I.

This is my ultimate and determining test of right--"What, in the

circumstances, would Christ have done?"--the Christ of the New

Testament, not the Christ of the commentators, theologians, priests

and parsons. The test is perhaps not infallible, but it is exceedingly

simple and gives as good practical results as any. I am not a Christian,

but so far as I know, the best and truest and sweetest character in

literature, is next to Buddha, Jesus Christ. He taught nothing new in

goodness, for all goodness was ages old before he came; but with an

almost infallible intuition he applied to life and conduct the entire

law of righteousness. He was a lightning moral calculator: to his

luminous intelligence the statement of the problem carried the

solution--he could not hesitate, he seldom erred. That upon his deeds

and words was founded a religion which in a debased form persists and

even spreads to this day is mere attestation of his marvelous gift:

adoration is a primitive mode of recognition.

It seems a pity that this wonderful man had not a longer life under more

complex conditions--conditions more nearly identical with those of the

modern world and the future. One would like to be able to see, through

the eyes of his biographers, his genius applied to more and more

difficult questions. Yet one can hardly go wrong in inference of his

thought and act. In many of the complexities and entanglements of

modern affairs it is no easy matter to find an answer off-hand to the

question,"What is it right to do?" But put it in another way: "What

would Christ have done?" and lo! there is light. I Doubt spreads her

bat-like wings and is away; the sun of truth springs into the sky,

splendoring the path of right and marking that of error with a deeper

shade.

The Shadow On The Dial, and Other Essays 1909 · 第 50 / 67 题