2. BELGIUM AND THE FRANCO-PRUSSIAN WAR.

Gladstone hated war. He held, as most people hold, that there are

causes, such as Life and Home and Freedom, for which the gentlest

and most humane of men must be prepared to draw the sword. But he

was profoundly anxious that it should never be drawn except under

the absolute compulsion of national duty, and during the Crimean

War he made this memorable declaration:

"If, when you have attained the objects of the war, you continue

it for the sake of mere military glory, I say you tempt the justice

of Him in whose hands the fates of armies are as absolutely lodged

as the fate of the infant slumbering in its cradle."

This being his general view of war, it was inevitable that he should

regard with horror the prospect of intervention in the Franco-German

War, which broke out with startling suddenness, when he was Prime

Minister, in the summer of 1870. He strained every nerve to keep

England out of the struggle, and was profoundly thankful that Providence

enabled him to do so. Yet all through that terrible crisis he saw

quite clearly that either of the belligerent Powers might take

a step which would oblige England to intervene, and he made a

simultaneous agreement with Prussia and France that, if either

violated the neutrality of Belgium, England would co-operate with

the other to defend the little State. Should Belgium, he said, "go

plump down the maw of another country to satisfy dynastic greed,"

such a tragedy would "come near to an extinction of public right

in Europe, and I do not think we could look on while the sacrifice

of freedom and independence was in course of consummation."

Prime Ministers and Some Others: A Book of Reminiscences · 第 27 / 79 题