FRANKLIN PIERCE.

WASHINGTON, _August 4, 1854_.

_To the House of Representatives_:

I have received the bill entitled "An act making appropriations for the

repair, preservation, and completion of certain public works heretofore

commenced under the authority of law." It reaches me in the expiring

hours of the session, and time does not allow full opportunity for

examining and considering its provisions or of stating at length the

reasons which forbid me to give it my signature.

It belongs to that class of measures which are commonly known as

internal improvements by the General Government, and which from a very

early period have been deemed of doubtful constitutionality and

expediency, and have thus failed to obtain the approbation of successive

Chief Magistrates.

On such an examination of this bill as it has been in my power to make,

I recognize in it certain provisions national in their character, and

which, if they stood alone, it would be compatible with my convictions

of public duty to assent to; but at the same time, it embraces others

which are merely local, and not, in my judgment, warranted by any safe

or true construction of the Constitution.

To make proper and sound discriminations between these different

provisions would require a deliberate discussion of general principles,

as well as a careful scrutiny of details for the purpose of rightfully

applying those principles to each separate item of appropriation.

Public opinion with regard to the value and importance of internal

improvements in the country is undivided. There is a disposition on all

hands to have them prosecuted with energy and to see the benefits sought

to be attained by them fully realized.

The prominent point of difference between those who have been regarded

as the friends of a system of internal improvements by the General

Government and those adverse to such a system has been one of

constitutional power, though more or less connected with considerations

of expediency.

My own judgment, it is well known, has on both grounds been opposed to

"a general system of internal improvements" by the Federal Government. I

have entertained the most serious doubts from the inherent difficulties

of its application, as well as from past unsatisfactory experience,

whether the power could be so exercised by the General Government as to

render its use advantageous either to the country at large or effectual

for the accomplishment of the object contemplated.

I shall consider it incumbent on me to present to Congress at its next

session a matured view of the whole subject, and to endeavor to define,

approximately at least, and according to my own convictions, what

appropriations of this nature by the General Government the great

interests of the United States require and the Constitution will admit

and sanction, in case no substitute should be devised capable of

reconciling differences both of constitutionality and expediency.

In the absence of the requisite means and time for duly considering the

whole subject at present and discussing such possible substitute, it

becomes necessary to return this bill to the House of Representatives,

in which it originated, and for the reasons thus briefly submitted to

the consideration of Congress to withhold from it my approval.

A Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents. Volume 5, part 3: Franklin Pierce · 第 113 / 383 题