Mikula at the Christmas Festival
Months glide quickly by while working hard--Deacon’s
meeting--Church-meeting--The kind of candidates who were
rejected--Baptismal service--The great meeting of the
Church--Election of deacons--The balance sheet--A deficit--Native
Christians wipe out the debt--Local missionary meeting--The great
communion service.
How quickly the months glided by! Mikula, my owner, was a busy man of
affairs. As deacon and teacher he voluntarily gave many days every month
to his arduous duties--visiting lukewarm members and absentees from
communion, investigating charges brought against such as were accused of
breaking the Church’s rules, examining and instructing candidates for
Church fellowship, receiving the contributions from Church members,
paying the teachers of his district their monthly allowances, performing
the rites of burial and of marriage, preaching in his own town and
frequently visiting other towns and villages to proclaim the Gospel of
Jesus Christ.
Besides all these labours for the Church, he helped his wife by doing
the roughest work on the farm, visited many of the markets for purposes
of trade, for this was his principal means of subsistence--the means by
which he met his various obligations as a man, a husband, and a Church
member.
If he had devoted the whole of his time to trading he would have been a
rich man. He was ’cute, smart, and energetic enough; but he preferred
laying up treasure in heaven where neither white ants, nor rats, nor
mildew could depreciate the value of his wealth.
It was thus the months passed all too quickly, and brought us to the
great Church Festival held at Christmas-time, and the three principal
events of this gathering were the Church-meetings, the baptisms, and the
communion service.
Messengers and letters had been sent to all the deacons and teachers
spread over the three thousand square miles that comprised the parish of
the Wathen missionaries. These letters had informed the officials and
Church members of the date upon which they were to assemble, and urging
them to come in large numbers.
During all the afternoon and evening of the appointed Saturday, groups
of men and women were continually arriving on the station, and the
housing accommodation was taxed to its utmost capacity. The programme
for the meeting had been arranged about a month before, and every male
and female missionary had had their parts apportioned to them; but
unhappily just on the very eve of the meetings two of the white men went
down with very serious fevers, and the depleted little band of white
folk had to work the harder to make up for those unfortunately laid
aside.
At four o’clock on the Saturday afternoon the deacons were assembled,
and the business to be laid before the coming Church meeting was
thoroughly examined, such as cases of discipline, fitness of applicants
for Church membership, the work, pay, and appointments of teachers to
new spheres, or their removal from one place to another, and the many
other points that demanded attention and investigation.
Soon after seven o’clock the bell rang out calling all those concerned
to the Church meeting. About five hundred male and female members
gathered. A hymn was sung, a prayer offered, a portion of Scripture was
read, the minutes of the previous month were read and confirmed, and
then the business of the meeting began--of course, everything was
conducted in the vernacular, consequently everybody present could enter
fully into the matters laid before them. After various items of business
had been voted upon, the claims of candidates for Church membership were
scrutinized and voted upon by those present.
While they were considering Mr. A.’s desire to join the Church, a member
arose and stated that the applicant had a very bad temper, became
enraged at the smallest annoyance, and frequently for no reason at all;
and the speaker thought that the candidate should by properly and
continually controlling his irritable nature get a better temper before
he was received into the Church. The other members thought the same, and
voted that Mr. A. should wait for a few months and be informed of the
reason.
A little later the case of Mr. B. was under consideration, when a native
of his village arose and said that the candidate was a very lazy man,
lounging about the village all day, living on his wife; and he thought
that such a person was undesirable as a Church member. Let him do some
work and be honestly industrious for a year and then apply again. The
vote was taken, and Mr. B. was counted as unworthy of Church membership
until he had changed his lazy habits.
Later still in the evening the name of Mr. D. was mentioned as desirous
of joining the Church, when a neighbour of his jumped to his feet
saying: “Mr. D. is in debt to many people in his village and to others
in the surrounding villages. Now we think that a member of this Church
should not be in debt to any one; let him pay all his debts first and
then apply for membership.” Hence Mr. D. was informed afterwards that he
must go and pay his debts and apply later.
Others were rejected through lack of knowledge of the fundamentals of
the Christian religion; others for using fetishes and charms, thus
showing they were not altogether free of their heathen superstitions;
and others because their lives were not consistent with their Christian
profession. But after all this winnowing there were more than twenty who
were recognized as worthy of joining the Church.
The following day, Sunday, commenced with an early morning prayer and
praise meeting; then at the nine o’clock service the missionary preached
a suitable sermon to the accepted candidates on some of the passages in
Revelation, where the word “overcome” occurs; and at the close the
candidates for baptism arose one by one, and in simple language, and,
often with much nervousness, bore his or her testimony to the pardoning
love of God in Christ Jesus that had called them out of the great
darkness into His marvellous light. And then we adjourned to the place
where the baptismal rite was to be administered.
The place was about a mile from the station, and the baptistery was
formed by the natural widening of the stream into a pool that answered
the purpose as though it had been designed especially. The stream came
from an open valley, and, filling the pool, passed beneath the cool
shelter of some trees that threw a shade over a part of the shore, that
by a steepish slope led down to the water. This incline was covered with
people in their varied coloured dresses and cloths, tier above tier,
that were desirous of witnessing the baptisms. Many lads and young men
had waded across the water, and had seated themselves on the edge of the
farther bank, from which point of advantage they gained an uninterrupted
view of all that took place. Around the nearer side of the pool,
occupying positions right on the very edge of the water, were those who
were to undergo the rite of baptism--the observed of all observers,
nervously conscious of all eyes being fixed upon them.
A baptismal hymn was very heartily sung, two deacons offered prayer, and
then one by one, the women first, and then the men, the candidates
entered the pool and were baptized in the name of the Father, Son, and
Holy Spirit--buried with Him in the waters, a symbol that the old,
heathen life was finished, and raised again--a sign that henceforth they
were to lead new lives of faith, purity and love in Jesus Christ.
Soon after ten o’clock on Monday morning the bell sounded forth its
clamorous call to the great Church meeting. The large building was soon
filled with more than six hundred Church members--male and female, who
had gathered to elect their deacons for the ensuing year, to hear of the
progress of Christ’s kingdom in their large parish, and to have laid
before them a financial statement concerning the income and expenditure
of the closing year.
[Illustration: A NATIVE MARKET.]
[Illustration:
_Photo_] BAPTISMAL SERVICE, CHRISTMAS, 1905. [_J. R. M. Stephens._
]
All deacons, no matter in what month they were elected, relinquished
office automatically at the end of the year, therefore one member of the
Church proposed, and another seconded a resolution of thanks to the
deacons for their work during the past year. This was carried
unanimously with much clapping of hands--a purely native mode of
expressing thanks whether performed by an individual or a crowd. Then
two others proposed and seconded a request that the retiring deacons be
asked to take office again for the coming year, with two exceptions. One
deacon during the year had broken a rule of the Church, and as it was
essential for the welfare of the Church that their deacons should be
blameless in life and character, he was not re-elected. Another deacon
had exhibited much incapacity and such an utter lack of zeal in the
discharge of his important duties, that he was asked to stand on one
side to make room for a better man. The rest were re-elected with
acclamation. Their spokesman replied in a few suitable words, and begged
them to remember their deacons always in prayer that they might perform
their difficult duties worthily of the Master they all desired to serve.
It was felt in consequence of the work extending so rapidly that the
number of deacons should be increased to twenty-five to adequately cope
with the work. Men, therefore, of strong character, of long, faithful
service, and good Christian lives were chosen and voted to the office to
make up the desired number.
Then the missionary who had charge of the Church books wrote on a
black-board the number of members in fellowship at the beginning of the
year, the number of those who had been expelled for inconsistency, the
number who had passed to the eternal home during the twelve months, the
large number that had been baptized on profession of their faith in
Christ, and it was shown that those who were enjoying all the privileges
of Church membership made a grand total of 1674. Here and there over the
building could be heard ejaculations of “Tutondele Mfumu Nzambi!” (“We
thank Thee, Lord God!”)
The white man then put another black-board in position, and wrote on it
all the offerings from the various districts, the amount of the July
Harvest Thanksgiving, and sundry other items to the credit of the Church
accounts--it reached some hundreds of thousands of brass rods. On
another black-board he wrote down the cost of the teachers in the
different districts, and when these were added up there was a large
deficit. What were they to do--leave the Church in debt, or withdraw
some of the teachers? No, they must wipe that debt off!
Another black-board was quickly in position to receive their offerings
for clearing away the deficit. A white teacher present said: “I will
give two thousand rods towards the debt.” But a native deacon arose to
his feet and said: “White man, we thank you for your kind offer to help
us; but this is our work for Jesus Christ, and we intend to do it by
paying that debt ourselves. Christ has done so much for us, that we must
do this little bit of work for Him.”
During the next hour the missionaries were very busy writing down gifts
and promises; and gradually the debt shrank until at last it
disappeared. They had contributed over £180 to meet the entire expenses
of their local missionary work. It was a large sum for poor people; but
it was an expression of their gratitude to God for all the benefits they
had received through the preaching of the Gospel. If it had been
possible to value all the voluntary work done by deacons and Church
members, the above amount would have been more than doubled.
That night a missionary meeting was held. The building was full; bright
and inspiring hymns were sung; and one teacher after another told of the
difficulties and triumphs of the Gospel in his part of the district.
Then two of the white men spoke of the grand results that had attended
the efforts of other missionaries at the various stations on the Upper
and Lower Congo. They summed up by saying: that thirty years ago there
was not a single language that had been reduced to writing, now eight
had been mastered, and into them more or less of God’s Word had been
translated; thirty years ago and there was not a single person on the
Congo who knew how to read or write, now there were thousands of men and
women, boys and girls who were reading God’s Word in their own
languages; thirty years ago there was not a single native teacher on the
Congo, now there were nearly five hundred--two-thirds of whom were
entirely supported by the free-will offerings of the native Christians,
and the other third doing voluntary work in their own towns and
villages; thirty years ago not a solitary brass rod was given to God’s
work--but hundreds of thousands of them were spent on witch-doctors,
fetishes and charms, now over £400 a year are given by native Christians
that others might hear the glad news of Christ’s redemption; thirty
years ago there was not a single Christian throughout the whole length
and breadth of Congoland, now in fellowship with the B. M. S. Churches
alone there are nearly 3500 Church members, and God Himself alone knows
the great number that has already passed from the Church militant on
earth, through faith in Christ, to the Church triumphant in heaven that
is gathering around the great white throne of the Lamb. These are 3500
fulfilments of God’s promises; 3500 encouragements to continue the work
with zeal and aggressiveness; 3500 proofs of the power of the Gospel to
change the hearts, and purify the lives of men and women.
It was about eleven o’clock next morning when that bell called the
Christians and their friends to the last great meeting of the festival.
The building in which the service was held was long, wide and rather
squatty, with no claim to beauty or dignity, and no pretensions to
architectural elegance; and although in the eyes of men it might
honestly be styled ugly, yet in the eyes of angels it must be very
beautiful--for it is the birthplace of many a soul.
It was all too small that day to hold the crowd that pressed into it.
The seats soon filled, and the mats that had been spread on every
available space quickly received more than their full quota of people,
and the doors and windows rapidly filled with folk who listened as
eagerly as those who were inside the building. How heartily they all
entered into the simple service!
The preacher knew their difficulties, their temptations and their
weaknesses; he knew the pit of heathenism from which they had been
digged; and he knew that they were going back to their towns, villages
and homes to live among superstitious heathen neighbours, so he preached
to them with the power born of full and deep conviction from 2 Tim. i.
12; and they by and by returned home strengthened to continue the fight
knowing that God was with them, and, therefore, they were on the winning
side.
The preaching service over, the non-members left the building, and their
places were immediately filled with those Church members who had been
standing round the doors and windows. Over seven hundred persons were
present to take the communion.
The eyes of the white man who officiated dimmed with tears as he looked
over that crowded assembly of communicants. He thought of those who had
borne the heat and burden of the day, those who had toiled and died
without knowing of any results to their labour; he thought of those who,
baffled and defeated by broken health, had been compelled to retire from
the dangerous climate; he thought of those native teachers who had lived
faithfully and worked arduously to bring about this grand gathering; and
he thought also of that vast number of friends in the homeland who by
their labours, gifts and prayers had made this glorious assembly
possible. Surely all would ultimately rejoice together in the great,
glad cry of Harvest Home! Perhaps--who can tell?--the spirits of those
who have passed away, missionaries and supporters--white and black
workers alike, were, some of them, present at that service and were
rejoicing together over so numerous a company of ransomed souls.
It was in a tremulous voice that the white man addressed a few words to
those who were to be received in that day, and then he took each by the
hand and welcomed him and her into fellowship in the name of the Church.
After that a prayer was offered that these new brethren and sisters
might ever remain true witnesses for Christ, the Saviour.
A hymn was then sung that the hearts and thoughts of all present might
be centred on the purpose of their presence in the gathering--to
commemorate the death of their dear Lord until He come.
One of the deacons prayed for a blessing on the “bread,” and it was then
dispensed among the communicants, and after they had partaken of it they
bowed their heads in reverent worship. The cups were then distributed to
every member in that great assembly. Another deacon pleaded with God for
a blessing on the cup; and then the missionary arose, and holding his
cup in his hand, said: “This cup is the New Testament in My blood: this
do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of Me. For as oft as ye eat
this bread, and drink this cup ye do show the Lord’s death until He
come.”
And as soon as his tones had died away seven hundred cups were raised
and drained to the memory of their Saviour, and seven hundred hearts
bowed in prayer before the Lord. In a little time there arose upon the
air a song of faith. It was a translation of that incomparable hymn--
"There is a fountain filled with blood,
Drawn from Immanuel’s veins;
And sinners, plunged beneath that flood,
Lose all their guilty stains.
"Dear dying Lamb! Thy precious blood
Shall never lose its power
Till all the ransomed Church of God
Be saved to sin no more.
“Then in a nobler, sweeter song,
I’ll sing Thy power to save,
When this poor lisping, stammering tongue,
Lies silent in the grave.”
NOTES TO PART I
1. _Being only eleven inches long_ (page 1).--Over a very large part of
the Congo soft brass wire of 34 gauge is now, and has been for many
years, the currency and the standard of value among the natives. This
wire was probably, in the first instance, introduced and used for
ornamental purposes, as binding round spears and knives, or beaten out
into ribbons of brass for decorating the hafts of their best spears and
paddles. At first the wire was bought in long lengths of so many
fathoms, according to the needs of the buyer and the purchasing power of
the article he offered the trader in exchange for it. Later they found
it more easy of manipulation to have it in lengths of thirty inches, and
these were shortened by those who had large numbers of them cutting off
a half-inch from each one and melting the small pieces down for brass
anklets, necklets, and bracelets, thus procuring their brass for
nothing, _i. e._ cutting off short pieces from each rod and passing the
rods again into currency at their normal value. So much of this was done
that the thirty-inch rod was reduced to twenty-seven inches, and sellers
of goods consequently demanded more rods of the shorter ones than of the
longer lengths.
This process of snipping off little pieces has gone on for thirty years,
and the result is that the brass rod has gradually decreased in length
until now, on the Lower Congo, it is scarcely five inches, and among the
Boloki of the Monsembe district it is only eleven inches, and if the
introduction of money does not displace the rod it will become only four
or five inches in that part also.
Of course, as the rod lessens in length the seller of an article demands
more of them for his goods. Thus an article that once cost three rods of
thirty-inch wire now costs thirty of the five-inch rods; for not only
has the rod shortened in length, but through the introduction of so much
brass wire into the country during the last quarter of a century it has
decreased in value. I hope some day to take the Rod among those people
who use an eleven-inch brass rod as their money.
2. _Kroo boys_ (p. 3).--These were natives procured from the Kroo Coast
to work the cargo on the steamers that ran along the west coast of
Africa. Only sufficient white sailors were carried to work the ship from
starting port to the Kroo country. On arrival there, the ship fired a
gun to intimate its need of a gang of Kroo “boys” to handle the cargo.
These “boys” were any age from about eighteen to fifty, and in a gang
there were generally about forty to fifty “boys” under a head man.
Most captains had a head man who gathered a gang ready by the time his
ship returned from its European port. For example: a ship leaves
Liverpool, and on arriving at the coast picks up its head man and gang
of “boys,” who work the winches, man the boats and handle the cargo all
the way along the coast and back again to their own country, where they
are paid off in barter goods, powder, guns, rum and gin at the rate of
one shilling a day. They then rest after their arduous work until that
ship returns, and they engage themselves for another trip. The Congo
boats now pick up their Kroo “boys” at Sierra Leone on the outward
voyage, and drop them there on the homeward journey, and pay them in
cash at the rate of about one shilling to one and sixpence per day and
their rations.
When not in port these Kroo “boys” polished the brasswork, scraped the
iron, cleaned the paint, holystoned the deck, etc.; but when in port
they went into the holds, tied up the cargo in slings, hoisted it by
winches, put it over the side into boats, and rowed it ashore. They were
hard-working men who toiled from 4 a.m. until 10 or 12 p.m., only
resting for their meals of boiled rice, salt beef or fish, and ship’s
biscuits.
3. _Peasoup_ (p. 4).--When the writer went to Congo first in 1881 there
came on board at the Kroo coast a head man whose name was Peasoup. For
many years he had acted as head man for the captain of that ship, who,
as an acknowledgment of his various good qualities, and as a joke,
presented him with a brass plate to hang round his neck by means of a
chain. The following words were engraved on it--
PEASOUP
Captain Jolly’s Head Man.
A Rogue, Thief, and a Liar.
Peasoup was a tall, thin, grey-headed, bandy-legged man; and I used to
see him polish the plate every morning, hang it across his chest, and
with knock-knees and bandy legs strut the deck and order his men about
as proud as any general with a breast hidden by medals.
Peasoup knew English fairly well, but, of course, could not read it; but
he would never accept as true the accurate rendering of his much-prized
brass plate. Passengers read it correctly to him; but with a laugh he
would retort: "You white men, you no sabbe read them thing properly. Him
live for say: ‘Peasoup, Captain Jolly’s Head Man. Him be plenty, proper,
good man.’"
Since those days Peasoup has passed away, leaving his brass plate as an
heirloom to his family, and if not melted down into a brass ornament, it
may turn up some day as a relic of a joke played by a master on a decent
servant in “the good old days” on the West African Coast.
4. _Riddles and conundrums_ (p. 9) were called _ngwala_; _ta e ngwala_ =
to pour out or ask a riddle; _twasa e ngwala_ = to fetch a riddle here,
_i. e._ give us a riddle; _nua e ngwala_ = give us the answer, or, lit.,
to drink the riddle.
_Ngwala_ also means spirits, rum, gin, from a corruption and a
shortening of the Portuguese word _aguardente_ = _gwaladente_ =
_ngwala_. The “r” is always turned into “l,” and the “g” takes the nasal
“n” before it. It is very probable that they pun on the double meaning
of the word _ngwala_ = riddle, and gin. Hence the usual form of asking a
conundrum is--
_Ngwala yeye_ = here is gin, _i. e._ here is a riddle.
_Ta e ngwala_ = pour out the gin, _i. e._ state the riddle (or _twasa e
ngwala_ = bring the gin here).
If those asked cannot give the answer, they say--
_Nua e ngwala_ = drink the gin, _i. e._ give us the answer yourself, as
we cannot guess it.
The natives of the Lower Congo are very fond of this pastime, but one
needs to understand the customs, language, and surroundings to properly
appreciate the conundrums; consequently only a few almost self-evident
ones, or those easily explained, are put in the text.
5. _It was a fetish_ (p. 12).--The early traders on the Congo placed in
their large stores a fetish to deter the natives from robbing them. It
was generally a large, gaudily-coloured, hideous image put on the top
shelf opposite the door, from which position it was supposed to dominate
and guard the contents of the whole building. Many traders called their
store “the fetish” because of the presence of this ugly figure in it.
This fetish exercised little, if any, deterrent power over the natives
for two reasons: (1) No witch-doctor would waste good “medicine,”
procured with difficulty, on making a fetish powerful for a mere white
man, and the natives knew this; and (2) supposing the witch-doctor put
proper “medicine” into the fetish, yet it needed periodic reinvigorating
at the hands of the witch-doctor, otherwise it became weak and useless;
and it would also require a sacrifice, certainly not less frequently
than once a month, of either a large fowl or a goat, or it would become
sulky and not act on behalf of its owner. Now I never heard of a white
man renewing the energy of his fetish by paying a witch-doctor to
palaver over it at stated intervals, nor did I ever hear of a white man
offering a sacrifice to the fetish in his store; therefore while the
trader was relying on his fetish to guard his goods, his native servants
and workpeople were laughing at it as an ineffective carved figure.
6. _In the sea there is a hole_ (p. 17).--Water sprites are supposed to
make the trade cloth, and as it is so finely woven the natives think
that these particular sprites have only _one eye_, i. e. that the visual
power of two eyes is focussed in one that it may see to do such fine
work.
7. _Some of his companions laughed_ (p. 20).--We are apt to think that
all natives are equally superstitious, but that is not so. A man may be
a devout believer in charms and fetishes, he may decorate his person,
his house, his children, his pigs, his goats and his dogs with as many
charms as he can afford to buy, or he may quietly leave all the charms
and fetishes severely alone, and no one will think the better or worse
of him; but he must believe in witchcraft, in witches and their occult
power, or his life will be made wretched with accusations of witchcraft.
I have known some natives to surround themselves with fetishes and
charms, and most scrupulously observe all rites and ceremonies, and I
have known others to disregard the whole box of tricks and hold them in
contempt.
8. _Burial postponed_ (p. 24).--It is not uncommon to postpone the
funeral of an important person for many months, and even years. The
writer once buried a man who had been dead for nearly fifteen years. The
persons responsible put off the expense as long as possible, and it is
probable they would not then have interred the corpse, but the King
ordered the family “to finish the palaver.” There was another case of a
body being left unburied for over twenty years because the man who was
responsible for the cost of the funeral believed that he would “die the
day after he buried the corpse.” Many thought that this was only an
excuse to avoid the expense. The body was dried, wound in cloth, stored
in a house specially built for the purpose, and guarded by relays of
young women.
9. _Nkandu_ (p. 25).--See Chapter XVIII on Governing, Marketing, and
Trading (p. 223).
10. _Cassava flour_ (p. 26).--Mandioc (or cassava) was introduced into
Congo from South America about the end of the fifteenth or beginning of
the sixteenth century. Its native name is _madioka_, an evident attempt
at saying mandioc. The roots when matured were soaked for a few days in
pools, or streams, by which time they were soft. They were then peeled,
cut in halves or quarters, and put on stones and small platforms in the
sun until the pieces were quite dry. After this the pieces were laid out
on shelves over their fires until friable, and they were then easily
pounded in a mortar, sifted through a fine sieve, and the result was a
very fine, white flour. Raw mandioc contains prussic acid, but the
poison is eliminated by heat.
11. _Kwanga_ (p. 26).--The cassava root was soaked, peeled, and cored,
as under note 10. Then, instead of being dried, it was thoroughly
kneaded and all lumps removed. The dough-like substance was made into
long sausages of various lengths and thicknesses, according to the
districts, or into balls like suet puddings. I have seen the sausages in
one district twenty feet long and two inches thick, and in another
twelve inches long and four inches thick. But whatever the shape, the
dough was wrapped in palm-leaves, or in leaves like the aspidistra, and
steamed until well cooked. These _kwanga_ would then keep sweet for
several days. They were sold on the markets, and an average price would
be at the rate of four shillings for two cwt.; and four pounds were
quite sufficient for a man per day.
12. _Bolt his food_ (p. 29).--It was not the custom at ordinary meals
for the natives to eat greedily, but on occasions such as this, when all
sorts of folk were thrown together, each one ate as much as he could
get. See paragraph on greediness in the Introduction to the “Folk-Lore
Stories.”
13. _Luku_ (p. 38).--The cassava flour is made as under note 10, and the
_luku_ is prepared in the following way: A saucepan of water is set on
the fire, and when the water boils, the cook takes a basket of the flour
and sprinkles it with one hand in the boiling water and stirs it with a
stick held in the right hand. This process is continued until the
porridge is stiff and can be turned out as one whole pudding from the
saucepan. When a person is eating it, he breaks off a piece, rolls it in
his fingers, dips it in some gravy and then lets it roll down his throat
without masticating, otherwise it will stick to the teeth like toffee.
14. _Glass vessel_ (p. 44).--In the original it is _ekumbi dia pelo_ =
ship of glass; pelo is from the Portuguese _espelho_ = mirror, glass,
etc. Probably glass was first seen by the natives in the form of
looking-glasses, and _ekumbi dia pelo_ might be translated--the mirror
or looking-glass ship.
The introduction of glass, guns, etc., into their stories are indicative
of native readiness to expand their tales by the free assimilation of
new ideas received from contact with foreigners. This has also had a
wide influence on their language and fetish religion. This story I first
heard in 1882 at San Salvador.
15. _Laid beads_ (p. 45).--In San Salvador and district beads form the
currency. They are round blue beads three-eighths of an inch in length
and about a quarter of an inch thick. One hundred of these beads
threaded on a cotton cost, invoice price, one farthing, and one egg cost
one string of beads. It was possible to buy little lots of food for ten
and fifteen beads. The phrase “laid beads” is equal to “laid money.” In
an Upper River story the fowl “laid brass rods,” _i. e._ the currency,
money.
16. _Ndungu_ (p. 52) is equivalent to our phrase “you are becoming
cold,” and the more indifferently it was uttered by the crowd, the more
certain was the witch-doctor that he had guessed wide of the mark. See
next note.
17. _Otuama_ (p. 52) is our way of saying “you are becoming hot,” and by
this the witch-doctor knew he was getting very near in his guesses, and
the more excitedly it was shouted, the nearer the guesser knew he was to
the facts of the case. In Chapter XXII the whole trick is more fully
explained. See also preceding note.
18. _Ran for his gun_ (p. 53).--I was talking in 1908 to a former
witch-doctor, who told me that he had been threatened three times with
guns by those whom he had accused of witchcraft, and if he had not
precipitately fled he would have been shot. Hence those _ngangas_ who
engaged in witch-finding always made sure of their fees first, and sent
them away by their assistants, hurrying off themselves directly they had
accused their man. It was dangerous work.
19. _Mboma_ (pp. 59, 78).--In San Salvador and its neighbourhood this
word meant the south bank of the Congo River from Ennoki to Matadi, or
such trading-stations as existed on that part of the river. This _mboma_
was from eighty to ninety miles from San Salvador, and took a caravan
about five days to traverse it. Special letter carriers would cover the
distance in three days. This word we generally translated “coast.”
20. _Congo dia Ngungu_, or, in its fuller native form, _Ekongo dia
Ngunga_ (p. 60).--Scattered over the country are several Congos (or
Kongos), as _Kongo dia Mpalabala_, _Kongo dia Lembwa_, etc. To
distinguish San Salvador from the other towns bearing the name of Kongo
it was known by the natives either as _Kongo dia Ntotela_ = Kongo of the
King, or _Kongo dia N gunga_ = Kongo of the Bell. The former designation
referred to the town as the capital of the country and the residence of
the King. The latter name is probably due to the fact that the
Portuguese Roman Catholics in the sixteenth century built a cathedral
and monastery there, and used a large bell to call the people to the
services. Such a bell would be a wonder to the natives, and quite
sufficient to cause them to name the town the Kongo of the Bell.
21. _Smell of white man_ (p. 61).--However contemptuously we may talk
about the “smell of niggers” or “of Chinese” and others, there is no
doubt that we of the white race emit an odour that is very noticeable to
other races. Repeated bathing and frequent changes of clothes will not
eradicate the odour, for a black man can tell when another black man has
been within a yard of any white man for a short time. Account for it how
you will, the black, red, yellow and white races each emits an effluvium
peculiarly its own and offensive to the others--we must, therefore, bear
and forbear. We as a white race are used to our own scent and do not
notice it, and when one lives a long time amongst black people he
becomes accustomed to their odour.
Occasionally I have been with a white man who, in spite of scrupulous
cleanliness, was very malodorous through suffering from empyreuma; and I
have met here and there a native whose smell was especially offensive,
and it was as objectionable to his black neighbours as to us. The
natives have a definite word for such malodorous emanations. Some lads
have told me that the perspiration of some white men has made them
vomit.
22. _You white man_ (p. 63).--A native has just as much objection to
being called “a white man” as a white man has to being called “a
nigger.” In both languages it is an insult to be resented.
23. _Screaming_ (p. 64).--In the pioneer years of the mission, when
white folk were seldom seen and were always regarded with superstitious
fear, I was frequently startled out of my sleep by women screaming out:
“The white man has stolen my child!” And I have wondered on more than
one occasion whether the half-sleepy folk would in a stupid panic turn
me out of their town in the middle of the night or do even worse.
24. _Mboma_.--See note 19.
25. _Fines paid for judging_ (p. 92).--All fines received by a native
judge are periodically divided among the chiefs of the district, who
combine to enforce the law. If a pig or a goat is given, then the meat
is shared out or the market value put into the fund. The money or goods
are divided according to the rank and influence of the chiefs, and he
who might be called the chairman, or principal, received twice as much
as any of the others.
26. _No shelves_ (p. 95).--Many years ago, after much persuasion, I
induced some natives from the Zombo country to come into my house at San
Salvador. The first thing they did was to scan with much eagerness the
walls of my rooms, and on asking them what they were looking for, they
replied, “We have always heard and believed that you white men bought up
the dead bodies of the black people, stored them on shelves in your
houses, and on the first good opportunity sent them to Mputu (Europe),
where by your wonderful magic you returned the life of the corpses, and
they then worked for you as slaves; but we cannot see the shelves.”
“But why did you think we bought corpses?” I asked, with much wonder and
amazement.
“We can understand why traders come to this country,” they answered,
“but we cannot understand why your kind of white men come, for you do
not trade, so we think you have some wicked purpose underlying your
presence in our land.”
Believing such ghastly things about us, their opposition to us and
hatred of us were no longer a surprise to me. The wonder is that they
did not murder all of us. We have had to live down their prejudices,
remove their foolish beliefs about us, and turn their suspicions into
confidence and love.
27. _Trade gin_ (p. 99).--Whatever ordinary gin may be, “trade gin” was
the vilest concoction of fusel oil and other ingredients that was ever
put on the market for human consumption. It always made the drinkers mad
drunk, and was responsible for most of the quarrels and much of the
fighting that took place among the natives. I have known a white man
take to drinking it and be dead in less than a week, and undoubtedly it
was the cause of many deaths among the natives. A dozen reputed pints in
bottles, case, packing, etc., cost only half-a-crown the lot.
28. _Law against the sale of spirits_ (p. 102).--Since the time
mentioned in the text a law has been passed limiting the sale of these
“fire waters” within certain boundaries, and restricting the sale of
them, so that neither white nor black can procure them without special
“permits.”
29. _Make them sell it_ (p. 102).--Several traders have told me how much
they hated selling such vile stuff to the natives; how they had
protested against the sale; but that they were compelled to sell them as
they yielded such large profits to their employers. Surely the curse of
both God and man must ever rest on such gains!
30. _His santu_ (p. 111).--All the men and women in and around San
Salvador, and a large proportion of those living in the other districts
of the Lower Congo, have each a _santu_, from the Portuguese word
_sancto_ = a christian, or sacred, name.
At birth a native name is given to the boy (or girl), and later in
life--at twelve or fourteen--the lad can take another name of his own
choice if, for any reason, he is dissatisfied with his birth name, and
allow his first one to be forgotten by disuse. While in their teens they
also select a _santu_ which is a Congoized form of a Portuguese name, as
Manwele = Manuel = Emanuel; Nzwau = Jaõa = John; Petelo = Pedro = Peter,
etc.; and the women take Madia = Maria = Mary, etc. To their _santus_
they prefix “Dom” and “Donna” respectively.
In San Salvador and the near towns every man and woman has a _santu_,
but the farther you travel from San Salvador, the less frequently is the
_santu_ found among the people. Undoubtedly it is a survival of the
_sancto_ given by the Roman Catholics to those who were baptized into
their Church.
Although the possession of “Dom” and “Donna” was so common, yet the use
of them was somewhat restricted to the better class of natives, much the
same as our use of Mr. and Mrs. and Miss. Of some men the natives never
spoke without calling them “Dom,” and to others they never prefixed the
“Dom” except when they wanted to ingratiate themselves or ask a special
favour.
31. _To represent dolls_ (p. 114).--The girls would often procure pieces
of firewood or cassava roots to represent dolls, and play with them as
such, carrying them tied to their backs, or on their hips, by old rags,
just as their mothers carried them when babies. These dolls they washed
in old saucepans, and held them out for a few minutes in the sun to dry,
as they themselves had been washed and dried. Then they dressed them in
strings of beads and a few imitation charms and re-tied them on their
backs.
When I first saw this performance--nearly thirty years ago--I felt great
pity for the wee girls having such poor dolls, and sent home to buy a
few for them. In due time they arrived, and the first girl I met
carrying a cassava root (in shape like a parsnip) I offered her one of
my dolls. She looked at it in great consternation--it was something
uncanny to her. It had legs, arms, body, head and a face just like a
human being. It was only with much persuasion that I prevailed on her to
exchange her root for my doll. A few days afterwards I heard that my
doll was sold on the market at a good price as a white man’s powerful
fetish. The other dolls remained in the box, although there were many
requests for them. We had not gone there to supply fetishes.
32. _Size of the King of San Salvador_ (p. 138).--On August 3, 1882, I
wrote as follows to a friend in England: "I have done a very foolish
thing to-day, for I have promised his majesty that I will ask you to
make him three shirts. I have not given him a personal present yet, and
thought some shirts would be suitable. I want you to buy three different
patterns of good, strong, showy stuff, with plenty of colour. The shirts
must have cuffs, collars and fronts.
"The measurements are as follows--
"Across the shoulders, 2 feet 11 inches.
"Waist, 5 feet 8 inches in circumference.
"Armholes, 23 inches in circumference.
"Round the neck, 20 inches.
"Arm, 1 foot 3 inches, not including the cuff, which is 5 inches long.
"Cuff, 9 inches round.
"From top to bottom, 3 feet 6 inches.
"I should tell you the King is clever with his needle, and his
twenty-two wives are just as clever at farming.
“One boy wants to know what sort of work our Queen does.”
The shirts had to be larger than above measurements to be loose on him.
33. _Driver-ants_ (p. 144), when searching for food, march four or five
abreast in a continuous line across country. I have known them to be
three days and nights hurrying past a given point, and when disturbed
they swarm over the ground. Looking at the crowd of people thrown from
the photographic slide on to the sheet impressed the King, and in
comparing the numbers of people to driver-ants covering the ground, he
used a very good simile.
34. _Dressed worse than slaves_ (p. 147).--Except on very special gala
days, the chiefs, head men, and freemen dressed in a very poor,
unpretentious style. This was to avoid suspicion, jealousy, and the evil
eye. Dressing badly, no one would know that they were rich, and
consequently would not cast the evil eye on them, nor try to render them
unlucky, etc., by the aid of witchcraft. The slaves were known as such,
therefore it did not matter how well they arrayed themselves; no one
would be jealous of them nor try to harm them by paying the fees of
witch-doctors. Thirty years ago the casual visitor would, five times out
of six, mistake the slave for the head man and the chief for a slave, or
poor man, on account of the difference in their garments.
35. _Sleep well_ (p. 148).--The morning greeting was: _Olele kiambote_ =
Have you slept well? The answer was: _Ndele kwame_ = I have slept well.
Good-night was: _Wenda leka kwambote_ = Go and sleep well; and the
answer: _Sala leka kwambote_ = Stay and sleep well. To sleep properly
and soundly was regarded as an infallible sign of good health.
36. _Papyrus string_ (p. 148).--The papyrus (_diwu_) was found very
plentifully in the many swamps around San Salvador, and was cut in
lengths of about nine feet. The outer skin was peeled off, when fresh
and green, in strips of half an inch, one end of the strip was held
between the thumb and index finger of the left hand, and then the right
hand very quickly twisted the strip, and to keep it from untwisting the
two ends were tied together and it was thrown into the sun. When dry the
strip would retain the twist, and, before using, a dozen of the twisted
strips were soaked in water to render them pliable. Such string was
commonly used for tying fences, and would last nearly twelve months, _i.
e._ as long as the other materials in the fence. It was very economical
and durable.
37. _Roasted plantain_ (p. 149).--As a rule, bananas were eaten ripe and
raw, and plantain green and roasted. Peel a nice large plantain, drop it
in the hot ashes, turn it from side to side until done, scrape off the
ash-dirt, then split it, rub in some butter and salt, and with a very
little imagination you have a hot roll.
38. _Portugal, Holland, or England_ (p. 156).--In the long ago, Portugal
was the only white man’s country known to the natives, and it is just
possible that Mputu (native name for all white countries) is a
corruption and a shortening of Portugal. There were more Portuguese
traders in Congo than from any other country; next after them were the
Dutch or Hollandaise, and lastly, in numbers, the English, who at that
time were only known as missionaries. The natives consequently thought
that Portugal was a larger and more populous place than the other
countries, then Holland the next in size, and lastly England, hence
their discussion.
39. _Stretched out the legs in front of a chief_ (p. 163).--To stretch
out the legs (and show the soles of one’s feet) before any one was
regarded as extremely rude, and a mark of disrespect which was resented
by him who had the power. To act so unceremoniously before a king or
great chief was punished by fines, floggings, and sometimes death. It
was worse than a man keeping on his hat in the presence of royalty.
40. _Rob them of their country and make them slaves_ (p. 172).--These
fears were constantly expressed in the early and middle eighties by both
King and people. The following is the true history of how one treaty was
made with a native king--
In 1884, a copy of _Le Mouvement Geographique_ fell into my hands, and
in it was a letter that was said to have been sent by Dom Pedro V, King
of Congo, to the King of Portugal. In it the former acknowledged the
latter as his liege lord and used every expression of fealty, loyalty,
and submission. I remember that the letter was, at the time, put forward
as a proof of the righteousness of the Portuguese claim to the Congo;
and it certainly helped them in gaining a part of what is now called
Portuguese Congo.
Having occasion to speak with the King about that time, I asked him if
he had written the said letter, and I gave him a translation of it. The
old man was sitting in a high-back, embossed, leather chair, and rising
from it, he said, “My brother, the King of Portugal, sent me this chair,
and I sent him a letter thanking him for his gift, and that is the only
letter I ever signed my mark to or ordered to be sent.” He had signed
away his country in saying “thank you for a chair.”
Attached to the letter were the names of the head Portuguese Roman
Catholic priest, a Portuguese trader, and a French trader, as witnesses
to the King’s mark. Shortly after reading this letter I met M. D----,
the French trader, and told him I had just seen the said letter. I
reminded him of its date, and asked, “Why was not I requested to sign
this letter, for all the other white men in San Salvador signed it, and
I was here on that date? Am I not a white man?”
M. D---- answered, “We did not ask you to witness the King’s mark
because we felt sure you would not do it until the King thoroughly
understood the real purport of the letter.”
I thanked M. D---- for his estimate of my character, and gave him my
view of the manner in which they had deceived and defrauded the King.
The King thought he was saying: Thank you for a few presents sent him by
a brother sovereign; but he was signing away his territory to another
power, and in this way he and his people were defrauded of their true
rights. They have every reason to hate white men for robbing them of
their country and reducing them to slavery.
41. _Kill herself_ (p. 181).--Suicide was not uncommon on the Lower
Congo. Both men and women committed it for much the same reason as folk
do in England.
42. _Oily-face_ (p. 183).--A lightish skin (not the colour of a
half-caste or an albino’s skin) and an oily face were signs of beauty,
hence the proverb: “The toad has an oily face where his father’s sister
is,” _i. e._ A person is always beautiful to his own family.
43. _Girl’s father of no importance_ (p. 187).--On the Lower Congo there
is mother-right but no father-right. The children belong to the mother’s
family and not to the father. He has no rights over them, nor does he
arrange for the marriage of his daughters, and he receives a very small
share only of the marriage money paid for his daughters.
44. _Rest claimed by the uncle_ (p. 188).--(See also note 43.) The uncle
was the head of his sisters’ families and the guardian of their
children, _i. e._ of his nieces and nephews. His eldest sister’s eldest
son was his heir. He helped his nephews when starting in life, and
assisted each in paying the marriage money for his first wife, and
arranged for the marriage of his nieces.
He claimed the great bulk of the marriage money for this reason: Suppose
he received £3 for his niece, and after five years she died, her husband
would come to the uncle and say, “I gave you £3 for the loan of your
niece, and she is now dead. I want my money back, and as you have had
the use of it for five years I expect 20_s._ interest on top.” Now
probably the uncle would not be able to pay this relatively large sum,
and in lieu of it would give another woman as a wife to the man. In
another five years, we will say, the second wife dies, and the husband
goes to the uncle and says, “The second woman you let me have is dead,
and as you have had the use of my money for ten years I want it returned
with 40_s._ interest.” (Sometimes they demand the equivalent of 80_s._
to 100_s._ interest.)
The uncle cannot meet so large a demand, so he gives another--the
third--woman, and should she die the husband has no further claim either
for the capital sum, interest, or another woman. Should the husband die,
then his heir has the same claim on the uncle up to three women, or the
money with interest; and if the uncle dies, then his heir who receives
his property is responsible for the claims of the husband or of his heir
up to three women or the money. (See note 54.) As the uncle took the
greater risks, it was only right that he should take most of the money.
Whatever the father received was his absolutely, without any risks.
45. _Girl received little presents_ (p. 188).--After a man has paid a
part or the whole of the marriage money, he will make presents of cloth,
fish, meat and trinkets to his betrothed. Should the negotiations for
her be broken off, he will put an exorbitant value on those presents,
and complicate matters by his demands. An unbetrothed girl would not
receive presents from a young man without the consent of her family, and
if she did do so without such consent, and the young man applied to the
family for her hand in marriage and was refused, he would demand all his
presents back, or in lieu of them a most extortionate price. Hence no
girl would accept a present from a man unless she knew that her uncle
and her family regarded his suit with favour. There are, of course,
untractable nieces on the Congo as there are unreasonable daughters in
Europe.
46. _Girl’s mother agreed_ (p. 188).--Every wise young man would by
various presents gain the goodwill of his future mother-in-law,
otherwise she could, under different pretexts, cause the marriage to be
postponed, and make herself very disagreeable and objectionable when she
could no longer hinder it.
47. _Sign of the cross_ (p. 199).--In the latter part of the fifteenth
century the Portuguese Roman Catholics were present in San Salvador, and
during the next half-century they became predominant in the local,
political, and religious life of the people. They introduced many
superstitions, images, relics and rites. In the early eighties we saw
Romish images used as fetishes, relics and the cross used as charms, and
baptismal rites practised as a superstitious ceremony. The mark of the
cross enters largely into the catalogue of the witch-doctor’s
stock-in-trade.
48. _I swear by my mother_ (p. 205).--In the Congo language there is no
lack of oath phrases. And these may be divided into four classes--
(1) Swearing by one’s relations, as shown in the text. Any near relative
may be substituted for mother. This may be extended into: By my mother,
may I never see her deathbed, or may my mother desert me.
(2) Swearing by a notable person or place: By the great King. By Dom
Alvaro. By the road to Congo. By the path to the tomb of the deceased
King.
(3) Swearing by the fetishes; and this may be divided into two classes:
(_a_) Those who swear by the ordinary fetishes, as: By the lightning
fetishes (_nzaji_), etc., and (_b_) those who have been initiated into
the _ndembo_ guild and swear by the fetishes of this secret society, as:
May the _nkita_ cause me to go mad. By the _ndembo_ enclosure. By
albinos and dwarfs. These latter are all powerful in the _ndembo_ guild.
(See _Folk-Lore_, June 1909, p. 189.)
(4) Swearing by God, as: May God punish me.
49. _Nearest man fired_ (p. 206).--Hunting laws were very stringent and
had to be carefully observed, or the breaker of them would one day find
that no one would accompany him on his hunts nor allow him to join them
in theirs.
If a man fires at an antelope and it rushes away, the hunter looks to
see if any blood has fallen, or any hairs; if not, it is decided that he
has not killed it, although he may have mortally wounded it; if another
man fires and it drops, it is the latter’s animal. If there is any
dispute as to whether it was killed by the first shot or the second, the
one who is positive and over-rides all argument must take the heart of
the antelope and eat it (not raw). If his shot really killed it all is
well, but if not, the eating of the heart will destroy his _kinkongo_,
or hunting skill. Many a man has relinquished his claim to an animal for
fear of spoiling his luck.
50. _Brave_ (p. 218).--When the natives fight with spears, knives and
arrows they are courageous, and, knowing how far their weapons will
carry, they run in to throw them. They will fight foot to foot with
their knives. To them guns are mysterious things--they pull a trigger
and there is a puff, a bang, and a bullet or slug flies out, and the
distance it will travel is, to them, an unknown quantity. They are not
acquainted with the science of firearms, and are so overawed by the
mysteriousness of these weapons that their natural bravery has not full
play.
51. _Some decoction_ (p. 248).--The witch-doctor procures some bark of
the baobab-tree, presses the juice out of it and rubs this on hand and
arm of the accused person who has well paid him. He can then dare the
boiling oil with impunity.
52. _In whose district his town_ (p. 253).--The “parish” of Wathen is
3000 square miles in extent, and is divided into four and sometimes five
districts, according to the strength of the missionary staff for the
time being. Each district is in charge of a white man, and all the boys
attending school on the station from that district are especially in his
charge. He looks after their welfare, cares for them, attends them in
sickness, listens to their palavers, and acts the part of a father to
them. All the girls from the same district are in the special care of
his wife (if he is a married missionary), and she acts as a mother to
them. All matters connected with the Church members and teachers of the
district are taken first to him, and he settles them upon
well-understood principles, and if any extraordinary issue arises he
consults his colleagues, and they jointly come to a decision, so that
all the districts may be governed on uniform lines. He acts also as a
pastor towards all the Church members of his district.
53. _Sunset at six o’clock_ (p. 257).--The nights and days are about
equally divided, as there are only some fifteen minutes’ difference
during the whole year in the time of the sun’s rising and setting.
Certainly on the Congo there is not that sudden darkness at sunset so
frequently stated in books on the tropics, for the twilight lasts from
thirty to forty minutes.
54. _Women I have borrowed_ (p. 324).--The old word on the Congo for
marriage was _sompa nkento_, which means to borrow a woman (see notes 43
and 44), for which loan the man paid something to the girl’s uncle. All
members of the Church are married by Holy Matrimony, and the word
_sompa_ (or to borrow) has given place to _kazala_ (to take as a wife).
PART II
Congo Folklore Tales
or
Stories told round the Congo Fire
INTRODUCTION
TO THE FOLKLORE TALES
For many years I have been collecting folklore stories such as are told
round the fires of the Congo villages--stories that have been handed
down from generation to generation; and are so well known that sentences
from them are often quoted, and have thus become the proverbs with which
the natives so freely interlard their talk.
To have printed all the stories collected would have meant a bulky
volume; but these selected for publication are typical of those that
remain, although every story has its own peculiarity of plot,
explanation, or teaching.
Between most of the stories told on the Upper Congo and those related on
the Lower Congo there is, as a rule, this marked difference: the former
try to explain why things are as they are, _i. e._ why people steal, lie
and die; why women run away from their husbands; and why some birds have
nests and other birds none: the latter are didactic parables. The former
are explanatory of habits and customs, and the latter contain the wit,
the wisdom and the moral teaching of many generations, and sum up their
view of life--that the cheat will himself be cheated; that the
unreasonable will be outwitted by craftiness; the tyrant and bully will
eventually be punished, and kindness rewarded with timely succour. I am
of opinion that the former--the explanatory--stage indicates a more
primitive state than the latter or teaching stage, still it would be a
very interesting study to decide this point.
These stories belong to the Lower Congo, and more especially to the
districts around San Salvador (Portuguese Congo), and Ngombe Lutete (or
Wathen in Congo Belge). Some of the Upper River stories I hope to
publish on a future occasion.
While living at San Salvador many years ago, the lads and I, on our
recreation evenings, told each other tales, and it was then that I heard
for the first time some of these stories; a few others I have culled
from the pages of a native magazine called _Ngonde ye Ngonde_ (= “Month
by Month”), printed and published by our Mission at San Salvador; but by
far the larger number were written for me by the teachers and boys of
the Wathen Mission School to whom I gave exercise-books with the request
that they would write out such stories as they could remember, or could
gather from their friends.
I never suggested a story nor a plot to them, for to me personally they
would lose their value if they were the result of any such promptings.
It was not until a large number of them had been collected that any idea
of presenting them in this form entered the mind of the collector. And
folklorists may rest assured that the stories here set before them are
genuinely native in plot, situation, explanation and “teaching,” and,
wherever possible, in idiom also.
In these stories the different birds, insects, reptiles and animals
speak, marry, attend markets, transact business and lay their cases for
decision before the elders as though they were human beings. The heroes
among them are endowed with those qualities most admired by the natives,
while those that are “fooled” are the personification of such
characteristics as awaken only their ridicule and contempt. ’Cuteness,
craftiness and wit are at a premium in these stories, and it is curious
to note that these qualities seem to be the peculiar property of the
small animals, such as the gazelle, the mouse, the squirrel, etc.; and
rarely the possession of the larger animals, as the elephant, buffalo
and leopard; or when two species of the same order--the driver-ant and
the small-ant--are brought into rivalry it is the latter that wins; two
birds, as in “The Crow and the Dove,” it is again the weaker one who
triumphs in the end.
On the other hand gullibility, dupability, utter stupidity and lack of
foresight are associated with bulk, _i. e._ the larger animals are, as a
rule, thoroughly fooled. They have laughed many a time at the way the
Gazelle “fooled” the Leopard, yet I do not think there was one who would
not rather have been the Leopard than the Gazelle--they were not so good
as their philosophy.
Greediness in eating is condemned by all natives, and it is interesting
to note that the only time, in these stories, the Gazelle is caught and
punished it is his greediness that leads to his downfall; and, again, in
the story of the Gazelle and the Palm-rat, the latter is choked, not so
much because he broke his promise--that is regarded as ’cuteness by the
natives--but because he refused to share the palm-nuts with his
companion--an act condemned by all natives. This is a trait well marked
in the native character. Any one of them will scramble and wrangle for
as big a portion of anything going as he can get; but once he has it he
will share it with any of his family, or his companions, or even with
strangers who happen to be present when he is eating it.
Again and again, when I have given portions of food or salt to a boy,
the recipient has shared it equally with his comrades. Here is a monkey
to be divided among a dozen boatmen. Two of them will be set to clean it
and divide it into twelve portions, and they will be very careful to
make all the divisions equal, because by an unwritten law, which I have
never seen infringed, the two who apportioned the meat will not take
their shares until the others have selected theirs. This is a guarantee
that all the portions will be alike, otherwise the last would come off
very badly. Each as he chooses will select what he considers to be the
largest heap; but once he has it, he is quite willing to share it with
any or all of his comrades.
There is a delightful absence of proportion in these stories, for in
them mice and birds marry young women; a mouse carries the head of a
leopard in his bag and brags that he has eaten nine leopards, and
although he punishes the elephant and the buffalo he has to cry for help
against the hyena; the gazelle eats whole pigs and goats; and a
chameleon snarls and the elephant, leopard and other animals run away in
terror. Nothing is strange or incongruous in a land where witch-doctors
abounded, and were credited with performing wonders by their supposed
magical powers. If you questioned any feat, you were at once told most
emphatically: “Well, it was done by his magic, or his fetish, or his
charm performed it.”
In all the animal stories in this collection the different animals
mostly address each other as “uncle,” irrespective of sex; but as this
would have been confusing to the reader, I have only retained the term
where it fits the sex of the one addressed. In the Congo language there
is no gender, and the animals belong to various classes (there are
fifteen classes in the Lower Congo language); but directly they are used
in stories, and have human characteristics ascribed to them, they are
removed from their different classes and placed in the first, or
personal, class, e.g. _Nsexi_ is in the second class, and its pronominal
prefix is _i_ singular, and _zi_ plural; but being moved into the first
class it becomes a person, and its prefix is _o_ singular, and _be_
plural--the animal is no longer an “it,” but a “he” or “she.”
Included in this collection are a few stories that are not animal ones,
as "The Water-Fairies save a Child"--a warning to parents not to be
unreasonable in their punishments; "The Story of two Young Women"--a
lesson on vanity, and that wealth does not always bring happiness; and
"The Adventures of the Twins"--a whimsical criticism on how human beings
should be made in order to avoid the inconveniences, limitations and
troubles that attend their present mode of construction.
The reader must not be surprised to find that some of these stories are
similar to those made famous by Uncle Remus,[68] and the reason is not
far to seek. About three generations ago the Congo natives were
transported in large numbers as slaves to America, and naturally they
carried with them their language and their stories. The _goobah_ in
_Uncle Remus_ is a corruption of _nguba_, the Lower Congo word for
peanut; and Brer Rabbit is the gazelle,[69] Brer Fox is the leopard, and
the Tar-baby is the fetish called _Nkondi_; but in the Tar-baby a
concession is made to civilization, for in Uncle Remus’s account the
image is covered with tar to account for Brer Rabbit sticking to it,
whereas in what I believe to be the original story the _Nkondi_ image
causes the victim to stick by its own inherent fetish power. In “Cunnie
Rabbit, Mr. Spider and the other Beef,” there is a story of a Wax-girl,
which has all the elements of the Tar-baby, and here again the wax that
causes the sticking is a concession, I think, to civilization like the
tar.
Footnote 68:
C. J. Harris, in his introduction to _Uncle Remus and His Sayings_
(Ward, Lock and Co., 6_d_. edition) mentions Prof. J. W. Powell, of
the Smithsonian Institute, and Herbert H. Smith as having found
similar stories “in a number of languages, and in various modified
forms.” The former among the North American Indians, and the latter
among the South American Indians, and one in particular he has traced
to India, and as far east as Siam. I would refer the reader to that
Introduction for further details.
Footnote 69:
It is said there are no true gazelles in Africa, whether that is so or
not I have found it convenient to translate the Congo word _nsexi_
uniformly as gazelle. The _nsexi_ is about eighteen inches high, of
slight body, thin legs, whitey-brown stomach, and brownish-grey back,
small, sharp-pointed horns, small head, and large pathetic eyes. The
_nsexi_ is very agile, and I suppose that the slaves from the Congo
finding no such animal in their new home in America, used the rabbit
as a substitute--also there are no leopards there, so they transferred
his gullibility to the fox, wolf and bear.
All raw natives would believe that a fetish by its own magical powers
could hold tightly its victim without the aid of such extraneous things
as tar and wax. It is apparent that the narrators have lost faith in the
magical powers of their fetish, and have introduced the wax and the tar
to render their stories a little more reasonable to themselves. It is
interesting to note that when Brer Rabbit was thrown among the leaves of
the briar bush he unsticks from the Tar-baby, and in the Leopard
sticking to the _Nkondi_ the Gazelle “cuts some leaves and made a charm
to set the Leopard free.” One can discover many similarities between
these stories and those told by Uncle Remus. There is little doubt that
most, if not all, the stories of Remus were told around the Congo
village fires before they delighted the hearts and lightened the burdens
of the negro slaves on the southern plantations of America. Yet is Congo
the original home of these stories? Or have they travelled far by
devious ways, perhaps even doubling back in their course, so that their
real home is now lost in antiquity, and the road to it obliterated by
the swamps of time across which the human family has wandered in its
many journeyings?
The natives in their talk often use phrases from their stories which are
quite sufficient to recall to the hearers the whole fable and its
teaching, as “sour grapes” with us conjures up the fox looking with
longing eyes at the fruit beyond his reach. Many of these concentrated
sentences have become the proverbs of to-day, and the Lower Congo
language is rich in such _mots_, and one could, in fact, gain a very
clear idea of the Congo man’s philosophy from an analysis of the
sentences culled from their stories which have become their maxims.
In these pages will be found some puzzle stories, such as “The Four
Fools” and “The Four Wonders.” These are propounded and cause no end of
discussion as to which has performed the greatest feat of skill, and
thus earned the fowl that laid money (_i. e._ beads); and also who had
committed the greatest wrong against the usual order of mundane affairs,
and thus deserved the most blame. Each fool and each wonder-worker has
his adherents, who will argue in his favour with so much vehemence and
gesticulation that the listener who does not know them will think them
on the verge of a most desperate fight. After long and toilsome journeys
the writer has heard his carriers argue about these problem stories far
into the night; and they would return again and again to the charge,
each individual (or party) supporting his favourite character with all
the natural eloquence at his command. Night after night they would
revert to the same story in order to give expression to the arguments,
in favour of their views, that had come into their minds through the day
while journeying with their loads up and down the hills. One problem
story has furnished them, sometimes, with sufficient discussion to last
four or five nights.
The stories are told round the fire on nights that are too dark for
dancing. The various groups will arrange themselves round the blazing
hearths, and after the news of the day has been exhausted, one will tell
a story suggested by some item of news, or the action of a friend, or
the saying of an enemy. The story is told with dramatic power and
forcible eloquence, the narrator acting the various parts and imitating
the sounds of the different animals. In some of the stories there are
choruses, and these are taken up and sung heartily to the clapping of
their hands.
There is no greater treat than to listen to a Congo story told in the
original by one of these born story-tellers--the lights and shadows
caused by the flickering fire, the swaying body of the narrator, the
fixed attention and grunts of approval of the listeners, the great dark
beyond, the many mystic sounds issuing from the surrounding bush and
forest lend a peculiar weirdness to the story and its teller.
A father correcting his children will tell them a story to enforce his
teaching, and though wise words might be forgotten, the story will
remain in the memory with guiding or deterrent power; sons and daughters
repeat these stories to their parents if they think they are not being
properly treated according to native ideas.
During a lawsuit the native advocates in stating the case for their
clients will tell stories with great effect, or will illustrate a point
against their opponents by relating a parable suitable to the occasion;
and the judge will often give his verdict by recounting a fable, and if
they do not know one appropriate to the case they will invent one, and
should it happen to be a happy invention it will pass from mouth to
mouth, and thus into the folklore of the district; the current stories,
known to all, are a survival of the fittest, and some of them are here
placed before the reader.
CONGO FOLKLORE TALES
I
How the Fowl evaded his Debt
Once upon a time a cock Fowl and a Leopard began a friendship, and not
very long afterwards the Leopard lent some money to the Fowl. It was
arranged that on a certain day the Leopard should receive the money at
the Fowl’s residence.
On the morning of the appointed day the Fowl ground up some red peppers,
and mixed them with water so that it looked like blood, and when he
heard that the Leopard was on the way to his house he went into his
courtyard and said to his slaves: “When the Leopard arrives and asks for
me, tell him my head has been cut off and carried to the women in the
farms to be combed and cleaned.” Then he hid his head under his wings
and told them to pour some of the pepper water on his neck, which they
did, and it fell to the ground like blood.
The Leopard arrived and asked for his friend the Fowl. The slaves
repeated what they had been told, and, on the Leopard hearing it, he
wished to be allowed a closer view of the marvel, and on beholding the
red-pepper water dropping to the ground, he thought it was all true.
On returning later he asked the Fowl how it was done, and the Fowl
replied: “When you reach your town, you cut off your head, and send it
to the farm to be combed and cleaned, and there you are.”
“Oh! thank you, friend,” said the Leopard, “I will astonish the natives
of my town.”
Away he went to his town, and told all his wives that he had been taught
some wonderful magic by his friend the Fowl.
“What is it?” they asked.
“Well, my head is cut off,” said the Leopard, “and then you take it to
the farm to comb and clean, and then you bring it back.”
“All right,” they cried in chorus.
The Leopard sent messengers to all the towns in his district, inviting
the folk on a certain day to come and see the wonder. On the day a great
crowd of people arrived, and when all was ready the Leopard went into
the centre, and his head was cut off, but his legs gave way, and he fell
down.
The head was returned after being combed and cleaned, but when they put
it on the neck it would not stay there. Thus died the Leopard because of
his conceit in thinking he could do all that others did; and also
because he did not use his common sense to perceive the foolishness of
what the Fowl told him. Do not believe all you see and hear.
II
Why the Small-ant was the Winner
One day a fierce Driver-ant[70] and a Small-ant had a long discussion as
to which of them was the stronger. The Driver-ant boasted of his size,
the strength of his mandibles, and the fierceness of his bite.
“Yes, all that may be true,” quietly answered the Small-ant, “and yet
with all your size and strong jaws you cannot do what I can do.”
“What is that?” sneeringly asked the Driver-ant.
“You cannot cut a piece of skin off the back of that man’s hand, and
drop it down here,” replied the Small-ant.
“Can’t I? All of you wait and see,” said the Driver-ant.
Away he climbed up the man until he reached the back of his hand. At the
first bite of the strong mandibles, the man started, and, looking down
at his hand, saw the Driver-ant, picked it off, and dropped it dead at
his feet right among the waiting crowd of ants.
Footnote 70:
Driver-ant = _Nsongonia_. Small-ant = _Mfitete_.
The Small-ant then climbed to the place, and gently, softly, with great
patience he worked round a piece of skin until it was loose, and he was
able to drop it to the ground. The waiting throng of ants proclaimed him
the winner, for he had done by his gentleness and patience what the
other had failed to do by his strength and fierceness.
III
How the Animals imitated the Gazelle
and brought Trouble upon Themselves
Once upon a time a Leopard gave birth to seven cubs, and she asked the
Jackal to act as nurse for her while she was away hunting.
Shortly after the departure of the Leopard the Gazelle arrived, and said
to the Jackal: “Let us eat one of the cubs and then you will have six
left.”
“What shall I do when the Leopard returns?” asked the Jackal.
“Oh! I will help you,” quickly promised the Gazelle.
Thereupon the Jackal gave up a cub, and then another, and another, until
at last all the cubs were eaten.
The Gazelle then tied the Jackal to a tree and said: "When you hear the
Leopard coming, shout out loudly, ‘Murder! Thieves!’"
In a little time the Jackal heard the Leopard bounding through the
forest, and he began to cry out: “We are robbed! we are robbed! Help!
Thieves!”
“What is the matter? What are you crying about?” asked the Leopard.
“Oh!” sobbed the Jackal, “I don’t know at all who tied me up, but all of
your children are eaten.” The Leopard, on hearing this, was very angry.
The reckless, daring Gazelle scampered off, and by and by reached a
place where all the animals were gambling with dice. A Pigeon gave him
the dice to throw, and the Gazelle threw a “Leopard” (the name of a
winning throw). “Oh, dear me!” said the Gazelle, when he saw his luck,
“I have eaten seven young leopards, and nothing has happened to me.”
The other animals thought this was a lucky saying, so they repeated the
words every time they threw the dice. The Gazelle warned them not to
imitate the sayings of others, or trouble would come upon them. But
they, thinking he only wanted to keep his good luck to himself, repeated
the words more earnestly. The Gazelle slipped away to call the Leopard,
and begged her not to be angry with what she would hear.
The Leopard went to the games, and when she heard one animal after
another say: “Oh, dear me! I have eaten seven young leopards, and
nothing has happened to me,” she became so angry that she fought with
the different animals and killed them all. As for the Gazelle, he took
himself out of the way. Thus the animals, through apeing others, lost
their lives.
IV
Why the Fowls never shut their Doors
There lived once a chief who owned a large number of Fowls. On arising
early one morning he found that the door of their house had been left
open all night. He thereupon woke up the Head Cock and asked why he had
not shut the door.
The Cock replied: “We did not go to sleep very early last night, as we
quarrelled over who should shut the door. I told one to do it, and he
told another, and at last we became so angry with each other that no one
would shut the door, so we went to sleep leaving it open.”
The owner snapped his fingers in speechless surprise at the Fowl’s
excuse, and walked away.
Another day the chief went to see his wives’ farms and found them all
clean and well weeded, but the road leading to the farms, which was
nobody’s work, was choked with tall grass and weeds. That evening the
chief called out loudly so that all the town could hear: “You women, I
went to your farms to-day, and found the road covered with tall grass
and weeds. Truly you are near relatives of the fowls, who sleep with
open door because each tells the other to shut it. To-morrow all of you
go and clear the road.”
When the Fowls heard these remarks they were very vexed, and the Cock
said: “You have heard what our owner has shouted out to the whole town.
He has held us up as a bad example to all in the place, yet when I went
to a neighbouring town the day before yesterday I saw a buffalo rotting
by the roadside.”
“Why was it rotting there?” asked the Black Hen of her husband.
The Cock replied: "When I reached the town the other day I heard that
Don’t-care, who is the son of Peter Pay-if-you-like, went outside his
house and saw a buffalo; he aroused his companions and told them to go
and shoot it; but they said: ‘Go and shoot it yourself.’ ‘What! am I to
see the buffalo and shoot it also?’ he asked. Thereupon Wise-man fired
at the buffalo, and told another to go and see if it were killed. He
came back and said it was wounded; so another went and killed it; but he
would not cut it up; and another went and cut it into pieces. Then each
thought that the other should carry the flesh into the town;
consequently it was left in the bush, and that was why the buffalo meat
rotted at the roadside."
The Black Hen said: “Indeed, is that so?” But the Speckled Hen observed:
“That it would be better for human beings if they looked better after
their own business, instead of poking their noses into affairs belonging
to Fowls, and holding them up as a bad example to their women.”
The Head Cock said: “That from that day neither he, nor his children,
nor his grandchildren should ever shut the doors of their houses, no
matter how cold it might be, or what risks they might run of being eaten
by wild animals.” Thus it is that Fowls never shut their doors at night.
They are angry that human beings, who conduct their own affairs so
badly, should find fault with the way in which Fowls look after theirs.
V
Why the Dog and the Palm-rat hate each other
One day the Dog, the Palm-rat, the Hawk, and the Eagle arranged to take
a journey together, but before starting they agreed not to thwart each
other in any matter.
They had not gone very far when the Eagle saw a bunch of unripe
palm-nuts, and said: “When these palm-nuts are ripe, and I have eaten
them, then we will proceed on our way.”
They waited many days until the palm-nuts ripened and were eaten by the
Eagle, then they started again, and by and by the Hawk espied the bush
(a great space covered with tall grass, canes, and stunted trees), and
said: “When this bush is burnt, and I have eaten the locusts, and drunk
in the smoke from the fire, then we will go.”
So they waited while the bush dried, and was burnt, and the Hawk ate his
locusts, and drank in the smoke from the burning grass, then they were
ready to start again; but when the Palm-rat saw the bush was burnt, he
said: “We remain here until the grass and canes have grown again, so
that I may eat the young canes, for remember we agreed not to thwart or
oppose each other on this journey.”
They waited there some months until the canes grew again, and the
Palm-rat had eaten them.
Once more they started on their travels, and on reaching a large forest
the Dog said: “Now I will dry my nose.”
His companions answered: “All right, we will go for firewood.”
The Palm-rat and the Hawk fetched the wood, and the Eagle went for the
fire. The Dog put his nose near the fire, but every time it dried he
made it wet again by licking it. They remained a long time in the
forest, but the Dog’s nose never became properly dry: it was an endless
job. His companions became vexed, and the Hawk and the Eagle flew away,
leaving the Palm-rat and the Dog alone. At last the patience of the
Palm-rat was exhausted, and he, too, ran away; but the Dog chased him to
kill him, and this is the reason why the Dog and the Palm-rat hate each
other. He would not wait until the Dog’s nose was dry.
VI
The Leopard boils his Mother’s Teeth
One day the Gazelle bought some maize at the market, and while he was
boiling them at home, the Leopard paid him a visit, and asked him:
“Friend Gazelle, what are you boiling in the saucepan?”
The Gazelle replied: “I am boiling my mother’s teeth.”
“Indeed!” exclaimed the Leopard, “let me taste them.” So the Gazelle
gave him some of the cooked maize, and the Leopard ate them, and thought
them so good that he went home and pulled out all his mother’s teeth,
and put them to boil in a saucepan.
The Gazelle, passing the house, called in, and seeing the saucepan on
the fire, asked the Leopard what he was cooking. “I am cooking my
mother’s teeth, but they don’t get soft,” answered the Leopard.
The Gazelle laughingly said: “I meant maize, and you have pulled out and
are boiling all your mother’s teeth.” The Leopard was so angry at what
he had foolishly done, that he drove the Gazelle off and wanted to kill
him, but the Gazelle ran away and hid in a log of wood.
The Leopard, returning from his pursuit of the Gazelle, saw the firewood
and carried it home, and, as he was splitting it, out jumped a fine dog.
The Leopard admired the dog so much that he told his wives never to beat
it.
One day one of the wives pointed her finger at it, and the dog was so
insulted at having a finger pointed at him that he howled so long and
loudly that the Leopard came and killed his wife for insulting his dog;
and thus he killed them one after the other; and when they were all
dead, the dog changed back into a Gazelle, and ran away laughing at the
Leopard for his foolishness in mistaking maize for teeth, and a Gazelle
for a dog.
VII
How the Ants saved the Partridge’s Eggs
Once upon a time a Partridge having laid her eggs, was driven from them
by a Python, who took possession of them by coiling herself round and
round the eggs.
The Partridge, seeing she had been deprived of her eggs, began to call
for help. A Buffalo, hearing her, came and asked what was the matter.
The Partridge said: “The Python has rolled herself round my eggs, and I
want a wise body to save them for me.”
“Don’t worry,” said the Buffalo, “I will go and stamp on her.”
“Not you,” cried the Partridge; “while you are stamping on her you will
smash my eggs. I am looking for a _wise body_ to help me.”
The Partridge continued to call, and the Elephant came asking what was
the matter.
“Oh!” sobbed the Partridge, “the Python has curled round my eggs, and I
want a wise body to save them.”
“Never mind,” replied the Elephant, “I will go and smash her to pulp.”
“Not you,” cried the Partridge, “you will break all my eggs.”
So one animal after another offered help, but they were rejected, as
they could not drive the Python away without endangering the eggs. The
poor Partridge was at her wits’ end, when an army of Driver-ants arrived
and inquired the reason of her calling for help. When they heard the
cause they marched right up to where the Python was, and at once began
to nip, nip, nip with their strong mandibles, and the Python unrolled
herself and glided away as fast as she could. Thus the Ants rescued the
stolen eggs that would otherwise have been broken by the clumsy attempts
of the Buffalo and the Elephant.
VIII
The Leopard sticks to the _Nkondi_
(Wooden Image)
In the long ago both the Leopard and the Gazelle made new maize farms.
When the ground was ready for planting, the Gazelle put some maize in a
saucepan to boil, and hid the rest of his maize in another place. While
the pot was on the fire the Leopard arrived, and asked: “Friend Gazelle,
what are you boiling?”
“Some maize,” said the Gazelle, “and when it is cooked I am going to
plant maize in my farm.”
The Leopard exclaimed, “Indeed! do you plant boiled maize?”
“Yes,” answered the Gazelle. “I boil all my maize, for then it grows
better.”
The Leopard returned home at once and rubbed all his maize off their
cobs, and boiled the maize. The next morning they both went and planted
their maize in their farms. During the following night, however, the
Gazelle went and planted some unboiled maize in the Leopard’s farm.
After a few days they went to have a look at their farms, and in the
Gazelle’s the whole of the maize was sprouting well, but in the
Leopard’s only the raw maize the Gazelle had planted was growing. The
Leopard could not understand it, for he said: “I well boiled all my
maize, and yet it does not grow.”
By and by the maize was ripe for plucking, and the Gazelle and Leopard
went and pulled what they wanted and returned home. For several nights
after that the Leopard went stealing maize in the Gazelle’s farm, and
one day the Gazelle said to him: “Friend Leopard, who is stealing maize
from my farm?”
“I don’t know,” replied the Leopard. The Gazelle carved a wooden fetish
called the _Nkondi_, and put it in his farm.
The next night the Leopard went and stole some more maize, and as he was
leaving the farm the Nkondi said: “Oh, you are the thief, are you?”
“If you talk like that,” growled the Leopard, “I will hit you.”
“Hit me,” said the _Nkondi_. The Leopard hit him, and his paw stuck to
the image.
“Let go,” cried the Leopard, “or I will hit you with my other hand.”
“Hit me,” repeated the _Nkondi_. The Leopard hit him with the other
hand, and that stuck also to the image.
“Let go,” angrily cried the Leopard, “or I will kick and bite you.”
Which he at once did, as the _Nkondi_ would not let him go, and his feet
and mouth stuck to the image; then both the Leopard and the _Nkondi_
fell to the ground together.
By and by the Gazelle arrived, and when he saw the Leopard sticking to
the _Nkondi_ he said: “Oh, you are the thief,” and, having punished him,
he cut some leaves and made a charm to set the Leopard free. After that
the Leopard never again went stealing in the Gazelle’s maize farm.
IX
How the Mouse won his Wife
On one occasion a daughter was born to a lonely pair, and the father
said: “Any one who wants to marry my daughter must first cut down the
mahogany tree standing in my garden.” Years passed, and when the father
was dying he sent and told his wife that only he who felled the mahogany
tree could marry his daughter.
By and by an Elephant arrived, and, sitting down in the town, asked the
girl for a drink of water. She poured some water into a calabash and
gave it to him, and he then asked her: “Are you married?” and she
replied: “No, I am not yet married.” The Elephant said: “I will marry
you.” Whereupon the mother called out: “You can marry her; but you must
first cut down the mahogany tree.” The Elephant took an axe and cut,
cut, cut until he was tired, and then went and rested under the eave of
the house so long that when he went again to the tree it was just as it
was before he cut it. When the Elephant saw that, he threw down the axe,
saying: “It is not my wedding, the woman costs too much.”
As the Elephant was going away he met the Buffalo, and told him all
about it, saying: “I came to marry, but I am not able to fell the tree.”
The Buffalo picked up the axe and cut, cut, cut, and then rested under
the verandah of the house. When he returned to the tree he found it had
grown again to its former size. Down he threw the axe and bolted.
As the Buffalo was rushing away a Lion shouted out: “Where have you come
from?” The Buffalo stopped and told him all his troubles. “Oh,” said the
Lion, “give me an axe, I’ll marry her.” But the same thing happened to
him, and to the Hyena, and to the Leopard also. They all cut at the
tree, got tired, rested too long, and each ran away, saying: “I came to
marry, but the girl is not worth the trouble.”
As the Leopard was bounding away, a Mouse asked him: “What is the
matter?” and the Leopard growled out: “I went to marry a woman, but
whoever marries her must fell the mahogany tree.” Thereupon the Mouse
went and gnawed, gnawed, gnawed without stopping, until at last the tree
toppled over and fell to the ground. When the mother saw the tree fall,
she said: “Mouse, you can sleep here, and in the morning take your
wife.”
In the morning they cut up six pigs and twenty loaves, then the Mouse
took his wife, and they started on their journey to his town. They
reached a stream where they camped for a time, and while there the
Elephant arrived, and the Mouse said to him: “See, this is my wife.”
The Elephant would not agree to that, but said: “She is mine, I married
her.”
“No,” said the Mouse, “she is mine. Accept of two pigs for dinner.”
When the Elephant heard that, he began to beat the Mouse, but the Mouse
entered his trunk and gave him such pain that the Elephant cried: “Come
out, and I will give you two pigs.” The Mouse came out, received his two
pigs, and went off with his wife.
They reached another camping-place, and while resting and eating there,
the Buffalo arrived. “Welcome to you, father,” said the Mouse. But the
Buffalo did not want his welcome, and said he had married the woman, and
when the Mouse would not give her up, the Buffalo hit him on the back
with a stick. The Mouse entered the Buffalo’s ear and gave him so much
pain that he bellowed: “Come out, and I will give you five sheep.” The
Mouse came out, received his five sheep, and went away with his wife.
As they journeyed along they met the Hyena, who said: “Why, that is my
wife,” and when the Mouse denied it, the Hyena became very angry, and
beat the Mouse about in his weakness and made him cry. The Mouse called
the Squirrels, who came and fought the Hyena, and while they were
fighting, the Mouse hurried off with his wife.
They travelled until they came to a high plateau, where they met a large
Rat, who said: “Give me that woman.”
To him the Mouse replied: “I cannot give her, for I have had plenty of
trouble to gain her.”
“Very well,” answered the Rat; “let us go to the drinking-booth, and I
will give you some palm-wine.”
While sitting there the Mouse took a rat’s head out of his bag.
“Where did you get that?” asked the Rat.
“Oh,” boasted the Mouse, “I have eaten nine rats, and you will be the
tenth.” So alarmed was the Rat that he ran away and never said
“Good-bye.”
At last the Mouse reached his town and gave his wife a house. There they
feasted on the pigs and sheep they had gained on the road. But one day
the Leopard paid a visit to the Mouse, and said: “Uncle Mouse, let us
jointly make a maize farm.” This they did, and while the Mouse was
watching the maize one day, the Leopard tried to run away with his wife.
The Mouse, hearing this, invited the Leopard to drink wine in his house,
and while they were drinking, the Mouse took out of his bag a Leopard’s
head.
“Where did you get that?” asked the Leopard.
“Down in the drinking-booth I killed and ate nine,” said the Mouse, “and
you will be the tenth.” The Leopard was so frightened at this, that when
the Mouse told him to get into the calabash, he went right in at once.
The Mouse put in the cork, and then put the calabash on the fire, and
thus the Leopard died. The Mouse said: “I will govern in this country,
for there is not another chief left.” Thus was the Mouse rewarded for
his courage, wit, and perseverance.
X
The Gazelle outwits the Leopard
Once upon a time a Leopard and a Gazelle lived together with their wives
and families in the same town. One day the Leopard said: “Friend
Gazelle, let us go and buy some drums in the Zombo country.” “All
right,” replied the Gazelle; “but where is the money?” “I have the money
by me,” answered the Leopard.
They started, and when they had walked a little way the Leopard growled
out: “Wait here. I must return to the town, as I have forgotten
something.” The Leopard returned to the town and went to the Gazelle’s
wife and said: “My friend has sent me for his children.” Mrs. Gazelle
gave them to him, and putting them into a bag, he returned to the place
where he left the Gazelle. They started again, and when they had
travelled a long distance the Leopard saw some honey in a hole in one of
the trees, whereupon he said to the Gazelle: “Wait for me here while I
go to eat the honey, but you must not undo the sack.”
The Gazelle was left to guard the sack, which he untied, and looking in,
he exclaimed: “Why, they are my children!” He put the sack on his back
and hurried to the town, gave his children back to his wife, and went to
the Leopard’s house and said: “My friend has sent me for his children.”
Mrs. Leopard gave them to him. He put them in the sack and returned
quickly to the spot where the Leopard had left him. After a time the
Leopard arrived, licking the honey off his lips, and, picking up the
bag, away they went again on their journey. By and by they reached Zombo
and bought some drums, and when the Leopard paid the money for them, he
whispered: “Don’t undo the bag now, there are some gazelles in it.”
As they were returning home they tried the drums. The Leopard beat a
tune and sang: “The stupid people go on foolish journeys.” For the
Leopard thought the Gazelle had helped to sell his own children for
drums. The Gazelle then beat a tune and sang: “At the place where they
ate honey they left their bag of wisdom.” The Leopard did not know he
had exchanged his own children for drums.
On their way home they played and sang in many towns, and received goats
and pigs as presents for their entertainment. On reaching their town the
Gazelle hurried to his house, and sent off his wife and children to
hide.
The Leopard went to his house, and, looking round, he asked his wife:
“Where are my children?” “Why, you sent the Gazelle for them,” she
replied; "and now you ask: ‘Where are the children?’" The Leopard went
in great rage to the Gazelle’s house, but the Gazelle ran away, and as
he was escaping, he cried out: “I am the wise Gazelle who has outwitted
your craftiness.”
XI
The Gazelle punishes the Palm-rat for breaking his promise
One day a Gazelle, being very hungry, went in search of food, and saw a
fine bunch of palm-nuts hanging from a palm-tree; but having only hoofs
he could not climb the tree. He therefore went in search of his friend
the Palm-rat, and said to him: “I know where there is a fine bunch of
palm-nuts, and if you will promise to give me some I will show you where
it is.”
The Palm-rat readily promised to share the nuts. So together they went
to the forest, and the Gazelle pointed out the nuts to his friend. With
his strong, sharp claws the Palm-rat quickly mounted the palm-tree, and
found there three bunches of palm-nuts; but instead of cutting them
down, he sat on a palm-frond and began to eat them.
After a time the Gazelle shouted out: “Friend Palm-rat, throw me down
some of the nuts according to your promise.”
“Oh,” cried the Palm-rat, “when I am eating I am deaf, and cannot hear
what is said to me.” And he continued to munch away at the nuts.
The Gazelle waited a little, and again called out: “Please throw me some
of the palm-nuts, for I have hoofs, and cannot climb a tree like you.”
But the Palm-rat ate greedily on, and took no notice of his friend’s
request, except to say that he was deaf when eating.
The Gazelle thereupon gathered some leaves, grass, twigs, and stubble,
and made a large fire at the bottom of the palm-tree. In a short time
the Palm-rat called out: “Uncle Gazelle, put out your fire, the heat and
smoke are choking me.”
“Oh,” replied the Gazelle, “when I am warming myself by the fire I
cannot hear what is said to me.” And he heaped more firewood and dried
grass on the fire.
The Palm-rat, choking with the smoke, lost his grip on the tree, and
fell to the ground dead. The Gazelle returned to the town and took
possession of all the goods belonging to the Palm-rat. If you make a
promise, keep it; and if you want a kindness shown to you, you must do
kind things to others.
XII
How the Crow cheated the Dove and
got into Difficulty through it
A long time ago the Crow and the Dove arranged to go hunting together.
They took with them their guns, charms, dogs, and chief huntsman. The
dogs entered the bush and started an animal which the Dove fired at and
killed. Then up ran the Crow shouting: “It is mine, it is mine.”
“No,” said the Dove; “I killed it.”
“It is mine,” asserted the Crow, and although they tried to argue with
him, he would not listen, but only shouted more loudly: “It is mine.”
At last the Dove gave way, and thus it was every time they went
hunting--the Crow always cheated the Dove out of his game by his loud
blustering cry: “It is mine. It is mine.”
One day, while hunting, the Dove accidentally shot the chief huntsman,
and no sooner did the Crow hear the report of the gun than he came
running and calling out: “It is mine, it is mine. I shot it,” but on
drawing near and seeing the body of the huntsman, he said to the Dove:
“It is yours.”
“No,” replied the Dove; "you have said ‘It is mine’ every time I have
killed game, and now this is yours also." They talked long and loudly
about the matter, and at last they laid the case before the elders in
the town.
The elders said to the Crow: “Yes, it is yours. You have claimed
everything before, now take this also, and bury the body properly, and
pay all the expenses of the funeral.” There are many people like the
Crow, who take all the credit to themselves, and leave the blame to
others.