CHAPTER XX.

September, 1829.--A chasm of many months in my journal. When last I

closed it, little could I have foreseen the terrible blow that awaited

me. Well may I exclaim with the French writer whose works I have been

just reading, "_Nous, qui sommes bornés en tout, comment le sommes-nous

si peu quand il s'agit de souffrir_." How slowly has time passed since!

Every hour counted, and each coloured by care, the past turned to with

the vain hope of forgetting the present, and the future no longer

offering the bright prospect it once unfolded!

How is my destiny changed since I last opened this book! My hopes have

faded and vanished like the leaves whose opening into life I hailed

with joy six months ago, little dreaming that before the first cold

breath of autumn had tinted them with brown, _he_ who saw them expand

with me would have passed from the earth!

_October_.--Ill, and confined to my chamber for several days, my

physician prescribes society to relieve low spirits; but in the present

state of mine, the remedy seems worse than the disease.

My old friends Mr. and Mrs. Mathews, and their clever son, have arrived

at Paris and dined here yesterday. Mr. Matthews is as entertaining as

ever, and his wife as amiable and _spirituelle_. They are excellent as

well as clever people, and their society is very agreeable. Charles

Mathews, the son, is full of talent, possesses all his father's powers

of imitation, and sings comic songs of his own composition that James

Smith himself might be proud to have written.

The Duc and Duchesse de Guiche, the Marquise de Poulpry, Lady

Combermere, Madame Craufurd, and Count Valeski, came in the evening,

and were all highly gratified with some recitations and songs given us

by Mr. Mathews and his son. They were not less pleased with Mrs.

Mathews, whose manners and conversation are peculiarly fascinating, and

whose good looks and youthfulness of appearance made them almost

disbelieve that she could be the mother of a grown-up son.

How forcibly did the recitations and songs bring back former times to

my memory, when in St. James's Square, or in his own beautiful cottage

at Highgate, I have so frequently been delighted by the performances of

this clever and worthy man! The recollection of the past occupied me

more last night than did the actual present, and caused me to return

but a faint echo to the reiterated applause which every new effort of

his drew forth from the party. There are moments when the present

appears like a dream, and that we think the past, which is gone for

ever, has more of reality in it!

I took Mr. and Mrs. Mathews to the Jardin des Plantes to-day, and was

much amused by an incident that occurred there. A pretty child, with

her _bonne_, were seated on a bench near to which we placed ourselves.

She was asking questions relative to the animals she had seen, and Mr.

Mathews having turned his head away from her, gave some admirable

imitations of the sounds peculiar to the beasts of which she was

speaking, and also of the voice and speeches of the person who had

exhibited them.

Never did he exert himself more to please a crowded and admiring

audience than to amuse this child, who, maintaining an immovable

gravity during the imitations, quietly observed to her nurse, "_Ma

bonne, ce Monsieur est bien drôle_."

The mortification of Mr. Mathews on this occasion was very diverting.

"How!" exclaimed he, "is it possible that all my efforts to amuse that

child have so wholly failed? She never moved a muscle! I suppose the

French children are not so easily pleased as our English men and women

are?"

He reverted to this disappointment more than once during our drive

back, and seemed dispirited by it. Nevertheless, he gave us some most

humorous imitations of the lower orders of the French talking loudly

together, in which he spoke in so many different voices that one could

have imagined that no less than half-a-dozen people, at least, were

engaged in the conversation.

I think so highly of the intellectual powers of Mr. Mathews, and find

his conversation so interesting that, admirable as are his imitations,

I prefer the former. He has seen so much of the world in all its

phases, that he has a piquant anecdote or a clever story to relate

touching every place and almost every person mentioned. Yet, with all

this intuitive and acquired knowledge of the world, he possesses all

the simplicity of a child, and a good nature that never can resist an

appeal to it.

Spent all yesterday in reading, and writing letters on business. I

begin to experience the _ennui_ of having affairs to attend to, and

groan in spirit, if not aloud, at having to read and write dry details

on the subject. To unbend my mind from its painful thoughts and

tension, I devoted the evening to reading, which affords me the surest

relief, by transporting my thoughts from the cares that oppress me.

Had a long visit from my old acquaintance the Count de Montalembert,

to-day. He is in very low spirits, occasioned by the recent death of an

only and charming daughter, and could not restrain his deep emotion,

when recounting to me the particulars of her latter days. His grief was

contagious, and found a chord in my heart that responded to it. When we

last met, it was in a gay and brilliant party, each of us in high

spirits; and now, though but a few more years have passed over our

heads, how changed are our feelings! We meet, not to amuse and to be

amused, but to talk of those we have lost, and whose loss has darkened

our lives. He spoke of his son, who already gives the promise of

distinguishing himself, and of reflecting credit on his family.

How little do we know people whom we meet only in general society, in

which every one assumes a similar tone and manner, reserving for home

the peculiarities that distinguish each from the other, and suppressing

all demonstration of the feelings indulged only in the privacy of the

domestic circle!

I have been many years acquainted with the Count de Montalembert, yet

never really appreciated him until today. Had I been asked to describe

him yesterday, I should have spoken of him as a _spirituel_, lively,

and amusing man, with remarkably good manners, a great knowledge of the

world, and possessing in an eminent degree the tact and talent _de

société_. Had any one mentioned that he was a man of deep feeling, I

should have been disposed to question the discernment of the person who

asserted it: yet now I am as perfectly convinced of the fact as it is

possible to be, and had he paid this visit before affliction had

assailed me, he would not, I am convinced, have revealed his own grief.

Yes, affliction is like the divinatory wand, whose touch discovers

deep-buried springs the existence of which was previously unknown.

---- called on me to-day, and talked a good deal of ----. I endeavoured

to excite sympathy for the unhappy person, but failed in the attempt.

The unfortunate generally meet with more blame than pity; for as the

latter is a painful emotion, people endeavour to exonerate themselves

from its indulgence, by trying to discover some error which may have

led to the misfortune they are too selfish to commiserate. Alas! there

are but few friends who, like ivy, cling to ruin, and ---- is not one

of these.

The Prince and Princesse Soutzo dined with us yesterday. They are as

amiable and agreeable as ever, and I felt great gratification in

meeting them again. We talked over the many pleasant days we passed

together at Pisa. Alas! how changed is my domestic circle since then!

They missed _one_ who would have joined me in welcoming them to Paris,

and whose unvaried kindness they have not forgotten!

The "decent dignity" with which this interesting couple support their

altered fortunes, won my esteem on our first acquaintance. Prince

Soutzo was Hospodar, or reigning Prince of Moldavia, and married the

eldest daughter of Prince Carraga, Hospodar of Walachia. He maintained

the state attendant on his high rank, beloved and respected by those he

governed, until the patriotic sentiments inseparable from a great mind

induced him to sacrifice rank, fortune, and power, to the cause of

Greece, his native land. He only saved his life by flight; for the

angry Sultan with whom he had previously been a great favourite, had

already sent an order for his decapitation! Never was a reverse of

fortune borne with greater equanimity than by this charming family,

whose virtues, endowments, and acquirements, fit them for the most

elevated station.

My old acquaintances, Mr. Rogers the poet, and Mr. Luttrell, called on

me to-day. Of how many pleasant days in St. James's Square did the

sight of both remind me! Such days I shall pass there no more: but I

must not give way to reflections that are, alas! as unavailing as they

are painful. Both of these my old friends are unchanged. Time has dealt

gently by them during the seven years that have elapsed since we last

met: the restless tyrant has been less merciful to me. We may, however,

bear with equanimity the ravages of Time, if we meet the destroyer side

by side with those dear to us, those who have witnessed our youth and

maturity, and who have advanced with us into the autumn of life; but,

when they are lost to us, how dreary becomes the prospect!

How difficult it is to prevent the mind from dwelling on thoughts

fraught with sadness, when once the chord of memory vibrates to the

touch of grief!

Mr. Rogers talked of Byron, and evinced a deep feeling of regard for

his memory, He little knows the manner in which he is treated in a

certain poem, written by him in one of his angry moods, and which I

urged him, but in vain, to commit to the flames. The knowledge of it,

however, would, I am convinced, excite no wrath in the heart of Rogers,

who would feel more sorrow than anger that one he believed his friend

could have written so bitter a diatribe against him. And, truth to say,

the poem in question is more injurious to the memory of Byron than it

could be painful to him who is the subject of it; but I hope that it

may never be published, and I think no one who had delicacy or feeling

would bring it to light.

Byron read this lampoon to us one day at Genoa, and enjoyed our dismay

at it like a froward boy who has achieved what he considers some

mischievous prank. He offered us a copy, but we declined to accept it;

for, being in the habit of seeing Mr. Rogers frequently beneath our

roof, we thought it would be treacherous to him. Byron, however, found

others less scrupulous, and three or four copies of it have been given

away.

The love of mischief was strong in the heart of Byron even to the last,

but, while recklessly indulging it in trifles, he was capable of giving

proofs of exalted friendship to those against whom he practised it;

and, had Rogers stood in need of kindness, he would have found no lack

of it in his brother poet, even in the very hour he had penned the

malicious lampoon in question against him.

Comte d'Orsay, with his frank _naÏveté_, observed, "I thought you were

one of Mr. Rogers's most intimate friends, and so all the world had

reason to think, after reading your dedication of the _Giaour_ to him."

"Yes," answered Byron, laughing, "and it is our friendship that gives

me the privilege of taking a liberty with him."

"If it is thus you evince your friendship," replied Comte d'Orsay, "I

should be disposed to prefer your enmity."

"You," said Byron, "could never excite this last sentiment in my

breast, for you neither say nor do spiteful things."

Brief as was the period Byron had lived in what is termed fashionable

society in London, it was long enough to have engendered in him a habit

of _persiflage_, and a love of uttering sarcasms, (more from a desire

of displaying wit than from malice,) peculiar to that circle in which,

if every man's hand is not against his associates, every man's tongue

is. He drew no line of demarcation between _uttering_ and _writing_

satirical things; and the first being, if not sanctioned, at least

permitted in the society in which he had lived in London, he considered

himself not more culpable in inditing his satires than the others were

in speaking them. He would have laughed at being censured for putting

on paper the epigrammatic malice that his former associates would

delight in uttering before all except the person at whom it was aimed;

yet the world see the matter in another point of view, and many of

those who _speak_ as much evil of their _soi-disant_ friends, would

declare, if not feel, themselves shocked at Byron's writing it.

I know no more agreeable member of society than Mr. Luttrell. His

conversation, like a limpid stream, flows smoothly and brightly along,

revealing the depths beneath its current, now sparkling over the

objects it discloses or reflecting those by which it glides. He never

talks for talking's sake; but his mind is so well filled that, like a

fountain which when stirred sends up from its bosom sparkling showers,

his mind, when excited, sends forth thoughts no less bright than

profound, revealing the treasures with which it is so richly stored.

The conversation of Mr. Luttrell makes me think, while that of many

others only amuses me.

Lord John Russell has arrived at Paris, and sat with me a considerable

time to-day. How very agreeable he can be when his reserve wears off,

and what a pity it is he should ever allow it to veil the many fine

qualities he possesses! Few men have a finer taste in literature, or a

more highly cultivated mind. It seizes with rapidity whatever is

brought before it; and being wholly free from passion or egotism, the

views he takes on all subjects are just and unprejudiced. He has a

quick perception of the ridiculous, and possesses a fund of dry caustic

humour that might render him a very dangerous opponent in a debate,

were it not governed by a good breeding and a calmness that never

forsake him.

Lord John Russell is precisely the person calculated to fill a high

official situation. Well informed on all subjects, with an ardent love

of his country, and an anxious desire to serve it, he has a sobriety of

judgment and a strictness of principle that will for ever place him

beyond the reach of suspicion, even to the most prejudiced of his

political adversaries. The reserve complained of by those who are only

superficially acquainted with him, would be highly advantageous to a

minister; for it would not only preserve him from the approaches to

familiarity, so injurious to men in power, but would discourage the

hopes founded on the facility of manner of those whose very smiles and

simple acts of politeness are by the many looked on as an encouragement

to form the most unreasonable ones, and as an excuse for the indulgence

of angry feelings when those unreasonable hopes are frustrated.

Lord John Russell, Mr. Rogers, Mr. Luttrell, Monsieur Thiers, Monsieur

Mignet, and Mr. Poulett Thomson, dined here yesterday. The party was an

agreeable one, and the guests seemed mutually pleased with each other.

Monsieur Thiers is a very remarkable person--quick, animated, and

observant: nothing escapes him, and his remarks are indicative of a

mind of great power. I enjoy listening to his conversation, which is at

once full of originality, yet free from the slightest shade of

eccentricity.

Monsieur Mignet, who is the inseparable friend of Monsieur Thiers,

reminds me every time I see him of Byron, for there is a striking

likeness in the countenance. With great abilities, Monsieur Mignet

gives me the notion of being more fitted to a life of philosophical

research and contemplation than of action, while Monsieur Thiers

impresses me with the conviction of his being formed to fill a busy and

conspicuous part in the drama of life.

He is a sort of modern Prometheus, capable of creating and of vivifying

with the electric spark of mind; but, whether he would steal the fire

from Heaven, or a less elevated region, I am not prepared to say. He

has called into life a body--and a vast one--by his vigorous writings,

and has infused into it a spirit that will not be soon or easily

quelled. Whether that spirit will tend to the advancement of his

country or not, time will prove; but, _en attendant_, its ebullitions

may occasion as much trouble to the _powers that be_ as did the spirit

engendered by Mirabeau in a former reign.

The countenance of Monsieur Thiers is remarkable. The eyes, even

through his spectacles, flash with intelligence, and the expression of

his face varies with every sentiment he utters. Thiers is a man to

effect a revolution, and Mignet would be the historian to narrate it.

There is something very interesting in the unbroken friendship of these

two men of genius, and its constancy elevates both in my estimation.

They are not more unlike than are their respective works, both of

which, though so dissimilar, are admirable in their way. The mobility

and extreme excitability of the French, render such men as Monsieur

Thiers extremely dangerous to monarchical power. His genius, his

eloquence, and his boldness, furnish him with the means of exciting the

enthusiasm of his countrymen as surely as a torch applied to gunpowder

produces an explosion. In England these qualities, however elevated,

would fail to produce similar results; for enthusiasm is there little

known, and, when it comes forth, satisfies itself with a brief

manifestation, and swiftly resigns itself to the prudent jurisdiction

of reason. Napoleon himself, with all the glory associated with his

name--a glory that intoxicated the French--would have failed to

inebriate the sober-minded English.

Through my acquaintance with the Baron de Cailleux, who is at the head

of the Musée, I obtained permission to take Lord John Russell, Mr.

Rogers, and Mr. Luttrell, to the galleries of the Louvre yesterday, it

being a day on which the public are excluded. The Baron received us,

did the honours of the Musée with all the intelligence and urbanity

that distinguish him, and made as favourable an impression on my

countrymen as they seemed to have produced on him.

Rogers has a pure taste in the fine arts, and has cultivated it _con

amore_; Luttrell brings to the study a practised eye and a matured

judgment; but Lord John, nurtured from infancy in dwellings, the walls

of which glow with the _chefs-d'oeuvre_ of the old masters and the best

works of the modern ones, possesses an exquisite tact in recognizing at

a glance the finest points in a picture, and reasons on them with all

the _savoir_ of a connoisseur and the feeling of an amateur.

It is a pleasant thing to view collections of art with those fully

capable of appreciating them, and I enjoyed this satisfaction

yesterday. The Baron de Cailleux evinced no little pleasure in

conducting my companions from one masterpiece to another, and two or

three hours passed away rapidly in the interesting study.

The Marquis and Marquise de B----, Comte V----, and some others, dined

here yesterday. The Marquise de B---- is very clever, has agreeable

manners, knows the world thoroughly, and neither under nor overvalues

it. A constant friction with society, while it smoothes down asperities

and polishes manners, is apt to impair if not destroy much of the

originality and raciness peculiar to clever people. To suit themselves

to the ordinary level of society, they become either insipid or

satirical; they mix too much water, or apply cayenne pepper to the wine

of their conversation: hence that mind which, apart from the artificial

atmosphere of the busy world, might have grown into strength and

beauty, becomes like some poor child nurtured in the unhealthy

precincts of a dense and crowded city,--diseased, stunted, rickety, and

incapable of distinguishing itself from its fellows.

As clever people cannot elevate the mass with which they herd to their

own level, they are apt to sink to theirs; and persons with talents

that might have served for nobler purposes are suffered to degenerate

into _diseurs de bons mots_ and _raconteurs de société_, content with

the paltry distinction of being considered amusing. How many such have

I encountered, satisfied with being pigmies, who might have grown to be

giants, but who were consoled by the reflection that in that world in

which their sole aim is to shine, pigmies are more tolerated than

giants, as people prefer looking down to looking up!

Lord Allen and Sir Andrew Barnard dined here yesterday. They appear to

enter into the gaiety of Paris with great zest, go the round of the

theatres, dine at all the celebrated _restaurateurs_, mix enough in the

_beau monde_ to be enabled to observe the difference between the

Parisian and London one, and will, at the expiration of the term

assigned to their _séjour_ here, return to England well satisfied with

their trip and with themselves.

Lord A---- has tasted all the _nouveaux plats à la mode_, for at Paris

new dishes are as frequently invented as new bonnets or caps; and the

proficiency in the culinary art which he has acquired will render him

an oracle at his clubs, until the more recent arrival of some other

epicurean from the French capital deposes his brief sovereignty.

But it is not in the culinary art alone that Lord Allen evinces his

good taste, for no one is a better judge of all that constitutes the

_agrémens_ of life, or more _au fait_ of the [* omitted word?] of

contributing to them.

Sir A. B----, as devoted as ever to music, has heard all the new, and

finds that the old, like old friends, loses nothing by comparison. It

is pleasant to see that the advance of years impairs not the taste for

a refined and innocent pleasure.

The Idler in France · 第 20 / 26 章