,

constitutions, or decrees of the said Society, or attempt in

any manner whatever to make any changes therein. To each and

every of the members only of the said Society, he permitted

to expose and propose, either by themselves or by the legates

and nuncios of the Holy See, to himself only, or the Popes his

successors, whatever they should think proper to be added,

modified, or changed in their institution.

“Who would have thought that even these dispositions should

prove ineffectual towards appeasing the cries and appeals

against the Society? On the contrary, very violent disputes

arose on all sides concerning the doctrine of the Society,

which many represented as contrary to the orthodox faith and

to sound morals. The dissensions among themselves, and with

others, grew every day more animated; the accusations against

the Society were multiplied without number, and especially with

that _insatiable avidity of temporal possessions_ with which

it was reproached. Hence the rise not only of those well-known

troubles which brought so much care and solicitude upon the

Holy See, but also of the resolutions which certain sovereigns

took against the said order.

“It resulted that, instead of obtaining from Paul V., of

blessed memory, a fresh confirmation of its institute and

privileges, the Society was reduced to ask of him that he

would condescend to ratify and confirm, by his authority,

certain decrees formed in the Fifth General Congregation of the

Company, and transcribed word for word in the Brief of the said

Pope, bearing date September 4, 1606. In these decrees, it is

plainly acknowledged that the dissensions and internal revolts

of the said companions, together with the demands and appeals

of strangers, had obliged the said companions assembled in

congregation to enact the following statute, namely:

“‘The Divine Providence having raised up our Society for the

propagation of the Faith, and the gaining of souls, the said

Society can, by the rules of its own institute, which are its

spiritual arms, arrive happily, under the standard of the

Cross, at the end which it has proposed for the good of the

Church and the edification of our neighbours. But the said

Society would prevent the effect of these precious goods, and

expose them to the most imminent dangers, _if it concerned

itself with temporal matters, and which relate to political

affairs and the administration of government_; in consequence

whereof, it has been wisely ordained by our superiors and

ancients, that, confining ourselves to combat for the glory of

God, we should not concern ourselves with matters foreign to

our profession: but whereas, in these times of difficulty and

danger, it has happened, through the fault perhaps of certain

individuals, through ambition and intemperate zeal, that our

institute has been ill spoken of in divers places, and before

divers sovereigns, whose affection and goodwill the Father

Ignatius, of holy memory, thought we should preserve for the

good of the service of God; and whereas a good reputation is

indispensably necessary to make _the vineyard of Christ bring

forth fruits_; in consequence hereof, our congregation has

resolved that we shall abstain from all appearance of evil, and

remedy, as far as in our power, the evils arisen from false

suspicions. To this end, and by the authority of the present

decree of the said congregation, it is severely and strictly

forbidden to all the members of the Society _to interfere in

any manner whatever in public affairs_, even though they be

thereto invited, or to deviate from the institute, through

entreaty, persuasion, or any other motive whatever. The

congregation recommends to the fathers-coadjutors, that they

do propose and determine, with all diligence and speed, such

further means as they may think necessary for remedying this

abuse.’

“We have seen, in the grief of our heart, that neither these

remedies, nor an infinity of others, since employed, have

produced their due effect, or silenced the accusations and

complaints against the said Society. Our other predecessors,

Urban VII., Clement IX., X., XI., and XII., and Alexander

VII. and VIII., Innocent X., XII., and XIII., and Benedict

XIV., employed, without effect, all their efforts to the same

purpose. In vain did they endeavour, by salutary constitutions,

to restore peace to the Church; as well with respect to

secular affairs, with which the Company ought not to have

interfered, as with regard to the missions; which gave rise

to great disputes and oppositions on the part of the Company

with the ordinaries, with other religious orders, about the

holy places, and communities of all sorts in Europe, Africa,

and America, to the great loss of souls, and great scandal of

the people; as likewise concerning the meaning and practice of

_certain idolatrous ceremonies_, adopted in certain places,

in contempt of those justly approved by the Catholic Church;

and further, concerning the use and explanation of certain

_maxims_, which the Holy See has with reason _proscribed as

scandalous, and manifestly contrary to good morals_; and,

lastly, concerning other matters of great importance and prime

necessity, towards preserving the integrity and purity of the

doctrines of the gospel; from which maxims have resulted very

great inconveniences and great detriment both in our days and

in past ages; such as _the revolts and intestine troubles in

some of the Catholic states_, persecutions against the Church

in some countries of Asia and Europe, not to mention the

vexation and grating solicitude which these melancholy affairs

brought on our predecessors, principally upon Innocent XI.,

of blessed memory, who found himself reduced to the necessity

of _forbidding the Company to receive any more novices_; and

afterwards upon Innocent XIII., who was obliged to threaten the

Company with the same punishment; and, lastly, upon Benedict

XIV., who took the resolution of ordaining a general visitation

of all the houses and colleges of the Company in the kingdom of

our dearly beloved son in Jesus Christ, the most faithful King

of Portugal.

“The late apostolic letter of Clement XIII., of blessed memory,

our immediate predecessor, by which the institute of the

Company of Jesus was again approved and recommended, was _far

from bringing any comfort to the Holy See, or any advantage

to the Christian republic_. Indeed this letter was rather

_extorted_ than _granted_, to use the expression of Gregory X.

in the above-named General Council of Lyons.

“After so many storms, troubles, and divisions, every good

man looked forward with impatience to the happy day which

was to restore peace and tranquillity. But under the reign

of this same Clement XIII. the times became more difficult

and tempestuous; _complaints and quarrels were multiplied on

every side; in some places dangerous seditions arose, tumults,

discords, dissensions, scandals, which, weakening or entirely

breaking the bonds of Christian charity, excited the faithful

to all the rage of party hatreds and enmities_. Desolation

and danger grew to such a height, that the very sovereigns,

whose piety and liberality towards the Company were so well

known as to be looked upon as hereditary in their families—we

mean our dearly-beloved sons in Christ, _the Kings of France,

Spain, Portugal, and Sicily—found themselves reduced to the

necessity of expelling and driving from their states, kingdoms,

and provinces, these very Companions of Jesus_; persuaded that

there remained _no other remedy_ to so great evils; and that

this step was necessary in order to prevent the Christians from

rising one against another, _and from massacring each other in

the very bosom of our common mother the Holy Church_. The said

our dear sons in Jesus Christ having since considered that even

this remedy would not be sufficient towards reconciling the

whole Christian world, unless the said Society was _absolutely

abolished and suppressed_, made known their demands and wills

in this matter to our said predecessor Clement XIII. They

united their common prayers and authority to obtain that this

last method might be put in practice, as the only one capable

of assuring the constant repose of their subjects, and the good

of the Catholic Church in general. But the unexpected death of

the aforesaid pontiff rendered this project abortive.

“As soon as by the divine mercy and providence we were

raised to the chair of St Peter, the same prayers, demands,

and wishes were laid before us, and strengthened by the

pressing solicitations of many bishops, and other persons of

distinguished rank, learning, and piety. But, that we might

choose the wisest course in an affair of so much importance,

we determined _not to be precipitate_, but to take due time;

not only to examine attentively, weigh carefully, and wisely

debate, but also, by unceasing prayers, to ask of the Father

of Lights his particular assistance under these circumstances;

exhorting at the same time the faithful to co-operate with

us by their prayers and good works in obtaining this needful

succour.

“And first of all we proposed to examine upon what grounds

rested the common opinion, that the institute of the Clerks

of the Company of Jesus had been approved and confirmed in an

especial manner by the Council of Trent. And we found that

in the said Council nothing more was done with regard to the

said Society, only to except it from the general decree,

which ordained that in the other regular orders, those who

had finished their novitiate, and were judged worthy of being

admitted to the profession, should be admitted thereto; and

that such as were not found worthy should be sent back from the

monastery. The same Council declared, that it meant not to make

any change or innovation in the government of the clerks of the

Company of Jesus, that they might not be hindered from being

useful to God and his Church, according to the intent of the

pious institute approved by the Holy See.

“Actuated by so many and important considerations, and, as

we hope, aided by the presence and inspiration of the Holy

Spirit; compelled, besides, by the necessity of our ministry,

which strictly obliges us to conciliate, maintain, and confirm

the peace and tranquillity of the Christian republic, and

remove every obstacle which may tend to trouble it; having

further considered that the said Company of Jesus can no longer

produce those abundant fruits, and those great advantages,

with a view to which it was instituted, approved by so many

of our predecessors, and endowed with so many and extensive

privileges; that, on the contrary, it was very difficult,

not to say impossible, _that the Church could recover a firm

and durable peace so long as the said Society subsisted_;

in consequence hereof, and determined by the particular

reasons we have here alleged, and forced by other motives

which prudence and the good government of the Church have

dictated, the knowledge of which we reserve to ourselves,

conforming ourselves to the examples of our predecessors, and

particularly to that of Gregory X. in the general Council of

Lyons; the rather as, in the present case, we are determining

upon the fate of a society _classed among the mendicant orders,

both by its institute and by its privileges;—after a mature

deliberation, we do, out of our certain knowledge, and the

fulness of our apostolical power_, SUPPRESS AND ABOLISH THE

SAID COMPANY: we deprive it of all activity whatever, of its

houses, schools, colleges, hospitals, lands, and, in short,

every other place whatsoever, in whatever kingdom or province

they may be situated; we _abrogate_ and _annul_ its statutes,

rules, customs, decrees, and constitutions, _even though

confirmed by oath, and approved by the Holy See or otherwise_;

in like manner we annul all and every its privileges, indults,

general or particular, the tenor whereof is, and is taken to

be, as fully and as amply expressed in the present Brief as

if the same were inserted word for word, in whatever clauses,

form, or decree, or under whatever sanction their privileges

may have been conceived. We declare all, and all kind of

authority, the General, the provincials, the visitors, and

other superiors of the said Society to be FOR EVER ANNULLED

AND EXTINGUISHED, of what nature soever the said authority may

be, as well in things spiritual as temporal. We do likewise

order that the said jurisdiction and authority be transferred

to the respective ordinaries, fully and in the same manner as

the said generals, &c. exercised it, according to the form,

places, and circumstances with respect to the persons and under

the conditions hereafter determined; forbidding, as we do

hereby forbid, the reception of any person to the said Society,

the novitiate or habit thereof. And with regard to those who

have already been admitted, our will is, that they be not

received to make profession of the simple, solemn, absolute

vows, under penalty of nullity, and such other penalties as

we shall ordain. Further, we do will, command, and ordain,

that those who are now performing their novitiate be speedily,

immediately, and actually sent back to their own homes; we

do further forbid that those who have made profession of the

first simple vows, but who are not yet admitted to either of

the holy orders, be admitted thereto under any pretext or

title whatever; whether on account of the profession they

have already made in the said Society, or by virtue of any

privileges the said Society has obtained, _contrary to the

tenor of the decrees of the Council of Trent_.

“And whereas all our endeavours are directed to the great

end of procuring the good of the Church and the tranquillity

of nations; and it being at the same time our intention to

provide all necessary aid, consolation, and assistance to the

individuals or companions of the said Society, every one of

which, in his individual capacity, we love in the Lord with

a truly parental affection; and to the end that they being

delivered on their part from the persecutions, dissensions, and

troubles with which they have for a long time been agitated,

may be able to labour with more success in the vineyard of the

Lord, and contribute to the salvation of souls; therefore,

and for these motives, we do decree and determine that such

of the companions as have yet made professions only of the

first vows, and are not yet promoted to holy orders, being

absolved, as in fact they are absolved, from the first simple

vows, do, without fail, quit the houses and colleges of the

said Society, and be at full liberty to choose such course of

life as each shall judge most conformable to his vocation,

strength, and conscience, and that within a space of time to

be prescribed by the ordinary of the diocese; which time shall

be sufficient for each to provide himself some employment or

benefice, or at least some patron who will receive him into

his house, always provided that the time thus allowed do not

exceed the space of one year, to be counted from the day of

the date hereof. And this the rather, as, according to the

privileges of the said Company, those who have only taken

these first vows may be expelled the order upon motives left

entirely to the prudence of the superiors, as circumstances

require, and without any previous form of process. As to such

of the companions as are already promoted to holy orders, we

grant them permission to quit the houses and colleges of the

Company, and to _enter into any other regular order_ already

approved by the Holy See. In which case, and supposing they

have already professed the first vows, they are to perform

the accustomed novitiate in the order into which they are to

enter according to the prescription of the Council of Trent;

but if they have taken all the vows, then they shall perform

only a novitiate of six months, we graciously dispensing with

the rest. Or otherwise, we do permit them to live at large

_as secular priests and clerks_, always under a perfect and

_absolute obedience to the jurisdiction of the ordinary of the

diocese_ where they shall establish themselves. We do likewise

ordain, that to such as shall embrace this last expedient, a

convenient stipend be paid out of the revenues of the house or

college where they reside; regard being paid, in assigning the

same, to the expenses to which the said house shall be exposed,

as well as to the revenues it enjoyed. With regard to those

who have made the last vows, and are promoted to holy orders,

and who, either through fear of not being able to subsist for

want of a pension, or from the smallness thereof, or because

they know not where to fix themselves, or, on account of age,

infirmities, or other grave and lawful reasons, do not choose

to quit the said colleges or houses, they shall be permitted to

dwell therein, provided always that they _exercise no ministry

whatsoever in the said houses or colleges, and be entirely

subject to the ordinary of the diocese_; that they make no

_acquisitions whatever_, according to the decree of the Council

of Lyons, that they do not alienate the houses, possessions, or

funds which they actually possess. It shall be lawful to unite

in one or more houses the number of individuals that remain,

nor shall others be substituted in the room of those who may

die; so that the houses which become vacant may be converted to

such pious uses as the circumstances of time and place shall

require, in conformity to the holy canons, and the intention

of the founders, so as may best promote the divine worship,

the salvation of souls, and the public good. And to this end a

member of the regular clergy, recommendable for his prudence

and sound morals, shall be chosen to preside over and govern

the said houses; _so that the name of the Company shall be, and

is, for ever extinguished and suppressed_.

“In like manner we declare, that in this general suppression of

the Company shall be comprehended the individuals thereof in

all the provinces from whence they have already been expelled;

and to this effect our will is, that the said individuals,

even though they have been promoted to holy orders, be _ipso

facto_ reduced to the state of secular priests and clerks, and

remain in absolute subjection to the ordinary of the diocese,

supposing always that they are not entered into any other

regular order.

“If, among the subjects heretofore of the Company of Jesus,

but who shall become secular priests or clerks, the ordinaries

shall find any qualified by their virtues, learning, and

purity of morals, they may, as they see fit, grant or refuse

them power of confessing and preaching; but none of them

shall exercise the said holy function without a permission

in writing; nor shall the bishops or ordinaries grant such

permission to such of the Society who shall remain in the

colleges or houses heretofore belonging to the Society, to

whom we expressly and for ever prohibit the administration

of the sacrament of penance, and the function of preaching;

as Gregory X. did prohibit it in the Council already cited.

And we leave it to the consciences of the bishops to see that

this last article be strictly observed; exhorting them to have

before their eyes the severe account which they must render to

God of the flock committed to their charge, and the tremendous

judgment with which the great Judge of the living and the dead

doth threaten those who are invested with so high a character.

“Further, we will, that if any of those who have heretofore

professed the institute of the Company, shall be desirous of

dedicating themselves to the instruction of youth _in any

college or school, care be taken that they have no part in the

government or direction of the same_, and that the liberty of

teaching be granted to such only whose labours promise a happy

issue, _and who shall shew themselves averse to all spirit of

dispute_, and untainted with any doctrines which may occasion

or stir up frivolous and dangerous quarrels. In a word,

the faculty of teaching youth shall neither be granted nor

preserved _but to those who seem inclined to maintain peace in

the schools and tranquillity in the world_.

“Our intention and pleasure is, that the dispositions which

we have thus made known for the suppression of this Society

shall be extended to the members thereof employed in missions,

reserving to ourselves the right of fixing upon such methods as

to us shall appear most sure and convenient for the conversion

of infidels and the conciliation of controverted points.

“All and singular the privileges and statutes of the said

Company being thus annulled and entirely abrogated, we declare

that as soon as the individuals thereof shall have quitted

their houses and colleges, and taken the habit of secular

clerks, they shall be qualified to obtain, in conformity to

the decrees of the holy canons and apostolic constitutions,

cures, benefices without cure, offices, charges, dignities,

and all employments whatever, _which they could not obtain so

long as they were members of the said Society_, according to

the will of Gregory XIII., of blessed memory, expressed in his

bull bearing date September 10th, 1548, which Brief begins

with these words—_Satus superque_, &c. Likewise we grant them

the power which they had not before, of receiving alms for the

celebration of the mass, and the full enjoyment of all the

graces and favours _from which they were heretofore precluded

as regular clerks of the Company of Jesus_.

“We likewise abrogate all the prerogatives which had been

granted to them by their General and other superiors in virtue

of the privileges obtained from the Sovereign Pontiffs, and by

which they were permitted to read heretical and impious books

proscribed by the Holy See; likewise the power they enjoyed of

not observing the stated fasts, and of eating flesh on fast

days; likewise the faculty of reciting the prayers called the

_canonical hours_, and all other like privileges; our firm

intention being, that they do conform themselves in all things

to the manner of living of the secular priests, and to the

general rules of the Church.

“Further, we do ordain, that after the publication of this our

letter, no person do presume to suspend the execution thereof,

under colour, title, or pretence of any action, appeal, relief,

explanation of doubts which may arise, or any other pretext

whatever, foreseen or not foreseen. Our will and meaning is,

that the suppression and destruction of the said Society, and

of all its parts, shall have an immediate and instantaneous

effect in the manner here above set forth; and that under pain

of the greater excommunication, to be immediately incurred

by whosoever shall presume to create the least impediment or

obstacle, or delay in the execution of this our will: the said

excommunication not to be taken off but by ourselves, or our

successors, the Roman Pontiffs.

“Further, we ordain and command, by virtue of the holy

obedience to all and every ecclesiastical person, regular

and secular, of whatever rank, dignity, and condition,

and especially those who have been heretofore of the said

Company, that no one of them do carry their audacity so far

as to impugn, combat, or even write or speak about the said

suppression, or the reasons and motives of it, or about the

institute of the Company, its form of government, or other

circumstance thereto relating, without an express permission

from the Roman Pontiff, and that under the same pain of

excommunication.

“We forbid all and every one to offend any person whatever

on account of the said suppression, and especially those who

have been members of the said Society, or to make use of any

injurious, malevolent, reproachful, or contemptuous language

towards them, whether verbally or by writing.

“We exhort all the Christian princes to exert all that force,

authority, and power which God has given them for the defence

of the holy Roman Church, so that, in consequence of the

respect and veneration which they owe to the Apostolic See,

things may be so ordered, that these our letters have their

full effect, and that they attentively heeding all the articles

therein contained, do publish such ordonnances and regulations

as may prevent all excesses, disputes, and dissensions among

the faithful, whilst they carry this our will into execution.

“Finally, we exhort all Christians, and entreat them by the

bowels of our Saviour Jesus Christ, to remember that we have

one Master, who is in heaven, one Saviour, who has purchased

us by his blood; that we have all been again born in the water

of baptism, through the word of eternal life; that we have all

been declared sons of God, and co-heirs with Jesus Christ;

all fed with the same bread of the Catholic doctrine, and of

the Divine Word; that we are all one body in Jesus Christ, of

which we are members, consequently it is absolutely necessary

that, united by the common bond of charity, they should live

in peace with all men, and consider it as their first duty to

love one another, remembering that he who loveth his neighbour

fulfilleth the law, avoiding studiously all occasion of

scandal, enmity, division, and such-like evils, which were

invented and promoted by the ancient enemy of mankind, in order

to disturb the Church of God, and prevent the eternal happiness

of the faithful, under the false title of schools, opinions,

and even of the perfection of Christianity. On the contrary,

every one should exert his utmost endeavours to acquire that

true and sincere wisdom of which St James speaks in his

canonical epistle, ch. iii. v. 13.

“Further, our will and pleasure is, that though the superiors

and other members of the Society, and others interested

therein, have not consented to this disposition, have not been

cited or heard, still it shall not at any time be allowed them

to make any observations on our present letter, to attack or

invalidate it, to demand a further examination of it, to appeal

from it, make it a matter of dispute, to reduce it to the terms

of law, to proceed against it by the means of _restitutionis

ad integrum_, to open their mouth against it, to reduce it _ad

viam et terminos juris_, or, in short, to impugn it by any way

whatever, of right or fact, favour or justice; and even though

these means may be granted them, and though they should have

obtained them, still they may not make use of them in court

or out of court; nor shall they plead any flaw, subreption,

obreption, nullity, or invalidity in this letter, or any other

plea, how great, unforeseen, or substantial it may be, nor

the neglect of any form in the above proceedings, or in any

part thereof, nor the neglect of any point founded on any law

or custom, and comprised in the body of laws, nor even the

plea of _enormis enormissimæ et totalis læsionis_, nor, in

short, any pretext or motive, however just, reasonable, or

privileged, not even though the omission of such form or point

should be of such nature as, without the same being expressly

guarded against, would render every other act invalid. For all

this notwithstanding, our will and pleasure is, that these

our letters should _for ever and to all eternity be valid,

permanent, and efficacious_, have and obtain their full force

and effect, and be inviolably observed by all and every whom

they do or may concern, _now or hereafter_, in any manner

whatever.

“In like manner, and not otherwise, we ordain that all the

matters here above specified, and every of them, shall be

carried into execution by the ordinary judge and delegate,

whether by the auditor, cardinal, legate _à latere_, nuncio,

or any other person who has, or ought to have, authority or

jurisdiction in any matter or suits, taking from all and every

of them all power of interpreting these our letters. And this

to be executed, notwithstanding all constitutions, privileges,

apostolic commands, &c. &c. &c. And though to render the

abolition of these privileges legal they should have been cited

word for word, and not comprised only in general clauses, yet

for this time, and of our special motion, we do derogate from

this usage and custom, declaring that all the tenor of the said

privileges is, and is to be supposed, as fully expressed and

abrogated as if they were cited word for word, and as if the

usual form had been observed.

“Lastly, our will and pleasure is, that to all copies of the

present Brief, signed by a notary public, and sealed by some

dignitary of the Church, the same force and credit shall be

given as to this original.

“Given at Rome, at St Mary the Greater,

under the seal of the Fisherman, the

21st day of July 1773, in the fifth

year of our Pontificate.”

Immediately after the promulgation of this Brief, the prelates Macedonio

and Alfani, accompanied by the Corsican soldiers, presented themselves

at the Gesù, called together all the members of the Society, read to

them the Brief of Suppression, and dispersed them, for the moment,

in different ecclesiastical establishments; the General Ricci being

confined to the English College. The two prelates, who were members of

a commission appointed to examine and proceed in all this important

matter, then took possession of the building, put the seal on all papers

and other valuable things, and left the house in the keeping of the

soldiers. Other commissioners resorted to the same proceedings in the

thirty-one establishments which the Jesuits possessed in Rome; while in

the provinces, the bishops received and executed the same orders. Next

morning, the Collegio Romano, and all the other different schools of the

Jesuits, were taken possession of, and served by the Capuchins. But we

must here observe, that even before the Brief was published, the Jesuits

had been brought before divers tribunals in Rome, and in other parts of

the Papal States, accused and found guilty of various misdemeanours; that

several of their houses, as in Bologna Mecerata Frascati, had been, by

the bishops, subjected to visitation, and some of them shut up; and that

even the possessions, and all the valuable things of the Collegio Romano,

had been confiscated to pay creditors. So that it may be said that even

had Ganganelli wished to preserve the Jesuits, he would have found it

difficult to resist public opinion, which, even in his own dominions, was

so decidedly against the order.

It will be perhaps well to take here a retrospective glance, and rapidly

examine the progressive march of the famous Society.

As we have seen, ten homeless and penniless enthusiasts, under the

guidance of a remarkable and superior intelligence, had decided upon

establishing a new religious order in a country already so infested by

such leprosy, that the Holy See itself had forbidden the establishment

of any new brotherhood. They were without friends, without supporters;

they met with many obstacles, which nothing but the courage and

indomitable energy of their chief could enable them to overcome. They

were obliged to beg, from door to door, a hard piece of bread, and had

nothing to shelter their wearied heads but the roofs of hospitals. Yet

all difficulties were vanquished, the Society was established, and

sixteen years after, in 1556, when Ignatius died, the order numbered

more than a thousand members, was established in thirteen provinces,

and was in possession of many valuable establishments. A hundred years

afterwards, the members of the Society had increased to twelve thousand,

the provinces to thirty-four, their wealth and the number of their

establishments to a very considerable extent. Already, at this epoch,

they boasted of having three saints, eight or ten martyrs, and ten or

twelve of Loyola’s disciples had sat in the College of Cardinals. At

the time of the Suppression, the Society numbered _thirty-nine_ houses

of professed members, 669 colleges, 61 novitiates, 196 seminaries, 335

residences, 223 missions, and 22,782 members, dispersed all over the

surface of the earth. The order then reckoned, as its chief glory, in

the register of its members, 24 cardinals, 6 electors of the empire, 19

princes, 21 archbishops, 121 titular bishops (so much for the article in

the Constitutions which forbids the member to accept of any dignity), 11

martyrs, and 9 saints.

We wish we could give, with an equal degree of exactness, the amount

of their fortune, raised by some to a fabulous amount, and by others

represented as very insignificant. Nevertheless, we shall try to come

to a fair estimate of the whole, from what we know, from their own

confession, to have been a part of it.

Crétineau gives a very minute detail of the fortune possessed by the

Jesuits in France; and the total sum, according to his calculations,

amounted to 58 millions of francs.[398] In the same volume, at page

303, the same historian says that the fortune the fathers possessed in

Spain was much more considerable—_beaucoup plus considerable_—than that

they had in France; let us, then, say 80 millions; while that which

they possessed in Austria, according to the same authority, amounted

to 125 millions.[399] So that the total sum of their fortunes in those

three estates amounted, by their own account, to 263 millions of francs.

We, who know almost all the establishments they had in Italy, do not

hesitate to say that what they possessed there amounted to an equal sum,

263. Now, let us add to these 526 millions their other possessions in

Belgium, Poland, in the remainder of Germany, in Portugal, in other small

states, and in those rich mercantile establishments in both Indies, and

we think it may be boldly asserted that their fortune amounted, in the

whole, to a sum certainly not short of 40 millions sterling. So much

for the article of the Constitution recommending _holy poverty as the

bulwark of religion_. To this prodigious and almost incredible amount of

property—which, however, was not all productive, part of it consisting

in houses and colleges—the reverend fathers added the annual income

arising from pensions, or incomes assigned by princes, towns, or chapters

for the maintenance of divers colleges, some of which assignments were

so considerable as to amount to £3000 yearly. Besides this, they had

the annual revenues arising from the presents which twice a year they

received from two or three hundred thousand pupils; the emoluments

received by some of them as private tutors, agents, or stewards of

great families; and, lastly, the——alms!!! Is not that a wonderful and

astonishing fact, which proves forcibly the cunning and cleverness of

those monks, who, to appearance, had nothing at heart but the conversion

of souls and the gratuitous education of children, and who were able, in

the space of 230 years, to accumulate the immense sum of forty millions

sterling?

However, when Ricci was examined, he swore that he had no hidden

treasures nor money laid out at interest; and we suppose that the

good father, not to tell an untruth, must have added secretly after

the words, _we have no hidden treasures_, “in the places where you

have looked for them, or where you supposed them to exist.” We know,

however, that after the Jesuits had been driven from France, Spain,

Naples, and Parma, “they were so terrified, that Father Delci started

instantly for Leghorn, carrying off the treasures of the order, with the

intention of transporting them to England; but the General, who was less

pusillanimous, stopped him in his flight.”[400] What then became of all

the moneys and valuable things which the Jesuits possessed, since little

or nothing was found in their establishments? This is a mystery which

we are not able to explain. We can conceive, and every one may easily

imagine, that the Jesuits, who, during the last twelve years of their

existence, expected to be suppressed from day to day, were not so simple

as to leave their transportable wealth at the mercy of their enemies;

but we would not hesitate to affirm that the Society must have possessed

a large treasure at the time, though, what became of it, we cannot say.

Indeed they were so cautious, and so eager to accumulate specie, that

for many years the revenues of the Collegio Romano were not employed

for its maintenance, and the fathers preferred having their immovable

possessions confiscated to pay its debts, in lieu of disbursing money. We

know also, that when they were re-established in 1814, they at once got

up their establishments in the most splendid style, and soon after made

many acquisitions. How did they come by the means by which all this was

effected? Was it the ancient treasure? and who had it in charge during

all the forty years of their legal suppression? This rather resembles

a romance than pure historical truth, and we have no means whatever of

elucidating it.

Meanwhile a commission was named to commence proceedings against Ricci

and some others of his brethren. The old General, when interrogated,

answered with sufficient simplicity, and without any apparent resentment.

He enlarged on the innocence of the Society, and protested that he had

neither concealed nor lent out at interest any money; and of all the

accusations that were brought against him, he only admitted that he had a

correspondence with the King of Prussia; we shall see afterwards for what

purpose.

About two months after, Ricci, the assistants, the secretary of the

order, the Fathers Favre, Forrestier, Gautier, and some others, were

sent to the Castel St Angelo, the state prison. The crimes of which

they were accused and convicted were, that they had attempted, both by

insinuations, and by more open efforts, to stir up a revolt in their

own favour against the Apostolic See; that they had published and

circulated throughout all Europe libels against the Pope, one of which

had for its title, _De Simoniaca electione fratris Ganganellii in Summum

Pontificem_—Simoniacal election of brother Ganganelli to the office of

Chief Pontiff; while Favre, Forrestier, and Gautier were loudly repeating

everywhere that the Pope was the Antichrist, and that the five cardinals

of the commission were to be compared to the five propositions of

Jansenius.[401] And in the following chapter, we shall see that they did

not confine their anger to threatenings and imprecations.