From the _Queen_. A Correspondent writes:--

"JOURNALISM.--I want to become a Dramatic Critic; how should I begin?

I am fond of going to the theatre, but find it difficult to remember

the plot of the play afterwards. What kind of notices do Editors

prefer?--_Histrionica_."

Isn't it Mr. DAVID ANDERSON who has set up a flourishing School for

Journalists? Why shouldn't there be a School for Critics? The Master

would take his pupils to the Theatre regularly, and could lecture on

the Play as it proceeded. Should Managers and Actors be so blind to

the best interests of their Art as to refuse to allow the play to be

stopped from time to time to allow of the Instructor's remarks, then

he would have to wait until after each Act, and retire with his pupils

into some quiet corner of the Refreshment-room, where he could give

his lecture. Or teacher and pupils could hear a Scene or an Act every

night,--and if they paid for their places (a reduction being made

for a quantity), the particular drama they patronised would be

considerably benefited by this plan.

There might be a uniform or an academic costume for these critical

scholars--say Shakspearian collars, Undergraduate gown, and portable

mortar-board, to fold up, and be sat upon. There might be a row

reserved for them at the back of the Dress Circle, and twenty-five

per cent. reduction on tickets for a series. The M.C., or Master of

Critics, would take a fee for a course from each pupil. Fee to include

seat at theatre, instruction, _and supper afterwards_.

* * * * *

IMPORTANT CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS THE UNIVERSAL LANGUAGE,--"Hallo!"

being the recognised telephonic summons in use between companies

and individuals of all nationalities, may be already considered as

"Hallo'd by a variety of associations."

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 100, March 28, 1891 · 第 14 / 38 题