CHAPTER I.

LIVES OF THE ELECTRICIANS.

LIVES

OF

THE ELECTRICIANS:

PROFESSORS

TYNDALL, WHEATSTONE, AND MORSE.

FIRST SERIES.

BY

WILLIAM T. JEANS.

“The electric telegraph is the most precious gift which Science has

given to civilisation.”--SIR D. BREWSTER.

LONDON:

WHITTAKER & CO., 2, WHITE HART STREET,

PATERNOSTER SQUARE, E. C.

GEORGE BELL & SONS, YORK STREET, COVENT GARDEN.

1887.

RICHARD CLAY AND SONS,

LONDON AND BUNGAY.

CONTENTS.

INTRODUCTION.

Use of lives of electricians--World-wide distribution of

electricians--Eminent authorities on biographical studies

_Pages_ ix-xvi

_PROFESSOR TYNDALL._

CHAPTER I.

Position as a scientist--Origin and early career--Work on

Ordnance Survey, and as a teacher--Student life at Marburg--

Sense of duty and early friendships _Pages_ 1-20

CHAPTER II.

Subjects of study in Germany--Discovery of diamagnetism--

Investigation of it--Scientific acquaintances--Early

connection with Royal Institution--Slaty cleavage--Glacier

phenomena explained _Pages_ 21-41

CHAPTER III.

Researches on Radiant Heat--Aqueous vapour and new

glacial theory--Calorescence--Formation of clouds--Germ

theory--Smoke respirator--Experiments on sound and its

production by heat _Pages_ 42-59

CHAPTER IV.

Alpine travels--Ascent of Monte Rosa, Mont Blanc,

Weisshorn, Col-du-Géant, and Piz Morteratch--Visit

to Vesuvius--An American’s impressions--Visit to

America--Exploration of Niagara Falls--Presidental

address to British Association _Pages_ 60-83

CHAPTER V.

Changes at Royal Institution--Development of

electricity explained--Experimental illustrations and

anecdotes--Reminiscences of Thomas Carlyle--Scientific

adviser to the Trinity House _Pages_ 84-104

_PROFESSOR WHEATSTONE._

CHAPTER I.

Forecasts of the telegraph--Early descriptions and

history of it--Birth and early achievements of

Wheatstone--Enchanted lyre or first telephone--Experiments

in audition--Invention of concertina--Velocity of

electricity measured--Spectrum analysis--Lightning

conductors _Pages_ 105-132

CHAPTER II.

Origin of telegraph--Early evidences of Wheatstone’s--

Working of first needle telegraph--Dispute with Mr. W. F.

Cooke as to priority of invention--Wheatstone’s vindication

--His electro-magnetic telegraph, magneto-electric machine,

electric clock, printing telegraph, chronoscope, method of

measuring electricity, and improved needle telegraphs

_Pages_ 133-172

CHAPTER III.

First uses of telegraph--Means of arresting criminals--

Early charges for telegraphing--Formation of Electric

Telegraph Company--Wheatstone’s magneto-electric exploder--

His early experiments with submarine cables--Cable from

Dover to Calais--Faraday on Wheatstone’s A.B.C. telegraph

instrument--His automatic instruments _Pages_ 173-203

CHAPTER IV.

Origin of Dynamo--Invention of stereoscope--Improvement

by Sir D. Brewster--Illustration of earth’s rotatory

motion--Wheatstone’s cryptograph--His minor inventions--

Honours conferred on him--His death _Pages_ 204-230

_PROFESSOR MORSE._

CHAPTER I.

Birth and education--Diverted from electricity to art--

Labours as an artist in England and America

_Pages_ 231-241

CHAPTER II.

Travels to study art--First conception of Recording

Telegraph--Experiments with it in New York--Invention

of Relay--His poverty and disappointments--His

originality disputed--First exhibitions of his apparatus--

Descriptions of it--Foreign patents--Introduction of

photography--Congress asked to try his telegraph--

Appropriation granted--Experimental line made and opened

_Pages_ 242-278

CHAPTER III.

Morse Telegraph offered to Government and declined--Rapid

extension of it by Companies--Determination of longitude;

Morse transmitter and sounder--First Atlantic Cable

_Pages_ 279-301

CHAPTER IV.

Rewards of inventors--Morse patents vindicated--Rival

inventions--Pioneers of practical telegraphy--Honours and

emoluments of Morse--Statue in New York--Last days--Death

_Pages_ 302-322

INTRODUCTION.

Although this work is the first of its kind relating to electricians,

its design is neither novel nor tentative. Its object is not only to

give a popular account of the most memorable achievements of those men

who have succeeded in evolving the laws of electricity, but to convey

to unscientific readers some knowledge of the nature of those laws, and

the means by which they have been applied to the purposes of man.

In some senses electrical science and its practical applications might

be described as the creation of the present century; and the author has

been encouraged to adopt this method of giving a popular account of the

great and useful work that our electricians have done by the success of

a similar work dealing, in like manner, with the men and the inventions

that have multiplied and cheapened the production and use of the most

useful of metals.[1] An eminent reviewer of that work justly observed

that “our inventors might well boast that with a piece of steel and

the recent developments of the magnetic force--so far at least as

manufactures and commerce are concerned--they have revolutionised the

world.” It is this revolution and the men who have effected it, that

this work proposes to give an account of, hoping to realise the truth

of Tacitus’ observation, that “the age which is most fertile in bright

examples is the best qualified to make a fair estimate of them.”

Of books on electricity there is already abundance. They have been

poured from the press in yearly increasing numbers. During the present

generation the laws of electricity have been explained in every variety

of form--in the rigid demonstrations of the geometrician, in the

abstract symbolism of the mathematician, in the technical language of

numerous text-books, and in the experimental illustrations of popular

lecturers. But to the ordinary reader the theorems of the mathematician

are written in an unknown tongue; and more elementary books on

electricity, to be made interesting to the popular mind, would have to

be written in “that language which can give a soul to the objects of

sense, and a body to the abstractions of mathematics.” Add to this the

fact that, as Prof. C. A. Young puts it, “since 1848 all things have

become new in the scientific world. There is a new mathematics and a

new astronomy, a new chemistry and a new electricity, a new geology

and a new biology. Great voices have spoken, and have transformed

the world of thought and research as much as the material products

of science have altered the aspects of external life. The telegraph

and dynamo-machine have not more changed the conditions of business

and industry than the speculations of Darwin and Helmholtz and their

compeers have affected those of philosophy and science.”

The conquest of these fresh fields of knowledge has been almost the

life’s work of professional scientists; and is that which was said

of the past to continue true of the future, that ideas which in one

generation are those of the learned few, in the next become those of

the educated and middle class, and in the third those of the general

public?

Even if no work were necessary to indicate the advances made in

electrical knowledge, biographies of the electricians would still be

a desideratum. Carlyle has said of art in general that biography is

almost the one thing needful. In the literature of electricity, it has

hitherto been the one thing lacking. The subject is not destitute of

historic as well as scientific interest; and hence it is possible that

the general reader may be led to regard it from Terence’s point of

view that “whatsoever concerns mankind concerns me.” It is possible,

too, that a record of the achievements which have brought electricity

to its present state of utility, may impart a reflex interest to that

science. “Art is art,” says Carlyle, “yet man also is man. Had the

_Transfiguration_ of Raphael been painted without human hand; had it

grown merely on the canvas, say by atmospheric influences, as lichen

pictures do on rocks--it were a grand picture doubtless; yet nothing

like so grand as _the_ picture which on opening our eyes we everywhere

in heaven and earth see painted, and everywhere pass over with

indifference,--because the Painter was not Man. Think of this; much

lies in it. The Vatican is great; yet poor to Chimborazo or the Peak of

Teneriffe; its dome is but the foolish chip of an egg-shell, compared

with that star-fretted dome where Arcturus and Orion glance for ever;

which latter notwithstanding who looks at? The biographic interest is

wanting: no Michael Angelo was He who built that ‘Temple of Immensity;’

therefore do we, pitiful Littlenesses as we are, turn rather to wonder

and to worship in the little toy-box of a Temple built by our like.”

Now it has been well observed that science is to the present age what

art was to the middle ages; and such being the case, may not a similar

interest to that described by Carlyle attach to the marvellous things

done by means of electricity? A great deal is said about electricity,

but very little about the men who made it subject to the will of man,

who converted it into “the pulse of speech” which annihilates time and

space, and who made it “the greatest blessing that science has given to

civilisation.” Of them it has often been said that “their line has gone

out through all the earth, and their words to the end of the world,”

but of their lives not much has been communicated to the general public

in a popular form.

The men who have made electricity the handmaid of industry are nearly

as widespread as the subtle force with which they have had to deal.

The United Kingdom was the birth-place of the monarch of modern

machinery--the steam-engine,--and also of the leading inventions

in metallurgy which supply the framework of all our manufacturing

machinery; but the pioneers and engineers of electricity have been

of different nations and tongues. In the infancy of the science no

country produced more electricians than Germany; in the discovery

and exposition of its subtlest laws, as well as in their application

to useful purposes, no country has done more than England; while in

the most novel and most extensive use of electrical appliances for

industrial purposes the New World may be said to have outstripped the

Old. But smaller countries have also made splendid contributions to

the general store of knowledge. Volta, the first philosopher who from

his youth devoted himself to the study of electricity, and who has

given his name to one department of it, was an Italian; so was Galvani,

who discovered that a frog was the most sensitive electrometer, and

whose name became a synonym for electricity. Oersted, who made himself

famous by the discovery of the mutual action of magnets and electrical

conductors, was a Dane; while Ampère, whom some writers have called

“the Newton of electricity,” and Arago, who discovered the development

of magnetism by rotation, were Frenchmen.

Most of these pioneers have already taken their place in the Temple of

Science; and this work not being intended to go over beaten ground,

it was expected, at the outset, to comprise in one volume sufficient

biographies to illustrate the more recent progress of electrical

science and its applications to industrial purposes; but the more

the writer investigated the subject, the more it grew, not only in

magnitude, but in magnetic attractiveness. He found that to give a

complete account of the revolution effected by means of electricity

would require biographies of the three classes of men,--scientific,

engineering, and commercial--that had been instrumental in bringing

electricity to its present state of usefulness; while to do justice

to these men would require such a varied picture of their lives as

would illustrate their marvellous versatility, or their multifarious

works, thus showing that they were among the ornaments as well as the

benefactors of their race. He was encouraged to begin this work by

the success of his previous effort, and he was encouraged to continue

it beyond the limit originally intended by experiencing a feeling of

pleasure akin to that which led Plutarch to say in the course of his

work, that when he first applied himself to the writing of ancient

lives it was for the sake of others, but he pursued that study for his

own sake: for it was like living and conversing with these illustrious

men, when he considered how great and wonderful they were. More

recently Lord Bacon said he “could not but wonder that our own times

have so little value for what they enjoy, as not more frequently to

write the lives of eminent men; for though kings, princes, and great

personages are few, yet there are many excellent men who deserve

better than vague reports and barren eulogies.” Nor is there any

lack of authority as to the value of our subject in the estimation

of contemporary schools of thought. An eminent Greek scholar (Dr.

Lushington) in addressing the students of Glasgow University as their

Lord Rector in 1885, observed that “the hope of adding something more

to the store of accomplished good to mankind cheered and upheld many

daring pioneers of science, whose venerated names, now become household

words, are linked together for ever in the history of human progress,

known and honoured throughout the whole civilised world. Yet who in

the age of Watt, even in the boldest flights of presaging imagination,

could have foretold such wondrous conquests over space and time as the

spectroscope, the electric telegraph, and the telephone have revealed?”

The object of this work is to give some account of “such wondrous

conquests.” The guiding principle in its compilation has been the

maxim of Goethe, that the main object of biography is to exhibit man

in relation to the features of his time; and not as Dumas, on the

other hand, sarcastically put it, “to trace each man’s innermost life,

ascertain whether he was born on a calcareous or a granite soil, learn

whether his ancestors and himself have drunk wine, cider, or beer, or

eaten meat, fish, or vegetables--nay, to penetrate the meanest details

of his existence, to descend from the heights of criticism and from a

scientific system to the gratification of a paltry curiosity.”

This volume opens with an account of the labours of the physicist

who made a special study of the phenomena of magnetism, electricity,

and co-relative forces; and in the course of it occasion is taken to

explain certain elementary principles of these forces. It then proceeds

to give, in the life of Professor Wheatstone, an account of some of

the methods by which such scientific principles were made serviceable

to man; and it concludes with an account of the man who made it the

labour of his life to produce a telegraphic apparatus and alphabet

which have found universal favour. Technical language has been avoided

as far as possible, and yet it is hoped that the descriptions given

of electrical laws and mechanism will convey substantially correct

impressions, without entering into elaborate details or straining

after scientific exactness. While it may thus become a means of

imparting to unscientific readers some knowledge of the history of

electrical science and engineering, it is hoped that the narrative

will be found sufficiently instructive to point a moral to that wider

class of readers who take a sympathetic interest in the struggles and

achievements of those unobtrusive but beneficent men, “who, departing,

leave behind them foot-prints on the sands of time.”

FOOTNOTES:

[1] _The Creators of the Age of Steel._

LIVES OF THE ELECTRICIANS.

PROFESSOR TYNDALL.

CHAPTER I.

“Precious is the new light of knowledge which our Teacher

conquers for us; yet small to the new light of Love

which also we derive from him: the most important

element of any man’s performance is the Life he has

accomplished.”--CARLYLE.

The position of Professor Tyndall in the world of science is somewhat

unique. He is one of our most popular teachers of physical science; he

is one of our most successful experimentalists; and he is one of our

most attractive writers. By his discoveries he has largely extended

our knowledge of the laws of Nature; by his teaching and writings he

has probably done more than any other man in England to kindle a love

of science among the masses; and by his life he has set an example to

students of science which cannot be too widely known or appreciated.

There are men who have made greater and more useful discoveries in

science, but few have made more interesting discoveries. There are

men whose achievements have been more highly esteemed by the devotees

of pure science, but rarely has a scientific man been more popular

outside the scientific world. There are men whose culture has been

broader and deeper, but who have nevertheless lacked his facility of

exposition and gracefulness of diction. The goddess of Science, which

ofttimes was presented to the public with the repulsive severity of a

skeleton, he has clothed with flesh and blood, making her countenance

appear radiant with the glow of poesy, and susceptible even to a touch

of human sympathy; while amongst scientific contemporaries, though he

does not rank as one of those creative minds that mark an epoch in

the history of physical philosophy, he may yet be said to have “built

many a stone into the great fabric of science, which gives it an

ever-broader support and an ever-growing height without its appearing

to a fresh observer as a special and distinctive work due to the sole

exertion of any one scientific man.” He commenced his scientific career

at the time when Sir William Grove began to elaborate that theory of

the co-relation of the physical sciences which Newton suspected and

Faraday elucidated; namely, “that the various affections of matter,

heat, light, electricity, magnetism, chemical affinity, and motion are

all correlative or have a reciprocal dependence: that neither, taken

abstractedly, can be said to be the essential or proximate cause of

the others, but that either may, as a force, produce the others; thus

heat may mediately produce electricity, electricity may produce heat;

and so of the rest.” Professor Tyndall has extended or simplified our

knowledge of these forces. Indeed he may be said to have revealed

some hidden links in the chain of causation. He has extended and

consolidated our knowledge of magnetism; as an explorer and discoverer

in the domain of radiant heat he stands almost alone; and as a lecturer

and experimentalist he has probably done more than any other man to

popularise the science of electricity.

There is a growing tendency in the present day to appreciate personal

achievement more highly than ancient lineage; and it is becoming more

a matter of boast in the intellectual world to say that an eminent

man was self-made than to say he was of noble birth. The subject of

this memoir can boast both of high descent and of lowly birth. “I am

distantly connected,” he says, “with one William Tyndale, who was rash

enough to boast, and to make good his boast, that he would place an

open Bible within reach of every ploughboy in England. His first reward

was exile, and then a subterranean cell in the Castle of Vilvorden.

It was a cold cell, and he humbly, but vainly, prayed for his coat to

cover him and for his books to occupy him. In due time he was taken

from the cell and set upright against a post. Round neck and post was

placed a chain, which being cunningly twisted, the life was squeezed

out of him. A bonfire was made of his body afterwards.”

It is said that the martyr Tyndale was descended from the ancient

barons of Tyndale in Northumberland, whose title eventually passed into

the family of the Percies, and that the said ancestors, leaving the

north during the war of the Roses, afterwards sought and found refuge

in Gloucestershire. Of one of these refugees the martyr of Vilvorden

was the great-grandson, and was, it is believed, born in 1484. Both

family tradition and documents show that some members of the Tyndale

family, who were cloth manufacturers, migrated from Gloucestershire to

the county of Wexford in Ireland about two centuries ago. One William

Tyndale landed on the coast of Ireland in 1670, and his descendants in

later years became scattered over Wexford, Waterford, and Carlow. Their

fortunes varied; but for our purpose it is sufficient to know that the

grandfather of the Professor had a small estate in Wexford; and that

on removing thence to the village of Leighlin Bridge on the banks of

the Barrow, county Carlow, he continued to prosper until he got into

easy circumstances. But throughout the whole race of Tyndale, from the

Martyr down to the Professor, intellectual independence appears to

have been preferred to worldly independence, and it was the exercise

of this trait that cost the Professor the small patrimony which his

grandfather had acquired. A high sense of rectitude and a benevolent

disposition are not incompatible with excessive susceptibility to

opposition; and hence persons of high principles sometimes stand like

adamant on points that to worldly minds appear too trifling even for

controversy, much less for self-sacrifice. Though the opinions of the

Tyndales may have differed, the leading principles that governed their

conduct appear to have been maintained with remarkable consistency and

self-denial. John Tyndale, the father of the Professor, differed in

opinion with his own father, William Tyndale of Leighlin Bridge, on

some point that has long since been forgotten, but in consequence of

that difference William revoked his will in favour of his first-born

son, John, and left his property to two sons of a second marriage.

Leighlin Bridge, where John Tyndall was born in humble circumstances

in 1820, was a thriving town of 2,000 inhabitants, forty-six miles

south-west of Dublin. It was then the _entrepot_ where the great

southern road from Dublin to Waterford and Cork crossed the Barrow, and

it has consequently been declining ever since the development of the

railway system diverted the traffic. It was not destitute of historical

associations, which to the Irish mind were of an exciting character.

Nor was the country destitute of natural attractions. When Tyndall

was a youth its general aspect was described as soft and agreeable,

with little of forcible or imposing scenery, yet free from those harsh

features which so frequently mar the effect of Irish landscape. In some

parts it so closely resembled the “champaign, ornate, and agreeable

districts of central England,” that it was said constantly to remind an

English traveller passing through the country of the “equable, grateful

scenery, the calm and soft-faced prettiness of territorial view to

which his mind had been accustomed.”

Yet to the ordinary English reader its loneliness would appear to

have little that was likely to fire the opening mind of the Apostle

of Physical Science. It need not, however, appear an inauspicious

birthplace to those who believe that it is no mere accident that

has made great enthusiasts generally proceed from lonely or sterile

countries.

Let us therefore look a little more into this home from which so

much light was to be reflected in after years by its then youngest

inhabitant. The Professor’s father, being left dependent on his own

resources, early joined the Irish Constabulary force and remained in

it for several years. He was regarded as a man of exceptional ability

and unswerving integrity, and was respected by all who knew him. A

sturdy politician and a zealous Orangeman, he preserved as a precious

relic a bit of flag which was said to have fluttered at the Battle of

the Boyne. In such a man Protestantism was no mere hereditary faith.

It was evolved from his own inner consciousness, and was part of his

intellectual being. His earnest and capacious mind had mastered the

works of Tillotson, Jeremy Taylor, Chillingworth, and other writers

who were not only the pillars of the Protestant faith, but still

remain unsurpassed as masters of English prose. In our own day men

of respectable theological attainments are content to reflect, in

lunar-like scintillations, the intellectual splendour, the massive

diction, the rich and glowing periods that adorn their pages; and

no better evidence could be given of the fine intelligence of John

Tyndall, of Leighlin Bridge, than to say that his delight was in the

works of these great men. It is the fashion nowadays for critics of

the “newspaper” school to sneer at their “pompous grandeur,” but it is

those living writers who in elevation of thought and graces of style

show the greatest affinity to them that are the most popular. It was

with such works that John Tyndall, _père_, sought to imbue the mind

of his only surviving son; and the subtle thoughts and inspiring

sentiments which he gathered from such classic ground must have had an

invigorating effect on his son’s susceptible mind. Besides his early

familiarity with the works of these powerful thinkers, it is said that

he soon knew the Bible almost by heart. This species of intellectual

discipline has sometimes been pointed to as presenting a strange

contrast with his excursions in later life into those regions of

natural philosophy which have sometimes been regarded as antagonistic

to theology. But it is more than probable that this early training did

much to model and chasten the rich, transparent, simple language in

which he has so beautifully expounded the laws of Nature. There is high

authority for saying that he could have had no better model. Alexander

von Humboldt, after reviewing the whole course of ancient literature

for “images reflected by the external world on the imagination,” says

that “as descriptions of nature the writings of the Old Testament are a

faithful reflection of the character of the country in which they were

composed, of the alternations of barrenness and fruitfulness, and of

the Alpine forests by which the land of Palestine was characterised.

The epic or historical narratives are marked by a graceful simplicity,

almost more unadorned than those of Herodotus, and most true to nature.

Their lyrical poetry is more adorned, and develops a rich and animated

conception of the life of nature. It might almost be said that one

single psalm (the 104th) represents the image of the whole cosmos....

The meteorological processes which take place in the atmosphere, the

formation and solution of vapour, according to the changing direction

of the wind, the play of its colours, the generation of hail, and

the rolling thunder are described with individualising accuracy,

and many questions are propounded which we in our present state of

physical knowledge may indeed be able to express under more scientific

definitions, but scarcely to answer satisfactorily.” Most of our great

writers have acknowledged that the literature that first made a lasting

impression on their mind materially influenced their style of writing,

and in the writings of Professor Tyndall will be found a good deal of

the beautiful simplicity and poetic feeling which abound in Hebrew

literature.

The origin of his love of nature is a problem that has exercised his

own mind. “I have sometimes tried,” he says, “to trace the genesis

of the interest which I take in fine scenery. It cannot be wholly

due to my early associations; for as a boy I loved nature, and hence

to account for that love of nature I must fall back upon something

earlier than my own birth. The forgotten associations of a foregone

ancestry are probably the most potent elements in the feeling.” He

then accepts as exceedingly likely Mr. Herbert Spencer’s idea that the

mental habits and pleasurable activities of preceding generations had

descended with considerable force to him. He has, indeed, repeatedly

supported the view that intellectual character is largely formed from

ancestral peculiarities; and if that be so, he may surely be said to

have reproduced some of the higher mental characteristics of the Irish

race with marvellous exactness. “In the Celtic genius,” says Michelet,

“there is a feeling repugnant to mysticism, and which hardens itself

against the mild and winning word, refusing to lose itself in the

bosom of the moral God. The genius of the Celts is powerfully urged

towards the material and natural; and this proneness to the material

has hindered them from easily acceding to laws founded on an abstract

notion.... In the seventh century St. Columbanus said: ‘The Irish are

better astronomers than the Romans.’ It was a disciple of his, also an

Irishman, Virgil, Bishop of Saltzburg, who first affirmed the rotundity

of the earth and the existence of the Antipodes. All the sciences were

at this period cultivated with much renown in the Scotch and Irish

monasteries.” These characteristics appear to predominate in the Irish

intellect at the present day. Physical science, which is the glory of

our age, owes much to Ireland. Sir William Thomson, one of the most

versatile and brilliant of natural philosophers, was born in Ireland;

so was George Gabriel Stokes, one of Newton’s worthiest successors in

the Lucasian chair of mathematics at Cambridge as well as President

of the Royal Society; Henry Smith, the greatest mathematician of his

time at Oxford, who died in 1883, was an Irishman; Sir William Rowan

Hamilton, the Astronomer-Royal for Ireland, was also one of Ireland’s

most precocious sons; and in such a constellation of Irish genius

Professor Tyndall excels as a popular expositor of the laws of nature.

At the age of seven he began to show his natural taste for the works of

nature, and his father gave him glowing accounts of the achievements of

Newton as

“That sun of science, whose meridian ray

Kindled the gloom of nature into day.”

A good education was the only patrimony which his father could bestow

upon him. He was therefore sent to the best school within reach, and

remained at it till his nineteenth year. In his earlier schooldays

he preferred physical to mental exercises, and thus became expert in

running, swimming, climbing, and other sports. The branch of study in

which he excelled was mathematics. Under the tuition of a good teacher

in an Irish national school, he acquired a knowledge of elementary

algebra, geometry, trigonometry, and conic sections. His favourite

“arithmetic” was the treatise of Professor Thomson, the father of Sir

William Thomson, who in later years became one of his most brilliant

contemporaries. At the age of seventeen he showed exceptional facility

in solving geometrical problems, and on his way home from school, in

company with his teacher, he would work out demonstrations on the snow

in winter. But even that accessory he became able to dispense with; for

he could so clearly present the relations of space to his mind without

the aid of diagrams, that he was able to draw mentally the lines

illustrating the solution of complex problems and to preserve this

mental image so distinctly that he could reason upon it as correctly as

on the diagrams drawn upon paper required by ordinary students. When

he came to solid geometry he was able by means of this power of mental

representation to dispense with models, which to other students were

indispensable.

His powers of reasoning were not confined to mathematics. In his youth

he was accustomed to debate with his father the points of doctrine that

divide the Protestant from the Roman Catholic Church, reasoning high

“of Providence, fore-knowledge, will, and fate.” Sometimes the son took

the Protestant side and at other times the Romish side; and in either

case he showed much dialectical skill and theological knowledge. He

also took more than ordinary interest in the study of English grammar,

which he has described as being to his youthful mind a discipline of

the highest value and a source of unfailing delight.

Leaving school in April, 1839, he joined a division of the Ordnance

Survey then stationed in that district, under the command of Lieut.

Geo. Wynne, of the Royal Engineers, who afterwards became an intimate

friend of his, and to whom he has frequently expressed his obligation

for acts of kindness that promoted his welfare in after life. About

that time a good deal of astonishment was publicly expressed at the

mathematical powers of one of the many boys employed in calculations

on the Ordnance Survey; his name was Alexander Gwin, a native of

Derry, and it was reported that at the age of eight years he had

got by rote the fractional logarithms from 1 to 1,000, which he

could repeat in regular rotation, or otherwise. His rapidity and

correctness in calculating trigonometrical distances, triangles, &c.,

were extraordinary: he could make a return, in acres, roods, and

perches, in less than one minute of any quantity of land, on receiving

the surveyor’s chained distances; a calculation which the greatest

arithmetician would take nearly an hour to do, and would not be so sure

of accuracy at the end of that time.

The intention of young Tyndall was to become a civil engineer, which

then appeared a most attractive profession to him. As a preliminary

qualification he determined to master all the operations of the

surveyors. Draftsmen being the best paid, he worked as a draftsman,

but applied himself so well to learning the whole business that he

soon became able to do the work of the computor, the surveyor, and

the trigonometrical observer. He then asked to be allowed to go on

field-work, and his desire was granted. In 1841, while he was stationed

at Cork, a circumstance occurred which may be described as the turning

point in his career. He worked at mapping in company with a gentleman,

who, assuming a paternal interest in him, one day, asked the young and

promising surveyor how he employed his leisure hours. Dissatisfied with

the account given, the gentleman said to him: “You have five hours a

day at your disposal, and this time ought to be devoted to study. Had

I, when I was your age, had a friend to advise me as I now advise you,

instead of being in my present subordinate position, I should be the

equal of the director of the Survey.” Pregnant words! Next morning

young Tyndall was at his books by five o’clock, and the studious habits

then commenced he continued for twelve years.

Next year he was in Preston, and there becoming a member of the Preston

Mechanics’ Institute he attended its lectures and made use of its

library. One experiment which he saw there he never forgot. In a

lecture on respiration, Surgeon Cortess showed the changes produced

by the passage of air through the lungs, and in order to illustrate

the fact that what went in as free oxygen came out in carbonic acid,

he forced his breath through lime water in a flask by means of a

glass tube dipped into it; the carbonic acid from the lungs converted

the dissolved lime into carbonate of lime, which being practically

insoluble was precipitated. All this, he says, was predicted beforehand

by the lecturer, “but the delight with which I saw this prediction

fulfilled by the conversion of the limpid lime-water into a turbid

mixture of chalk and water remains with me as a memory to the present

hour” (1884.)

His diligence in study he was soon able to turn to good account. On one

occasion there was a dearth of men capable of making trigonometrical

observations when such observations were required. Tyndall offered his

services in that department; but the offer was not readily accepted.

His superiors hesitated to intrust him with a theodolite on account of

his inexperience in work of that description: and indeed there were

bets made against his chances of success. However, being allowed to

try his hand at it, he at once took his theodolite into an open field,

where he examined all its parts, and studied their uses. He then made

the trigonometrical observations prescribed to him, and when they were

compared with the measurement previously made on a larger scale, his

work was pronounced to have been successfully done. When he quitted the

Ordnance Survey in 1843 he had practically mastered all its operations.

The pay upon the Ordnance Survey, however, was very small, but having

ulterior objects in view, he considered the instruction received as

some set-off to the smallness of the pay. In order to “prevent some

young men from considering their fate specially hard, or from being

daunted, because from a very low level they had to climb a very steep

hill,” he has stated that on quitting the Ordnance Survey in 1843, his

salary was a little under twenty shillings a week, adding, “I have

often wondered since at the amount of genuine happiness which a young

fellow, of regular habits, not caring for either pipe or mug, may

extract even from pay like that.”

In 1844 affairs in this country did not look very tempting to him, and

he therefore resolved to go to America, whither some relatives had

emigrated early in the century. He had actually made preparations for

going there before some of his friends succeeded in dissuading him from

it. A sudden outburst of activity in railway construction at the same

time opened up a brighter prospect at home. After a pause, he says,

there came the mad time of the railway mania, when he was able to turn

to account the knowledge he had gained upon the Ordnance Survey; in

Staffordshire, Cheshire, Lancashire, Durham, and Yorkshire especially,

he was in the thick of the fray.

As a workman at that period he has been highly spoken of by his

contemporaries. One of them has stated that “Extreme caution and

accuracy, together with dauntless perseverance under difficulties,

characterised the performance of every piece of work he took in hand.

Habitually, indeed, he pushed verification beyond the limits of all

ordinary prudence, and, on returning from a hard day’s work, he has

been known to retrace his steps for miles in order to assure himself

of the security of some ‘bench mark,’ upon whose permanence the

accuracy of his levels depended. Previous to one of those unpostponable

thirtieths of November, when all railway plans and sections had to be

deposited at the Board of Works, a series of levels had to be completed

near Keighley in Yorkshire, and Manchester reached before midnight.

The weather was stormy beyond description; levelling staves snapped in

twain before the violent gusts of wind; and level and leveller were

in constant peril of being overturned by the force of the hurricane.

Assistants grumbled ‘Impossible,’ and were only shamed into submissive

persistence by that stern resolution which, before nightfall, triumphed

over all obstacles.”

Of these stirring scenes the Professor has given a graphic account. He

says:--“It was a time of terrible toil. The day’s work in the field

usually began and ended with the day’s light, while frequently in the

office, and more especially as the awful 30th of November--the latest

date at which plans and sections of projected lines could be deposited

at the Board of Trade--drew near, there was little difference between

day and night, every hour of the twenty-four being absorbed in the work

of preparation. Strong men were broken down by the strain and labour

of that arduous time. Many pushed through, and are still among us in

robust vigour; but some collapsed, while others retired with large

fortunes, but with intellects so shattered that, instead of taking

their places in the front rank of English statesmen, as their abilities

entitled them to do, they sought rest for their brains in the quiet

lives of country gentlemen. In my own modest sphere I well remember

the refreshment I occasionally derived from five minutes’ sleep on a

deal table, with _Babbage and Callet’s Logarithms_ under my head for

a pillow. On a certain day, under grave penalties, certain levels had

to be finished, and this particular day was one of agony to me. The

atmosphere seemed filled with mocking demons, laughing at the vanity

of my efforts to get the work done. My levelling staves were snapped,

and my theodolite was overthrown by the storm. When things are at their

worst a kind of anger often takes the place of fear. It was so in the

present instance; I pushed doggedly on, and just at nightfall, when

barely able to read the figures on my levelling staff, I planted my

last ‘benchmark’ on a tombstone in Haworth Churchyard. Close at hand

was the vicarage of Mr. Brontë, where the genius was nursed which soon

afterwards burst forth and astonished the world. It was a time of mad

unrest--of downright money mania. In private residences and public

halls, in London reception rooms, in hotels and the stables of hotels,

among gipsies and costermongers, nothing was spoken of but the state of

the share market, the prospects of projected lines, the good fortune

of the ostler or potboy who by a lucky stroke of business had cleared

£10,000. High and low, rich and poor, joined in the reckless game.

During my professional connection with railways I endured three weeks’

misery. It was not defeated ambition; it was not a rejected suit; it

was not the hardship endured in either office or field; but it was the

possession of certain shares purchased in one of the lines then afloat.

The share list of the day proved the winding-sheet of my peace of mind.

I was haunted by the Stock Exchange. I became at last so savage with

myself that I went to my brokers and put away, without gain or loss,

the shares as an accursed thing.”

When in Halifax in 1845 he attended a lecture which was delivered by

Mr. George Dawson, and which appeared to make a lasting impression on

his mind. That popular lecturer then defined duty as a debt owed; and

with reference to the Chartist doctrine of “levelling” then in vogue,

he said: Supposing two men to be equal at night, and that one rises at

six while the other sleeps till nine, what becomes of the gospel of

levelling then? The Professor regarded these as the words of Nature,

and there was, according to his impression, “a kindling vigour in the

lecturer’s words that must have strengthened the sense of duty in the

minds of those who heard him.”

It was while working in Yorkshire about that time that he first met

Mr. T. A. Hirst, then an articled pupil, who became one of his most

intimate friends, and who afterwards became Professor of Mathematics

in University College, London. At that time, too, Sir John Hawkshaw,

who afterwards was Prof. Tyndall’s successor as President of the

British Association, was chief engineer on the Manchester and Leeds

Railway, and it was in his Manchester office that Tyndall spent the

last days of his railway life. A calm followed the storm of competition

just described; work became scarce, and the prospects of engineers were

once more overcast.

In these circumstances he accepted, in 1847, an appointment as a

teacher in Queenswood College, Hampshire. The well-known Socialist

reformer, Robert Owen, and his disciples built that college--a fine

edifice occupying a healthy position--and called it Harmony Hall,

as it was meant to inaugurate the millennium; the letters “C. of M”

(commencement of millennium) being inserted in flint in the brickwork

of the house. Around this college were large farms, where lessons

were given by Prof. Tyndall to the more advanced students on the

subjects which he had mastered in his previous labours. With teaching

he combined self-improvement. The chemical laboratory was under the

charge of Dr. Frankland, with whom he soon became friendly. In order

to spend part of his time in study in the chemical laboratory, Tyndall

relinquished part of his salary, and there he laid the foundations of

that knowledge of physical science which was destined afterward to be

his own passport to fame and to afford delight to many thousands of

his fellowmen. He was also very successful as a teacher in Queenswood

College. He is said to have exercised a kind of magnetic influence

over his students, and such was their faith in him that when any

disturbances arose among them he was invariably called upon to settle

them, and he did so merely by the power of moral influence and force of

character. As to his impressions of life at Queenswood, the Professor

says:--

“Schemes like Harmony Hall look admirable upon paper; but, inasmuch

as they are formed with reference to an ideal humanity, they go to

pieces when brought into collision with the real one. At Queenswood,

I learned, by practical experience, that two factors went to the

formation of a teacher. In regard to knowledge he must, of course,

be master of his work. But knowledge is not all. There might be

knowledge without power--the ability to inform without the ability to

stimulate. Both go together in the true teacher. A power of character

must underlie and enforce the work of the intellect. There were men

who could so rouse and energise their pupils--so call forth their

strength and the pleasure of its exercise--as to make the hardest work

agreeable. Without this power it is questionable whether the teacher

could ever really enjoy his vocation--with it, I do not know a higher,

nobler, and more blessed calling than that of the man who, scorning the

cramming so prevalent in our day, converts the knowledge he imparts

into a lever, to lift, exercise, and strengthen the growing minds

committed to his care.”

After pursuing their scientific studies together for some time, both

Tyndall and Frankland began to think of extending the range of their

scientific culture. But that could not then be done in England. In

1845 a man could not easily get first-class instruction in practical

chemistry and the other physical sciences that were then making great

strides forward. Between 1840 and 1850 Germany assumed the lead in

these sciences. In that country science then organised itself on a

vast scale, and from that time to this it has been growing there at a

most extraordinary rate; indeed, Prof. Huxley declared in 1884 that in

the whole history of the world there has never been such a tremendous

amount of organised energy bestowed in the development of physical

science as in Germany.

“At the time here referred to,” says Professor Tyndall, “I had emerged

from some years of hard labour the fortunate possessor of two or three

hundred pounds. By selling my services in the dearest market during

the railway madness the sum might, without dishonour, have been made a

large one; but I respected ties which existed prior to the time when

offers became lavish and temptation strong. I did not put my money in

a napkin, but cherished the design of spending it in study at a German

university. I had heard of German science, while Carlyle’s references

to German philosophy and literature caused me to regard them as a

kind of revelation from the gods. Accordingly, in the autumn of 1848,

Frankland and I started for the land of universities, as Germany is

often called. They are sown broadcast over the country, and can justly

claim to be the source of an important portion of Germany’s present

greatness.

“Our place of study was the town of Marburg, in Hesse-Cassel, and

a very picturesque town Marburg is. It clambers pleasantly up the

hillsides, and falls as pleasantly towards the Lahn. On a May day,

when the orchards are in blossom, and the chestnuts clothed with

their heavy foliage, Marburg is truly lovely. It is the same town in

which my great namesake, when even poorer than myself, published his

translation of the Bible. I lodged in the plainest manner in a street

which perhaps bore an appropriate name while I dwelt there. It was

called the Ketzerbach--the heretics’ brook--from a little historical

rivulet running through it. I wished to keep myself clean and hardy,

so I purchased a cask and had it cut in two by a carpenter. That cask,

filled with spring-water over night, was placed in my small bedroom,

and never during the years that I spent there, in winter or in summer,

did the clock of the beautiful Elizabethekirche, which was close at

hand, finish striking the hour of six in the morning before I was in my

tub. For a good portion of the time I rose an hour and a-half earlier

than this, working by lamp-light at the Differential Calculus when the

world was slumbering around me. I risked this breach of my pursuits

and this expenditure of my time and money, not because I had any

definite prospect of material profit in view, but because I thought the

cultivation of the intellect important; because, moreover, I loved my

work, and entertained a sure and certain hope that armed with knowledge

one can successfully fight one’s way through the world. I ought not

to omit one additional motive by which I was upheld at the time here

referred to--that was the sense of duty. Every young man of high aims

must, I think, have a spice of this principle within him. There are

sure to be hours in his life when his outlook will be dark, his work

difficult, and his intellectual future uncertain. Over such periods,

when the stimulus of success is absent, he must be carried by his sense

of duty. It may not be so quick an incentive as glory, but it is a

nobler one, and gives a tone to character which glory cannot impart.

That unflinching devotion to work, without which no real eminence in

science is now attainable, implies the writing at certain times of

stern resolve upon the student’s character: ‘I work not because I like

work, but because I ought to work.’ At Marburg my study was warmed

by a large stove. At first I missed the gleam and sparkle from flame

and ember, but I soon became accustomed to the obscure heat. At six

in the morning a small milch-brod and a cup of tea were taken to me.

The dinner hour was one, and for the first year or so I dined at an

hotel. In those days living was cheap in Marburg. Dinner consisted of

several courses, roast and boiled, and finished up with sweets and

dessert. The cost was a pound a month, or about eightpence per dinner.

I usually limited myself to one course, using even that in moderation,

being convinced that eating too much was quite as sinful, and almost

as ruinous, as drinking too much. By attending to such things I was

able to work without weariness for sixteen hours a day. My going to

Germany had been opposed by some of my friends as quixotic, and my

life there might, perhaps, be not unfairly thus described. I did not

work for money; I was not even spurred by ‘the last infirmity of noble

minds.’ I had been reading Fichte, and Emerson, and Carlyle, and had

been infected by the spirit of these great men, the Alpha and Omega

of whose teaching was loyalty to duty. Higher knowledge and greater

strength were within reach of the man who unflinchingly enacted his

best insight.”

Even a statue was capable of impressing this truth upon him. But it was

the statue of the man who said of his own features: “This is the face

of a man who has struggled energetically”--the man of whose portrait

Carlyle says: “Reader, to thee thyself, even now, he has one counsel

to give, the secret of his whole poetic alchemy. Think of living! Thy

life, were thou the pitifullest of all the sons of earth, is no idle

dream, but a solemn reality. It is thy own; it is all thou hast to

front eternity with. Work, then, even as he has done and does--LIKE

A STAR, UNHASTING YET UNRESTING.” Equally impressive was the effect

produced on Professor Tyndall by even the sight of the form of such a

man. Finding himself one fine summer evening standing beside a statue

of Goethe in a German city, the contemplation of this work of art,

which he considered the most suitable memorial for a great man, excited

a motive force within his mind, which he thought no purely material

influence could generate. “There was then,” he says, “labour before me

of the most arduous kind. There were formidable practical difficulties

to be overcome, and very small means wherewith to overcome them; and

yet I felt that no material means could, as regards the task I had

undertaken, plant within me a resolve comparable with that which the

contemplation of this statue of Goethe was able to arouse.”

From his youth Tyndall appeared to have a remarkable power, not only

of attracting friends, but of retaining them. The circumstances under

which he early became acquainted with his life-long friends, General

Wynne and Professor Hirst, have already been mentioned. Hirst was

scarcely sixteen years of age when he became acquainted with Tyndall,

who was ten years older. Though they stood in the relation of pupil

and teacher, their intimacy ripened into an enduring friendship which

separation heightened rather than dissolved. An incident that occurred

while Tyndall was studying at Marburg affords honourable evidence of

this fact. The death of a relative in 1849 made Hirst the possessor of

a small patrimony, which he determined to divide between himself and

his former teacher. He accordingly pressed Professor Tyndall to accept

one half of his small fortune, but much to his disappointment Tyndall

would have none of it. Entreaties to accept it for friendship’s sake

were unavailing, but friendship, like necessity, can invent strange

means for attaining its end. Hirst took counsel with a German banker as

to a way of conveying the money to his friend, and soon a device was

carried out, by means of which the devotee of science had to sacrifice

his self-denial on the altar of friendship. While at work one morning

in his lodgings in Marburg the postman brought him a heavy roll closely

packed and sealed, which, to his astonishment, contained all sorts of

German coins amounting to 20_l._ sterling, a considerable gratuity for

a student to receive in those days. He had no alternative but to accept

it. On a subsequent occasion when Tyndall left Marburg to visit England

another friend of his youth, General Wynne, offered to replenish his

exchequer, which he feared must be nearly empty, but the offer was

declined with assurances that such generous assistance was unnecessary.

Lives of the electricians · 第 1 / 8 章