When, in 1892, Mr. Justice Brewer, in rendering the decision of the
Supreme Court of the United States in the case of the Church of the
Holy Trinity against the United States (144 U. S. 457), which
involved an interpretation of the Alien Labor Law, indulged in the
obiter remark that “this is a Christian nation,” a subject was
presented for the consideration of thoughtful minds which is of no
ordinary importance.
The dictum of Mr. Justice Story in Vidal against Girard’s Executors
(2 How. U. S., 198), to the effect that Christianity was a part of
the common law of Pennsylvania, is also relied upon, but is not an
authoritative judicial determination of that proposition. The remark
was not necessary to the decision.
The remarks of Mr. Justice Brewer, to which reference has already
been made, were also unnecessary to the decision rendered by the
court.
The fact that oaths are administered to witnesses, that the hollow
mockery is pursued of opening deliberative assemblies and
conventions with prayer, that wills begin with the absurd phrase,
“In the name of God, Amen,” that gigantic missionary associations
are in operation to establish Christian missions in every quarter of
the globe, were also instanced. But none of these illustrations
affords any valid proof in support of the assertion that “this is a
Christian nation.”
Our legislation relative to the observance of Sunday is such a mass
of absurdities and inconsistencies that almost anything can be
predicated thereon except the idea that our legislators are
impressed with the notion that there is anything sacred in the day.
According to the views of any section of the Christian church, the
acts which I have enumerated as permitted would be regarded as
sinful. Their legality in the eye of the law is a demonstration that
the prohibitory enactments relating to Sunday are simply police
regulations, and it should be the effort of every good American
citizen to liberalize our Sunday legislation still more, so that it
shall cease to be the cloak of hypocrisy.
As a final resort, we are told by our opponents that this is a
Christian government because the majority of our citizens are
adherents of the Christian faith; that this is a government of
majorities, because government means force and majorities represent
the preponderance of strength. This is a most dangerous doctrine....
If the Christianity of the United States is to be questioned, the last
person to initiate the inquiry should be a member of that race which had
no hand in creating the Constitution or in the upbuilding of the
country. If Christian prayers in public are a hollow mockery, and Sunday
laws unreasonable, the last person in the world to oppose them should be
a Jew.
Mr. Marshall has the advantage of being an American by birth. He was
born in Syracuse, New York, in 1856, the son of Jacob and Zilli
Marshall. After practicing law in Syracuse, he established himself in
New York, became a Wall Street corporation lawyer, and his native
country has afforded him generous means to win a large fortune.
The question arises whether it is patriotic for Mr. Marshall to implant
into the minds of his foreign-born co-religionists the idea that this is
not a Christian country, that Sunday laws should be opposed, and that
the manners and customs of the native-born should be scorned and
ridiculed. The effect has been that thousands of immigrant Jews from
Eastern Europe are persistently violating Sunday laws in the large
industrial centers of the country, that they are haled to court,
lectured by judges, and fined. American Jews who are carrying into
practice the teachings of Mr. Marshall and his followers are reaping the
whirlwind of a natural resentment.
Mr. Marshall was the leader of the movement which led to the abrogation
of the treaty between the United States and Russia. Whenever government
boards or committees are appointed to investigate the actions, conduct
or conditions of foreign-born Jews, great influences are immediately
exerted to have Mr. Marshall made a member of such bodies to “protect”
the Jewish interests.
As head of millions of organized Jews in the United States, Mr. Marshall
has invariably wielded this influence by means of a campaign of
“protests,” to silence criticisms of Jewish wrongdoing. He thus
protested when testimony was made before the Senate Sub-Committee in
Washington, in 1919, that the Jewish East Side of New York was the
hotbed of Bolshevism. Again he protested to Norman Hapgood against the
editorial in _Harper’s Weekly_, criticising the activities of Jewish
lobbyists in Washington.
Mr. Marshall describes himself in “Who’s Who” as a leader in the fight
for the abrogation of the treaty with Russia. That was a distinct
interference in America’s political affairs and was not a “religious
activity” connected with the preservation of “Jewish rights” in the
United States. The limiting expression “in the United States” is, of
course, our own assumption. It is doubtful if Mr. Marshall limits
anything to the United States. He is a Jew and therefore an
internationalist. He is ambassador of the “international nation of
Jewry” to the Gentile world.
The pro-Jewish fights in which Mr. Marshall has been engaged in this
country make a considerable list:
He fought the proposal of the Census Bureau to enumerate Jews as a race.
As a result, there are no official figures, except those prepared by the
American Jewish Committee, as to the Jewish population of the United
States. The Census has them listed under a score of different
nationalities, which is not only a non-descriptive method, but a
deceptive one as well. At a pinch the Jewish authorities will admit of
3,500,000 Jews in the United States. The increase in the amount of
Passover Bread required would indicate that there are 6,000,000 in the
United States now! But the Government of the United States is entirely
at sea, officially, as to the Jewish population of this country, except
as the Jewish government in this country, as an act of courtesy, passes
over certain figures to the government. The Jews have a “foreign office”
through which they deal with the Government of the United States.
Mr. Marshall also fought the proposed naturalization laws that would
deprive “Asiatics” of the privilege of becoming naturalized citizens.
This was something of a confession!
Whenever there were extradition cases to be fought, preventing Jewish
offenders from being extradited, Mr. Marshall was frequently one who
assisted. This also was part of his “religious activities,” perhaps.
He fought the right of the United States Government to restrict
immigration. He has appeared oftener in Washington than any other Jew on
this question.
In connection with this, it may be suggested to Mr. Marshall that if he
is really interested in upholding the law of the land and restraining
his own people from lawless acts, he could busy himself with profitable
results if he would look into the smuggling of Jews across the Mexican
and Canadian borders. And when that service is finished, he might look
into the national Jewish system of bootlegging which, as a Jew of
“religious activities,” he should be concerned to break up.
Louis Marshall is leader of that movement which will force the Jew by
law into places where he is not wanted. The law compelling hotel keepers
to permit Jews to make their hotels a place of resort if they want to,
has been steadily pushed. Such a law is practically a Bolshevik order to
destroy property, for it is commonly known what Jewish patronage does
for public places. Where a few respectable Jews are permitted, the
others flock. And when one day they discover that the place they
“patronize” is becoming known as “a Jew hotel” or “a Jew club,” then all
the Jews abandon it—but they cannot take the stigma with them. The place
is known as “a Jew place,” but lacks both Jew and Gentile patronage as a
result.
When Louis Marshall succeeded in compelling by Jewish pressure and
Jewish threats the Congress of the United States to break the treaty
with Russia, he was laying a train of causes which resulted in a
prolongation of the war and the utter subjugation of Russia. Russia
serves the world today as a living illustration of the ruthlessness, the
stupidity and the reality of Jewish power—endless power, fanatically
mobilized for a vengeful end, but most stupidly administered. Does Mr.
Marshall ever reflect on the grotesque stupidity of Jewish leadership?
It is regretted that space does not permit the publication here of the
correspondence between Mr. Marshall and Major G. H. Putnam, the
publisher, as set forth in the annual report of the American Jewish
Committee. It illustrates quite vividly the methods by which Mr.
Marshall secures the suppression of books and other publications which
he does not like. Mr. Marshall, assisted by factors which are not
mentioned in his letter, procured the suppression of the Protocols,
after the house of Putnam had them ready to publish, and procured later
the withdrawal of a book on the Jewish Question which had attracted wide
attention both here and in England.
Mr. Marshall apparently has no confidence in “absurdities” appearing
absurd to the reader, nor of “lies” appearing false; but he would
constitute himself a censor and a guide of public reading, as well as of
international legislation. If one might hazard a guess—Mr. Marshall’s
kind of leadership is on the wane.
——
Issue of November 26, 1921.
_James Russell Lowell always declared “that he was of Jewish
extraction and proud of his ancestry.”_
_If anybody has achieved an exceptionally high grade in a
difficult course, he or she was probably Jewish.—Syracuse Jewish
Monthly._
LXXVII.
The Economic Plans of International Jews
The strength of Jewish money is in its internationalism. It stretches a
chain of banks and centers of financial control across the world, and
plays them on the side of the game that favors Judah. This center was,
and for the moment is, in Germany, at Frankfort-on-the-Main, but
feverish anxiety now accompanies the fear that it may have to be moved.
Destiny is overtaking the Jewish World Power. The gold which is their
god—“the God of the living” is what they call their gold—is being
brought overseas on every available ship and locked up in the vaults of
Jewish bankers in North and South America, not to enrich this hemisphere
but to mobilize Jewish financial power for any desperate stroke.
Financial Jewry is afraid. It has a right to be afraid. Its conscience,
still bloody from the war whose gains have not yet stopped, is in a
troubled state.
Single Jewish banking houses in any country, however great such banks
should grow, would be no menace. In spite of the fact that the richest
bankers in the world are Jews, as mere bankers in their several
countries they would not occasion alarm. In straight out-and-out
banking, the Jew is not a success. The Rothschilds were never bankers in
a proper sense; they were money-lenders to nations whose representatives
they had corrupted to seek the loans. They did business precisely on the
plane of the money-lender in the side street who induces the rich man’s
son to borrow a large sum, knowing that the father will pay. That is
scarcely banking. Brains of that sort may “get” money, but will not
“make” money. The deposit banking of the world is not done in Jewish
banks anyway, even Jewish depositors preferring banks which are managed
by non-Jews.
It is not, therefore, the success of the individual Jewish banking house
that concerns us. Flabby-minded non-Jews who have been blinded by
pro-Jewish propaganda find difficulty in seeing that point. They say
that the individual Jewish business man has as much right to his
business success as has anyone else. Which is a perfect Jewish
platitude! Certainly he has. Who ever stated that he had not? But when
you are dealing with a world chain of financial consulates, all of them
linking up in a world system, none of them to be regarded as American
banks, or British banks, or French banks, or Italian banks, or German
banks, but all of them members of the Jewish World Banking System, you
are obviously not dealing with individuals who are trying to make a
living. You are then dealing with a mighty force for good or ill, and
thus far, sad truth to know, the ill is mountainous in comparison.
Nor does this Jewish banking system require that in each country a
Jewish house be the most important. It is not the wealth and importance
of single houses, but the wealth and importance of the world chain, that
gives the strength. Kuhn, Loeb & Company is far from being the most
important financial house in the United States, but with its foreign
connections, all Jewish, it takes on a new aspect. Kuhn, Loeb & Company
is far from being the most important banking house in the United States,
and yet it was an idea that came out of Kuhn, Loeb & Company’s office
that now dominates the monetary system of the United States. Paul
Warburg, a German Jew, scion of the Jewish world banking group, is
boosted into undue prominence and power through the pressure of
banker-bought prestige in government circles. It is his
connections—Jewish ones—that count.
The Warburg idea in the United States, dovetailing with the Sterns, the
Furstenbergs, the Sonnenschiens and the Sassoons and Samuels and
Bleichroeders overseas, was something to wonder at. Jewish bankers ran
this war as they have run every great war. No informed Jew will deny
that. Most informed Jews have boasted of it as indicating the importance
of their people. Above the nations at war was an international financial
committee, all Jewish, looking down upon all the ruction and blood as
serenely as American baseball league directors look down upon a pennant
series. Separated, each man tied to his country by ties of undivided
nationalistic loyalty, none of these would have amounted to much.
United, as a super-national financial board, knowing the secrets of all
the nations, conferring one with another in all sorts of ways, even
during the hardest days when all communication between countries was
supposed to be locked by war, deciding the duration of the war and the
hour of so-called peace, these groups constitute a danger which no one
doubts after once having clearly seen it.
Men who can thus manipulate money in time of war can do so in time of
peace. The United States is living under some of that peace manipulation
now.
The reader of the Protocols is much impressed by the financial notes
that are sounded throughout their proposals. The Jewish defense against
the Protocols, that they were written by a criminal or madman, is
intended only for those who have not read the Protocols, or who have
overlooked the financial plans they offer. Madmen and criminals do not
coolly dissect one money system and invent another, as do the
Protocolists.
It will be worth while, in view of the sidelights that these articles
have thrown on the money question, to recall some of the forecasts and
plans made in these most remarkable documents which have been attributed
to the Wise Men of Zion, the world leaders of the inner council.
“When we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate
officers of the revolutionary party; when we rise, _there rises also our
terrible power of the purse_.” So wrote the great Jewish Zionist leader,
Theodor Herzl, in his work, “A Jewish State,” (p. 23). It is precisely
that union of revolutionary tendencies and financial power that the
world is facing now. Look at Russia, and look at the people who swarmed
at Versailles and made the Peace Treaty. The Peace Treaty was written by
financiers; it is the bill presented, not to a beaten foe, but to the
world. Very few people have ever read it; but its operation is evident
everywhere. The Jewish bankers the world over are shoveling in the gold.
Protocol VI is interesting in this connection:
“We shall soon begin to establish huge monopolies, colossal
reservoirs of wealth, upon which even the big Gentile properties
will be dependent to such an extent that they will all fall,
together with the government credit, on the day following the
political catastrophe.”
Although these words were written with Europe in view (the United States
not yet having been Judaized) their import is clear. At the present
moment the number of business concerns in the hands of Jewish creditors,
through “loans,” is very large. The Jewish idea in business is to
“borrow,” instead of making the business stand on its own feet. The
trail of that idea is seen all over our land today.
“At the same time it is necessary to encourage trade and industry
vigorously, _and especially speculation_, the function of which is
to act as a counterpoise of industry. _Without speculation, industry
will cause private wealth to increase and tend to improve the
position of agriculture by freeing the land_ from indebtedness for
loans by the land banks. _It is necessary for industry to deplete
the land_ both of laborers and capital, and, through speculation,
transfer all the money in the world into our hands....
“To destroy Gentile industry, we shall, as an incentive to this
speculation, encourage among the Gentiles a strong demand for
luxuries, all-enticing luxuries.”
There is the Idea—Extravagance and Debt support the Jewish
money-lender’s power. He does not lend to build industry, but to drain
it. Independent industrial or agricultural wealth menaces his rule.
Industry must be curbed by speculation; speculation must be encouraged
by extravagance; an industrious people soon works itself free of its
debt slavery; therefore invent new excitements to keep it in debt.
Entice people from the farms, and so forth, and so forth, all which
devices are now well known to the world.
“_We will force up wages_, which, however, will be of no benefit to
workers, for _we will at the same time cause a rise in the price of
prime necessities, pretending_ that this is due to the decline of
agriculture and cattle raising. _We will also artfully and deeply
undermine the sources of production_ by instilling in the workmen
ideas of anarchy and encourage them in the use of alcohol....”
That wages were forced up, that they were of little profit to the
workers, that prices did rise, that the above excuses were given, that
anarchistic ideas now being circulated among the workers are Jewish and
are circulated by Jews, that the illicit liquor business (as once was
the legal liquor business) is entirely in the hands of Jews—these things
everyone knows to be true.
The Protocols have been in non-Jewish knowledge since 1896. The British
Museum has possessed a copy since 1906. Were they written by a _prophet
who foresaw_, or by a _power that foreordained_?
The Jewish World Program is shown in these Protocols to be largely
dependent on the _false economic ideas_ it can induce the governments
and peoples to accept. The false economic ideas—not only false, but
cruelly deceptive and impossible—which are being sown among the masses
of the people are the counterpart of the other false economic propaganda
being sown in the upper circles of banking and government.
_Jewish economic ideas are quite different from the ones which Jewish
thinkers put out for others to follow._
Jewish bankers know better than anyone else the utter falsity of the
present system, but they profit by that falsity, and they are ruining
non-Jewish rule by that falsity, and they are establishing Judah by that
falsity, and they will try to maintain that falsity until it brings the
inevitable collapse, after which they hope to reorganize the world on
Jewish monetary principles. So, at least, the Protocols indicate. This
bad régime is for the so-called Gentile period only.
The temporary nature of the present Jewish system, and the destruction
it is meant to work in the world, is shown in the Third Protocol, where,
after discussing ways and means to make the lower classes hate the
well-to-do, it says:
“This hostility will be still more accentuated as the result of
crises which will close stock exchange operations and stop the
wheels of industry. Having organized such a general economic crisis
by all the underground means available to us, and thanks to the
assistance of gold, all of which is in our hands, we will throw
whole crowds of workingmen into the streets simultaneously in all
the countries of Europe. These crowds will gladly shed the blood of
those whom they, in the simplicity of their ignorance, have envied
since childhood and whose property they will then be able to loot.”
All this, as the world knows, has occurred in Europe. The weapons first
used were economic. The subjection of the people, the revolution, was
first economic. The Jewish program profited by the split which Jewish
ideas had been able to make between the upper and lower classes of
“Gentile” society. “Divide and Rule,” is the Jewish motto, as quoted in
the Protocols. “Divide the working class from the directing class.
Divide the Catholic and Protestant churches.” In brief, divide
Christendom on economic, creedal, social and racial lines, while the Jew
remains a solid body, able because of his solidarity to handle a divided
world. And this plan has succeeded. Out of the disorder of the World War
look how high the government of Judah has been placed in Russia,
Austria, Germany, France, Italy, England and in the United States.
All the Jewish bankers are still in Russia. It was only the non-Jewish
bankers who were shot and their property confiscated. Bolshevism has not
abolished Capital, it has only stolen the Capital of the “Gentiles.” And
that is all that Jewish socialism or anarchism or Bolshevism is designed
to do. Every banker who is caricatured with dollar marks on his clothes
is a “Gentile” banker. Every capitalist publicly denounced in Red
parades is a “Gentile” capitalist. Every big strike—railroad, steel,
coal—is against “Gentile” industry. That is the purpose of the Red
movement. It is alien, Jewish and anti-Christian.
Now, one of the interesting points about the Jewish financial scheme for
the future as shown in the Protocols is the way in which it contrasts
with the financial scheme which the Jewish groups now favor. As before
stated, what the Protocolists now advise is not what they will adopt
when their present advice has worked its hoped-for results.
The Protocols which detail the future financial plan of Jewish control
are numbered XX and XXI. Protocol XX opens thus:
“Today we will speak of the financial program, the discussion of
which I have postponed to the close of my report as it is the most
difficult, decisive and concrete of our plans.”
Throughout the recital the Protocolist harks back to the old (our
present) financial system, and some of his remarks are worth
transcribing here:
“You know that _the gold standard destroyed the governments that
accepted it_, for _it could not satisfy the demand for currency_,
especially as _we removed as much gold as possible from
circulation_.”
Whether the first statement is true remains to be seen; the others are
demonstrably true. The gold in the ground and the gold that is money is
under Jewish control, and they withdraw it when they will.
The stupid so-called “Gentile” says, “Why should they withdraw it? They
cannot make any money that way!” Once again remember the distinction: it
is not a matter of “making” money but of “getting” it; panics are more
quickly profitable than is a long period of prosperity for men whose
commodity is money. Indeed, men who deal in money as a commodity and on
the Jewish plan, lose their prestige if prosperity continues too long.
The banker who is a banker, who lives to serve industry and the
community—he profits by prosperity, but not so the money sharks.
“We created economic crises for the Gentiles _by the withdrawal of
money from circulation_. Mass capital stagnated, money was withdrawn
from use by the various governments, and they in turn were obliged
to turn back to the capitalists for loans. Such loans naturally
embarrassed the governments, owing to the payment of interest
charges, and made them subservient to the capitalists....”
The withdrawal of money from circulation will create panics; everyone
knows that. Such withdrawal of money is within the decision of a very
small group of men. Here in the United States we have been for a long
fifteen months witnessing such a withdrawal and its effects. The word
went by wire across the land, setting a date. On that date values began
to crash all over the country, and honest bankers tried to help, while
others who knew the game profited hugely. As shown in the last article,
money was withdrawn from legitimate use, that it might be lent to money
speculators at six per cent, who in turn lent it to desperate people at
rates as high as 30 per cent.
No intelligent person will attempt to explain such events on the ground
of natural law or of honest practice. These things occurred in this
country within recent days. It is the “elastic” system, you know, with
the public as a monkey on one end of the “elastic.” A splendid idea, no
doubt, if administered by the non-Jewish method of doing the greatest
possible good to the greatest number, but a deliberate assassination of
life and property as it has been administered.
The Protocolists then pay their respects to governmental finance with
the keenness that is well justified:
“Owing to methods allowed by irresponsible Gentile governments,
their treasuries became empty. Then came the period of contracting
loans and using up the assets that remained. This brought all the
Gentile governments to bankruptcy.”
As operating groups, the governments are bankrupt now. Only their power
of confiscation keeps them up. The United States, commonly referred to
as the richest country in the world, is just as poor as a government as
is any other. It has nothing; it is in debt and borrowing. And its
creditors are constantly discounting their obligations and are putting
it into worse hands than ever. Even the Liberty Bonds are almost passed
out of the hands of the people into the hands of Jewish fiscal agents
who “get” money out of the necessities of the people who sell and out of
the necessities of the government which borrowed. And if all signs do
not fail, we shall one day be hearing in Congress pleas for special
legislation in behalf of “the poor bond-holders.” It is to be hoped when
that day comes, some one will have mettle enough to stand up and declare
who the “poor bond-holders” are. A list should be made now, for future
reference.
“Every loan proves government inefficiency and ignorance of
governmental rights. Loans, like the sword of Damocles, hangs above
the heads of the rulers, who, instead of placing temporary taxes on
their subjects, stretch forth their hands and beg for charity at the
hands of our bankers. Essentially, foreign loans are leeches, which
in no instance can be removed from the government body until they
fall off of their own accord or the government itself removes them.
But Gentile governments, instead of removing them, continue to place
more. They must perish inevitably through exhaustion by voluntary
blood-letting.”
This is the plainly expressed criticism of the Jewish World Government
upon the governments of the nations, and the truth of it cannot be
gainsaid. It represents a statement of common wisdom upon which the
Jewish World Program hopes to commend itself to the common people.
“Then why do not the Jewish world financiers help the nations out of
this false financial policy?” Why, indeed? Jewish financiers are the
inventors of such loans as they here describe, the barriers to such
direct taxes as they here recommend. Listen—in the same page as the
above:
“_You may well understand that such a policy, although inspired by
us, cannot be followed by us._”
That is historically true, whether it will prove prophetically true or
not. Compromising loans and interest are Jewish devices, historically
Jewish. Practically and at present the Jew prefers not to borrow except
in such a way as to place all business risks on other people’s money
while he keeps his own safely, and the payment of interest is an
abomination to him. These statements of the Protocols have at least
these historical and racial confirmations.
The whole stupidity of the “Gentile” system by which Jewish
International Financiers are enriched, is clearly set forth in the same
XXth Protocol:
“What is the effect of a loan, especially of a foreign loan, other
than this? A loan is the issuance of government notes, pledging
interest in proportion to the sum of borrowed capital. If the loan
pays five per cent then in twenty years the government has paid the
interest in vain, for it is equal to the sum of the loan; in forty
years it has paid out an amount equal to the loan twice over; and in
sixty years, three times, _while the original debt remains unpaid_.”
Extremely simple, and yet it is the most generally ignored fact of all.
We live in a democracy, yet loans are contracted that always cost more
than the amount of the loan, and no one has a word to say about it. We
Americans do not know how much interest we pay every year, and we don’t
know to whom we pay it. We are still living under the lie that “A
National Debt Is a National Blessing,” the most delusive doctrine ever
promulgated.
The amount of our National Debt is the measure of our enslavement to
Jewish World Finance.
The reader may observe in passing that Jewish apologists, John Spargo,
Herman Bernstein, and others, say that the Protocols were put out by the
secret police of the Russian Czarist régime. It is very unusual, is it
not, to find the Czar’s police interested in plans to remove graft from
high finance, and preaching doctrines exactly contrary to the
established system? The reader will find some amusement in searching for
Russian police spies in the further development of the Jewish financial
philosophy.
The purpose of Protocols XX and XXI is not to describe the present
financial chaos in which the Gentiles are encouraged to continue; that
system was described in previous Protocols; their purpose is rather to
describe how the Jewish World Power plans to run things when the time
comes.
This is well worth considering, for there are portions of the plan which
would be worth adopting. The Jewish expectation of World Rule is, of
course, absurd, although the mass of Jews sincerely hold it. Their
condemnation is that they regard every degeneracy in society as bringing
them a step nearer their goal, which explains the great assistance they
give to all degenerative processes.
“_When we ascend the thrones of the world, such financial
expediencies, not being in accord with our interest, will be
definitely eliminated._”
That is the opening note. It is another version of the statement—“You
may well understand that such a policy, although inspired by us, cannot
be followed by us.”
What, then, did the Protocolists, looking for world power, propose to
eliminate?
(1) “_The stock exchanges will be permanently suppressed_, for we will
not allow the prestige of our authority to be shaken by price
fluctuations on our stocks. We will fix the full value legally without
permitting any power to raise or lower it. Raising prices gives the
pretext for lowering them—which was _what we started with the stocks and
bonds of the Gentiles_.”
(2) “The lawful _confiscation of money_ in order to regulate its
circulation.”
(3) “We must introduce a _unit of exchange based on the value of labor
units_ regardless of whether paper or wood are used as the medium. We
will issue money to meet the normal demands of every subject (citizen),
adding a total sum for every birth and decreasing the total amount for
every death.”
(4) “Commercial paper will be bought by the government, which, instead
of paying tribute on loans as at present, will _grant loans on a
business basis_. A measure of this character will prevent the
_stagnation of money, parasitism and laziness, qualities which were
useful to us as long as the Gentiles maintained their independence_, but
which are not desirable to us when our kingdom comes.”
(5) “We will replace stock exchanges by great _government credit
institutions_, whose functions will be to tax trade paper according to
government regulations. These institutions will be in such a position
that they may market or buy as many as half a billion industrial shares
a day.” (The reader will bear in mind that “police spies” of
agricultural Russia “forged this document” in 1896. As a gentleman
remarked: If this is the forgery, what must the original have been!—Ed.)
“Thus all industrial undertakings will become dependent on us. You may
well imagine what power that will give us.”
The Protocolist now being quoted also gives his attention to taxation
(observe again the “Russian police spy” doing some “forging”). The
builders of this plan for World Rule recognize that when the overturn
comes they will have to be in a position to offer the people something
extremely good in order to win their favor. This, of course, was the
plan in Russia, although Russia presents no parallel to what the
Protocolists hope to do for what they call their “kingdom.” Russia was
simply tortured in punishment. Russia was a passover offering. Russia is
an example of Jewish vengeance, destruction, rage, not of the rule which
International Jewry hopes to put over a world economically conquered
through its own weakness and lust. Hear then the taxation plan:
(1) “When we become rulers, our autocratic government, as a first
principle of self-protection, will _avoid burdening the people with
heavy taxes_. It must not forget to play the part of father and
protector. But, as government organizations are costly, it is necessary
to raise money for maintenance. Consequently, it is necessary to study
carefully in this particular the problem of checks and balances.”
(2) Kinds of taxes to be raised: (a) “The best method of taxation is to
establish _a progressive tax on property_.” (b) “The receipt of
_purchase money_ or an _inheritance_ will be subjected to a progressive
stamp tax.” (c) “Any transfer of personal property, whether in money or
other form of value....” (d) A luxury tax—“the latter will be taxed
through the medium of a stamp impost.”
The rich are to be taxed in proportion to their wealth: “A tax on a poor
man is the seed of revolution and it is detrimental to the government
which loses the big things in its pursuit of the small.” But there are
other shrewd reasons for thus taxing the rich (a) “Aside from this, the
tax on capitalists will _lessen the growth of wealth in private hands,
where we have concentrated it at present as a counterweight to the
governmental power of the Gentiles_....” (b) “Such a measure _will
destroy the hatred of the poor toward the rich_, who will be regarded as
the financial support of the government and the exponents of peace and
prosperity. The poor will realize that the rich are paying the money
necessary to attain these things.”
This was written at least as early as 1896. How many forms of taxation
have come precisely as here outlined!
How illuminating also the following remark: “Money should circulate; and
to hinder free circulation has a fatal effect upon the government
mechanism, which it lubricates. The thickening of the lubricator may
stop the correct functioning of the whole machine. _The substitution of
a part of money exchange by discount paper has created just such an
impediment._”
Remember that when next you hear the Jewish plan that “Gentiles” shall
do business with their own bits of paper, while Jews keep the gold
reserve safely in their own hands. If the crash comes, “Gentiles” have
the paper and Jews the gold. If bits of paper serve ordinarily, the
world may some time decide to do away with the gold. Certainly a system
which rests on Cash yet works with Not-Cash, has disadvantages which
depression and panic reveal. Says Protocol XXII—“We hold in our hands
the greatest modern power—gold; in two days we could free it from our
treasuries in any desired quantities.”
The Jews are economists, esoteric and exoteric; they have one system to
tangle up the “Gentiles,” another which they hope to install when
“Gentile” stupidity has bankrupted the world. The Jews are economists.
Note the number of them who teach economics in the state universities.
Says Protocol VIII:
“We will surround our government with a whole world of economists.
_It is for this reason that the science of economics is the chief
subject of instruction taught by the Jews._”
——
Issue of July 23, 1921.
LXXVIII.
A Jew Sees His People As Others See Them
This week we present another Jew’s comment on his race and for the good
of the race. Bert Levy has said these things before Jewish Women’s
Councils, and B’nai B’rith lodges, and they will assist readers of this
series to an understanding of some of the truer, though minority,
influences which are at work in American Jewry. He sincerely exposes
every obvious defect, and it is to be hoped that one day, with as
sincere a pen, he will go deeper. Mr. Levy’s chosen title is: