THE PLANET OF ROMANCE.
Outline of the Subject--Is Mercury the Planet nearest the
Sun?--Transit of an Interior Planet across the Sun--Has a Transit
of Vulcan ever been seen?--Visibility of Planets during a Total
Eclipse of the Sun--Professor Watson's Researches in 1878.
Provided with a general survey of the Solar System, and with such an
outline of the law of universal gravitation as the last chapter has
afforded us, we commence the more detailed examination of the planets
and their satellites. We shall begin with the planets nearest to the
sun, and then we shall gradually proceed outwards to one planet after
another, until we reach the confines of the system. We shall find much
to occupy our attention. Each planet is itself a globe, and it will be
for us to describe as much as is known of it. The satellites by which so
many of the planets are accompanied possess many points of interest. The
circumstances of their discovery, their sizes, their movements, and
their distances must be duly considered. It will also be found that the
movements of the planets present much matter for reflection and
examination. We shall have occasion to show how the planets mutually
disturb each other, and what remarkable consequences have arisen from
these influences. We must also occasionally refer to the important
problems of celestial measuring and celestial weighing. We must show how
the sizes, the weights, and the distances of the various members of our
system are to be discovered. The greater part of our task will
fortunately lead us over ground which is thoroughly certain, and where
the results have been confirmed by frequent observation. It happens,
however, that at the very outset of our course we are obliged to deal
with observations which are far from certain. The existence of a planet
much closer to the sun than those hitherto known has been asserted by
competent authority. The question is still unsettled, but the planet
cannot at present be found. Hence it is that we have called the subject
of this chapter, The Planet of Romance.
It had often been thought that Mercury, long supposed to be the nearest
planet to the sun, was perhaps not really the body entitled to that
distinction. Mercury revolves round the sun at an average distance of
about 36,000,000 miles. In the interval between it and the sun there
might have been one or many other planets. There might have been one
revolving at ten million miles, another at fifteen, and so on. But did
such planets exist? Did even one planet revolve inside the orbit of
Mercury? There were certain reasons for believing in such a planet. In
the movements of Mercury indications were perceptible of an influence
that it was at one time thought might have been accounted for by the
supposition of an interior planet.[13] But there was necessarily a great
difficulty about seeing this object. It must always be close to the sun,
and even in the best telescope it is generally impossible to see a
star-like point in that position. Nor could such a planet be seen after
sunset, for under the most favourable conditions it would set almost
immediately after the sun, and a like difficulty would make it invisible
at sunrise.
Our ordinary means of observing a planet have therefore completely
failed. We are compelled to resort to extraordinary methods if we would
seek to settle the great question as to the existence of the
intra-Mercurial planets. There are at least two lines of observation
which might be expected to answer our purpose.
An opportunity for the first would arise when it happened that the
unknown planet came directly between the earth and the sun. In the
diagram (Fig. 40) we show the sun at the centre; the internal dotted
circle denotes the orbit of the unknown planet, which has received the
name of Vulcan before even its very existence has been at all
satisfactorily established. The outer circle denotes the orbit of the
earth. As Vulcan moves more rapidly than the earth, it will frequently
happen that the planet will overtake the earth, so that the three bodies
will have the positions represented in the diagram. It would not,
however, necessarily follow that Vulcan was exactly between the earth
and the luminary. The path of the planet may be tilted, so that, as seen
from the earth, Vulcan would be over or under the sun, according to
circumstances.
If, however, Vulcan really does exist, we might expect that sometimes
the three bodies will be directly in line, and this would then give the
desired opportunity of making the telescopic discovery of the planet. We
should expect on such an occasion to observe the planet as a dark spot,
moving slowly across the face of the sun. The two other planets interior
to the earth, namely, Mercury and Venus, are occasionally seen in the
act of transit; and there cannot be a doubt that if Vulcan exists, its
transits across the sun must be more numerous than those of Mercury, and
far more numerous than those of Venus. On the other hand, it may
reasonably be anticipated that Vulcan is a small globe, and as it will
be much more distant from us than Mercury at the time of its transit, we
could not expect that the transit of the planet of romance would be at
all comparable as a spectacle with those of either of the two other
bodies we have named.
The question arises as to whether telescopic research has ever disclosed
anything which can be regarded as a transit of Vulcan. On this point it
is not possible to speak with any certainty. It has, on more than one
occasion, been asserted by observers that a spot has been seen
traversing the sun, and from its shape and general appearance they have
presumed it to have been an intra-Mercurial planet. But a close
examination of the circumstances in which such observations have been
made has not tended to increase confidence in this presumption. Such
discoveries have usually been made by persons little familiar with
telescopic observations. It is certainly a significant fact that,
notwithstanding the diligent scrutiny to which the sun has been
subjected during the past century by astronomers who have specially
devoted themselves to this branch of research, no telescopic discovery
of Vulcan on the sun has been announced by any really experienced
astronomer. The last announcement of a planet having crossed the sun
dates from 1876, and was made by a German amateur, but what he thought
to have been a planet was promptly shown to have been a small sun-spot,
which had been photographed at Greenwich in the course of the daily
routine work, and had also been observed at Madrid. From an examination
of the whole subject, we are inclined to believe that there is not at
this moment any reliable telescopic evidence of the transit of an
intra-Mercurial planet over the face of the central luminary.
[Illustration: Fig. 40.--The Transit of the Planet of Romance.]
But there is still another method by which we might reasonably hope to
detect new planets in the vicinity of the sun. This method is, however,
but seldom available. It is only possible when the sun is totally
eclipsed.
When the moon is interposed directly between the earth and the sun, the
brightness of day is temporarily exchanged for the gloom of night. If
the sky be free from clouds the stars spring forth, and can be seen
around the obscured sun. Even if a planet were quite close to the
luminary it would be visible on such an occasion if its magnitude were
comparable with that of Mercury. Careful preparation is necessary when
it is proposed to make a trial of this kind. The danger to be specially
avoided is that of confounding the planet with the ordinary stars, which
it will probably resemble. The late distinguished American astronomer,
Professor Watson, specially prepared to devote himself to this research
during the notable total eclipse in 1878. When the eclipse occurred the
light of the sun vanished and the stars burst forth. Among them
Professor Watson saw an object which to him seemed to be the long-sought
intra-Mercurial planet. We should add that this zealous observer saw
another object which he at first took to be the star known as Zeta in
the constellation Cancer. When he afterwards found that the recorded
place of this object did not agree so well as he expected with the known
position of this star, he came to the conclusion that it could not be
Zeta but must be some other unknown planet. The relative positions of
the two objects which he took to be planets agree, however, sufficiently
well, considering the difficulties of the observation, with the relative
positions of the stars Theta and Zeta Cancri, and it can now hardly be
doubted that Watson merely saw these two stars. He maintained, however,
that he had noticed Theta Cancri as well as the two planets, but without
recording its position. There is, however, a third star, known as 20
Cancri, near the same place, and this Watson probably mistook for Theta.
It is necessary to record that Vulcan has not been observed, though
specially looked for, during the eclipses which have occurred since
1878, and it is accordingly the general belief among astronomers that no
planet has yet been detected within the orbit of Mercury.