THE POSTAL CAR PAY.

The wide credence which has been given to the statement that the

Government is paying to the railroads an annual rent for postal cars

equal to the cost of building them is remarkable.

The Government does not pay a rental for any car. The idea is an

erroneous one, and is based upon ignorance regarding the payment of

what is called "Post Office Car Pay."

Originally, the mail business on railroads was the transportation of

mail bags, and was essentially a freight traffic. But its character

has entirely changed.

The business now consists almost wholly in providing moving post

offices, expensive to build and expensive to operate, in which the

average weight for which pay is received is about two tons in full

postal cars and six hundred pounds in apartment cars.

The Post Office Department weighed all the mails carried in all postal

cars and apartment cars in the country during October, 1907, and the

average weight of mail on the Burlington road loaded in a forty-foot

postal car was found to be less than 2,000 pounds; in fifty-foot cars

it was 2,500 pounds; and in sixty-foot cars it averaged less than

4,500 pounds; in apartment cars it was 607 pounds.

The average load carried in an ordinary freight car on the Burlington

road is from 36,000 to 40,000 pounds. Railroads, as a rule, haul a ton

of paying or productive freight for every ton of dead or unproductive

load. In the Government mail business they carry nineteen tons of dead

weight for each ton of paying weight.

These cars are fitted up as post offices and are used for distribution

en route in order to expedite and facilitate the prompt transmission

and delivery of mails. They largely take the place of very expensive

distribution offices in cities.

The railroads provide cars for freight traffic, but refused to build,

and maintain, and haul these moving post offices with their clerks and

paraphernalia, without pay. That is the post office car pay of which

so much is said.

The truth regarding this feature of the subject is clearly stated in

the following recent letter from the Postmaster-General:

(_Congressional Record_, March 5, 1910, 61st Congress, Second Session,

Vol. 45, No. 61, Page 2852.)

LETTER OF THE POSTMASTER-GENERAL RELATIVE TO THE COST OF

FURNISHING AND OPERATING RAILWAY POST OFFICE CARS.

"OFFICE OF THE POSTMASTER-GENERAL,

WASHINGTON, D.C., March 2, 1910.

"Hon. JOHN W. WEEKS,

_Chairman Committee on Post Offices and

Post Roads, House of Representatives_.

"MY DEAR SIR: In response to your inquiry made of the Second

Assistant Postmaster-General in regard to the cost of

maintaining and operating railway post office cars and its

relation to the compensation received by railroad companies for

the same and your reference to the speech delivered by Senator

Vilas on the subject in the United States Senate, February 13,

1895, I have the honor to advise you as follows:

"The Department has not at this time sufficient information upon

this point to give from its own records a reliable estimate. As

you are aware, we have recently asked railroad companies to

submit answers to inquiries with reference to the cost of

operating the mail service, and it is believed that when these

shall have been received we will be in a position to furnish

such information. Inasmuch, however, as it may be of importance

to you to have estimates made from time to time by others and

such incomplete information as we have at present, I submit the

following:

"The cost of operating a railway post office car has been

variously estimated (but not officially by the Department) as

from 15 to 30 cents a car mile. The average run per day of such

a car is about 300 miles. Estimating the cost at 18 cents a car

mile, the total cost of operating such car for one year would

be $19,710.

"The specific items which constitute this total cost are not

definitely known to the Department. However, as to the cost of

lighting, cleaning, repairs, etc., the General Superintendent of

Railway Mail Service furnished the following estimates before

the Commission to investigate the postal service in 1899, viz.:

Lighting, $276; heating, $365; cleaning, water, ice, oil, etc.,

$365; repairs, $350; proportion of original cost of car

(estimating the life of a car at fifteen years and the original

cost at $6,000), $400; total, $1,756. Recent inquiry gives the

following as the approximate cost of maintaining a car at the

present time: Lighting (electric), $444; heating, $150;

cleaning, $360; repairs, $300; oil and brasses, $120; interest

on cost of car (at $7,500), $300; annual deterioration

(estimating the life of a car at twenty years), $375; total,

$2,049. These figures give the cost of a car built according to

the Department's standard specifications. The cost of modern

steel cars being built by some of the railroad companies is from

$14,000 to $15,000.

"The compensation received by a railroad company for operating a

car and carrying the mails in it would be approximately as

follows:

"The pay for a 60-foot car at $40 a track mile per annum, for a

track mileage of 150 miles, would be $6,000. The average load of

a 60-foot car, according to statistics obtained recently, is

2.83 tons. The rate per ton of an average daily weight of 50,000

pounds carried over the route is $25.06. At this rate the

company would receive $10,637.97 per annum for the average load

of mail hauled in the car. This sum added to the specific rate

for the railway post office car ($6,000), makes the total pay

for the car and its average load $16,637.97 per annum.

"Senator Vilas' argument was based upon the theory that the

rates fixed for railroad transportation alone, based on the

weights of the mails carried, are adequate compensation for all

services rendered, including the operation of railway post

office cars, and that, therefore, the railroad companies would

be required to operate postal cars owned by the Post Office

Department for the compensation allowed by law for the weight of

mails alone, including apartment-car space and facilities. Such

theory is not justified by the facts, as will appear from the

following:

"A careful perusal of the debates in both Houses of Congress

which led to the enactment of the present law fixing the rate of

pay for railroad transportation of the mails and for railway

post office cars clearly indicates that the additional

compensation for railway post office cars was intended to cover

the additional expense imposed upon the railroad companies for

building, maintaining, and hauling such cars. The companies at

that time insisted that these cars, which were practically

traveling post offices, did not carry a remunerative load, and

that therefore the amount of pay, based on weight, did not

compensate them for their operation. This led to the specific

appropriation for railway post office cars. In this connection

it should be borne in mind that the purpose of the railway post

office car is to furnish ample space and facilities for the

handling and distribution of mails en route. Therefore, the

space required is much greater than would be required for merely

hauling the same weight of mails.

"In regard to any proposal for Government ownership of postal

cars, other facts as well as the above should be given

consideration. Such cars must be overhauled, cleaned, and

inspected daily. It would be necessary to either arrange with

the railway companies for this service or for the Department to

employ its own inspectors, repair men, and car cleaners at a

large number of places throughout the country, which would

probably be more expensive than the cost to the railway

companies in that respect at present. It would hardly be

feasible to establish a Government repair shop. Therefore, the

Department would be compelled to use the shops of the several

railway companies throughout the country. Without the closest

supervision and attention of the Government's inspectors it

could scarcely be expected that our cars would receive the same

consideration in railroad shops as those owned by the railway

companies. These shops are frequently congested, and it is

probable that the railroad work would be given the preference.

"Yours very truly,

"FRANK H. HITCHCOCK,

"_Postmaster-General_."

The Wolcott Commission carefully investigated the whole subject of

Postal Car Pay and their conclusions regarding this form of

compensation and its reasonableness are set forth in their report in

the following language:

"Until a comparatively short time prior to 1873 the distribution

of the mails in transitu was unknown. Prior to the late sixties

the railroads simply transported the mails, which were delivered

at the post offices and there distributed. Accordingly, 'weight'

as the basis of compensation was at the time of its adoption and

long thereafter entirely adequate.

"For a few years, however, prior to 1873 the distribution of the

mails in transitu had been practiced to a sufficient extent to

satisfy the Post Office Department and Congress that it was a

desirable innovation and a branch of the postal service that

should be very much enlarged. But it was recognized that if the

railroads were not only to transport the mail itself, but also

to supply, equip, and haul post offices for the distribution of

the mails, the compensation upon weight basis that had obtained

up to that time was not entirely adequate and just, and

therefore the law of 1873, as already indicated, contained a

provision allowing additional compensation for railway post

office cars. At first these cars were mostly not exceeding 40 or

45 feet in length and of light construction, similar to baggage

and express cars.

"From the policy of the Department, however, of constantly

demanding better and better facilities from the railroads and

the introduction of every improvement that could be discovered,

it has come to pass that, today, the railroad post office cars,

with the exception of a few obsolete ones that are being

discontinued as rapidly as practicable, are elaborate

structures, weighing between 90,000 and 100,000 pounds; built as

strongly and fitted up, so far as suitable to the purpose for

which it is intended, as expensively as the best Pullman and

parlor cars; costing from $5,200 to $6,500; maintained at a cost

of $2,000 per year; traveling on an average of 100,000 miles per

annum; provided with the very best appliances for light, heat,

water, and other comforts and conveniences; placed in position

for the use of the postal authorities from two and a half to

seven hours before the departure of the train upon which they

are to be hauled, and owing to the small space allowed in them

for the actual transportation of the mails, accompanied on the

denser lines by storage cars for which no additional

compensation is paid by the Government and on the less dense

lines the larger bulk of mails is carried in the baggage cars

without additional compensation for the car.

"These cars are constructed and fitted up by the railroads in

accordance with plans and specifications furnished by the

Department, and the amount of mail transported therein is

determined exclusively by the postal authorities. From these two

facts it results that the railroad must haul 100,000 pounds of

car when the weight of the mail actually carried therein is only

from 3,500 to 5,000 pounds--often very much less, and

occasionally somewhat more.

"Taking in view all these facts, as disclosed by the testimony

filed herewith, we are of opinion that the 'prices paid * * * as

compensation for the postal-car service' are not excessive, and

recommend that no reduction be made therein so long as the

methods, conditions, and requirements of the postal service

continue the same as at present."

The Mail Pay on the Burlington Railroad Statements of Car Space and All Facilities Furnished for the Government Mails and for Express and Passengers in All Passenger Trains on the Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad · 第 18 / 21 题