CHAPTER XII.[48]

ITALIAN MASTERS FROM THE FOURTEENTH TO THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURIES--TADDEO

GADDI, 1300, SUPPOSED TO HAVE DIED 1366--FRA FILIPPO, 1412-1469--BENOZZO

GOZZOLI, 1424-1496--LUCA SIGNORELLI, 1441, SUPPOSED TO HAVE DIED ABOUT

1524--BOTTICELLI, 1447-1515--PERUGINO, 1446-1522--CARPACCIO, DATE AND

PLACE OF BIRTH AND DEATH UNKNOWN--CRIVELLI--FILIPPINO LIPI, EARLIER THAN

1460--ANTONELLA DA MESSINA, BELIEVED TO HAVE DIED AT VENICE,

1496--GAROPALO, 1481-1559--LUINI, DATE OF BIRTH UNKNOWN, SUPPOSED TO

HAVE DIED ABOUT 1530--PALMA, ABOUT 1480-1528--PARDENONE, 1483-1538--LO

SPAGNA, DATE OF BIRTH UNKNOWN, 1533--GIULIO ROMANO, 1492-1546--PARIS

BORDONE, 1500-1570--IL PARMIGIANINO, 1503-1540--BAROCCIO,

1528-1612--CARAVAGGIO, 1569-1609--LO SPAGNOLETTO, 1593-1656--GUERCINO,

1592-1666--ALBANO, 1578-1660--SASSOFERRATO, 1605-1685--VASARI,

1513-1574--SOFONISBA ANGUISCIOLA, 1535, ABOUT 1620--LAVINIA FONTANA,

1552-1614.

Taddeo Gaddi, the most important of Giotto's scholars, was born in 1300,

and was held at the baptismal font by Giotto himself. Gaddi rather went

back on earlier traditions and faults. His excellence lay in his purity

and simplicity of feeling. His finest pictures are from the life of the

Virgin, in S. Croce, Florence. He was, like his master, a great

architect as well as painter. He furnished the plans for the Ponte

Vecchio and Campanile, Florence, after Giotto's death. He was possessed

of great activity and industry. He is supposed to have died in 1366, and

rests in the scene of his labours, since he was buried in the cloisters

of S. Croce.

Fra Filippo, 1412-1469, a Carmelite friar. The romantic, scandalous

life, including his slavery in Barbary, attributed to him by Vasari, the

great biographer of the early Italian painters, has received no

corroboration from modern researches. It is rather refuted. He always

signed his pictures 'Frater Filippus,' and his death is entered in the

register of the Carmine convent as that of 'Frater Filippus.' In all

probability he was from first to last a monk, and not a disreputable

one. He describes himself as the poorest friar in Florence, with six

marriageable nieces dependent on him, and he is said to have been

involved in debt.

His colouring was 'golden and broad,' in anticipation of that of Titian;

his draperies were fine. He was wanting in the ideal, but full of human

feeling, which was apt to get rude and boisterous; his angels were 'like

great high-spirited boys.' Withal, his style of composition was stately.

Among the best examples of his work are scenes from the life of St John

the Baptist in frescoes in the choir of the Duomo at Prato. His panel

pictures are rather numerous. There are two lunette[49] pictures by Fra

Filippo in the National Gallery.

Benozzo Gozzoli, 1424-1496, a scholar of Fra Angelico, but resembling

him only in light and cheerful colouring. He is said to have been the

first Italian painter smitten with the beauty of the natural world. He

was the first to create rich landscape backgrounds, and he enlivened

his landscapes with animals. He displayed a fine fancy for architectural

effects, introducing into his pictures open porticoes, arcades,

balconies, and galleries. He liked to have subsidiary groups and circles

of spectators about his principal figures. In these groups he introduced

portraits of his contemporaries, true to nature and full of expression

and delicate feeling. His best work is in the Campo Santo, Pisa, scenes

from the history of the Old Testament, ranging from Noah to the Queen of

Sheba. The Pisans were so pleased with his work as to present him, in

1478, with a sarcophagus intended to contain his remains when they

should be deposited in the Campo Santo. He survived the gift eighteen

years, dying in 1496. His easel pictures are rare, and do not offer good

representations of the master. There is one in the National Gallery--a

Virgin and Child, with saints and angels.

Luca d'Egidio di Ventura, called also Luca 'da Cortona,' from his

birth-place, and Luca Signorelli, 1441, supposed to have died about

1524. His is a great name in the Tuscan School. He played an important

part in the painting of the Sistine Chapel, though he is only

represented by one wall picture, the History of Moses. At his best he

anticipated Michael Angelo in power and grandeur, but he was given to

exaggeration. His fame rests principally on his frescoes at Orvieto,

where, by a strange chance, he was appointed, after an interval of time,

to continue and complete the work begun by Fra Angelico, the master most

opposed to Signorelli in style. Luca added the great dramatic scenes

which include the history of Antichrist, executed with a grandeur which

'only Lionardo among the painters sharing a realistic tendency could

have surpassed.' These scenes, which contain The Resurrection, Hell, and

Paradise, bear a strong resemblance to the work of Michael Angelo. In

his fine drawing of the human figure Signorelli may be known by 'the

squareness of his forms in joints and extremities.' A conspicuous detail

in his pictures is frequently a bright-coloured Roman scarf. His work is

rarely seen north of the Alps.

Sandro Filipepi, called Botticelli, 1447-1515. He was an apprentice to

a goldsmith, and then became a scholar of Filippo Lipi's. Botticelli was

vehement and impetuous, full of passion and poetry, seeking to express

movement. He was the most dramatic painter of his school. Occasionally

he rises to a grandeur that allies him to Signorelli and Michael Angelo.

His circular pictures of the Madonna and Child, with angels, are

numerous. Like Fra Filippo, Botticelli's angels are noble youths, some

of them belonging to the great families of the time. They are prone to

be ecstatic with joy or frantic with grief. There is a grand Coronation

of the Virgin, by Botticelli at Hamilton Palace, and a beautiful

Nativity by the old master belongs to Mr Fuller Maitland. His Madonna

and Child are grand and tragic figures always. Botticelli's noble

frescoes in the Sistine Chapel are apt to be overlooked because of

Michael Angelo's 'sublime work' on the ceiling. There has been a revival

of Botticelli's renown within late years, partly due to the new

interest in the earlier Italian painters which Mr Browning has done

something to stimulate.

I quote some thoughtful remarks on Botticelli by W.C. Lefroy in

_Macmillan's Magazine_: 'Mr Ruskin, we know, divides Italian art into

the art of faith, beginning with Giotto, and lasting rather more than

200 years, and the art of unbelief, or at least of cold and inoperative

faith, beginning in the middle of Raphael's life. But whatever division

we adopt, we must remember that the revival of Paganism, as a matter of

fact, affected men in different ways. Right across the schools this new

spirit draws its line, but the line is not a hard and sharp one. Some

men lie wholly on one side of it, with Giotto, Angelico, and Orcagna;

some wholly upon the other, with Titian and Correggio, but there are

some on whom it seems to fall as a rainbow falls upon a hill-side. Such,

for instance, is Botticelli. Now he tries to paint as men painted in the

old days of unpolluted faith, and then again he breaks away and paints

like a very heathen.

'The interest which this artist has excited in the present generation

has been exaggerated into something like a fashion, and recent criticism

has delighted to find or imagine in him the idiosyncrasies of recent

thought. To us it may be he does in truth say more than he or his

contemporaries dreamed of, but while true criticism will sternly refuse

to help us to see in his pictures that which is purely subjective, it

will, I think, recognise the fact that a day like ours is capable of

reading in the subtle suggestions of ancient art thoughts which have

only now come to be frankly defined or exquisitely analysed. To us,

moreover, Botticelli presents not only the poem of the apparition of the

young and beautiful manhood of humanism before the brooding and

entranced, yet half expectant, maidenhood of mediævalism, but also the

poem of the painter's own peculiar relation to that crisis. For us there

is the poetry of the thing itself, and also the poetry of Botticelli's

attempt to express it. The work of Botticelli does not supply a

universal utterance for mankind like Shakespeare's plays, but when we

stand before the screen on which his "Nativity" is hung, or contemplate

in the adjoining room his two perplexed conceptions of "Aphrodite," we

are face to face with a genuine outcome of that memorable meeting,

mediævalism, humanism, and Savonarola, which no generation can afford to

ignore, and our own especially delights to contemplate. There has been

much dispute about the date of Botticelli's "Nativity," and some

defenders of Savonarola have hoped to read 1511 in the strange character

of its inscription, so that this beautiful picture, standing forth as

the work of one for many years under the influence of "the Frate," may

refute the common calumny that that influence was unfriendly to art. Our

catalogue, indeed, unhesitatingly asserts of Botticelli, that "he became

a follower of Savonarola and no doubt suffered from it;" but though

there seems to be really little doubt that the "Nativity" was painted in

1500, the inscription, with its mystic allusion to the Apocalypse, and

the whole character of the picture, afford unmistakable evidence of the

influence of Savonarola.'

Pietro Perugino, 1446, died of the plague at Frontignano in 1522.

Perugino is another painter who has been indebted to the last

Renaissance. His fame, in this country rested chiefly on the

circumstance that he was Raphael's master, whom the generous prince of

painters delighted to honour, till the tide of fashion in art rose

suddenly and floated old Pietro once more to the front. At his best he

had luminous colour, grace, softness, and enthusiastic earnestness,

especially in his young heads. His defects were monotony, and formality,

together with comparative ignorance of the principles of his art. His

conception of his calling in its true dignity was not high. His attempts

at expressing ardour degenerated into mannerism, and he acquired habits

and tricks of arrangement and style, among which figured his favourite

upturned heads, that in the end were ill drawn, and, like every other

affectation, became wearisome. In the process of falling off as an

artist, when mere manual dexterity took the place of earnest devotion

and honest pains, Perugino had a large studio where many pupils executed

his commissions, and where, working for gain instead of excellence in

art, he had the satisfaction, doubtless, of amassing a large fortune.

Among his finest works is the picture of an enthroned Madonna and Child

in the gallery of the Uffizi. Another fine Madonna with Saints is at

Cremona. His frescoes in the Sala del Campio at Perugia are among his

best works. The subjects of these frescoes are partly scriptural; partly

mythological. In the execution there is excellence alike in drawing,

colouring, and the disposal of drapery. A _chef d'oeuvre_ by the master

is the Madonna of the Certosa at Pavia, now in, the National Gallery.

Yet it is said to have been painted at the very period when Michael

Angelo ridiculed Perugino's work as 'absurd and antiquated.' Vittore

Carpaccio, date and place of birth unknown, though he is said to have

been a native of Istria. He was a historical painter of the early

Venetian School and a follower of the Bellini. His romantic _genre_

pictures show the daily life of the Venice of his time, and are

furnished with landscape and architectural backgrounds. His masterly and

rich work is mostly in Venice. He introduces animals freely and well in

his designs.

Carlo Crivelli was another master of the fifteenth century who deserves

notice. He had strong individuality, yet was influenced by the Paduan

and Venetian Schools. He displayed an old-fashioned preference for

painting in tempera. Sometimes his drawing approaches that of Mantegna,

while he has a gorgeousness of colouring all his own. His pictures

occasionally show dignity of composition in combination with grace and

daintiness; but he could be guilty of exaggerated vehemence of

expression. He frequently introduced fruit, flowers, and birds in his

work. He is fully represented in the National Gallery, his works there

ranging from 'small tender pictures of the dead Christ with angels, to a

sumptuous altar-piece in numerous compartments.'

Filippino Lipi was an adopted son and probably a relation of Fra

Filippo's, though a scholar's use of his master's name was not uncommon.

The date of his birth is earlier than 1460. Filippino was also a pupil

of Botticelli's, while there was a higher sense of beauty and grace in

the pupil than in the teacher. Among his last works is the Vision of St

Bernard, an easel picture in the Badia at Florence. The apparition of

the Madonna in this picture is said to be 'full of charm.' In his larger

works he is one of the greatest historical painters of his country.

Roman antiquities had the same keen interest for him which they held for

the greatest of his contemporaries, and he made free use of them in the

architecture of his pictures. He has fine work in the Carmelite Church,

Florence, and in S. Maria Sopra Minerva, Rome. Much of some of his

pictures is painted over. The National Gallery has a picture of

Filippino's 'of grand execution,' though almost colourless--the Madonna

and Child, with St Jerome and St Francis.

Antonella da Messina was the Neapolitan painter who brought the practice

of painting in oils from the Netherlands into Italy, though it is now

believed, from stubborn discrepancies in dates, that the story of his

great friendship with Jan Van Eyck, as given by Vasari, is apochryphal.

Very likely Hans Memling, called also 'John of Bruges,' was the real

friend and leader of Antonella. His best work consisted of portraits. He

is believed to have died at Venice in 1496.

Benvenuto Tisio, surnamed from the place of his birth Garofalo, was born

in 1481, and died in 1559. He passed from the early school of Ferrara to

that of Raphael. His conception was apt to be fantastic, while his

colouring was vivid to abruptness, and he was deficient in charm of

expression. He fell into the fault of monotonous ideality. At the same

time his heads are beautiful, and his drapery is classic. His finest

work is an 'Entombment' in the Borghese Palace, Rome. There is an

altar-piece by Garofalo, a Madonna and Child with angels, in the

National Gallery.

Bernardo Luini, who stands foremost among the scholars of Lionardo da

Vinci, was born by the Lago Maggiore, the date unknown, came to Milan in

1500, was elderly in 1525, and is supposed to have died not long after

1530. His work is chiefly found in Milan. His great merit has been only

lately acknowledged. He is not 'very powerful or original,' but for

'purity, grace, and spiritual expression,' he ranks very high. He unites

the earnestness of the older masters with the prevailing feeling for

beauty of the great masters of Italian Art. His pictures were long

mistaken for those of his master, Lionardo, though it is said that when

the difference between them is once pointed out, it is easily

recognised; indeed, the resemblance is confined to a smiling beatific

expression in the countenances, which abounds more in Luini's pictures.

His heads of women, children, and angels present every degree of

serenity, sweet cheerfulness and happiness, up to ecstatic rapture.

'Christ Disputing with the Doctors,' in the National Gallery, formerly

called a Lionardo, is now known to be a Luini. He painted much, whether

in tempera, fresco, or oil. His favourite subjects in oil were the

Madonna and Child, with St John and the Lamb, and the Marriage of St

Catherine. Probable he appears to greatest advantage in frescoes. He is

said to have reached his highest perfection in the figure of St John in

a Crucifixion in the Monasterio Maggiore, Milan.

Jacopo Palma, called Il Palma Vecchio, was born about 1480 near Bergamo,

and died in 1528. He is believed to have studied under Giovanni Bellini,

while he is also the chief follower of Giorgione. His characteristics

are ample forms and gorgeous breadth of drapery. His female saints, with

their large rounded figures, have a soft yet commanding expression. He

had an enchanting feeling for landscape, which seems to have been the

birthright of the Venetian painters. To Palma is owing what are called

'Santa Conversazione,' where there are numerous groups round the Virgin

and Child, as if they are holding a court in a retired and beautiful

country nook. Palma rivalled Giorgione and Titian as a painter of

women's portraits. Among these is that of his daughter Violante,

believed to have been loved by Titian. 'Palma's three Daughters,' in the

Dresden Gallery, is a masterpiece of 'fair, full-blown beauty.' The hair

of the women is of the curiously bleached yellow tint affected then by

the Venetian ladies. Palma painted many pictures, leaving at his death

forty-our unfinished.

Giovanni Antonio da Pardenone, born 1483, died 1538. He had many names,

'Pardenone' from his birth-place, 'Corticellis' from that of his father,

and he is believed to have assumed the name 'Regillo' after he received

knighthood from the King of Hungary. He was Venetian in his artistic

qualities. Many of his works are in his native Pardetowns near. All have

suffered and some are now hidden by whitewash. His chief strength lay in

fresco. His scenes from the Passion in the cathedral, Cremona, are

greatly damaged and wretchedly restored, but they still reveal the

painter as a great master. They have 'fine drawing, action, excellent

colouring, grand management of light and shade, with freedom of hand and

dignity of conception.' In the prophets and sibyls around the cupola of

the Madonna di Campagna, Piacenza, Pardenone's power is fully proven.

His immense works in fresco account for the rarity of his oil pictures

and their comparative inferiority. There is only one picture, and that a

portrait, indisputably assigned to Pardenone in England, in the Baring

Collection.

Giovanni di Pietro, known as Lo Spagna (the Spaniard), was a

contemporary of Raphael's, a fellow-pupil of his under Perugino. There

is no record of the time and place of Lo Spagna's birth. He died in

1533. He was a careful, conscientious follower of Perugino and Raphael,

doing finished and delicate work; an 'Assumption' in a church at Trevi

is a fine example of his qualities. His best picture was painted in

1516, and is at Assisi. It represents the Madonna enthroned with three

saints on each side. In his later works he betrayed feebleness. Pictures

by Lo Spagna are often attributed to Raphael.

Giulio Pippi, surnamed Romano, born in 1492, died in 1546, was a very

different painter, while he was the most celebrated of Raphael's

scholars. He had a vigorous, daring spirit, with a free hand and a bold

fancy. So long as he painted under Raphael, Giulio followed his master

closely, especially in his study of the antique, but he lacked the

purity and grace of his teacher, on whose death, the pupil leaving Rome,

pursued his own coarser, more vehement impulses. The frescoes in the

Villa Modama, Rome, are good examples of his style, so is the

altar-piece of the Martyrdom of St Stephen in S. Stefano, Genoa. Giulio

Romano was the architect who designed the rebuilding of half Mantua.

His best easel picture in England is the 'Education of Jupiter by Nymphs

and Corybantes,' in the National Gallery. In Raphael's lifetime his

principal scholar was accustomed to work on the master's pictures, and

on his death Giulio, together with another pupil, Gianfrancesco Penni,

were left executors of Raphael's will and heirs of his designs.

Paris Bordone was born at Treviso in 1500 and died in 1570. He was

educated in the Venetian School, and remained remarkable for delicate

rosy colour in his flesh tints and for purple, crimson, and shot hues in

his draperies, which were usually small and in crumpled folds. His _chef

d'oeuvre_ is in the Venetian Academy. It is a fisherman presenting a ring

to the Doge, and is a large and fine picture with many figures. He dealt

frequently in mythological or poetic subjects. There is an example of

the first in the National Gallery. He was great in single female

subjects and women's portraits. There is a portrait by Bordone of a

lovely woman of nineteen belonging to the Brignole family, in the

National Gallery. He had often fine landscape and grand architecture in

his pictures.

Il Parmigianino, born 1503, died 1540, was a follower of Correggio's. In

Parmigianino's case the danger of the master's peculiarities became

apparent by the lapse into affectation and frivolity. 'His Madonnas are

empty and condescending, his female saints like ladies in waiting.'

Still there were certain indestructible beauties of the master which yet

clung to the scholar. He had clear warm colouring, decision, and good

conception of human life. He was highly successful in portraits. There

is a splendid portrait by Parmigianino, said to be Columbus, in Naples.

Among his celebrated pictures is 'The Madonna with the Long Neck,' in

the Pitti Palace. An altar-piece in the National Gallery, which

represents a Madonna in the clouds with St John the Baptist appearing

to St Jerome, is a good example of Parmigianino. It is said that he was

engrossed with this picture during the siege of Rome in 1527. The

soldiers entered the studio intent on pillage, but surprising the

master at his work, respected his enthusiasm and protected him.

Federigo Baroccio, of Urbino, born in 1528, died in 1612, was also a

follower of Correggio's, and made a stand against the decline of art in

his day. He was tender and idyllic, though apt in his turn to be

affected and sentimental. When painting in the Vatican, Rome, his rivals

sought to take his life by poison. The attempt caused Baroccio to return

to Urbino, where he established himself and executed his commissions.

Amirighi da Caravaggio was born at Caravaggio in 1569, and died at Porto

Ercole in 1609. He was chief of the naturalistic school, the members of

which painted common nature and violent passions in bitter opposition to

the eclectics, especially the Caracci. The feud was sometimes carried on

appositely enough on the side of the naturalistic painters by poison and

dagger. Caravaggio was distinguished by his wild temper and stormy life,

in keeping with his pictures. He resided principally in Rome, but dwelt

also in Naples. He is vulgar but striking, even pathetic in some of his

pictures. The 'Beheading of John the Baptist,' in the Cathedral, Malta,

is one of his masterpieces. His Holy Families now and then resemble

gipsy _ménages_.

Guiseppe Ribiera, a Spaniard, and so called Lo Spagnoletto, was born

1593 and died 1656. He followed Caravaggio, while he retained

reminiscences of the Spanish School and of the Venetian masters. Some of

his best pictures, such as 'the Pieta with the Marys and the Disciples,'

and his 'Last Supper,' are in Naples. He had a wild fancy with a

preference for horrible subjects--executions, tortures--in this respect

resembling Domenichino. Lo Spagnoletto is said to be particularly

unpleasant in his mythological scenes. Many of his pictures have

blackened with time. His 'Mary of Egypt standing by her open Grave' is a

remarkable picture in the Dresden Gallery.

Giovanni Francesco Barbiera, surnamed Guercino da Cinto, approached the

school of the Caracci. In his art he resembled Guido Reni, with the same

sweetness, greater liveliness, and fine chiaroscuro. 'Dido's Last

Moments' and 'St Peter raising Tabitha' in Rome and in the Pitti Palace

are fine examples of Guercino's work. His later pictures, like Guido's,

are fascinating in softness, delicate colouring and tender sentiment,

degenerating, however, into mannerism and insipidity, while his

colouring becomes at last pale and washy.

Albano, born 1578, died 1660. He had elegance and cheerfulness which

hardly rose to grace. He painted mostly scenes from ancient mythology,

such as 'Venus and her Companions.' Religious subjects were

comparatively rare with him; one, however, often repeated was the

'Infant Christ sleeping on the Cross.'

Giovanni Battista Salvi, surnamed from his birth-place Sassoferrato, was

born in 1605 and died in 1685. He followed the scholars of the Caracci,

but with some independence, returning to older and greater masters. His

art was distinguished by a peculiar but slightly affected gentleness of

conception, pleasing and sweet--with the sweetness verging on weakness.

He finished with minute care. He gave constant representations of the

Madonna and Child and Holy Families in a domestic character. In one of

his pictures in Naples the Madonna is engaged in sewing. His most

celebrated, 'Madonna del Rosario,' is in S. Sabina, Rome. The Madonna

bending in ecstatic worship over an infant Christ lying on a cushion is

in the Dresden Gallery.

Giorgio Vasari was born at Arezzo in 1512 and died at Florence in 1574.

He was an architect, or jeweller, and a historical painter of heavy

crowded pictures. His lives of the early Italian painters and sculptors

up to his own time, the sixteenth century, though full of traditional

gossip, are invaluable as graphic chronicles of much interesting

information which would otherwise have been lost.

Sofonisba Anguisciola, born 1535, died about 1620, was a pupil of

Bernardino Campi about the close of the sixteenth century at Cremona.

She is justly praised by Vasari. Though her works are rare there are a

few in England and Scotland. Three of her pictures which are mentioned

with high commendation by Dr. Waagen are, 'a nun in the white robes of

her order, nobly conceived and delicately coloured,' in Lord

Yarborough's collection; in Mr Harcourt's collection, 'her own

portrait, still very youthful, delicate, charming, and clear;' and in

the collection of the late Sir W. Stirling Maxwell, 'another portrait of

herself at an easel painting the Virgin and Child on wood, delicately

conceived, clear in colour, and very careful.'

Lavinia Fontana, born in 1552, died 1614, was a daughter of Prospero

Fontana, who belonged to the fast degenerating Bolognese artists at the

close of the sixteenth and beginning of the seventeenth century. She was

a better artist than her fellow painters, worked cleverly and boldly,

and showed truth to nature. She has left excellent portraits. In the

late Sir W. Stirling Maxwell's collection there is a picture by her,

'Two girls in a boat with a youth rowing,' on wood, 'of very graceful

motive and careful treatment.'

The Old Masters and Their Pictures, For the Use of Schools and Learners in Art · 第 12 / 13 章