CHAPTER 2. THE AFFAIR OF ENCOUNTER BAY.

Meeting of the Investigator and Le Geographe in Encounter Bay.

Flinders cautious.

Interview of the two captains.

Peron's evidence.

The chart of Bass Strait.

Second interview: Baudin inquisitive.

Baudin's account of his explorations.

On the afternoon of April 8,* (* In his manuscript journal, which was

used by the Quarterly reviewer of the first volume of the Voyage de

Decouvertes, in August 1810, Flinders gave the date on which he met Le

Geographe as April 9th (Quarterly Review volume 4 52). But there is no

contradiction. In his journal Flinders gave the date of the nautical day,

which commenced at noon. As he met Baudin's corvette in the late

afternoon, it was, by nautical reckoning, April 9th. But by the calendar,

the civil day commencing at midnight, the date was April 8th, as stated

by Flinders in his published volumes, by both Peron and Louis de

Freycinet, and in the log of Le Geographe. A similar difference of dates,

which puzzled Labilliere in writing his Early History of Victoria 1 108,

occurs as to the first sighting of Port Phillip by Flinders. It is

explained in exactly the same way.) the man at the masthead of the

Investigator reported a white rock ahead. He was mistaken. Glasses were

turned towards it, and as the distance lessened it became apparent that

the white object was a sail. The sloop was at this time in latitude 35

degrees 40 minutes south, longitude 138 degrees 58 minutes east. To meet

another vessel in this region, many leagues from regular trading routes,

in a part of the world hitherto undiscovered, was surprising. The

Investigator stood on her course, and as the strange ship became more

clearly defined it was evident that she was making towards the British

sloop. Flinders therefore "cleared for action in case of being attacked."

He knew that the French Government had sent out ships having like objects

with his own; he knew that some influential persons in England,

especially the Court of Directors of the East India Company, were uneasy

and suspicious about French designs; and he had been fully instructed by

the Admiralty as to the demeanour he should maintain if he met vessels

flying a hostile flag. But though his duty prescribed that he must not

offer any provocation, he could not forget that when he left Europe Great

Britain and France were still at war, and preparation for extremities was

a measure of mere prudence.

The stranger proved to be "a heavy-looking ship without any top-gallant

masts up." On the Investigator hoisting her colours, Le Geographe "showed

a French ensign, and afterwards an English jack forward, as we did a

white flag." Flinders manoeuvred so as to keep his broadside to the

stranger, "lest the flag of truce should be a deception." But the

demeanour of the French being purely pacific, he had a boat hoisted out

and went on board, Le Geographe having also hove to.

On the French vessel, meanwhile, similar curiosity had been provoked as

to the identity of the ship sailing east. Captain Baudin's men had been

engaged during the morning in harpooning dolphins, which they desired for

the sake of the flesh. Peron, in his narrative, waxes almost hysterically

joyous about the good fortune that brought along a school of these fish

just as the ship's company were almost perishing for want of fresh food.

They appeared, he says, like a gift from Heaven.* (* "Cette peche

heureuse nous parut comme un bienfait du ciel. Alors, en effet, le

terrible scorbut avoit commence ses ravages, et les salaisons pourries et

rongees de vers auxquelles nous etions reduits depuis plusieurs mois

precipitoient chaque jour l'affreux developpement de ce fleau." Voyage de

Decouvertes 1 323.) Unlike the bronzed and healthy crew of the

Investigator, the company on Le Geographe were suffering severely from

scurvy. The virulence of the disease increased daily. They were rejoicing

at the capture of nine large dolphins, which would supply them with a

feast of fresh meat, when the look-out man signalled that a sail was in

sight.* (* Mr. T. Ward, in his Rambles of an Australian Naturalist (1907)

page 153, relates that in 1889 he harpooned a large dolphin, Grampus

gris, in King George's Sound, and that whalers told him that dolphins

were at one time common in the Bight, in schools of two and three

hundred. As to dolphin flesh as food, the reader may like to be reminded

that Hawkins's men, in 1565, found dolphins "of very good colour and

proportion to behold, and no less delicate in taste" (Hakluyt's Voyages

edition of 1904 10 61). So also in 1705 a voyager to Maryland related the

capture of dolphins, "a beautiful fish to see...it is also a good fish to

eat." "Narrative of a Voyage to Maryland," printed from manuscript in

American Historical Review 12 328.)

At first it was considered that the ship was Le Naturaliste, the consort

of Le Geographe, the two vessels having become separated in a storm off

the Tasmanian coast. But as the Investigator steered towards the French

and hoisted her flag, the mistake was corrected.

Flinders took Brown, the naturalist, with him on board, because he was a

good French scholar; but Captain Baudin spoke English "so as to be

understood," and the conversation was therefore conducted for the most

part in that language. Brown was the only person present at the first

interview on the 8th, and at the second on the following morning;* (* "No

person was present at our conversations except Mr. Brown" (Flinders,

Voyage 1 190). Robert Brown was a very celebrated botanist. Humboldt

styled him "botanicorum facile princeps." His Prodromus Florae Novae

Hollandiae is a classic of price.) both taking place in the French

captain's cabin. Peron, in the first volume of the Voyage de Decouvertes,

wrote as though he were present and heard what occurred between the two

commanders. "En nous fournissant tous ces details M. Flinders se montre

d'une grande reserve sur ses operations particulieres," he wrote; and

again: "apres avoir converse plus d'une heure avec nous." But his

testimony in this, as in several other respects, is not reliable. Baudin

wrote no detailed account of the conversations, nor did Brown; but

Flinders related what occurred with the minute care that was habitual

with him. Peron's evidence is at best second-hand, and he supplemented it

with such information as could be elicited by "pumping" the sailors in

Flinders' boat.* (* "Nous apprimes toutefois par quelques-uns de ses

matelots qu'il avoit eu beaucoup a souffrir de ces memes vents de la

partie du Sud qui nous avoient ete si favorables." The boatmen were not

questioned by Peron himself, who at this time could not speak English

(Freycinet, Voyage de Decouvertes 2 Preface page 17). Freycinet admits

that Peron was not present at the interviews, but says that Baudin

related what took place with "more or less exactitude." But as Freycinet

was not present himself either at the interviews or on the ship when

Baudin related what occurred, how could he know that the version of the

commander--at whom, after Baudin's death, he never missed an opportunity

of sneering--was merely "more or less" exact?) Even then he blundered,

for some of the things stated by him were not only contrary to fact, but

could not have been ascertained from Baudin, from Flinders, or from the

sailors.

Peron stated, for example, that Flinders said that he had been

accompanied from England by a second vessel, which had become separated

from him by a violent tempest. There had been no second vessel, and

Flinders could have made no such assertion. Again, Peron wrote that

Flinders said that, hindered by contrary winds, he had not been able to

penetrate behind the islands of St. Peter and St. Francis, in Nuyts

Archipelago. Flinders made no such absurd statement. He had followed the

coast behind those islands with the utmost particularity. His track, with

soundings, is shown on his large chart of the section.* (* On this

statement the Quarterly reviewer of 1810 bluntly wrote: "Now, we will

venture not only to assert that all this is a direct falsehood (for we

have seen both the journal and charts of Captain Flinders, which are

fortunately arrived safe in this country), but also to pledge ourselves

that no such observations are to be found either in Captain Baudin's

journal or in the logbook of the Geographe." Quarterly Review 4 52. It

was a good guess. No such observation is contained in the printed log of

Le Geographe.) Once more, Peron stated that Flinders said that he had

lost a boat and eight men in the same gale as had endangered the French

ships in Bass Strait. Flinders had lost John Thistle, an officer to whom

he was deeply attached, and a crew of eight men off Cape Catastrophe, but

the incident occurred during a sudden squall. Moreover, Thistle and his

companions were drowned on February 21, whilst the storm in the

Strait--as Baudin told Flinders--occurred exactly a month later.

When Flinders got on board Le Geographe, he was received by an officer,

of whom he inquired for the commander. Baudin was pointed out to him, and

conducted him and Brown into the captain's cabin. Flinders then

"requested Baudin to show me his passport from the Admiralty, and when it

was found, and I had perused it, I offered him mine from the French

marine minister, but he put it back without inspection." The incident

serves to remind us that both commanders believed their nations to be at

war at this time. As a matter of fact, just a fortnight before the

meeting in Encounter Bay, diplomacy had patched up the brittle truce

ironically known as the Peace of Amiens (March 25). But neither Flinders

nor Baudin could have known that there was even a prospect of the

cessation of hostilities. Europe, when they last had touch of its

affairs, was still clanging with battle and warlike preparations, and the

red star of the Corsican had not yet reached its zenith. Baudin's

readiness to produce his own passport when "requested"--in a style prompt

if not peremptory, it would seem--and his indifference about that of the

English commander, should be noted as the first of a series of facts

which establish the purely peaceful character of the French expedition.

Baudin talked freely about the work upon which he had been engaged in

Tasmanian waters. Flinders inquired concerning a large island said to lie

in the western entrance of Bass Strait--that is, King Island--but Baudin

"had not seen it and seemed to doubt much of its existence." As a matter

of fact, Le Geographe had sailed quite close to the island, as indicated

on the track-chart showing her course, and that it should have been

missed indicated that the look-out was not very vigilant. Curiously

enough, too, Baudin marked down on his chart, presumably as the result of

this inquiry of Flinders, an island "believed to exist," but he put it in

the wrong place.

An incident that appealed to Flinders' dry sense of humour occurred in

reference to a chart of Bass Strait which Baudin had with him. This chart

was one which had been drawn from George Bass's sketch by Flinders

himself, and incorporated with his own more scientific chart of the north

coast of Tasmania and the adjacent islands. Bass had traversed, in his

whale-boat, the southern coast of Victoria as far as Westernport, but not

being a surveyor he had furnished only a rough outline of the lay of the

shore. Up to this time Baudin had not inquired the name of the commander

of the Investigator, and it was from not knowing to whom he was talking

that he fell into a blunder which the politeness, native to a French

gentleman, would certainly have made him wish to avoid. He began to

criticise the chart, finding great fault with the north side, but

commending the drawing of the south--that is, of northern Tasmania and

the islands near it. "On my pointing out a note upon the chart explaining

that the north side of the Strait was seen only in an open boat by Mr.

Bass, who had no good means of fixing either latitude or longitude, he

appeared surprised, not having before paid attention to it. I told him

that some other and more particular charts of the Strait and its

neighbourhood had since been published, and that if he would keep company

until next morning I would bring him a copy, with a small memoir

belonging to them. This was agreed to, and I returned with Mr. Brown to

the Investigator."

On the following morning Flinders and Brown again visited Le Geographe

with the promised chart. At the conclusion of this second interview,

Baudin requested that, should the Investigator fall in with Le

Naturaliste, Flinders would inform her captain that it was his intention

to sail round to Port Jackson as soon as the bad weather set in. "On my

asking the name of the captain of Le Naturaliste, he bethought himself to

ask mine, and finding it to be the same as the author of the chart which

he had been criticising, expressed not a little surprise, but had the

politeness to congratulate himself on seeing me." In a letter to Banks,

Flinders said that Baudin "expressed some surprise at meeting me, whom he

knew by name."* (* Historical Records of New South Wales 4 755.) He had

the name, of course, upon Flinders' chart of 1799.* (* The new chart

which Flinders gave to Baudin was published after Le Geographe left

Havre. The chart which he had in his possession was the one advertised in

the Moniteur on 8th Vendemiaire, Revolutionary Year 10. (September 30,

1800): "Nouvelle carte du detroit de Basse, situe entre la Nouvelle

Galles Meridionale, a la Nouvelle Hollande, lequel separe ces deux

parties; avec la route du vaisseau qui l'a parcouru et partie de la cote

a l'est de la Nouvelle Hollande, levee par Flinders. Prix deux francs."

This chart had been reproduced by the French Department of Marine from

the one published by Flinders in England in 1799, and several copies of

it had been supplied to Baudin and his officers for the use of the

expedition, though it was also offered for sale. See the Moniteur, 27

Thermidor, Revolutionary Year 11 (August 15, 1803), as to the engraving

of the chart at the French depot for the use of the expedition.)

At the second interview Baudin was more inquisitive than he had been on

the previous day. He had then been more disposed to talk about his own

discoveries in southern Tasmania than to ask questions about the

Investigator's work. "It somewhat surprised me," said Flinders, "that

Captain Baudin made no inquiries concerning my business upon this unknown

coast, but as he seemed more desirous of communicating information I was

happy to receive it." Another of the inaccuracies of Peron is that "M.

Flinders showed a great reserve concerning his particular operations."

There was no need of reserve, and none was shown. But "tact teaches when

to be silent," as Disraeli's Mr. Wilton observed; and an occasion for the

exercise of this virtue is presented when information likely to be

valuable is being given. Reflection, and what his officers had been able

to learn from Flinders' boat crew, however, had stimulated Baudin's

curiosity. On the 9th, therefore, he asked questions. Flinders, so far

from maintaining reserve, readily explained the discoveries he had made,

and furnished Baudin with some useful information for his own voyage. He

described how he had explored the whole of the south coast as far as the

place of meeting;* (* Manuscript Journal.) related how he had obtained

water at Port Lincoln by digging in the clay; pointed out Kangaroo Island

across the water, where an abundance of fresh meat might be procured;

"told him the name I had affixed to the island," in consequence of the

marsupials shot there; and "as proof of the refreshment to be obtained at

the island, pointed to the kangaroo skin caps worn by my boat's crew."

The return made for this courtesy was that upon the Terre Napoleon maps

the name Flinders gave was ignored, and "L'Ile Decres" was scored upon

it, this being done while the true discoverer was pent up in French

custody in an island of the Indian Ocean.

The most interesting statement made by Baudin will be dealt with in the

next chapter. The two commanders conversed on the 8th for about half an

hour, and on the second occasion, when Flinders presented the new chart

of Bass Strait, for a shorter period. Early on the morning of the 9th

they bade each other adieu. Flinders returned to the Investigator, and

the two ships sailed away--the French to retrace the coast already

followed by Flinders, but to find nothing that was new, because he had

left so little to be found; the English to proceed, first to King Island

and Port Phillip, and then through Bass Strait to Port Jackson, where the

two commanders met again.

Terre Napoleón; a History of French Explorations and Projects in Australia · 第 2 / 12 章