The primitive government of Rome was composed, with some political

skill, of an elective king, a council of nobles, and a general assembly

of the people. War and religion were administered by the supreme

magistrate; and he alone proposed the laws, which were debated in the

senate, and finally ratified or rejected by a majority of votes in

the thirty _curi_ or parishes of the city. Romulus, Numa, and Servius

Tullius, are celebrated as the most ancient legislators; and each

of them claims his peculiar part in the threefold division of

jurisprudence. The laws of marriage, the education of children, and the

authority of parents, which may seem to draw their origin from _nature_

itself, are ascribed to the untutored wisdom of Romulus. The law of

_nations_ and of religious worship, which Numa introduced, was derived

from his nocturnal converse with the nymph Egeria. The _civil_ law is

attributed to the experience of Servius: he balanced the rights and

fortunes of the seven classes of citizens; and guarded, by fifty new

regulations, the observance of contracts and the punishment of crimes.

The state, which he had inclined towards a democracy, was changed by the

last Tarquin into a lawless despotism; and when the kingly office was

abolished, the patricians engrossed the benefits of freedom. The royal

laws became odious or obsolete; the mysterious deposit was silently

preserved by the priests and nobles; and at the end of sixty years, the

citizens of Rome still complained that they were ruled by the arbitrary

sentence of the magistrates. Yet the positive institutions of the kings

had blended themselves with the public and private manners of the city,

some fragments of that venerable jurisprudence were compiled by the

diligence of antiquarians, and above twenty texts still speak the

rudeness of the Pelasgic idiom of the Latins.

I shall not repeat the well-known story of the Decemvirs, who sullied by

their actions the honor of inscribing on brass, or wood, or ivory, the

Twelve Tables of the Roman laws. They were dictated by the rigid and

jealous spirit of an aristocracy, which had yielded with reluctance to

the just demands of the people. But the substance of the Twelve Tables

was adapted to the state of the city; and the Romans had emerged

from Barbarism, since they were capable of studying and embracing the

institutions of their more enlightened neighbors. A wise Ephesian was

driven by envy from his native country: before he could reach the shores

of Latium, he had observed the various forms of human nature and civil

society: he imparted his knowledge to the legislators of Rome, and a

statue was erected in the forum to the perpetual memory of Hermodorus.

The names and divisions of the copper money, the sole coin of the

infant state, were of Dorian origin: the harvests of Campania and Sicily

relieved the wants of a people whose agriculture was often interrupted

by war and faction; and since the trade was established, the deputies

who sailed from the Tyber might return from the same harbors with a more

precious cargo of political wisdom. The colonies of Great Greece had

transported and improved the arts of their mother country. CumÊ and

Rhegium, Crotona and Tarentum, Agrigentum and Syracuse, were in the

rank of the most flourishing cities. The disciples of Pythagoras applied

philosophy to the use of government; the unwritten laws of Charondas

accepted the aid of poetry and music, and Zaleucus framed the republic

of the Locrians, which stood without alteration above two hundred years.

From a similar motive of national pride, both Livy and Dionysius are

willing to believe, that the deputies of Rome visited Athens under the

wise and splendid administration of Pericles; and the laws of Solon were

transfused into the twelve tables. If such an embassy had indeed been

received from the Barbarians of Hesperia, the Roman name would have been

familiar to the Greeks before the reign of Alexander; and the faintest

evidence would have been explored and celebrated by the curiosity of

succeeding times. But the Athenian monuments are silent; nor will it

seem credible that the patricians should undertake a long and perilous

navigation to copy the purest model of democracy. In the comparison of

the tables of Solon with those of the Decemvirs, some casual resemblance

may be found; some rules which nature and reason have revealed to every

society; some proofs of a common descent from Egypt or Phnicia. But in

all the great lines of public and private jurisprudence, the legislators

of Rome and Athens appear to be strangers or adverse at each other.

Chapter XLIV: Idea Of The Roman Jurisprudence.--Part II.

Whatever might be the origin or the merit of the twelve tables, they

obtained among the Romans that blind and partial reverence which

the lawyers of every country delight to bestow on their municipal

institutions. The study is recommended by Cicero as equally pleasant and

instructive. "They amuse the mind by the remembrance of old words and

the portrait of ancient manners; they inculcate the soundest principles

of government and morals; and I am not afraid to affirm, that the brief

composition of the Decemvirs surpasses in genuine value the libraries of

Grecian philosophy. How admirable," says Tully, with honest or affected

prejudice, "is the wisdom of our ancestors! We alone are the masters of

civil prudence, and our superiority is the more conspicuous, if we deign

to cast our eyes on the rude and almost ridiculous jurisprudence of

Draco, of Solon, and of Lycurgus." The twelve tables were committed

to the memory of the young and the meditation of the old; they were

transcribed and illustrated with learned diligence; they had escaped the

flames of the Gauls, they subsisted in the age of Justinian, and their

subsequent loss has been imperfectly restored by the labors of modern

critics. But although these venerable monuments were considered as the

rule of right and the fountain of justice, they were overwhelmed by the

weight and variety of new laws, which, at the end of five centuries,

became a grievance more intolerable than the vices of the city. Three

thousand brass plates, the acts of the senate of the people, were

deposited in the Capitol: and some of the acts, as the Julian law

against extortion, surpassed the number of a hundred chapters. The

Decemvirs had neglected to import the sanction of Zaleucus, which so

long maintained the integrity of his republic. A Locrian, who proposed

any new law, stood forth in the assembly of the people with a cord

round his neck, and if the law was rejected, the innovator was instantly

strangled.

The Decemvirs had been named, and their tables were approved, by an

assembly of the _centuries_, in which riches preponderated against

numbers. To the first class of Romans, the proprietors of one hundred

thousand pounds of copper, ninety-eight votes were assigned, and

only ninety-five were left for the six inferior classes, distributed

according to their substance by the artful policy of Servius. But the

tribunes soon established a more specious and popular maxim, that every

citizen has an equal right to enact the laws which he is bound to

obey. Instead of the _centuries_, they convened the _tribes_; and the

patricians, after an impotent struggle, submitted to the decrees of an

assembly, in which their votes were confounded with those of the meanest

plebeians. Yet as long as the tribes successively passed over narrow

_bridges_ and gave their voices aloud, the conduct of each citizen

was exposed to the eyes and ears of his friends and countrymen. The

insolvent debtor consulted the wishes of his creditor; the client would

have blushed to oppose the views of his patron; the general was followed

by his veterans, and the aspect of a grave magistrate was a living

lesson to the multitude. A new method of secret ballot abolished the

influence of fear and shame, of honor and interest, and the abuse of

freedom accelerated the progress of anarchy and despotism. The

Romans had aspired to be equal; they were levelled by the equality of

servitude; and the dictates of Augustus were patiently ratified by

the formal consent of the tribes or centuries. Once, and once only,

he experienced a sincere and strenuous opposition. His subjects had

resigned all political liberty; they defended the freedom of domestic

life. A law which enforced the obligation, and strengthened the bonds

of marriage, was clamorously rejected; Propertius, in the arms of Delia,

applauded the victory of licentious love; and the project of reform was

suspended till a new and more tractable generation had arisen in the

world. Such an example was not necessary to instruct a prudent usurper

of the mischief of popular assemblies; and their abolition, which

Augustus had silently prepared, was accomplished without resistance, and

almost without notice, on the accession of his successor. Sixty thousand

plebeian legislators, whom numbers made formidable, and poverty secure,

were supplanted by six hundred senators, who held their honors, their

fortunes, and their lives, by the clemency of the emperor. The loss of

executive power was alleviated by the gift of legislative authority; and

Ulpian might assert, after the practice of two hundred years, that the

decrees of the senate obtained the force and validity of laws. In the

times of freedom, the resolves of the people had often been dictated by

the passion or error of the moment: the Cornelian, Pompeian, and Julian

laws were adapted by a single hand to the prevailing disorders; but the

senate, under the reign of the CÊsars, was composed of magistrates and

lawyers, and in questions of private jurisprudence, the integrity of

their judgment was seldom perverted by fear or interest.

The silence or ambiguity of the laws was supplied by the occasional

edicts of those magistrates who were invested with the _honors_ of the

state. This ancient prerogative of the Roman kings was transferred, in

their respective offices, to the consuls and dictators, the censors and

prÊtors; and a similar right was assumed by the tribunes of the people,

the ediles, and the proconsuls. At Rome, and in the provinces, the

duties of the subject, and the intentions of the governor, were

proclaimed; and the civil jurisprudence was reformed by the annual

edicts of the supreme judge, the prÊtor of the city. As soon as he

ascended his tribunal, he announced by the voice of the crier, and

afterwards inscribed on a white wall, the rules which he proposed to

follow in the decision of doubtful cases, and the relief which his

equity would afford from the precise rigor of ancient statutes. A

principle of discretion more congenial to monarchy was introduced into

the republic: the art of respecting the name, and eluding the efficacy,

of the laws, was improved by successive prÊtors; subtleties and fictions

were invented to defeat the plainest meaning of the Decemvirs, and where

the end was salutary, the means were frequently absurd. The secret or

probable wish of the dead was suffered to prevail over the order of

succession and the forms of testaments; and the claimant, who was

excluded from the character of heir, accepted with equal pleasure from

an indulgent prÊtor the possession of the goods of his late kinsman or

benefactor. In the redress of private wrongs, compensations and fines

were substituted to the obsolete rigor of the Twelve Tables; time and

space were annihilated by fanciful suppositions; and the plea of

youth, or fraud, or violence, annulled the obligation, or excused the

performance, of an inconvenient contract. A jurisdiction thus vague and

arbitrary was exposed to the most dangerous abuse: the substance, as

well as the form, of justice were often sacrificed to the prejudices of

virtue, the bias of laudable affection, and the grosser seductions of

interest or resentment. But the errors or vices of each prÊtor expired

with his annual office; such maxims alone as had been approved by reason

and practice were copied by succeeding judges; the rule of proceeding

was defined by the solution of new cases; and the temptations of

injustice were removed by the Cornelian law, which compelled the

prÊtor of the year to adhere to the spirit and letter of his first

proclamation. It was reserved for the curiosity and learning of Adrian,

to accomplish the design which had been conceived by the genius of

CÊsar; and the prÊtorship of Salvius Julian, an eminent lawyer,

was immortalized by the composition of the Perpetual Edict. This

well-digested code was ratified by the emperor and the senate; the long

divorce of law and equity was at length reconciled; and, instead of the

Twelve Tables, the perpetual edict was fixed as the invariable standard

of civil jurisprudence.

From Augustus to Trajan, the modest CÊsars were content to promulgate

their edicts in the various characters of a Roman magistrate; and, in

the decrees of the senate, the _epistles_ and _orations_ of the prince

were respectfully inserted. Adrian appears to have been the first who

assumed, without disguise, the plenitude of legislative power. And this

innovation, so agreeable to his active mind, was countenanced by the

patience of the times, and his long absence from the seat of government.

The same policy was embraced by succeeding monarchs, and, according to

the harsh metaphor of Tertullian, "the gloomy and intricate forest

of ancient laws was cleared away by the axe of royal mandates and

_constitutions_." During four centuries, from Adrian to Justinian

the public and private jurisprudence was moulded by the will of the

sovereign; and few institutions, either human or divine, were permitted

to stand on their former basis. The origin of Imperial legislation was

concealed by the darkness of ages and the terrors of armed despotism;

and a double fiction was propagated by the servility, or perhaps the

ignorance, of the civilians, who basked in the sunshine of the Roman and

Byzantine courts. 1. To the prayer of the ancient CÊsars, the people

or the senate had sometimes granted a personal exemption from the

obligation and penalty of particular statutes; and each indulgence was

an act of jurisdiction exercised by the republic over the first of

her citizens. His humble privilege was at length transformed into the

prerogative of a tyrant; and the Latin expression of "released from the

laws" was supposed to exalt the emperor above _all_ human restraints,

and to leave his conscience and reason as the sacred measure of his

conduct. 2. A similar dependence was implied in the decrees of the

senate, which, in every reign, defined the titles and powers of an

elective magistrate. But it was not before the ideas, and even the

language, of the Romans had been corrupted, that a _royal_ law, and an

irrevocable gift of the people, were created by the fancy of Ulpian, or

more probably of Tribonian himself; and the origin of Imperial power,

though false in fact, and slavish in its consequence, was supported on

a principle of freedom and justice. "The pleasure of the emperor has the

vigor and effect of law, since the Roman people, by the royal law,

have transferred to their prince the full extent of their own power and

sovereignty." The will of a single man, of a child perhaps, was allowed

to prevail over the wisdom of ages and the inclinations of millions; and

the degenerate Greeks were proud to declare, that in his hands alone

the arbitrary exercise of legislation could be safely deposited. "What

interest or passion," exclaims Theophilus in the court of Justinian,

"can reach the calm and sublime elevation of the monarch? He is already

master of the lives and fortunes of his subjects; and those who have

incurred his displeasure are already numbered with the dead." Disdaining

the language of flattery, the historian may confess, that in questions

of private jurisprudence, the absolute sovereign of a great empire can

seldom be influenced by any personal considerations. Virtue, or even

reason, will suggest to his impartial mind, that he is the guardian

of peace and equity, and that the interest of society is inseparably

connected with his own. Under the weakest and most vicious reign, the

seat of justice was filled by the wisdom and integrity of Papinian and

Ulpian; and the purest materials of the Code and Pandects are inscribed

with the names of Caracalla and his ministers. The tyrant of Rome was

sometimes the benefactor of the provinces. A dagger terminated the

crimes of Domitian; but the prudence of Nerva confirmed his acts, which,

in the joy of their deliverance, had been rescinded by an indignant

senate. Yet in the _rescripts_, replies to the consultations of the

magistrates, the wisest of princes might be deceived by a partial

exposition of the case. And this abuse, which placed their hasty

decisions on the same level with mature and deliberate acts of

legislation, was ineffectually condemned by the sense and example of

Trajan. The _rescripts_ of the emperor, his _grants_ and _decrees_, his

_edicts_ and _pragmatic sanctions_, were subscribed in purple ink,

and transmitted to the provinces as general or special laws, which the

magistrates were bound to execute, and the people to obey. But as their

number continually multiplied, the rule of obedience became each day

more doubtful and obscure, till the will of the sovereign was fixed and

ascertained in the Gregorian, the Hermogenian, and the Theodosian codes.

* The two first, of which some fragments have escaped, were framed by

two private lawyers, to preserve the constitutions of the Pagan emperors

from Adrian to Constantine. The third, which is still extant, was

digested in sixteen books by the order of the younger Theodosius to

consecrate the laws of the Christian princes from Constantine to his own

reign. But the three codes obtained an equal authority in the tribunals;

and any act which was not included in the sacred deposit might be

disregarded by the judge as spurious or obsolete.

Chapter XLIV: Idea Of The Roman Jurisprudence.--Part III.

Among savage nations, the want of letters is imperfectly supplied by

the use of visible signs, which awaken attention, and perpetuate the

remembrance of any public or private transaction. The jurisprudence of

the first Romans exhibited the scenes of a pantomime; the words were

adapted to the gestures, and the slightest error or neglect in the

_forms_ of proceeding was sufficient to annul the _substance_ of the

fairest claim. The communion of the marriage-life was denoted by the

necessary elements of fire and water; and the divorced wife resigned the

bunch of keys, by the delivery of which she had been invested with the

government of the family. The manumission of a son, or a slave, was

performed by turning him round with a gentle blow on the cheek; a work

was prohibited by the casting of a stone; prescription was interrupted

by the breaking of a branch; the clinched fist was the symbol of a

pledge or deposit; the right hand was the gift of faith and confidence.

The indenture of covenants was a broken straw; weights and scales were

introduced into every payment, and the heir who accepted a testament was

sometimes obliged to snap his fingers, to cast away his garments, and to

leap or dance with real or affected transport. If a citizen pursued any

stolen goods into a neighbor's house, he concealed his nakedness with

a linen towel, and hid his face with a mask or basin, lest he should

encounter the eyes of a virgin or a matron. In a civil action the

plaintiff touched the ear of his witness, seized his reluctant adversary

by the neck, and implored, in solemn lamentation, the aid of his

fellow-citizens. The two competitors grasped each other's hand as if

they stood prepared for combat before the tribunal of the prÊtor; he

commanded them to produce the object of the dispute; they went, they

returned with measured steps, and a clod of earth was cast at his feet

to represent the field for which they contended. This occult science

of the words and actions of law was the inheritance of the pontiffs

and patricians. Like the Chaldean astrologers, they announced to their

clients the days of business and repose; these important trifles were

interwoven with the religion of Numa; and after the publication of the

Twelve Tables, the Roman people was still enslaved by the ignorance of

judicial proceedings. The treachery of some plebeian officers at length

revealed the profitable mystery: in a more enlightened age, the

legal actions were derided and observed; and the same antiquity which

sanctified the practice, obliterated the use and meaning of this

primitive language.

History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire — Volume 4(#893) · 第 23 / 49 段