DEAR SARA:

I should like, while the subject is vividly present with me, to

tell you more exactly than I have ever yet done, what I knew of

my aunt, Elizabeth Evans. My father, you know, lived in

Warwickshire all my life with him, having finally left

Staffordshire first, and then Derbyshire, six or seven years

before he married my mother. There was hardly any intercourse

between my father's family, resident in Derbyshire and

Staffordshire, and our family--few and far between visits of (to

my childish feelings) strange uncles and aunts and cousins from

my father's far-off native county, and once a journey of my own,

as a little child, with my father and mother, to see my uncle

William, a rich builder, in Staffordshire--but not my uncle and

aunt Samuel, so far as I can recall the dim outline of

things--are what I remember of northerly relations in my

childhood.

But when I was seventeen or more--after my sister was married and

I was mistress of the house--my father took a journey into

Derbyshire, in which, visiting my uncle and aunt Samuel, who were

very poor, and lived in a humble cottage at Wirksworth, he found

my aunt in a very delicate state of health after a serious

illness, and, to do her bodily good, he persuaded her to return

with him, telling her that I should be very, very happy to have

her with me for a few weeks. I was then strongly under the

influence of Evangelical belief, and earnestly endeavoring to

shape this anomalous English-Christian life of ours into some

consistency with the spirit and simple verbal tenor of the New

Testament.

I was delighted to see my aunt. Although I had only heard her

spoken of as a strange person, given to a fanatical vehemence of

exhortation in private as well as public, I believed that we

should find sympathy between us. She was then an old woman--above

sixty--and, I believe, had for a good many years given up

preaching. A tiny little woman, with bright, small dark eyes, and

hair that had been black, I imagine, but was now gray--a pretty

woman in her youth, but of a totally different physical type from

Dinah. The difference--as you will believe--was not simply

physical; no difference is. She was a woman of strong natural

excitability, which, I know, from the description I have heard my

father and half-sister give, prevented her from the exercise of

discretion under the promptings of her zeal. But this vehemence

was now subdued by age and sickness; she was very gentle and

quiet in her manners--very loving--and (what she must have been

from the very first) a truly religious soul, in whom the love of

God and love of man were fused together. There was nothing highly

distinctive in her religious conversation. I had had much

intercourse with pious Dissenters before. The only freshness I

found in our talk, came from the fact that she had been the

greater part of her life a Wesleyan; and though she left the

society when women were no longer allowed to preach, and joined

the new Wesleyans, she retained the character of thought that

belongs to the genuine old Wesleyan. I had never talked with a

Wesleyan before, and we used to have little debates about

predestination, for I was then a strong Calvinist. Here her

superiority came out, and I remember now, with loving admiration,

one thing which at the time I disapproved. It was not strictly a

consequence of her Arminian belief, and at first sight might seem

opposed to it,--yet it came from the spirit of love which clings

to the bad logic of Arminianism. When my uncle came to fetch her,

after she had been with us a fortnight or three weeks, he was

speaking of a deceased minister, once greatly respected, who from

the action of trouble upon him had taken to small tippling,

though otherwise not culpable. "But I hope the good man's in

heaven for all that," said my uncle. "Oh, yes," said my aunt,

with a deep inward groan of joyful conviction, "Mr. A.'s in

heaven--that's sure." This was at the time an offence to my

stern, ascetic, hard views--how beautiful it is to me now!

As to my aunt's conversation, it is a fact that the only two

things of any interest I remember in our lonely sittings and

walks are her telling me one sunny afternoon how she had, with

another pious woman, visited an unhappy girl in prison, stayed

with her all night, and gone with her to execution; and one or

two accounts of supposed miracles in which she believed--among

the rest, the face with the crown of thorns seen in the glass. In

her account of the prison scenes, I remember no word she

uttered--I only remember her tone and manner, and the deep

feeling I had under the recital. Of the girl she knew nothing, I

believe--or told me nothing--but that she was a common coarse

girl, convicted of child-murder. The incident lay in my mind for

years on years, as a dead germ, apparently--till time had placed

in my mind a nidus in which it could fructify; it then turned out

to be the germ of "Adam Bede."

I saw my aunt twice after this. Once I spent a day and night with

my father in the Wirksworth cottage sleeping with my aunt, I

remember. Our interview was less interesting than in the former

time: I think I was less simply devoted to religious ideas. And

once again she came with my uncle to see me--when my father and I

were living at Foleshill; then there was some pain, for I had

given up the form of Christian belief, and was in a crude state

of free-thinking. She stayed about three or four days, I think.

This is all I remember distinctly, as matter I could write down,

of my dear aunt, whom I really loved. You see how she suggested

Dinah; but it is not possible you should see as I do how entirely

her individuality differed from Dinah's. How curious it seemed to

me that people should think Dinah's sermon, prayers and speeches

were copied--when they were written with hot tears, as they

surged up in my own mind!

As to my indebtedness to facts of local and personal history of a

small kind, connected with Staffordshire and Derbyshire--you may

imagine of what kind that is when I tell you that I never

remained in either of those counties more than a few days

together, and of only two such visits have I more than a shadowy,

interrupted recollection. The details which I knew as facts, and

have made use of for my picture, were gathered from such

imperfect allusion and narrative as I heard from my father in his

occasional talk about old times.

As to my aunt's children or grandchildren saying, if they did

say, that Dinah is a good portrait of my aunt--that is the vague,

easily satisfied notion imperfectly instructed people always have

of portraits. It is not surprising that simple men and women

without pretension to enlightened discrimination should think a

generic resemblance constitutes a portrait, when we see the great

public so accustomed to be delighted with misrepresentations of

life and character, which they accept as representations, that

they are scandalized when art makes a nearer approach to truth.

Perhaps I am doing a superfluous thing in writing all this to

you--but I am prompted to do it by the feeling that in future

years "Adam Bede" and all that concerns it may have become a dim

portion of the past, and I may not be able to recall so much of

the truth as I have now told you.

Once more, thanks, dear Sara.

Ever your loving

MARIAN.

It is easy to gather from this letter that whilst the existence of

Marian Evans was calm enough externally, her inner life was full of

stirring events--of the most stirring events, in fact which can

agitate the human soul for it is evident that she had passed along

some quite opposite phases of religious belief. In 1851, after a

visit to the continent, she goes--where all English writers seem to

drift by some natural magic--to London, and fixes her residence there.

It is curious enough that with all her clearness of judgment she works

here for five years, apparently without having perceived the vocation

for which her whole natural and acquired outfit had so remarkably

prepared her. We find her translating Spinoza's _Ethics_; not only

translating but publishing Feuerbach's _Essence of Christianity_ and

Strauss's _Life of Jesus_. She contributes learned essays to the

Westminster Review; it is not until the year 1856, when she is

thirty-six years old that her first slight magazine story is sent to

Blackwood's; and even after his first commendations her timidity and

uncertainty as to whether she could succeed in story-writing are so

great that she almost resolved to give it up. I should regard it as

mournful, if I could think it religious to regard anything as mournful

which has happened and is not revocable, that upon coming to London

Marian Evans fell among a group of persons represented by George Henry

Lewes. If one could have been her spiritual physician at this time one

certainly would have prescribed for her some of those warm influences

which dissipate doubt by exposing it to the fierce elemental heats of

love, of active charity. One would have prescribed for her the very

remedy she herself has so wisely commended in _Janet's Repentance_.

"No wonder the sick room and the lazaretto have so often been a

refuge from the tossings of intellectual doubt--a place of repose

for the worn and wounded spirit. Here is a duty about which all

creeds and philosophers are of one mind; here, at least, the

conscience will not be dogged by adverse theory; here you may

begin to act without settling one preliminary question. To

moisten the sufferer's parched lips through the night-watches, to

bear up the drooping head, to lift the helpless limbs, to divine

the want that can find no utterance beyond the feeble motion of

the hand or beseeching glance of the eye--these are offices that

demand no self-questionings, no casuistry, no assent to

propositions, no weighing of consequences. Within the four walls

where the stare and glare of the world are shut out, and every

voice is subdued--where a human being lies prostrate, thrown on

the tender mercies of his fellow, the moral relation of man to

man is reduced to its utmost clearness and simplicity; bigotry

cannot confuse it, theory cannot pervert it, passion, awed into

quiescence, can neither pollute nor perturb it."

Or one might have prescribed for her America where the knottiest

social and moral problems disappear unaccountably before a certain new

energy of individual growth which is continually conquering new points

of view from which to regard the world.

At the time to which we have now brought her history, Marian Evans

would seem to have been a singularly engaging person. She was small in

stature and her face was what would be called plain here; but she was

widely read, master of several languages, a good talker and listener:

and beyond all, every current of testimony runs towards a certain

intensity and loving fire which pervaded her and which endowed her

with irresistible magnetic attraction for all sensitive souls that

came near her. Her love for home matters, and for the spot of earth

where she had been born, her gentle affection for animals; how the

Bible and Thomas a Kempis were her favorite books, these and a

thousand womanly traits I hope to bring out as we study some of her

greater works,--for with all her reputed reserve I find scarcely any

writer so sincerely communicative and so frankly desirous of sympathy

on the part of her reader as George Eliot. In the next article I shall

ask leave to present you with some pictures of the stage at which

English novel-writing has arrived under the recent hands of Scott,

Thackeray and Dickens when George Eliot is timidly offering her first

manuscript to Blackwood's; and I shall then offer some quotations

from these first three stories--particularly from _Janet's Repentance_

which seems altogether the most important of the three--and shall

attempt to show distinctly what were the main new features of wit, of

humor, of doctrine, and of method which were thus introduced into

literature, especially in connection with similar features which about

this same time were being imparted by Mrs. Browning.

Meantime, let me conclude by asking you to fix your attention for a

moment on this figure of Milly, sweet wife of Amos Barton, going to

bed with her unmended basket of stockings in great fatigue, yet in

great love and trust, and contrast it with that figure of Prometheus,

nailed to the Caucasian rock in pain and hate, which formed the first

object of these studies. What prodigious spiritual distance we have

swept over from the Titan lying down, to unrest, thundering defiance

against Jove's thunder, as if clashing shield against shield, and the

tender-limbed woman whom the simple narrative puts before us in these

words: "Her body was very weary, but her heart was not heavy ...; for

her heart so overflowed with love," &c. Fixing your attention upon

this word "love," and reminding you how, at the close of the last

lecture, we found that the whole movement of the human spirit which we

have traced here as the growth of personality towards the

unknown--towards fellow-man--towards nature,--resulting in music, in

the novel, in science--that this whole movement becomes a unity when

we arrive at the fact that it really imparts a complete change in

man's most ultimate conception of things--a change, namely, from the

conception of Justice as the organic idea of moral order, a conception

which we have seen Aeschylus and Plato vainly working out to the

outrageous conclusions of Prometheus, of the _Republic_; to the

conception of Love as the organic idea of moral order, a conception

which we are just now to see George Eliot working out to the

divinely-satisfactory conclusion of Milly Barton, who conquers with

gentle love a world which proved refractory alike to the justice of

Jove and the defiance of Prometheus; reminding you, I say, of this

concurrent change from feeble personality and justice to strong

personality and love, what an amazing arc of progress we have

traversed in coming from Aeschylus to George Eliot!

And it is, finally, most interesting to find this change receiving

clear expression, for the first time in English literature, in the

works of the two women I have mentioned, Mrs. Browning and George

Eliot. In this very autumn, when we have seen the editor of

_Blackwood's Magazine_ reading the MS. of George Eliot's first story

to Thackeray, Mrs. Browning is sending _Aurora Leigh_ to print; and,

as I shall have frequent occasion to point out, the burden of _Aurora

Leigh_ as well as of George Eliot's whole cyclus of characters is

love.

There is a charming scene in the first Act of Bayard Taylor's _Prince

Deukalion_, which, though not extending to the height we have reached,

yet very dramatically sums up a great number of ideas which converge

towards it. In this scene Gaea, the Earth, mother of men, is

represented as tenderly meditating upon her son, man. Near her stands

a rose-tree, from one bud of which Love is presently to emerge. She

says:

"I change with man,

Mother, not more than partner, of his fate.

Ere he was born I dreamed that he might be,

And through long ages of imperfect life

Waited for him. Then vexed with monstrous shapes,

That spawned and wallowed in primeval ooze,

I lay supine and slept, or dreamed to sleep;

And dreamed, or waking felt as in a dream,

Some touch of hands, some soft delivering help,

And he was there! His faint new voice I heard;

His eye that met the sun, his upright tread,

Thenceforth were mine! And with him came the palm,

The oak, the rose, the swan, the nightingale;

The barren bough hung apples to the sun;

Dry stalks made harvest: breezes in the woods

Then first found music, and the turbid sea

First rolled a crystal breaker to the shore.

His foot was on the mountains, and the wave

Upheld him: over all things huge and coarse

There came the breathing of a regal sway,

Which bent them into beauty. Order new

Followed the march of new necessity,

And what was useless, or unclaimed before,

Took value from the seizure of his hands."

In the midst of like thoughts, a bud on a rose which stands by Gaea

bursts open, and Eros, the antique god of young love, appears from it.

The English Novel and the Principle of its Development · 第 46 / 71 题