CHAPTER IV.

THE SCHOOLS OF KENT.

§ 1.

It is a debatable question whether any Roman culture lived through the

Saxon conquest.

The Saxon conquest of Britain was certainly, on the whole, a destructive

one, and it has been justly contrasted with the Frankish conquest of

Gaul; where the conquerors quickly assimilated with the conquered. The

relics of Roman civilisation which the Saxons adopted, were indeed few.

This is true, as a general statement. But there is some ground for

regarding Kent as a case apart. Here all accounts seem to indicate a

gradual and less violent intrusion of the new race, and to suggest the

possibility that there was not for that area a complete break in the

traditions and customs of life. The capital city itself, Dorobernia

(Canterbury), whatever revolution it may have suffered, was at least not

destroyed. There is nothing that requires us to assume the extinction of

the schools of grammar which existed presumably in Kent as in Gaul.

The foundation of schools by the Roman mission is not recorded, nor does

Bede say anything to imply it when thirty years later he describes the

foundation of schools in East Anglia. These were founded by king

Sigberct because he desired to have good institutions such as he had

seen in Gaul, and his wishes were carried into effect by bishop Felix,

after the pattern of the schools of Kent.[57] Whether it would be

possible to trace the study of Roman law as a scholastic exercise

through these obscure times, is very doubtful.[58] But certainly there

is something about the Latinity of our earliest legal documents, that

has a local and even a vernacular aspect. Slight as these traces may be,

they are interesting enough to merit consideration.

In the Kentish laws are preserved our oldest extant relics of ancestral

custom. The first code is that of Æthelberht, with this title:--"This be

the Dooms that Æthelbriht, king, ordained in Augustine's days." It is

much concerned with penalties for personal injuries. These are some of

the "Dooms":--

Cap. 40. If an ear be smitten off, 6 shillings amends (bôt).

" 41. If the ear be pierced through, 3 shillings.

" 43. If an eye is lost, 50 shillings.

" 44. If mouth or eye be damaged, 12 shillings.

" 45. If the nose be pierced, 9 shillings.

" 51. For the four front teeth, 6 shillings each; the tooth

that stands next, 4 shillings; the next to that, 3

shillings; and thenceforth, each, 1 shilling.

Penalties for theft are graduated according to the quality of the person

injured, _i.e._, according to the different orders of men in the body

politic, each of whom has a separate value: king, noble, freeman, serf,

slave. Such we may suppose to have been the primitive institutes of the

tribes in the old mother country on the Continent. But the code is

headed by a captel, in which the property of the Church is valued beyond

that of the king, and the same applies to the higher clergy. "Cap. 1.

The property of God and the Church, 12 fold; Bishop's property, 11 fold;

Priest's, 9 fold [the same as the King's]; Deacon's, 6 fold; Clerk's, 3

fold." Next follows one that we may well suppose might have been the

first of the pre-Christian code: "Cap. 2. If the king summon his people

to him, and one there do them evil--double bôt, and 50 shillings to the

king." Bede mentions (ii., 5) these laws of Æthelberht, and especially

this feature of them, that they began with the protection of Church

property. He also says, that the king constituted these laws according

to Roman precedent (_juxta exempla Romanorum_), by which some have been

led to expect that there would be an element of Roman law in them. The

imitation consisted only in committing the laws to writing.

Æthelberht died in 616, and then came a heathen reaction under his son

Eadbald; but he was converted to Christianity in 618 by Bishop

Laurentius. His son Erconbriht, who succeeded in 640, was the first

king who dared to demolish the heathen fanes. Bede informs us that this

king made a law for the observance of the Lenten fast; but no law of the

kind appears until we come to the laws of Wihtred. Ecgbriht succeeded

his father in 664, under whom the waning power of Kent reasserted its

former sway. To him succeeded first Hlothære in 673, and then Eadric.

These two reigns were short, and the names of both the kings stand at

the head of the next Kentish code.

The introductory sentence of this code was this:--"Hlothhære and Eadric,

kings of the men of Kent, enlarged the laws which their predecessors had

made aforetime, with these dooms following":--

Cap. 8. If one man implead another in a matter, and he cite the man

to a 'Methel' or a 'Thing', let the man always give security to the

other, and do him such right, as the Kentish judges prescribe to

them.

This code has a little series of laws concerning offences to the sense

of honour, and consequent danger to the king's peace:--

Cap. 11. If in another's house one man calleth another man a

perjurer, or assail him offensively with injurious words; let him

pay a shilling to the owner of the house, and 6 shillings to the

insulted man, and forfeit 12 shillings to the king.

Cap. 12. If a man remove another's stoup where men drink without

offence, by old right he pays a shilling to him who owns the house,

and 6 shillings to him whose stoop was taken away, and 12 shillings

to the king.

Cap. 13. If weapon be drawn where men drink, and no harm be done; a

shilling to the owner of the house, and 12 shillings to the king.

After a troublous time of encroachment from the side of Wessex, the

kingdom of Kent had again a time of honour, if not of absolute

independence, under king Wihtred (691-725), who, in the preamble to his

laws, is called the most gracious king of the Kentish folk (_se mildesta

cyning Cantwara_). His laws are mostly ecclesiastical. The rights of the

Church and of her ministers, the keeping of the Sunday, manumission of

slaves at the altar, penalties for heathen rites, these subjects make

the bulk of a code of 28 captels, of which the last four are about

theft. The closing provision is characteristic of the state of society:

Cap. 28. If a man from a distance, or a stranger, go off the road,

and he neither shout nor blow a horn, as a thief he is liable to be

examined, or slain, or redeemed.

In the preamble this code is precisely dated on the 6th day of August in

Wihtred's fifth year, which is 696. Also it mentions Berghamstyde, which

seems to mean Berkhamstead (Herts), as the place of enactment, and

Gybmund, bishop of Rochester, as having been present. Doubts have been

cast upon the genuineness of this code, but it is defended in Schmid's

introduction. This is the last of the laws of Kent.

The Kentish laws are found in a register of the twelfth century, which

has a high character for fidelity. No doubt the substance of them is

faithfully preserved. But they are not in the original Kentish dialect;

they have been translated into West Saxon. The translation has not,

however, obliterated all traces of the original; there are some

peculiarities which survive, and which enable us to see through the

present form those traces of a higher antiquity, which strengthen that

confidence which the contents are calculated to inspire.

The Kentish dialect was the first literary form of the language of our

Saxon ancestors. It has been thought that in the Epinal Gloss, of which

a specimen will be given below, we have the best extant representation

of this ancient dialect. Early in the ninth century we have some

original documents in the Kentish dialect, and these are our surest

guides in judging of other specimens.[59]

The following extract is from a legal document of the year 832. Luba had

made a deed of gift from her estate to the fraternity of Christ Church

at Canterbury, and the following sanction was appended:

✠ Ic luba eaðmod godes ðiwen ðas forecwedenan god ⁊ ðas

elmessan gesette ⁊ gefestnie ob minem erfelande et

mundlingham ðem hiium to cristes cirican ⁊ ic bidde ⁊ an

godes libgendes naman bebiade ðæm men ðe ðis land ⁊ ðis

erbe hebbe et mundlingham ðet he ðas god forðleste oð

wiaralde ende se man se ðis healdan wille ⁊ lestan ðet ic

beboden hebbe an ðisem gewrite se him seald ⁊ gehealden sia

hiabenlice bledsung se his ferwerne oððe hit agele se him

seald ⁊ gehealden helle wite bute he to fulre bote gecerran

wille gode ⁊ mannum uene ualete.

I, Luba, the humble handmaid of God, appoint and establish

these foresaid benefactions and alms from my heritable land

at Mundlingham to the brethren at Christ Church; and I

entreat, and in the name of the living God I command, the

man who may have this land and this inheritance at

Mundlingham, that he continue these benefactions to the

world's end. The man who will keep and discharge this that

I have commanded in this writing, to him be given and kept

the heavenly blessing; he who hinders or neglects it, to

him be given and kept the punishment of hell, unless he

will repent with full amends to God and to men. Fare ye

well.

§ 2.

The middle of the seventh century was a very dark period throughout the

West. The lingering rays of ancient culture had grown very faint in

France, Italy, and Spain. Literary production had ceased in France since

Gregory of Tours and his friend Venantius Fortunatus, the poet; in

Spain, soon after Isidore of Seville, the Christian area had been

narrowed by the Moslem invasion; in Italy, though the tradition of

learning was never extinguished, yet no writer of eminence appeared for

a long time after Gregory the Great. At such a time it was that the seed

of learning found a new and fruitful soil among the Anglo-Saxon people;

and they who had been the latest receivers of the civilising element,

quickly took the lead in religion and learning.

In the year 668 three remarkable men came into Britain, These were

Theodore, a Greek of Tarsus, who came as Archbishop of Canterbury;

Hadrian, an African monk who had deprecated his own appointment to that

office; and Biscop Baducing (called Benedict Biscop), an Angle of

Northumbria, who had left his retreat in the monastery of Lerins, to

guide and accompany the travellers into his native country.

This had risen out of an unforeseen event, and had almost the appearance

of accident. But the consequences were great and far-reaching. Theodore

organised the English Church upon lines that proved permanent. A new era

was also inaugurated for literature and art. Literature was represented

by Hadrian, who set up education at St. Augustine's upon an improved

plan; and art, especially in relation to religious and educational

institutions--books, buildings, ritual--was the province of Benedict

Biscop.

Up to this time education and literature had two rival sources, the old

schools of Kent, and the schools of the Irish teachers. But from

Hadrian's coming a new literary era commences. For more than a hundred

years our island was the seat of learning beyond any other country in

the world of the West. Even Greek learning, extinct elsewhere, was

revived for a time; and Bede, whose childhood had corresponded to the

opening of this new activity, looked back on it when he was old as a

glorious time, and he put it on record that he had known many scholars

to whom both the Latin and Greek languages were as their mother tongue.

Of those who were formed in the school of Hadrian, the first and most

conspicuous is Aldhelm. His rudimentary education must have been over

before he knew Hadrian. The school of Maidulf gave him his boyish

training at the monastery which was called after the Irish founder, and

which has given name to the town of Malmesbury (Maidulfes burh). So

Aldhelm stands between the two systems, the old Irish and the new

Kentish. His preference was for the latter, but his works retain the

characteristics of both. He has a love of grandiloquence which is both

Keltic and Saxon, and a delight in alliteration which is more especially

Saxon. His familiarity with the national poetry looms often through his

Latin. But his proper characteristics, those whereby he fills a position

altogether his own, are apart from these peculiarities. He is the

scholar of the age, the type of that set whom Bede delighted to recall,

who knew Latin and Greek like their mother tongue. He is the father of

Anglo-Latin poetry. He made a zealous study of the Latin metres, and he

commended the pursuit to other scholars. His Greek knowledge manifests

itself everywhere: not always with a good effect, according to present

taste; but in a manner which is of historical value as demonstrating his

real familiarity with the Greek language.

Aldhelm's great work, and the work which most conveys his interpretation

of the spiritual conditions of his time, is his book, "De Laude

Virginitatis," in praise of Celibacy. But for the purposes of literary

history, his artistic studies are of more importance than those which

are strictly religious and ecclesiastical. Of the greatest interest for

us are his Riddles. These are short Latin poems somewhat after the model

of Symphosius, whose work he describes,[60] and whom he seems ambitious

to outstrip. The riddles of Symphosius are uniformly of three hexameter

lines, those of Aldhelm vary in length from four lines to sixteen;

rarely more. The external structure is that of the Epigram, with the

object speaking in the first person. The riddles both of Symphosius and

Aldhelm are so closely identified with the vernacular riddles of the

famous Exeter Song Book, that the reader may be glad of a specimen from

each author. It should be premised that in each collection the subject

stands as a title at the head of each piece. The subject of the

sixteenth in Symphosius is the book-moth:--

DE TINEA.

Litera me pavit, nec quid sit litera novi,

In libris vixi nec sum studiosior inde,

Exedi musas nec adhuc tamen ipse profeci.

I have fed upon literature, yet know not what it is; I have

lived among books, yet am not the more studious for it; I have

devoured the Muses, yet up to the present time I have made no

progress.

One of Aldhelm's riddles is on the Alphabet; and this will be a fit

specimen here, as containing something that is germane to the history of

literature:--

Nos denæ et septem genitæ sine voce sorores,

Sex alias nothas non dicimus adnumerandas,

Nascimur ex ferro rursus ferro moribundæ,

Necnon et volucris pennâ volitantis ad æthram;

Terni nos fratres incertâ matre crearunt;

Qui cupit instanter sitiens audire, docemus,

Turn cito prompta damus rogitanti verba silenter.

We are seventeen sisters voiceless born; six others,

half-sisters, we exclude from our set; children of iron by

iron we die, but children too of the bird's wing that flies so

high; three brethren our sires, be our mother as may; if any

one is very eager to hear, we tell him, and quickly give

answer without any sound.[61]

Aldhelm is the first of the Anglo-Latin poets, and he was a classical

scholar at a time when to be so was a great distinction. Both in prose

and verse, his style has the faults which belong to an age of revived

study. His love of learning, his keen appreciation of its beauty and its

value, have tended to inflate his sentences with an appearance of

display. His poetic diction is simpler than that of his prose; but here,

too, he is habitually over-elevated, whence he becomes sometimes

stilted, and oftentimes he drops below pitch with an inadequate and

disappointing close. But we must honour him in the position which he

holds. He is the leader of that noble series of English scholars who

represent the first endeavouring stage of recovery after the great

eclipse of European culture.

There is nothing of his remaining in the vernacular; but that he was an

English poet we have testimony which, though late, is not to be

disregarded. William of Malmesbury quotes a book of King Alfred's, which

said that Aldhelm had been a peerless writer of English poetry: and he

adds, moreover, that a popular song, which had been mentioned by Alfred

as Aldhelm's, was still commonly sung in his own time--that is, in the

twelfth century.

Attempts have been made to identify some of our extant Anglo-Saxon

literature with a name so eminent. In 1835 the Anglo-Saxon Psalter of

the Paris manuscript was first printed at Oxford, and as this book gives

a hundred of the Psalms in vernacular poetry, the suggestion that they

might be Aldhelm's, though modernised, had rhetorical attractions for

the editor (Thorpe), and supplied him with material for a few rather

idle sentences of his Latin preface. In 1840 Jacob Grimm edited (from

Thorpe's editio princeps) two poems of the Vercelli book, the "Andreas"

and the "Elene;" and in his preface he sought to fix this poetry upon

Aldhelm by a line of argument altogether fallacious, as was afterwards

shown by Mr. Kemble in his edition of the "Andreas" for the Ælfric

Society.

That which we have to show for this period in the native Kentish dialect

is less ambitious, but it will not be despised by the considerate

reader. In the beginnings of learning, when students had not the

apparatus of grammars and dictionaries, which now, being common, are

almost as much a matter of course as any gift of nature, it was

necessary for students to make lists of words and phrases for

themselves, and after a while a few of these would be thrown together,

and would be reduced to alphabetical order for facility of reference. It

is to such a process as this that we owe the Glossaries which form an

interesting branch of Anglo-Saxon literature. The Epinal Gloss is the

oldest of these, and it is very valuable because of the archaic forms of

many of the words. A selection is here given by way of specimen:--[62]

EPINAL GLOSS.

(_Cooper, Appendix B, p. 153._)

_Alba spina_, haegu thorn (hawthorn).

_Aesculus_, boecae (beech).

_Achalantis, luscina_ netigalæ (nightingale).

_Acrifolus_, holegn (holly).

_Alnus_, alaer (alder).

_Abies_, saeppae (fir).

_Argella_, laam (loam).

_Accitulium_, geacaes surae (sorrel).

_Absintium_, uuermod (wormwood).

_Alacris_, snel (swift, German _schnell_).

_Alveus_, stream rad (stream-road = channel).

_Aquilæ_, segnas (military standards).

_Anser_, goos (goose).

_Beta_, berc, _arbor_ (birch).

_Ballena_, hran (whale).

_Buculus_, rand beag (buckler).

_Berruca_, uueartæ (wart).

_Cados_, ambras (casks).

_Chaos_, duolma (confusion, error).

_Cicuta_, hymblicae (hemlock).

_Cofinus_, mand (hamper).

_Fulix_, ganot, dop aenid (gannet, dip-chick).

_Filix_, fearn (fern).

_Fasianus_, uuor hana (pheasant).

_Fungus_, suamm (German _schwamm_).

_Fragor_, suoeg (swough, sough).

_Finiculus_, finugl (fennel).

_Follis_, blest baeelg (blast-bellows).

_Glarea_, cisil (pebble, cf. Chesil Bank).

_Hibiscum_, biscop uuyrt (marsh mallow).

_Horodius_, uualh hebuc (foreign hawk).

_Hirundo_, sualuuae (swallow).

_Intestinum_, thearm (German _Darm_).

_Jungetum_, risc thyfil (jungle).

_Inprobus_, gimach (troublesome).

_Iners_, asolcaen (lazy).

_Inter primores_, bituien aeldrum (among the chief men).

_Juris periti_, red boran (counsellors).

_Invisus_, laath (loath).

_Iuuar_ (= _jubar_), leoma, earendil (gleam, beacon, crest).

_Ignarium_, al giuueorc (fire-work).

_Ibices_, firgen gaett (mountain goats, chamois).

_Lunules_, mene scillingas (coins or bracteates on a necklace).

_Lucius_, haecid (hake, German _Hecht_).

_Lolium_, atae (oats).

_Limax_, snel (snail).

_Ligustrum_, hunaeg sugae (honeysuckle).

_Manipulatim_, threatmelum (in bands).

_Manica_, gloob (glove).

_Mascus_, grima (mask).

_Malva_, cotuc, geormant lab (mallow).

_Mars_, Tiig (cf. Tuesday).

_Ninguit_, hsniuuith (snoweth).

_Nigra spina_, slach thorn (sloe-thorn).

_Nanus_, duerg (dwarf).

_Olor_, aelbitu (the elk, wild swan).

_Piraticum_, uuicing sceadan (pirates).

_Pares_, uuyrdae (Fates).

_Perna_, flicci (flitch).

_Pictus acu_, mið naeðlae sasiuuid (embroidered).

_Pronus_, nihol (perpendicular).

_Pollux_, thuma (thumb).

_Quoquomodo_, aengiþinga (anyhow).

_Rumex_, edroc.

_Ramnus_, theban (thorn).

_Salix_, salch (sallow).

_Sturnus_, staer (starling).

_Titio_, brand (firebrand).

_Tignarius_, hrofuuyrcta (roofwright).

_Vadimonium_, borg (pledge, security).

In this glossary we see the preparation for our modern Latin-English

dictionaries. Already, as early as the reign of Augustus, the foundation

of the Latin dictionary was laid by Verrius Flaccus, but his dictionary

would naturally consist of Latin words with Latin explanations. But in

the seventh century there was a demand for Latin vocabularies, with

equivalents in the vernacular languages; and here, in the Epinal

Glossary, we have the earliest known example of such a work. At first

such glossaries would be merely lists of words formed in the course of

studying some one or two Latin texts, and in process of time would

follow the compilation of several such glossaries into one, until, in

the tenth and eleventh centuries, we find vocabularies of some compass

(as Ælfric's), and by the fifteenth century we have such bulky

dictionaries as the "Catholicon" and the "Promptorium Parvulorum."

We will close this chapter with specimens of the "Psalter of St.

Augustine," which received an Anglo-Saxon gloss (dialect Kentish[63])

at the end of the ninth, or early in the tenth century. The book has

been already described above, p. 33.

PSALM XLIX. (L.), 7:--"Hear, O my people," &c.

geher folc min ond sprecu to israhela folce ond

7. Audi populus meus et loquar Israhel et

ic cythu the thætte god god thin ic eam

testificabor tibi quoniam Deus Deus tuus ego sum

na les ofer onsegdnisse thine ic dregu the onsegdnisse

8. Non super sacrificia tua arguam te holocausta

soth thine in gesihthe minre sind aa

autem tua in conspectu meo sunt semper

ic ne on foo of huse thinum calferu ne of eowdum

9. Non accipiam de domo tua vitulos neque de gregibus

thinum buccan

tuis hircos

for thon min sind all wildeor wuda neat in

10. Quoniam meæ sunt omnes feræ silvarum jumenta in

muntum ond oexen

montibus et boves

ic on cneow all tha flegendan heofenes ond hiow

11. Cognovi omnia volatilia cæli et species

londes mid mec is

agri mecum est

gif ic hyngriu ne cweothu ic to the min is sothlice

12. Si esuriero non dicam tibi, meus est enim

ymb hwerft eorthan ond fylnis his

orbis terræ et plenitudo ejus

ah ic eotu flæsc ferra oththe blod

13. Numquid manducabo carnes taurorum aut sanguinem

buccena ic drinco

hircorum potabo

ageld gode onsegdnisse lofes ond geld tham hestan

14. Immola Deo sacrificium laudis et redde Altissimo

gehat thin

vota tua

gece mec in dege geswinces thines thæt ic genere

15. Invoca me in die tribulationis tuæ ut eripiam

thec ond thu miclas mec

te et magnificabis me

D I A P S A L M A.

to thæm synfullan sothlice cweth god for hwon thu

16. Peccatori autem dixit Deus Quare tu

asagas rehtwisnisse mine ond genimes cythnisse mine

enarras justitias meas et adsumes testamentum meum

thorh muth thinne

per os tuum

thu sothlice thu fiodes theodscipe ond thu awurpe

17. Tu vero odisti disciplinam et projecisti

word min efter the

sermones meos post te

gif thu gesege theof somud thu urne mid hine ond

18. Si videbas furem simul currebas cum eo et

mid unreht hæmderum dæl thinne thu settes

cum adulteris portionem tuam ponebas

muth thin genihtsumath mid nithe ond tunge thin

19. Os tuum abundavit nequitia et lingua tua

hleothrade facen

concinnavit dolum

sittende with broether thinum thu teldes ond

20. Sedens adversus fratrem tuum detrahebas et

with suna moeder thinre thu settes eswic

adversus filium matris tuæ ponebas scandalum

thas thu dydes ond ic swigade thu gewoendes on unrehtwisnisse

21. Hæc fecisti et tacui existimasti iniquitatem

thæt ic wære the gelic

quod ero tibi similis

ic threu thec ond ic setto tha ongegn onsiene

Arguam te et statuam illa contra faciem

thinre Ongeotath thas alle tha ofer geoteliath

tuam (22.) intelligite hæc omnes qui obliviscimini

dryhten ne hwonne gereafie ond ne sie se generge

Dominum ne quando rapiat et non sit qui eripiat

onsegdnis lofes gearath mec ond ther

23. Sacrificium laudis honorificabit me et illic

sithfet is thider ic oteawu him haelu godes

iter est in quo ostendam illi salutare Dei

PSALM LXXVI. (LXXVII.)

Ond smegende ic eam in allum wercum thinum ond

13. Et meditatus sum in omnibus operibus tuis et

in gehaeldum thinum ic bieode

in observationibus tuis exercebor

god in halgum weg thin hwelc god micel

14. Deus in sancto via tua quis Deus magnus

swe swe god ur thu earth god thu the doest

sicut Deus noster (15.) tu es Deus qui facis

wundur ana cuthe thu dydes in folcum megen

mirabilia solus notam fecisti in populis virtutem

thin gefreodes in earme thinum folc thin

tuam (16.) liberasti in brachio tuo populum tuum

bearn

filios Israhel et Joseph

gesegun thec weter god gesegun thec weter ond

17. Viderunt te aquæ Deus viderunt te aquæ et

on dreordun gedroefde werun niolnisse mengu

timuerunt turbati sunt abyssi (18.) multitudo

swoeges wetre stefne saldun wolcen ond sothlice

sonitus aquarum Vocem dederunt nubes et enim

strelas thine thorh leordun stefn thunurrade thinre

sagittæ tuæ pertransierunt (19.) vox tonitrui tui

in hweole

in rota

in lihton bliccetunge thine eorthan ymbhwyrfte gesaeh

Inluxerunt coruscationes tuæ orbi terræ vidit

ond onstyred wes eorthe

et commota est terra

in sae wegas thine ond stige thine in wetrum miclum

20. In mari viæ tuæ et semitæ tuæ in aquis multis

ond swethe thine ne bioth oncnawen

et vestigia tua non cognoscentur

thu gelaeddes swe swe scep folc thin in honda

21. Deduxisti sicut oves populum tuum in manu

mosi ond aaron

Moysi et Aaron

These specimens of the Kentish dialect (with the exception of the Epinal

Gloss) are of much later date than the times which our narrative has yet

reached; and they are only offered as a proximate representation of that

which was the first of English dialects to receive literary culture.

This dialect is peculiarly interesting as being that from which the West

Saxon was developed; in other words, it is the earliest form of that

imperial dialect in which the great body of extant Saxon literature is

preserved. But the Kentish did not ripen into the maturer outlines of

the West Saxon without the intervention of a third dialect; and in order

to appreciate this it is necessary for us to review that more spacious

culture of which the scene was laid in the country of the Northern

Angles.

FOOTNOTES:

[57] "Ecclesiastical History," iii., 18.

[58] Aldhelm speaks of the study of Roman law in connexion with other

scholastic studies, as Latin verses and music. But then that was after

the new start given to education by Theodore and Hadrian. A century

later, Alcuin described the studies at V York in this order,--grammar,

rhetoric, law.--Wharton, "Anglia Sacra," ii. 6; Alcuin's poem, "De

Pontificibus &c."

[59] They are in Kemble, "Codex Diplomaticus," Nos. 226, 228, 229, 231,

235, 238.

[60] Aldhelm's "Works," ed. Giles, p. 228.

[61] Seventeen consonants and six vowels; made with iron style and

erased with the same, or else made with a bird's quill; whatever the

instrument, three fingers are the agents; and we can convey answer

without delay even in situations where it would be inconvenient to

speak.

[62] I have given the _th_, or þ, or ð, as in the manuscript. This is

done in the present instance because a peculiar interest attaches to it

in the earliest specimens of writing. The frequency of _th_, and the

rarity of the monograms, is itself a distinguishing feature. Speaking in

general terms of Anglo-Saxon literature, as it appears in manuscripts,

it might be fairly said that there is no _th_; this sound is represented

by ð or þ. And of these two, the modified Roman character, Ð ð, is found

to prevail over the native Rune (þ) in the oldest extant writings.

Throughout this little book the _th_ is commonly used, as being most

convenient for the general reader.

[63] Transactions of the Philological Society for 1875-6.

Anglo-Saxon Literature · 第 4 / 12 章