I agreed.

“And not being married, you, well—in point of fact, you can’t know. A

man, especially as he gets on in years, has to make concessions to his

wife. All life is compromise, as you know, and married life in

particular. A certain happiness, or, at any rate, peace, must be

secured, and compromise is the highroad to it—in fact, the only road.

But it is absurd for me to be saying all this, because of course you know

Lady Fergusson.”

I knew her well, but I knew also that in that _ménage_ the grey mare was

not the better animal; it was Sir Edmund who ruled, and any compromise

that was made came from his wife’s side.

He may suddenly have been aware that some such thoughts were passing in

my mind, for he added, not without a slight flush, “Of course, you have

not seen her lately”—as though during the few months of our estrangement

both her character and his own had undergone one of those changes that

happen only in tracts and fairy tales. He even had the hardihood to add,

“You’ll notice a great difference when,” but stumbled over it and went on

quickly—“that is, if you ever honour us by your company again, as I most

cordially hope you will.

“For,” he continued more fluently, “it is about that that I have come;

about that, and our letter to you, which I have been regretting ever

since it was sent. What I want to make clear—without any disloyalty,

mind, to Lady Fergusson—is that that letter was written when we were in a

highly nervous state and was written almost wholly at her Ladyship’s

wish. You recall what I said about compromise?

“Well, my dear doctor,” he said, “my dear Greville, if you will permit me

to call you that once more—for the sake of harmony, for the sake of that

peace which must dominate a home, I consented to write that letter and to

do many other things which were a natural consequence of it. When your

reply came, I recognized the good sense of it at once; I knew, as any man

of the world must know, that my poor boy cannot be wholly absolved, that

it takes two to make an elopement no less than a marriage. I knew—but

women have not our penetration and common reasonableness, our sagacity,

shall I say?

“Lady Fergusson,” he continued, “could not take that view, and compromise

made me, in that moment of stress and disaster, when the Hall and all it

stood for seemed to be toppling about us like a house of cards,

compromise made me as wax in her hands.

“I have come now, in humility and shame, to apologize for my share of

this most lamentable quarrel, and to ask you, for the sake of my poor

wife, to overlook it, to forget it, and once more to show your

magnanimity by coming to the Hall and doing something to relieve that

poor distraught creature’s pain.

“I ask nothing for myself,” he concluded. “I merely grovel. But for her

sake you will come, won’t you? No one knows her symptoms as you do. In

no one has she such confidence.”

I had listened to the harangue without a word, but not without many

thoughts. Chiefly had I been wondering if husband and wife were in

collusion, or if they were really acting independently. To this day I

don’t know.

As he came to an end, he advanced to me with an extended hand, which I

took.

“I will come to the Hall to-morrow,” I said. “But I should like as much

publicity to be given to your new friendly attitude as to the hostile one

now terminating. I count on you to let others know, as well as myself,

that you have reason to be ashamed of your conduct towards me.”

“How?” he asked blankly.

“I must leave that to you,” I said.

I was relieved that the hatchet was buried, not because I had been

incommoded by the feud to any great extent, but quarrels are not in my

line, and this one was uncomfortable to the village. More than

uncomfortable: degrading.

It was humiliating, for example, to one who would wish every one to be

dependent and honest, to see the embarrassment into which some of my

neighbours could be plunged when I had come suddenly upon them while they

were talking with Sir Edmund or Lady Fergusson. They had to decide in a

moment which side to be on, whether to acknowledge me or not. I was, of

course, in the long run, of infinitely more use to them than the Hall

people could be: but wealth is wealth, and position is position, and poor

human nature is poor human nature and ever will be. I don’t expect it to

change, but I cannot bear to be a cause of plunging it into its less

admirable moods.

Our community was too small for the Hall people and the doctor to be at

enmity; and a large part of a country doctor’s duty is to act as cement,

a fuser of classes, and while the vendetta held how could I be this?

But if a sigh of relief went up when it was known that I had been seen to

drive into the Hall gates again, no one emitted it with more genuine

heartiness than the rector, who had been put in a peculiarly awkward

position. For although my friend of many years’ standing, he had not,

poor fellow, enough courage to take any stand in the matter. I am not

blaming him. The church does not train men to take a very strong stand

on such occasions, nor indeed require recruits from the ranks of the

independent and outspoken. Clerics, it is true, can become approximately

courageous and frank, but preferment usually precedes the operation.

Your country rector or vicar keeps himself as free from trouble as

possible—very wisely—and listens to all sides even if he is not a

partisan of all sides.

The Fergussons were too important for our rector even to contemplate the

risk of losing them. So far as his church was concerned, he was safe, as

I was not an attendant; but I was on this committee and that with both

Sir Edmund and himself; we were all three of us governors of the

almshouses. I had brought the rector’s numerous children into the world;

I was even godfather to one of them. The rector was continually coming

to me for advice. My usefulness was as necessary to him, or at any rate

as comforting, as the Hall’s prestige, patronage and port.

Both of us he had, of course, held reprehensible in a very high degree

for the effect on his parishioners of the defiance of morality involved

in Ronnie and Rose’s escapade. He blamed the Fergussons for providing a

Ronnie, and me for my association, although so vicarious, with Rose. How

could he expect his simple flock to keep in the straight path, he asked,

if the seventh commandment was treated with such contempt by the sons and

daughters of the rich and exalted? He felt that his stewardship was

under a cloud, even though Ronnie was merely a visitor among us from

India and Rose from Wilton Place. Both had been children under him, when

he was young and far more energetic than now. If they had weakened and

fallen, was it not a reflection on his own zeal?

Mrs. O’Gorman told me something of the good man’s line of self-torturing

argument when I called on her one day, for he did not himself dare to

present the case to me.

“What do you think the old fellow’s saying now?” she said. “He’s saying

that if any of the husbands and wives in his congregation—Joe Smithers,

for example, and Alice Leith—were to bolt together for the bad motive,

he’d have not a word to reply to them if they were to say they did it

because Captain Fergusson and Mrs. Holt had made a break.

“‘Rubbish! my dear sir,’ I said to him. ‘People don’t argue like that;

at least not honestly: only for effect. And people don’t wait for

examples; they do what they want if they have the courage, but for the

most part they do nothing at all, because they’re cowards.’

“It takes more courage, I told him, to do what Captain Fergusson and Mrs.

Holt have done than to resist temptations; and my own belief is that no

temptation worth the name ever is resisted. It’s only resisted when it’s

pretending to be strong. Passion isn’t resisted; but mercifully there’s

very little of it in England. What we call passion is usually a mixture

of a certain amount of loneliness and a certain amount of curiosity and a

certain amount of appetite and a tremendous desire to escape from what

one is doing and have an adventure. But passion, burning hot and

self-sacrificing—there’s very little!

“The rector,” she went on, “actually had the nerve to congratulate

himself on the good conduct of the parish. He seemed to think it’s due

to his sermons. I put him right. ‘My dear man,’ I said, ‘it’s not your

sermons; it’s the want of opportunity.’”

“You’re so uncompromising, Mrs. O’Gorman,” I said. “And you put into

speech what other people only dare to think, and sometimes not even that.

It’s a great privilege to be Irish.”

“Well,” she said, “all I hope is that that poor child of yours is happier

with her soldier than she ever was with her solicitor.”

“Barrister,” I corrected.

“Barrister,” she said. “I knew he was a barrister but I wanted to be

alliterative. Don’t forget that my father was a scholar and a poet, and

he taught us to make phrases.”

* * * * *

Rose—the older Rose—used to write regularly. They were living at Kwala

Lumpur, in the Straits Settlements, and Ronnie was doing well with

rubber. He would never be really strong again, but they seemed to be

happy. I wrote regularly in reply and sent news of Rose the less, whose

perplexity about her mother’s disappearance and the change of home was no

longer acute. In the first instance Eustace had told her that her mother

had gone away across the sea, and left it vaguely there. To a child of

five such voyages may seem natural.

“What message shall I give to your mother?” I wanted to ask, but I never

did; nor did Rose send any message to her daughter. It seemed better to

let the tie relax and gradually cease to be. Rose was never one to ask

for things “both ways.”

Eustace meanwhile was still in the Argentine, and it was three years

before he returned to England. His work at Buenos Aires had led to

various profitable ventures into which he had been glad to throw himself

as he shrank more and more from the idea of resuming life in London. The

house in Wilton Place being let furnished at a high rent, and Rose being

safe with me, why should he return? The hymnist may ask, with an

outraged wonderment in his voice, “Can a mother’s tender care cease

towards the child she bare?” but my experience is that it can do so quite

easily. I have watched it in the process. As for a father’s tender care

for the child he engendered, that often never begins to exist at all.

Eustace, at any rate, endured separation from his daughter with exemplary

fortitude.

At the end of three years he was ready, however, to face the music again,

and a letter arrived saying that he would come down for the week-end to

see Rose and talk things over.

He duly arrived, very grey, but looking strong and hard and handsome. He

watched Rose very carefully at lunch, but seemed to have no wish to be

alone with her—almost a fear that he might have to be. Rose studied him

gravely, too, but merely answered his questions and volunteered nothing.

I have had all my life only one rule of conduct with regard to children,

and that is to treat them as if they were grown up; I ask their advice,

consult with them, even conspire; and great has been my reward in

consequence. But Eustace was one of those men who too consciously come

down a peg or two with the young, and Rose was made uneasy. She

disappointed him by her ignorance of the Argentine and expressed no

interest when her father told her that in sailors’ language Buenos Aires

became Bows and Arrows.

I had been troubled by the fear that he would want to take Rose away and

try the experiment of being a father to her: but it was a false alarm.

Once again I had been guilty of the folly of anticipating disaster—a

foible to which human nature is ever too prone.

Eustace had many plans, but they did not embrace any intimate association

with his flesh and blood. Having satisfied himself of my genuine desire

to keep Rose, he told me some of them. He was selling most of the Wilton

Place furniture, keeping only enough for a small service flat. He would

spend most of his week-ends in the Dormy House at Bellingdon (what golf

and tobacco can do for bachelors, widowers and the separated, no pen can

ever compute!), but would like to come down to me occasionally, if I had

no objection.

“I don’t think I am the best companion for a child of Rose’s age,” he

said. “When she is older I hope that she may come and live with me, but

just now I am both unsettled and unhappy and I should not be able to give

her sufficient attention. She should go to school, I think, and then

part at least of the holidays—the summer holidays—she and I could spend

together by the sea. I might do a little sailing.”

Of the other Rose he said nothing. Nor did I mention her. But Rose the

less was like enough to her mother (her double in expression, in certain

moods) for him inevitably to have her in his thoughts whenever the child

was present. Except at meals, however, she was careful to be absent.

* * * * *

Meanwhile Rose was growing up. When Eustace returned she was eight and I

did not want better company. In herself she was interesting, and it was

interesting also to compare her with her mother at the same age: I almost

felt sometimes as if both were present. She was more with me than the

other Rose had been, for I was now less often out and away, having a

younger man to take the harder work: and when I was away it was for

shorter periods because the car was so much swifter than poor old Silver.

Another reason was that this Rose was less friendly with the neighbours:

not because of any natural shyness, but because she did not receive the

same quality of welcome. The little Rose of twenty years earlier, whose

father had died suddenly, was more acceptable than the little Rose of

to-day, whose mother had run away from husband and child with another

man—and that man the heir to the Hall. We are often not logical in our

censorious moods; and one of the last things to go, in the decay of

feudalism, will be respect for the Great House. No one was so mean or

courageous as to refuse Rose’s acquaintance; but she must have felt

instinctively that she was a little under a cloud and therefore have been

the more prepared to keep within the home borders.

She was, however, as welcome as sunshine in both adjoining

territories—the Westerleys’ and the Sturgis’s. Colonel Westerley, who

was getting very blind, found her invaluable as a guide. Again and again

I have listened to them on their tours round the beds, Rose’s clear

little voice raised (for he was getting deaf too) to keep him in touch

with the progress of every plant.

“This is where the fritillaries are”—she had great difficulty with some

of the names. “There are two new purple speckled ones and three white.”

“Now we’re opposite the auriculas. The yellow ones are terrific.”

“Oh dear, how the rain has broken down the tulips!”

“Now we’re opposite the hedge-sparrow’s nest. Wait a minute while I see

if there are any more eggs. No, only three still.”

So she would mark the changes of each morning, meanwhile leading the

gentle old warrior by the hand.

The three Sturgis sisters—though none of them was destined to soar to the

realms of bliss as Mrs. Julius Greville—fulfilled part of the destiny

that the other Rose, all unconsciously, had planned for them, by becoming

the most solicitous foster-mothers to her daughter. Out of their

unselfishness and their leisure they suggested that Rose should go to

them for lessons: a proposal that I was very glad to accept; and so it

came about that the eldest gave Rose an hour a day with pencil and paint

brushes in the studio (Rose’s grandfather’s studio), and the other two

each an hour in more general instruction. Having a full measure of the

Quaker placidity to keep them contented with their lot, they had no wish

to roam, and were thus ever to be depended upon.

Not that their lot was to be despised, for they had turned Theodore’s

house into a very beautiful serene place. It was a Georgian house,

panelled in white, with many recesses; and the three sisters had filled

these with blue china. The gods dispense their gifts capriciously, and

upon these descendants of a sect vowed to hostility to the arts and

graces they had conferred the most exquisite taste. A series of

provident ancestors had put them into a position to gratify most of their

wishes, and their home kept pace with modern culture in all its quieter

aspects.

* * * * *

Rose, you see, if she had not many friends, had very good ones. Her

chief lack was the chief lack of many only children—contemporaries. How

much happier she would have been had she playmates of her own age, I

cannot say; but it is absurd to pretend that without them she was

unhappy.

And this I can say with certainty: she kept me young. She did not

actually transform me into a contemporary, but she so arranged it that

there was very little awkwardness or fear between us. I am not

pretending to have been in her complete confidence, I am merely stating

the fact that we were under very little constraint together.

Even had we been real contemporaries, how could we really have known each

other! A man may guess at a man’s thoughts, may fairly safely measure

him by himself; but how can a man guess at a girl’s thoughts? Speech

reveals so few of them. If while one is speaking twenty words one can be

thinking of a hundred different things, what of the silent pauses? How

they must teem! Where was my Rose when her blue eyes looked through

their black lashes into space? How could I follow her unaided? Or would

she have aided me? Not would, but could. Could she have told me? Could

any of us tell all our thoughts in any given hour? Even if ships that

passed in the night signalled to each other the whole passenger list

there would always be a few of the steerage and some of the crew unnamed.

And if those were revealed, there would still be a stowaway!

* * * * *

One matter never mentioned between Rose and me was her mother’s _faux

pas_. What the child knew about this I did not discover, or wish to. I

am old-fashioned enough to prefer to talk of grown-up matters only with

grown-up people. The longer the gaiety and happiness of children can be

unclouded by knowledge of the difficulties and disasters which can

proceed from our emotional instincts, the better. So far as I was

concerned Rose was ignorant of her mother’s rebellion. We talked about

her as a child, but we did not touch on recent history. English families

are marvellous in their capacity to regulate conversational reservations.

One funny little pet turn of speech to which Rose was addicted comes back

to me very vividly as I write. Every one has favourite locutions, and

Rose had the habit of prefacing many of her remarks with the phrase “As a

matter of fact”; only, being mostly in a hurry to express herself, she

used to contract the last three words to one: “As a maffact.” Very few

minutes could pass, when we were together and she was unburdening herself

on this or that question, without her beginning a sentence: “As a

maffact, Dombeen.”

* * * * *

When the War came Rose was thirteen and I was sixty-five; and we were

therefore both non-combatants. But it did not leave us—any more than

anyone else—untouched; for I was old enough to be saddened and shocked by

the calamities that it bred; and Rose was young enough to be ripe for the

new Hedonism which the peace inaugurated and which is still in full

swing. Ronnie, the other Rose told me, longed to be in it, but was too

delicate, and they remained on their estate throughout its lengthy

course.

The War found the old Colonel still living, but he did not long survive.

He was not of the kind that spends its breath in lamenting the decadence

of the Army in present times—I never heard him couple the Service and the

dogs—but he had had his little autobiographical weaknesses, in which

border skirmishes played no inconspicuous part, and in the presence of

the gigantic drama in Belgium and France he found his occupation gone.

No one wanted to listen to him any more; and he was too aged and infirm

to be of any use. The War must have hit countless other retired officers

in this way and in a moment have dried up their streams of reminiscence

and emptied all their boasts. The Colonel was, however, a rural

gentleman and not a frequenter of clubs, and his lot was comparatively

easy; but I saw a steady decline in his strength, and he did not long

survive the death of two of his grandsons in the Battle of Mons.

* * * * *

The Colonel was not our only loss. Mrs. O’Gorman had been declining for

some time, and in the early spring she also left us.

I have been at many death-beds, and at most the grief was that of the

living rather than the dying. Nature has mercifully arranged that most

people are ready for the end—even look forward to it. Suffering or

weakness has broken down their resistance: the goal they desire is peace.

Others, with more fight in them, morphia lulls into acquiescence. But

Mrs. O’Gorman needed no drugs, nor were there tears to distress her.

Being the last of her clan her house was uninvested by relations. Only

the faithful Julia, her servants and I were about. Steadily and quietly

her flame lowered and was extinguished.

“I’m ready to die,” she said, “but it wouldn’t be true to say I should

want to if I had strength. It’s a muddling old world, but one hates the

dark. And I like to know what’s going on. I should have liked to see

your new Rose growing up. And that other Rose, poor darling, I don’t

like leaving her. And my little Peek, it will be horrid not to be able

to pat him and give him his sugar.

“Perhaps when we’re dead,” she went on, “we can still watch our friends.

If so, you can be very sure I shall be watching you. But don’t worry. I

won’t move the furniture or bother you with manifestations. I’ll simply

be looking on, and if there’s any means by which a spirit can add to the

content of a living friend, you can be sure I shall apply it. But there

can’t be,” she added, “or we should all be happier.

“It’s a sin,” she said another time, “that all we can leave are our

twopenny-halfpenny possessions. Why can’t we leave our brains? I don’t

pretend that mine are particularly desirable, but they would be a godsend

to that stupid woolly Mrs. Stansted, for example. It’s a pity I can’t

hand them on to her.”

To the end she kept up her spirit and to the end she teased poor Julia.

“Have you ordered your mourning yet?” she asked her once.

Julia’s reply was a sound of protest and a sob.

“But I want you to. I told you to. All this fuss about a simple little

matter like dying is so ridiculous. Don’t you want me to be happy in

heaven, Julia?”

More sobs.

“Now listen. I command you to get your mourning. I want to see if it

becomes you. Why shouldn’t I? A young bride is allowed to see the

bridesmaids who are to follow her to the church; why should an old widow

woman be prevented from seeing what her chief mourner will look like?”

Nothing, however, could get Julia to consider death a subject matter for

discussion, or as anything but a gaunt, grisly, abnormal happening.

“I hope they don’t insist on one’s entering heaven the very instant one

dies,” Mrs. O’Gorman said at another time. “That won’t suit me at all.

What I want is a really long sleep first—weeks and weeks of it. What do

you think, Julia, will they be in such a hurry?”

Poor Julia, all this was hard to bear; but when the old lady’s soul and

body did at last part company and her will was made public, it was found

that the legacy to her faithful companion was ten times larger than she

had foreshadowed in conversations. The poor of the village were

remembered also, and both the Roses had little mementoes.

* * * * *

We lost the Fergussons too, although not by death. They had not long

remained at the Hall after the burial of the hatchet, even though my

invaluable attendance was theirs once more. They had become restless and

discontented. The Hall estate had been bought for Ronnie to succeed to;

and of what use was it now? Sir Edmund had nothing to do—his interest in

tree-planting and general improvements disappeared, and he gradually took

a dislike to the place. The result was that they left for one of the

Continental health resorts—Aix-les-Bains, I think it was. When they went

I decided to take no new patients, and gradually allowed my practice to

pass to others, and when Mrs. O’Gorman died I retired altogether.

* * * * *

I said something a little while back about Rose and her ignorance of her

mother’s flight—or, at any rate, silence regarding it. That was when she

was a child. But later, when she had reached the teens, references to

her mother gradually came naturally into her conversation, and she would

even ask me about her.

“Tell me about mother, Dombeen,” she would say. “Was she like me? Mrs.

O’Gorman says that our voices are just the same.”

“Did you like her better than me?” She wanted to know this very badly.

I have no doubt that she had collected other views as well as mine and

had a fairly sound idea of the situation.

“Of course it was naughty to run away from father,” she began once, after

one of Eustace’s visits, “but—” Here she broke off with a suspicion of a

chuckle.

Rose and Rose · 第 21 / 31 题