CHAPTER XXIV.

AMERICAN EXPERIMENTS IN DRAINAGE--DRAINAGE IN IRELAND.

Statement of B. F. Nourse, of Maine.--Statement of Shedd and Edson,

of Mass.--Statement of H. F. French, of New Hampshire.--Letter of

Wm. Boyle, Albert Model Farm, Glasnevin, Ireland.

It was part of the original plan of this work, to give a large number of

statements from American farmers of their success in drainage; but,

although the instances are abundant, want of space limits us to a few.

These are given with such diagrams as will not only make them

intelligible, but, it is hoped, will also furnish good examples of the

arrangement and modes of executing drains, and of laying them down upon

plans for future reference. The mode adopted by Shedd and Edson, of

indicating the size of the pipes used, by the number of dots in the

lines of drains, is original and convenient. It will be seen by close

attention, that a two-inch pipe is denoted by dots in pairs, a

three-inch pipe by dots in threes, and so on.

It is believed that Mr. Nourse's experiment is one of the most thorough

and successful works of drainage yet executed in America. His plan is

upon page 195.

STATEMENT OF B. F. NOURSE, ESQ.

GOODALES CORNER, ORRINGTON, ME.,

Sept. 1st, 1858.

MY DEAR SIR:--So much depends upon the preliminary surveys and

"levels" for conducting works of thorough-draining and irrigation

cheaply, yet to obtain the most beneficial results, that a

competent person, such as an engineer or practiced land-drainer,

should be employed to make them, if one can be obtained.

Unfortunately for me, when I began this operation, some years ago,

there were no such skilled persons in the country, or I could learn

of none professionally such, and was forced to do my own

engineering. Having thus practically acquired some knowledge of it,

I use and enjoy a Summer vacation from other pursuits, in the

prosecution of this; and this employment, for the last few weeks,

has delayed my answer to your inquiries. Nor could I sooner arrive

at the figures of cost, extent, &c., of this season's work.

This is expected to be completed in ten days, and then I shall have

laid, of

Stone drains, including mains 702 rods

Tile drains (two inches, or larger) 1043 "

----

In all 1745 "

or, about five and one-half miles, laying dry, _satisfactorily_,

about thirty-five acres. The character and extent of the work will

better appear by reference to the plan of the farm which I send

with this for your inspection.

The earlier portion was fairly described by the Committee of the

Bangor Hort. Soc.--(See Report, for 1856, of the Maine Board of

Agriculture.) It was far too costly, as usual in works of a novel

character conducted without practical knowledge. No part of my

draining, even that of this season, has been done so cheaply as it

ought to be done in Maine, and will be done when tiles can be

bought at fair prices near at hand. I call your attention

particularly to this, because the magnitude of the cost, as I

represent it, ought not to be taken as a necessary average, or

standard outlay per acre, by any one contemplating similar

improvement, when almost any farmer can accomplish it equally well

at far less cost. My unnecessary expenditures will not have been in

vain, if they serve as a finger-post to point others in a

profitable way.

My land had upon its surface, and mingled in its super soil, a

large quantity of stones, various in size, from the huge boulders,

requiring several blasts of powder to reduce them to movable size,

to the rubble stones which were shoveled from the cart into the

drains. To make clean fields all these had to be removed, besides

the many "heaps" which had been accumulated by the industry of my

predecessors. A tile-drain needs no addition of stone above the

pipe; indeed, the stone may be a positive injury, as harboring

field vermin, or, if allowed to come within two feet of the

surface, as obstructing deep tillage, and favoring the access of

particles of soil upon or into the tile with the rapid access of

water which they promote. Carefully placed to the depth of six or

eight inches in a four-foot drain, quite small stones are, perhaps,

useful, and they certainly facilitate the drawing of water from the

surface. Such was, and still is, with many, the prescribed method

of best drainage in Scotland, and some parts of England. The

increased cost of adding the stone above the tile is obvious; and

when the width of that drain is enlarged to receive them, the cost

is materially enhanced. Yet such has been my practice, at first,

under the impression of its necessity, and all the time from a

desire to put to use, and out of sight, the small stones with which

I was favored in such abundance. The entire cost of moving, and

bringing more than 2,500 heavy loads of stone, is included in the

cost of drains, as set down for the 1,745 rods.

Including this part of expense, which is never _necessary_ with

tile, and cannot be incurred in plain clay soils, or clay loams

free of stones, the last 700 rods cost an average of 97 cents per

rod completed. This includes the largest mains; of which, one of 73

rods was opened four feet wide at bottom of the trench, of which

the channel capacity is 18 x 18 = 324 square inches, and others 110

rods of three and one-half and three feet width at bottom, all

these mains being laid entirely with stone. The remainder of the

700 rods was laid with two-inch tile, which cost at the farm

eighteen dollars per 1,000. These last were opened four rods apart,

and lay dry about seventeen acres, at a cost, including the mains,

of $678, or $40 per acre. In this is included every day's labor of

man and beast, and all the incidental expenses, nothing being

contributed by the farm, which is under lease.

I infer that an intelligent farmer, beginning aright, and availing

himself of the use of team and farm labor, when they can best be

spared from other work--as in the dry season, after haying--or

paying fair prices for digging his ditches only, and doing the rest

of the work from the farm, can drain thoroughly at a cost of $20

per acre, drains four rods apart, and four feet deep; or at $25 per

acre, forty feet apart, and three feet nine inches deep.

My subsoil is very hard, requiring constant use of the pick, and

sharpening of the picks every day, so that the labor of loosening

the earth was one-third or one-half more than the throwing out with

a shovel. The price paid per rod, for opening only, to the depth of

three and a half feet (or, perhaps, three and three-quarters

average,) of a width for laying tile, was 25 cents per rod. At this

price, the industrious men, skillful with tools, earned $1.12 to

$1.25 per day, besides board; and they threw out one-third more

earth than was really necessary, for "room to work" as they said.

_But they labored hard, 14 hours per day._ The same men, working in

a soil free from stones, and an easier subsoil, would, in the same

time, open from 50 to 100 per cent. more length of ditch.

The greater part of these drains were laid four rods apart. When

first trying this distance upon a field, of which the soil was

called "springy and cold," and was always too wet in the Spring and

early Summer for plowing, a partial, rather than "thorough"

drainage was attempted, with the design, at some future day, to lay

intermediate drains. The execution of that design may yet appear

expedient, although the condition of soil already obtained, is

satisfactory beyond expectation.

Owing to the excess of water that saturated the soil in Spring and

Fall, the former proprietors of the farm had not attempted the

cultivation of the field alluded to, for many years. Originally

producing heavy crops of hay, it had been mowed for thirty years or

more, and was a good specimen of "exhausted land," yielding

one-half or three-fourths of a ton of hay per acre. This field is

designated in the plan, as the "barley field, 1858," lies

south-west of the dwelling-house, and contains nearly six acres.

Its northerly half, being the lower end of the field, was drained

in 1855, having been Summer-plowed, and sowed with buckwheat, which

was turned under, when in flower, as a fallow crop. The other half

was drained in 1856; plowed and subsoiled the same Fall. In 1857,

nearly the whole field was planted with roots--potatoes, rutabagas,

mangolds, carrots, English turnips, &c.--and one acre in corn. For

these crops, fair dressings of manure were applied--say ten or

twelve cartloads of barn-manure plowed in, and one hundred pounds

of either guano or bone-dust harrowed in, or strewed in the drill,

for each acre; about fifteen loads per acre of seasoned muck or

peat were also plowed in. There was a good yield of all the roots;

for the corn, the season was unfavorable. Last Spring, a light

dressing of manure, but all that we could afford, was applied, the

whole well ploughed, harrowed, seeded to grass with barley,

harrowed, and rolled. The barley was taken off last week; and, from

the five and three-quarter acres, seventeen heavy loads were hauled

into the barn, each estimated to exceed a ton in weight. The grain

from a measured acre was put apart to be separately threshed, and I

will advise of its yield when ascertained.[A] This was said, by the

many farmers who saw it, including some from the Western States,

to be the "handsomest field of grain" they had ever seen. The young

grass looks well; and I hope, next Summer, to report a good cut of

"hay from drained land."

[Footnote A: This was threshed about the middle of November, and

yielded "51 bushels, round measure." The entire field averaged 45

bushels per acre.]

Last Winter, there were no snows to cover the ground for sleighing

until March; and, lying uncovered, our fields were all frozen to an

unusual depth. But, _our drains did not cease to run through the

Winter_. And Mr. O. W. Straw, who works the farm, and was requested

to note the facts accurately, wrote to me this Spring, "the frost

came out of the drained land about one week first" (that is,

earlier than from the undrained land adjacent); and, "in regard to

working condition, the drained land was in advance of the

undrained, ten days, at least." The absence of snow permitting this

unusual depth of frost, had caused a rare equality of condition the

last Spring, because, until the frost was out, the drains would not

draw surface-water. Usually, when early snows have fallen to

protect the ground, and it remains covered through the Winter, the

frost goes off with the snow, _or earlier_, and, within a few days,

the land becomes in good condition for plowing--quite two weeks

earlier than the driest of my undrained fields, or any others in

the vicinity.

These remarks apply to land in which the drains are four rods

apart. The farm lies with an inclination northerly and easterly,

the fall varying from 1 in 33 to 1 in 8; that in most of the drains

laid four rods apart, being about 1 in 25. The drains in the

"barley field" fall 1 in 27, average, all affording a rapid run of

water, which, from the mode of construction, and subsequent

subsoiling, finds ready access to the drain-channels. Hence, we

never observe running water upon the surface of any of our drained

lands, either during the heaviest rains, or when snows are melting,

and the wasteful "washing" from the surface that formerly injured

our plowed grounds, has ceased.

It is fair to suppose that it is the considerable descent which

renders the drains so effectual at four rods apart; and that where

there is but slight fall, other circumstances being the same, it

would be necessary to lay drains much nearer, for equal service.

The results of one man's experiments, or practice, whether of

success or failure, should not be conclusive to another, unless all

the circumstances are identical. These are ever varying from one

farm to another; and only a right understanding of the natural laws

or principles brought into use, can determine what is best in each

case. Therefore, a description of the methods I have used, or any

detailed suggestions I may give, as the result of experience, would

not be worth much, unless tested by the well-ascertained rules

applicable to them, which men of science and skill have adopted

and proved, by the immensely extended draining operations in Great

Britain, and those begun in this country. These are now given in

elaborate treatises, and quoted in agricultural journals. But they

should be made familiar to every farmer, in all their practical

details, and with methods suited to our country, where labor is

dear and land cheap, as contrasted with the reversed conditions in

England, where the practice of "thorough-draining" has so generally

obtained, and has so largely improved the conditions of both

landlord and tenant. Your book will do this, and thus do a great

good; for draining will greatly enlarge the productive capacity of

our land, and, consequently, its value, while it will render labor

more effective and more remunerative to the employer and the

employed.

The fact of increased production from a given quantity of land, by

draining, being ascertained beyond question, and the measure of

that increase, at its minimum, being more than the interest at six

per cent. upon the sum required to effect it--even at $50 per

acre--the question of expediency is answered. To the owner of

tillage lands there is no other such safe, sure, and profitable

investment for his money. He lodges it in a bank that will never

suspend payments, and from which better than six per cent. dividend

can be received annually.

Very truly, yours, B. F. NOURSE.

Hon. H. F. FRENCH, Exeter, N. H.

STATEMENT OF SHEDD AND EDSON.

BOSTON, February 1, 1859.

DEAR SIR:--The plan for a system of thorough drainage, a copy of

which we send you herewith, was executed for Mr. I. P. Rand, of

Roxbury.

An outfall was obtained, at the expense of considerable labor, by

deepening the Roxbury and Dorchester Brook for a distance of nearly

a quarter of a mile, about four hundred feet of which was through a

rocky bottom, which required some blasting. The fall thus obtained

was only about two inches in the whole distance.

The fall which can be obtained for the main drain is less than two

inches per hundred feet, but the lateral drains entering into the

main, will have a fall varying from two inches to a foot per

hundred.

The contour lines, or lines traced along the ground, intersecting

points on an equal level, are drawn on this plan, showing a fall of

four-tenths of a foot, each line being in every part four-tenths of

a foot lower than the line above it. Where the lines are near

together, the fall is greater, as a less horizontal distance is

passed over before reaching a point which is four-tenths lower than

the line above.

[Illustration: Thorough Drainage BY SHEDD & EDSON. AGR'L ENG'S

BOSTON, 1859]

It will be seen by the plan, that the fall in the line occupied by

the main drain is very slight, while the side drains have a fall

much greater.

The lateral drains are run in the line of steepest descent, which

is, of course, at right angles to the general direction of the

contour lines.

The water from the entire system is collected, and escapes at one

outlet into the brook.

A peep hole is placed at the intersection of the sub-main drain

with the main, which commands about one-half the entire area--the

other, half is commanded by the outlet.

Two-inch tile will be laid in the lateral drains, and three, four,

and five-inch in the sub-main and main.

It is quite indispensable, to the successful execution of a plan of

drainage on land so level as this, that careful measurements be

made on the ground with an engineer's level, and such a

representation of its surface projected as will show to the eye at

a glance what all the natural inclinations are. The work can then

be laid out with ease in the best position, and executed in a

systematic manner. The time and labor which is devoted to such an

examination of the ground is well spent, and, with the knowledge

gained by it, the work can be carried on with such economy as to

save the original cost of the examination many times over.

Very truly, yours,

SHEDD & EDSON

Hon. H. F. FRENCH, Exeter, N. H.

STATEMENT OF HENRY F. FRENCH, OF EXETER, N. H.

The drained field represented in the plan (Fig. 102), contains

about eight acres. I purchased it in 1846. The upper part of it is

sand, with underlying clay at depths of from four to ten feet. The

field slopes towards the river, and, on the slope, the clay strata

coming out to the surface, naturally bring out the water, so that

the side hill was so wet as to produce cranberries--quite too wet

for any hoed crop. At the foot of the hill the soil is a stiff

clay, with veins of sand and gravel. Through the centre was a wet

ravine, which served as a natural outlet for the springs, and which

was so full of black alders as to make an excellent cover for

woodcock. Until the land was drained, this ravine was impassable in

the hay season even, except by a bridge which I built across it.

Now it may be crossed at any season and at any point.

I first attempted to drain the wettest parts with brush drains,

running them into the wet places merely, and succeeded in drying

the land sufficiently to afford good crops of hay. I laid one

brush-drain across the brow of the hill, five feet deep, hoping to

cut off all the water, which I supposed ran along upon the surface

of the clay. This dried the land for a few rods, but the water

still ruined the lower parts of the field, and the drain produced

very little effect upon the land above it. In 1856, finding my

brush drains quite insufficient, I thorough-drained the side-hill

on the lower part of the plan at the reader's left hand, at fifty

feet distances, up and down the slope, at an average of about four

feet depth, going five feet deep on the brow of the hill, to cut

through the brush-drain. I used two-inch sole-tiles for minors, and

three-inch for the main.

The effect was instantaneous. The land which, in the Spring of

1856, had been so wet that it could not, even though partially

drained with brush-drains, be planted till the 5th of June, was, in

1857, ready to work as soon as the snow was off. My farm journal

says, under date of April 6th, "plowed drained land with double

plow two days after a heavy storm--dry enough." I spent that Summer

in Europe. The land was planted with corn, which produced a heavy

crop. I find an entry in my journal, on my return, "My drained land

has been in good condition--neither too wet nor too dry--all

Summer."

In the Fall of 1857, I laid about 170 rods in other parts of the

field, at similar depths and distances, and in 1858 completed the

upper part, on which is an orchard of apple trees. A part of this

orchard was originally so wet as to kill the trees the first year,

but by brush-drains I dried it enough to keep the next set alive.

There was no water visible at the surface, and the land was dry

enough for corn and potatoes; still the trees looked badly, and

many were winter-killed. I had learned the formation of the earth

about my premises, of which I had at first no adequate conception,

and was satisfied that no fruit tree could flourish with its feet

in cold water, even in Winter. All nursery-men and fruit-growers

agree, that land must be well drained for fruit. I therefore laid

four-foot tile drains between the rows of trees, in this apparently

dry sand. We found abundance of water, in the driest season, at

four feet, and it has never ceased to flow copiously.

I measured accurately the discharge of water from the main which

receives the drainage of about one and a half acres of the orchard,

at a time when it gave, what seemed to me an average quantity for

the Winter months, when the earth was frozen solid, and found it to

be about 480 barrels per day! The estimate was made by holding a

bucket, which contained ten quarts, under the outlet, when it was

found that it would fill in fifteen seconds, equal to ten gallons

per minute; and six hundred gallons, or twenty barrels per hour,

and four hundred and eighty barrels per day.

I have seen the same drain discharge at least four times that

quantity, at some times! The peep-holes give opportunity for

inspection, and I find the result to be, that the water-table is

kept down four feet below the surface at all times, except for a

day or two after severe rain-storms.

There is an apparent want of system in this plan, partly to be

attributed to my desire to conform somewhat to the line of the

fences, and partly to the conformation of the land, which is quite

uneven. At several points near the ravine, springs broke out,

apparently from deep fountains, and short drains were run into

them, to keep them below the surface.

The general result has been, to convert wet land into early warm

soil, fit for a garden, to render my place more dry and healthful,

and to illustrate for the good of the community the entire

efficiency of tile-drainage. The cost of this work throughout, I

estimate at fifty cents per rod, reckoning labor at $1 per day, and

tiles at $12 per thousand, and all the work by hand-tools. I think

in a few years, we may do the same work at one-half this cost.

Further views on this point are given in the chapter on the "Cost

of Drainage."

After our work was in press, we received from Mr. William Boyle, Farmer

at the Albert Model Farm in Ireland, the paper which is given below,

kindly sent in reply to a series of questions proposed by the author.

The Albert Model Farm is one of the Government institutions for the

promotion of agriculture, by the education of young men in the science

and the practice of farming; and from what was apparent, by a single

day's examination of the establishment in our visit to it in August,

1857, we are satisfied of its entire success. The crops then growing

were equal, if not superior, to any we have seen in any country. Much of

the land covered by those crops is drained land; and having confidence

that the true principles of drainage for that country must be taught and

practiced at this institution, we thought it might be instructive, as

well as interesting to the farmers of America, to give them the means of

comparison between the system there approved, and those others which we

have described.

Had the paper been sooner received, we should have referred to it

earlier in our book; yet coming as it does, after our work was mostly in

type, we confess to some feeling of satisfaction, at the substantial

coincidence of views entertained at the Albert Model Farm, with our own

humble teachings. With many thanks to Mr. Boyle for his valuable letter,

which we commend to our readers as a reliable exposition of the most

approved principles of land-draining for Ireland, we give the paper

entire:

ALBERT MODEL FARM, Glasnevin, Dublin,

January 31, 1859.

To the Hon. HENRY F. FRENCH, Exeter, N. H.:

SIR:--Your queries on land-drainage have been too long unanswered.

I have now great pleasure in sending you, herewith, my views on the

points noted. * * *

Pray excuse me for the delay in writing. I am, sir,

Your obliged and obedient servant, WILLIAM BOYLE.

LAND DRAINAGE--REPLIES TO QUERIES, ETC.

_Introductory observations._ Ireland contains close on to

twenty-one millions of acres, thirteen and a half millions of which

were returned as "arable land," in 1841. By "Arterial" and

thorough-drainage, &c., effected through loans granted by

government, the extent of arable land has been increased to fifteen

and a half millions of acres. The "Board of Works" has the

management of the funds granted for drainage and land improvements

generally, and competent inspectors are appointed to see that the

works are properly executed. The proprietor, or farmer, who obtains

a loan may, if competent, claim and obtain the appointment of

overseer on his own property, and thus have an opportunity of

economically expending the sum which he will have to repay

(principal and interest) by twenty-two installments. The average

cost of thorough-drainage, under the Board of Works, has been about

L5 per statute acre. In 1847, when government granted the first

loan for land-drainage, tiles were not so easily obtained as at

present, nor was tile-drainage well understood in this country; and

the greater part of the drains then made--and for some years

after--were either sewered with stones, formed into a conduit of

various dimensions, and covered over with finely-broken stones, or

the latter were filled into the bottom of the drain, to about one

foot in depth, as recommended by Smith, of Deanston. The

dimensions for minor drains, sewered with stones, were, usually,

three and a half feet deep, fifteen inches wide at top, and three

to four inches wide at bottom (distance apart being twenty-one

feet); and the overseer carried about with him a wooden gauge, of a

size to correspond, so that the workmen could see at a glance what

they had to do. These drains are reported to have given general

satisfaction; and they were cheaply made, as the stones were to be

had in great abundance in almost every field. On _new_ land,

trenching was sometimes carried on simultaneously with the

drainage; and it very often happened that the removal of the stones

thus brought to the surface, was very expensive; but they were

turned to profitable account in sewering drains and building

substantial fences. In almost every case the drains were made in

the direction of the greatest inclination, or fall of the land; and

this is the practice followed throughout the country. Some

exceptions occur on _hill-sides_, where I have seen the drains laid

off at an acute angle with the line of inclination. It is not

necessary that I should explain the scientific reasons for draining

in the direction of the fall of the land, as that point has been

fully treated of, and well illustrated, in your article already

referred to. I shall now pass on to the Queries.

[Illustration: Thorough Drainage BY HENRY F. FRENCH. EXETER N.H.]

_Depth of drains, and distance apart._ There is still a great

diversity of opinion on these points, and particularly in reference

to the drainage of stiff clay soils; some of the most intelligent

and practical farmers in this country hold to the opinion that, on

such soils, the maximum depth should not exceed three feet, and the

distance apart sixteen to twenty feet. On clay loams, having a

subsoil more or less free, the general practice is, to make the

drains three and a half to four feet deep, and at twenty-one to

thirty feet apart. On lighter soils, having a free subsoil, four

feet deep and forty feet apart are the usual limitations. This farm

may be taken as a fair average of the land in Ireland, as a test

for drainage; the soil is a deep clay loam; the subsoil a compact

mixture of strong clay and calcareous gravel, almost free from

stones. Thirty miles of drains have been made on the farm, the

least distance apart being twenty-one feet, and the greatest

distance thirty feet; the depth in every case, three and a half to

four feet for minor drains. This drainage has given the greatest

satisfaction; for although the greatest part of the work was

performed by the Agricultural pupils, in training here, we have not

had occasion to re-make a single drain, except in one instance,

where the tiles got choked, and which I shall explain hereafter.

_Tiles: Size, Shape, Draining, Capacity, &c._ We use circular pipe

tiles, of inch and a half bore, for all parallel drains whose

length does not exceed one hundred yards, and two-inch pipes for

any additional length up to one hundred and fifty yards, the

greatest length, in my opinion, a parallel drain should reach

before discharging into a main or sub-main drain. We do not find it

necessary to use collars on this farm, as we have _firm_ ground to

place the tiles on, and we can cut the drain to fit the tiles

exactly. As regards the size of tiles for main and sub-main drains,

_that_ can only be regulated by the person in charge of the

drainage at any particular place, after seeing the land opened up

and the minor drains discharging. As a general rule, a circular

pipe of three inches internal diameter will discharge the

_ordinary_ drainage of five or six statute acres, and give

sufficient space for the circulation of air. It should be observed,

however, that this applies to a district where the annual rain-fall

is from twenty-six to thirty inches, that of all Ireland being

about thirty-five inches; besides, we have not the immense falls of

rain in a _few hours_ that occur in other countries. All these

points should be carefully considered in estimating the water-way

for drainage. I have said that collars are not used with the tiles

on this farm, as the bottom of the drains is quite firm and even;

but, where the bed for the tile is soft, and the subsoil is of a

_shifting_ nature, then collars should be used in every case.

Collars cost about half the price of tiles, which they are made to

connect, so that the use of them adds one-third to the expense of

the sewering material; and, as I have already pointed out, I think

it quite unnecessary to use them where the subsoil is _firm_, and

where the drain can be bottomed to _fit the tile_. Where large

pipes are not to be had conveniently for sewering main or

sub-drains, I find a proportional number of pipes of lesser

diameter to answer perfectly. It is very desirable to provide

_branch pipes_ for connecting the minor with the main drains. The

branch should be socketed to receive the end of the last tile in

the minor drain, and the point of attachment to the main pipe may

be on the top or on the side of the latter. If the branch be made

to lead the water into the side of the main pipe, then it should

join the latter at an acute angle, that both streams may meet with

the least possible opposition of forces.

_Fall necessary in Tile Drainage._ I consider one foot in one

hundred yards the _least_ fall to work upon with safety.

_Securing Outlets._ All the outlets from main-drains should be well

secured against the intrusion of vermin, by a wrought-iron grating,

built in mason-work. The water may flow into a stone trough

provided with an overflow-pipe, by which the quantity discharged

may be ascertained at any time, so as to compare the drainage

before and after rain, &c.

_Traps, or Silt Ponds._ Where extensive drainage is carried on in

low-lying districts, and the principal outlet at a considerable

distance, it may be found necessary to have traps at several points

where the silt from the tiles will be kept. These traps may be of

cast-iron, or mason-work, cemented; and provision should be made,

by which they can be cleaned out and examined regularly--the

drainage at these periods also undergoing inspection at the

different traps.

_Plow-Draining._ We have no draining-plows in use in Ireland, that

I know of; the common plow is sometimes used for marking off the

drains, cutting the sides, and throwing out the earth to a

considerable depth, thereby lessening the manual labor

considerably. Efforts have been made in England to produce an

efficient implement of this description; but it would appear there

is ample room for an inventive Jonathan to walk in for a profitable

patent in this department, and thus add another to the many

valuable ones brought out in your great country.

_Case of Obstruction in Tiles._ Some years since, one of the

principal main-drains on this farm was observed not discharging the

water freely, as it hitherto had done, after a heavy fall of rain;

and the land adjoining it showed unmistakable signs of wetness. The

drain was opened, and traced to the point of obstruction, which was

found to be convenient to a _small poplar tree_, the rootlets of

which made their way into the tiles, at the depth of five and a

half feet, and completely filled them, in the direction of the

stream, for several yards. We have some of the tiles (horse-shoe)

in our museum here, as they were then lifted from the drain,

showing clearly the formidable nature of the obstruction. Another

serious case of obstruction has come to my knowledge, occasioned by

frogs or toads getting into the tiles of the main-drain in large

numbers, on account of the outlet being insufficiently protected.

In this case, a large expenditure had to be incurred, to repair the

damage done.

I have not observed any case of obstruction from the roots of our

cultivated plants. It has been said by some that the rootlets of

mangold will reach the drains under them; and, particularly, where

the drains contain most water in rapid motion. I took up the tiles

from a drain on this farm, in '54, which had been laid down (by a

former occupier), about the year '44, at a depth not exceeding

two-and-a-half feet, and not one of these was obstructed in the

least degree, although parsnips, carrots, cabbages, mangolds, &c.,

had been grown on this field. Obstructions may occur through the

agency of _mineral_ springs; but very few cases of this nature are

met with, at least in this country. I would anticipate this class

of obstruction, if from the nature of the land there was reason to

expect it, by increasing the fall in the drains and having _traps_

more frequent, where the main outlets are at a distance to render

them necessary. In my opinion, the roots of trees are the great

intruders to be guarded against, and more particularly the

_soft_-wooded sorts, such as poplars, willows, alders, &c. The

distance of a drain from a tree ought always to be equal to the

height of the latter.

_Tiles flattening in the drying process._ With this subject, I am

not practically familiar. In most tile-works, the tiles, after

passing through the moulding-machine, are placed horizontally on

shelves, which rise one above another to any convenient height, on

which the tiles are dried by means of heated flues which traverse

the sheds where the work is carried on; or they are allowed to dry

without artificial heat. I prefer the tiles prepared by the latter

method, as, if sufficient time be given them to be well dried, they

will burn more equally, and be more durable. The tiles will flatten

more or less for the first day or two on the shelves, after which

they are _rolled_. This is done by boys (who are provided with

pieces of wood of a diameter equal to the bore of the tile when

made), who very soon learn to get over a large number daily. The

"roller" should have a shouldered handle attached, the whole

thickness of which should not be greater than that of the tile. The

_shoulder_ is necessary to make the _ends_ of the tiles even, that

there may be no _very open_ joints when they are placed in a drain.

Once rolled, the tiles are not likely to flatten again, if the

operation be performed at the proper time.

As good tiles as I ever saw were dried in a different way, and not

rolled at all. As they were taken from the machine--six at a

time--each carrier passed off with his tray, and placed them _on

end_ carefully, upon an _even floor_. When five or six rows of

tiles were thus placed, the whole length of the drying-house, a

board was set on edge to keep them from falling to one side; then

followed five or six other rows of tiles, and so on, till the

drying-ground was filled.

This was the plan adopted in a tilery near Dublin, some years ago.

It is only a few days since I examined some of the tiles made at

these works, which had been taken from a drain, where they had been

in use for nine years; and the _clear ringing sound_ produced by

striking them against each other, showed what little effect that

length of time produced upon them, and how well they had been

manufactured.

_Cost of Tiles._ We have recently paid at the works--

For 1-1/2 inch pipes 17s. 6d. per thousand.

" 2 " 25s. "

" 3 " 45s. "

Each tile one foot in length, and the one and one-half-inch pipes

weighing 16 cwt. per thousand.

One of the great difficulties in connection with tile-making is, in

many districts, to procure clay sufficiently free from lime. Tiles

are very often sold by sample, sent a considerable distance, and it

becomes necessary to test them, which we do (for

lime) by placing them in water for a night; and, if lime is present

in the tile, it will, of course, swell out, and break the latter,

or leave it in a riddled state.

I have now endeavored to answer the queries in your postscript, and

I have carefully avoided enlarging on some points in them with

which your readers are already familiar. If I shall have thrown a

single ray of additional light on this subject across the Atlantic,

I shall be amply repaid for any attention I have given to

thorough-drainage during the past twelve years.

I should here observe that I mislaid amongst my papers the portion

of your letter containing the queries (it was a separate sheet),

and it has not as yet turned up, so that I had to depend on a

rather treacherous memory to keep the queries in my mind's eye. It

is highly probable, therefore, that I have overlooked some of them.

This circumstance was the chief cause of the delay in writing.

You are quite at liberty to make any use you please of this

communication.

WILLIAM BOYLE.

INDEX.

Absorption of moisture; 303, 304, 322

" Fertilizing substances; 268

Aeration; 269, 276

Albert Model Farm; 375

American experiments; 367

Anderson, J. F.; 112

Arrangement of drains; 173

Artesian Wells; 83

Attraction, adhesive; 301

" capillary; 302

" of soils for vapor; 304

Auger, Elkington's; 35, 246

Bache, Prof.; 65

Back water; 181

Barn cellar; 356-359

Bergen, Mr.; 199

Birmingham spades; 240

Bletonism; 36

Blodgett, Lorin; 51, 59

Bligh, Captain; 24, 27

Bogs; 91

Boning-rod; 234

Bore, form of; 129

Boring; 35, 365

Boring tools; 35, 346

Boyle, Wm.; 375

Branch pipes; 196, 378

Bricks, draining; 121, 144

" cost of; 204

Brush drains; 104, 105

Capacity of pipes; 131, 132, 134, 201

Capillary attraction; 302

Cellars, drainage of; 351-359

Challoner's Level; 235

Clay soil; 167, 329

Clays, drainage of; 322-332

Clays, cracking of; 275, 324-331

Collars; 47, 126, 127, 128, 219, 316, 320, 378

Cold from evaporation; 63, 272

Cost of drainage; 211-224, 309, 376

" tiles; 201-205, 381

Count Rumford; 272, 273, 287

_Country Gentleman_; 16, 198, 329

Crisp, Thomas; 203

Custis, G. W. P.; 18

Dams; 333, 347

Deanston system; 37

Delafield; 46, 76, 168

Denton, J. Bailey; 21, 161

" Letter from; 200

Depth of drains; 164-173, 326, 328, 377

Directions how to lay drains; 252-258

Dew, cause of; 305

" increased by drainage; 284, 306

" imparts warmth; 307

Dew-point; 65, 66, 306

Dickinson, A. B.; 108

Direction of drains; 146-155

Distance " ; 155-164, 377

Ditch diggers; 247-251

Drainage acts; 349

" companies; 333

" effects of; 258-276

" methods of; 99-120

" water of; 60, 61, 339

Drainage, will it pay? 95

Drain bricks; 121, 144

Drains of brush; 104

" larch tubes; 111

" plug; 106

" of poles; 113

" rails; 112

" stones; 114-119

" wedge; 110

" run before rain; 269, 270

Drought, drains prevent; 281-286, 300

Dry Wells; 197, 198

Durability of drains; 141-145

Elkington's system; 27, 33, 240, 365

Embankment; 18

Emerson, R. W.; 15, 23

Engineering; 163, 213

England; 19, 340

" wet land in; 89

English tools; 243

Evaporation; 48, 61, 62, 293-297

" cold from; 63, 272, 293-297

" from land; 62, 69, 72

" " water; 62, 69, 73

Excavation; 165

" cost of; 165, 201, 214

" table of; 216

Experiments, American; 367, 376

Factory reservoirs; 341-343

Fall in drains; 174, 378

Fences; 211, 346

Filtration; 41, 60, 61

Filtration tables of; 70, 71

Fitzherbert; 23

Flat-bottomed tiles; 129

Flowage, effects of; 333, 341, 343, 346

Flushing drains; 186

Freezing out; 75, 262

" of pipes; 171

French's plan; 373

Friction of water; 131, 133

Frost; 67, 143, 170, 172, 297, 299

Fruit trees; 298, 374

Furrows; 195

Gauge; 246

Germination; 276-281

Gillis, Lieut.; 65

Gisborne; 122, 126

Gravitation; 131

Grading drains; 233

Gratings at outlets; 183

Great Britain; 89

" wet lands in; 89

Greeley, Horace; 88

Haarlaem, Lake; 19

Headers; 153, 154

Heat in wet land; 288-290

" water; 272, 273

Hobbs, Doctor; 51, 54, 56

Holyoke, Doctor; 62

Horse-shoe tiles; 124

Implements; 225, 252

Indications of moisture; 93

Injury by drainage; 308, 313

Ireland, drainage in; 376

Irrigation; 14

Irish spade; 238

Johnson, B. P.; 17

Johnston, John; 46, 168, 256, 262, 328, 329

Johnstone; 28, 31, 120

Joints, how covered; 255

" spaces at; 134, 140

Junction of drains; 195, 196

Keythorpe system; 40

Klippart, J. H.; 16

Land Drainage Companies; 349

Larch tubes; 111

Lardner, Dr.; 270

Laying out drains; 213, 253

Laying tiles; 219, 252-258

Legal rights to water; 85, 86, 346

Legislation; 340

Levelling instruments; 229-235

Lincolnshire fens; 19, 310

Lines, use of; 233, 253

Lord Lincoln's Act; 347

Madden, Doctor; 276

Mains, position and size of; 190-194

Mangolds, obstruction by; 316, 317, 379

Mapes, Prof.; 16, 167

Massachusetts, laws; 347

Mechi, Sheriff; 260, 339

Methods of drainage; 99

Mice; 104, 116, 315

Mill dams; 340-344

Mill streams; 89, 333

Minors; 194

Moisture, sources of; 78

Moles; 104, 116

Mole drains; 107

Mole Plow; 108

Moon, influence of; 306

Morris, Edward; 60

Nash, Prof.; 199

Nene River; 337

New York Park; 47, 219

Nourse, B. F.; 285, 299, 367

" statement and plan of; 195, 367, 372

Obstruction of drains; 313-320

" by sand; 313, 321

" by frogs, &c.; 183, 315, 379

" per-oxide of iron; 317

" roots; 315, 316, 379

" filling at joints; 319

Open ditches; 99, 263

" objections to; 101, 102

Opening ditches; 252

Outfalls; 345

Outlets; 176-183, 219, 252, 257, 315, 378

Over-draining peats; 309, 366

Parkes, Josiah; 25, 38, 40, 128

Paul's ditcher; 250

Peat tiles; 113

Peats, over-draining of; 309, 366

Peep-holes; 187, 188, 321, 373

Per-oxide of iron; 317

Pettibone, J. S.; 329

Picks; 245

Pipes; 47, 122, 123, 144

" capacity of; 131-138, 159, 191, 193

" cost in England; 201, 204

" " United States; 202-205, 218

" position of; 190-194

Pipe layer; 244, 245

Plans of drains; 195, 372, 377

" importance of; 161

Plow, use of; 253, 379

Plow, Fowler's drain; 247, 248

" Shanghae; 109

Paul's ditcher; 250

Routt's; 251

Plug drains; 107

Pole drain; 113

Pratt's Ditch digger; 248, 249

Pressure of water; 131, 132, 331, 332, 356

" water of; 84

Process of draining; 252-258

Puddling; 198, 266, 323

Pulverization; 260, 282, 299

Rain; 48, 158, 159, 284

Rain-fall; 50, 158, 378

Rain-fall, tables of; 53-60, 70-73

Relief pipes; 184, 186

Reservoirs; 341, 343

Ridge and furrow; 195

Rolling pipes; 205, 380

Roots, length of; 258, 259, 283

" obstruction by; 315, 316, 379

Round pipes; 47, 122

Rumford, Count; 272, 273, 287

Ruffin, Edmund, Esq.; 29, 364

Rye and Derwent; 344

Saturation; 66

Scoops; 244

Screens at outlets; 183

Season lengthened; 261

Shallow drains; 168

Shanghae plow; 109

Shedd and Edson; 21, 51, 372

Shoulder drain; 110

Shovels; 236, 237

Silt basin; 186, 379

Sinkholes; 198

Size of tiles; 190, 201, 377

Smith, of Deanston; 26, 37

Snow, fall of; 59

Sole-tile; 125

Spades; 235, 236, 240-242

Spirit level; 230

Springs; 78-83

" drainage of; 34

" run before rain; 270-271

" how to preserve; 189

Staff and target; 231

Stagnant water; 93

Stone drains; 114-119, 377

" cost of; 114, 222

Stones above tiles; 118

Streams affected by drainage; 333-340

Subsoil plow; 169

Subsoiler, Marcus and Co.'s; 107

Surface washing prevented; 261

Swallow-holes; 197, 198

Swamps; 91, 360

" drainage of; 360-363

Swamp-lands; 17

Swan, R. J.; 168

System, importance of; 160, 173

Tables of evaporation; 72, 73

" excavation; 216

" filtration; 70, 71

" rain-fall; 53-59, 71-73

" of tiles to acre; 220

" number of rods; 220

" capacity of pipes; 135-138

Talpa; 23

Temperature; 67, 189, 280, 287-300

" underground; 187, 288, 291

" for vegetation; 271

Thermometer, wet and dry; 64, 65

Thomas, J. J.; 229

Tile-drainage; 120

Tiles, cost in England; 201, 212

" " United States; 201-205

" forms of; 122-130

" length of; 221

" size of; 130-138

" weight of; 219

" number to the acre; 220

Tile machines; 46, 202-210

Tile-works; 47, 121

Tools; 225-246

Tops and bottoms; 140, 319, 379

Traps; 185, 186, 379, 380

Velocity of water; 131

Vermin; 104

Virginia; 18, 364

Warder, Doctor; 346

Water, how it enters; 138, 314, 320

" stagnant; 93

" of drainage, uses of; 189, 339

" velocity of; 131

Water passage; 129

Water-line; 51, 139

Water-powers; 333, 335, 341-345

Water of pressure; 84, 161

Water, pressure of; 84, 140, 141

" rights in; 85, 86

Wedge drain; 110, 236

Weight of tiles; 219, 381

Wells, drainage into; 197-199

" dried by drains; 85, 366

Well and relief-pipe; 184-186

Well with silt trap; 186

Wharncliffe system; 44

Width of ditches; 215-218, 226

Wright, Gov.; 17

Yeomans, T. G.; 46, 108

* * * * *

Transcriber's Note:

Summarized here are the corrections applied to the text.

List of Engravings:

Drain Gauge

"Gauge" was printed as "Guage"

H. F. French's Drainage 376

the page number was printed as "374"

unmindful of their obligations to him

"unmindful" was printed as "unmindul"

of gauging

the quantity of water traveling along an important drain

"gauging" was printed as "guaging"

were removed, a pond would remain

"would" was unreadable in the Original

knowledge of the subject

"knowledge" was printed as "knowlege"

That drains will long continue to be opened in

this vast country by hand labor

"vast" was printed as "fast"

the greater permanency

of tiles

"permanency" was printed as "permanancy"

have come to our knowledge

"knowledge" was printed as "knowlege"

lay drains deep enough to be beyond the danger of water

bursting in

"bursting" was printed as "brusting"

people of Great Britain

"Britain" was printed as "Britian"

The farmer sees his

thousand bushels of potatoes submerged

"potatoes" was printed as "potatos"

the temperature at the latter

depth

"the" was printed twice

representing the

cellar referred to

"cellar" was printed as "celler"

and another outside

"another" was printed as "auother"

becomes necessary to test them

"to" was printed twice

Farm drainage The Principles, Processes, and Effects of Draining Land with Stones, Wood, Plows, and Open Ditches, and Especially with Tiles · 第 24 / 24 章