THE ANCESTRAL BOND

A WELL-KNOWN citizen of Ohio once discovered another man of the same

name exactly resembling him, and writing a "hand" which, including the

signature, he was unable to distinguish from his own. The two men

were unable to discover any blood relationship between them. It is

nevertheless almost absolutely certain that a relationship existed,

though it may have been so remote a degree that the familiar term

"forty-second cousin" would not have exaggerated the slenderness of the

tie. The phenomena of heredity have been inattentively noted; its laws

are imperfectly understood, even by Herbert Spencer and the prophets. My

own small study in this amazing field convinces me that a man is the

sum of his ancestors; that his character, moral and intellectual,

is determined before his birth. His environment with all its varied

suasions, its agencies of good and evil; breeding, training, interest,

experience and the rest of it--have little to do with the matter and can

not alter the sentence passed upon him at conception, compelling him to

be what he is.

Man is the hither end of an immeasurable line extending back to the

ultimate Adam--or, as we scientists prefer to name him, Protoplasmos.

Man travels, not the mental road that he would, but the one that he

must--is pushed this way and that by the resultant of all the forces

behind him; for each member of the ancestral line, though dead, yet

pusfaedi. In one of what Dr. Nolmes (Holmes, ed.) calls his "medicated

novels," _The Guardian Angel_, this truth is most admirably and lucidly

set forth with abundant instance and copious exposition. Upon another

work of his, _Elsie Venner_--in which he erroneously affirms the

influence of circumstance and environment--let us lay a charitable hand

and fling it into the fire.

Clearly all one's ancestors have not equal power in shaping his

character. Conceiving them, according to our figure, as arranged in line

behind him and influential in the ratio of their individuality, we shall

get the best notion of their method by supposing them to have taken

their places in an order somewhat independent of chronology and a little

different from their arrangement behind his brother. Immediately at his

back, with a controlling hand (a trifle skinny) upon him, may stand his

great-grandmother, while his father may be many removes arear. Or

the place of power may be held by some fine old Asian gentleman who

flourished before the confusion of tongues on the plain of Shinar; or by

some cave-dweller who polished the bone of life in Mesopotamia and was

perhaps a respectable and honest troglodyte.

Sometimes a whole platoon of ancestors appears to have been moved

backward or forward, _en bloc_ not, we may be sure, capriciously, but in

obedience to some law that we do not understand. I know a man to whose

character not an ancestor since the seventeenth century has contributed

an element. Intellectually he is a contemporary of John Dryden, whom

naturally he reveres as the greatest of poets. I know another who has

inherited his handwriting from his great-grandfather, although he has

been trained to the Spencerian system and tried hard to acquire it.

Furthermore, his handwriting follows the same order of progressive

development as that of his greatgrandfather. At the age of twenty he

wrote exactly as his ancestor did at the same age, and, although at

forty-five his chirography is nothing like what it was even ten years

ago, it is accurately like his great-grandfather's at forty-five. It was

only five years ago that the discovery of some old letters showed

him how his great-grandfather wrote, and accounted for the absolute

dissimilarity of his own handwriting to that of any known member of his

family.

To suppose that such individual traits as the configuration of the

body, the color of the hair and eyes, the shape of hands and feet, the

thousand-and-one subtle characteristics that make family resemblances

are transmissible, and that the form, texture and capacities of

the brain which fix the degree of natural intellect, are _not_

transmissible, is illogical and absurd. We see that certain actions,

such as gestures, gait, and so forth, resulting from the most complex

concurrences of brain, nerves and muscles, are hereditary. Is it

reasonable to suppose that the brain alone of all the organs performs

its work according to its own sweet will, free from congenital

tendencies? Is it not a familiar fact that racial characteristics are

persistent?--that one race is stupid and indocile, another quick and

intelligent? Does not each generation of a race inherit the intellectual

qualities of the preceding generation? How could this be true of

generations and not of individuals?

As to stirpiculture, the intelligent and systematic breeding of men and

women with a view to improvement of the species--it is a thing of the

far future, It is hardly in sight. Yet, what splendid possibilities it

carries! Two or three generations of as careful breeding as we bestow

on horses, dogs and pigeons would do more good than all the penal,

reformatory and educating agencies of the world accomplish in a thousand

years. It is the one direction in which human effort to "elevate the

race" can be assured of a definitive, speedy and adequate success. It

is hardly better than nonsense to prate of any good coming to the race

through (for example) medical science, which is mainly concerned in

reversing the beneficent operation of natural laws and saving the

unfittest to perpetuate their unfitness. Our entire system of charities

is of, to the same objection; it cares for the incapables whom Nature

is trying to "weed out," This not only debases the race physically,

intellectually and morally, but constantly increases the rate of

debasement. The proportion of criminals, paupers and the various kinds

of "inmates" of charitable institutions augments its horrible percentage

yearly. On the other hand, our wars destroy the capable; so thus we make

inroads upon the vitality of the race from two directions. We preserve

the feeble and extirpate the strong. He who, in view of this amazing

folly can believe in a constant, even slow, progress of the human

race toward perfection ought to be happy. He has a mind whose Olympian

heights are inaccessible--the Titans of fact can never scale them to

storm its ancient reign.

The Shadow On The Dial, and Other Essays 1909 · 第 65 / 67 题