SIR,

By the last packets I had the favour of yours, and am surprised that you

should apply to a person so ill-qualified as I am, for a full and

impartial account of the state of our trade. I have always lived as

retired as possible; I have carefully avoided the perplexed honour of

city-offices; I have never minded anybody's business but my own; upon all

which accounts, and several others, you might easily have found among my

fellow-citizens, persons more capable to resolve the weighty questions you

put to me than I can pretend to be. But being entirely at leisure, even at

this season of the year, when I used to have scarce time sufficient to

perform the necessary offices of life, I will endeavour to comply with

your requests, cautioning you not implicitly to rely upon what I say,

excepting what belongs to that branch of trade in which I am more

immediately concerned.

The Irish trade is, at present, in the most deplorable condition that can

be imagined; to remedy it, the causes of its languishment must be inquired

into. But as those causes (you may assure yourself) will not be removed,

you may look upon it as a thing past hope of recovery.

The first and greatest shock our trade received was from an act passed in

the reign of King William, in the Parliament of England, prohibiting the

exportation of wool manufactured in Ireland, an act (as the event plainly

shows) fuller of greediness than good policy; an act as beneficial to

France and Spain, as it has been destructive to England and Ireland. At

the passing of this fatal act, the condition of our trade was glorious and

flourishing, though no way interfering with the English; we made no

broadcloths above 6_s._ per yard; coarse druggets, bays and shalloons,

worsted damasks, strong draught-works, slight half-works, and gaudy

stuffs, were the only products of our looms: these were partly consumed by

the meanest of our people, and partly sent to the northern nations, from

which we had in exchange timber, iron, hemp, flax, pitch, tar, and hard

dollars. At the time the current money of Ireland was foreign silver, a

man could hardly receive 100_l._, without finding the coin of all the

northern powers, and every prince of the empire among it.

This money was returned into England for fine cloths silks, &c., for our

own wear, for rent, for coals, for hardware, and all other English

manufactures, and in a great measure supplied the London merchants with

foreign silver for exportation.

The repeated clamours of the English weavers produced this act, so

destructive to themselves and us.

They looked with envious eyes upon our prosperity, and complained of being

undersold by us in those commodities which themselves did not deal in. At

their instances the act was passed, and we lost our profitable northern

trade. Have they got it? No; surely you have found out they have ever

since declined in the trade they so happily possessed? You shall find (if

I am rightly informed) towns without one loom in them, which subsisted

entirely upon the woollen manufactory before the passing of this unhappy

bill; and I will try if I can give the true reasons for the decay of their

trade, and our calamities.

Three parts in four of the inhabitants of that district of the town where

I dwell were English manufacturers, whom either misfortunes in trade,

little petty debts contracted through idleness, or the pressures of a

numerous family, had driven into our cheap country. These were employed in

working up our coarse wool, while the finest was sent into England.

Several of these had taken the children of the native Irish apprentices to

them, who being humbled by the forfeiture of upward of three millions by

the Revolution, were obliged to stoop to a mechanic industry. Upon the

passing of this bill, we were obliged to dismiss thousands of these people

from our service. Those who had settled their affairs returned home, and

overstocked England with workmen; those whose debts were unsatisfied went

to France, Spain, and the Netherlands, where they met with good

encouragement, whereby the natives, having got a firm footing in the

trade, being acute fellows, soon became as good workmen as any we have,

and supply the foreign manufactories with a constant recruit of artisans;

our island lying much more under pasture than any in Europe. The

foreigners (notwithstanding all the restrictions the English Parliament

has bound us up with) are furnished with the greatest quantity of our

choicest wool. I need not tell you, sir, that a custom-house oath is held

as little sacred here as in England, or that it is common for masters of

vessels to swear themselves bound for one of the English wool-ports, and

unload in France or Spain. By this means the trade in those ports is, in a

great measure, destroyed, and we were obliged to try our hands at finer

works, having only our own consumption to depend upon; and I can assure

you we have, in several kinds of narrow goods, even exceeded the English,

and I believe we shall in a few years more, be able to equal them in

broadcloths; but this you may depend upon, that scarce the tenth part of

English goods are now imported, of what used to be before the famous act.

The only manufactured wares we are allowed to export, are linen cloth and

linen yarn, which are marketable only in England; the rest of our

commodities are wool, restrained to England, and raw hides, skins, tallow,

beef, and butter. Now these are things for which the northern nations

have no occasion; we are therefore obliged, instead of carrying woollen

goods to their markets, and bringing home money, to purchase their

commodities.

In France, Spain, and Portugal, our wares are more valuable, though it

must be owned, our fraudulent trade in wool is the best branch of our

commerce; from hence we get wines, brandy, and fruit, very cheap, and in

great perfection; so that though England has constrained us to be poor,

they have given us leave to be merry. From these countries we bring home

moydores, pistoles, and louisdores, without which we should scarce have a

penny to turn upon.

To England we are allowed to send nothing but linen cloth, yarn, raw

hides, skins, tallow, and wool. From thence we have coals, for which we

always pay ready money, India goods, English woollen and silks, tobacco,

hardware, earthenware, salt, and several other commodities. Our

exportations to England are very much overbalanced by our importations; so

that the course of exchange is generally too high, and people choose

rather to make their remittances to England in specie, than by a bill, and

our nation is perpetually drained of its little running cash.

Another cause of the decay of trade, scarcity of money, and swelling of

exchange, is the unnatural affectation of our gentry to reside in and

about London. Their rents are remitted to them, and spent there. The

countryman wants employment from them; the country shopkeeper wants their

custom. For this reason he can't pay his Dublin correspondent readily, nor

take off a great quantity of his wares. Therefore the Dublin merchant

can't employ the artisan, nor keep up his credit in foreign markets.

I have discoursed some of these gentlemen, persons esteemed for good

sense, and demanded a reason for this, their so unaccountable

proceeding--expensive to them for the present, ruinous to their country,

and destructive to the future value of their estates--and find all their

answers summed up under three heads, curiosity, pleasure, and loyalty to

King George. The two first excuses deserve no answer; let us try the

validity of the third. Would not loyalty be much better expressed by

gentlemen staying in their respective counties, influencing their

dependents by their examples, saving their own wealth, and letting their

neighbours profit by their necessary expenses, thereby keeping them from

misery and its unavoidable consequence, discontent? Or is it better to

flock to London, be lost in a crowd, kiss the King's hand, and take a view

of the royal family? The seeing of the royal house may animate their zeal

for it; but other advantages I know not. What employment have any of our

gentlemen got by their attendance at Court, to make up to them their

expenses? Why, about forty of them have been created peers, and a little

less than a hundred of them baronets and knights. For these excellent

advantages, thousands of our gentry have squeezed their tenants,

impoverished the trader, and impaired their own fortunes! Another great

calamity is the exorbitant raising of the rents of lands. Upon the

determination of all leases made before the year 1690, a gentleman thinks

he has but indifferently improved his estate if he has only doubled his

rent-roll. Farms are screwed up to a rack-rent--leases granted but for a

small term of years--tenants tied down to hard conditions, and discouraged

from cultivating the lands they occupy to the best advantage, by the

certainty they have of their rent being raised on the expiration of their

lease, proportionably to the improvements they shall make. Thus is honest

industry restrained; the farmer is a slave to his landlord; 'tis well if

he can cover his family with a coarse, home-spun frieze. The artisan has

little dealings with him; yet he is obliged to take his provisions from

him at an extravagant price, otherwise the farmer cannot pay his rent.

The proprietors of lands keep great part of them in their own hands for

sheep-pasture; and there are thousands of poor wretches who think

themselves blessed, if they can obtain a hut worse than the squire's

dog-kennel, and an acre of ground for a potato plantation, on condition of

being as very slaves as any in America. What can be more deplorable than

to behold wretches starving in the midst of plenty?

We are apt to charge the Irish with laziness, because we seldom find them

employed; but then we don't consider they have nothing to do.

Sir William Temple, in his excellent remarks on the United Provinces,

inquires, why Holland, which has the fewest and worst ports and

commodities of any nation in Europe, should abound in trade, and Ireland,

which has the most and best of both, should have none? This great man

attributes this surprising accident to the natural aversion man has for

labour; who will not be persuaded to toil and fatigue himself for the

superfluities of life throughout the week, when he may provide himself

with all necessary subsistence by the labour of a day or two. But, with

due submission to Sir William's profound judgment, the want of trade with

us is rather owing to the cruel restraints we lie under, than to any

disqualifications whatsoever in our inhabitants. I have not, sir, for

these thirty years past, since I was concerned in trade (the greatest part

of which time distresses have been flowing in upon us), ever observed them

to swell so suddenly to such a height as they have done within these few

months. Our present calamities are not to be represented; you can have no

notion of them without beholding them. Numbers of miserable objects crowd

our doors, begging us to take their wares at any price, to prevent their

families from immediate starving. We cannot part with our money to them,

both because we know not when we shall have vent for our goods, and as

there are no debts paid, we are afraid of reducing ourselves to their

lamentable circumstances. The dismal time of trade we had during Marr's

Troubles in Scotland, are looked upon as happy days when compared with the

present. I need not tell you, sir, that this griping want, this dismal

poverty, this additional woe, must be put to the accursed stocks, which

have desolated our country more effectually than England. Stock-jobbing

was a kind of traffic we were utterly unacquainted with. We went late to

the South Sea market, and bore a great share in the losses of it, without

having tasted any of its profits.

If many in England have been ruined by stocks, some have been advanced.

The English have a free and open trade to repair their losses; but, above

all, a wise, vigilant, and uncorrupted Parliament and ministry,

strenuously endeavouring to restore public trade to its former happy

state. Whilst we, having lost the greatest part of our cash, without any

probability of its returning, must despair of retrieving our losses by

trade, and have before our eyes the dismal prospect of universal poverty

and desolation.

I believe, sir, you are by this time heartily tired with this indigested

letter, and are firmly persuaded of the truth of what I said in the

beginning of it, that you had much better have imposed this task on some

of our citizens of greater abilities. But perhaps, sir, such a letter as

this may be, for the singularity of it, entertaining to you, who

correspond with the politest and most learned men in Europe. But I am

satisfied you will excuse its want of exactness and perspicuity when you

consider my education, my being unaccustomed to writings of this nature,

and, above all, those calamitous objects which constantly surround us,

sufficient to disturb the clearest imagination, and the soundest judgment.

Whatever cause I have given you, by this letter, to think worse of my

sense and judgment, I fancy I have given you a manifest proof that I am,

sir,

Your most obedient, humble servant,

J. S.

"A PROPOSAL FOR THE UNIVERSAL USE OF IRISH MANUFACTURES." 1720.

The social condition of Ireland at the above period has been already

briefly described. When the landlord class were degraded and the tenantry

debased by the iniquitous laws of Charles II. and William III., which

suppressed the trade of the country, the oppressed people found in Swift a

mouthpiece for their wrongs. The above proposal was the voice of the

nation rendered articulate by his utterance. It proposes in effect a

reprisal on England for her restrictions, by a refusal to use anything

that comes thence. A confederation is to be formed, pledged to use nothing

that is not of Irish manufacture. Everything, he trusts, will be burned

that comes from England, except the people and the coals. Swift's proposal

was faulty in political economy. Of this the age knew little, and Swift

cared less. The printer of this pamphlet was prosecuted. The Chief Justice

(Whitshed) sent back the jury nine times, and kept them eleven hours

before they would consent to bring in a "special verdict." The

unpopularity of the prosecution became so great that it was at last

dropped.

Ireland in the Days of Dean Swift (Irish Tracts, 1720 to 1734) · 第 65 / 73 题