BISHOP AYLMER'S LETTER, AND THE POEM ON THE ARMADA.

As I am in a condition to answer the inquiry of your "Hearty

Well-wisher," on p. 12 of your last Number of "NOTES AND QUERIES," I

proceed to give him the information he asks. I shall be happy if what

follows is of any use to your correspondent, taking it for granted that

he is as zealous for your success as his signature indicates.

The "foolish rhyme," to which the attention of the Bishop of London had

been directed by Lord Burghley, has the subsequent doggrel title:--

"A Skeltonicall Salvtation,

Or condigne gratvlation,

And iust vexation

Of the Spanishe nation,

That in a bravado

Spent many a crvsado,

In setting forth an armado

England to invado."

This is as the title stands in the Oxford impression (of which I never

saw more than one copy, because, we may presume, it was suppressed by

the authorities of the University), and the following is the imprint at

the bottom of it:--"Printed at Oxford by Ioseph Barnes, and are to bee

sold in Paules Churchyard, at the signe of the Tygres head, 1589."

There exists several exemplars of the London edition--"Imprinted at

London for Toby Cooke, 1589,"--the title-page of which, as well as the

rest of the poem, differs only literally from that of Oxford, excepting

that to the latter is appended a Latin version, also in rhyme, and in

close imitation of the English. I subjoin a brief specimen of it:-- {19}

"Qui regis Hispanos,

Superbos et vanos,

Crudeles et insanos,

Multùm aberrasti,

Cùm tuos animasti,

Et bellum inchoasti

Contra Anglos animosos,

Fortes et bellicosos,

Nobiles et generosos.

Qui te excitavit

Proculdubio deliravit

Et te fascinavit," &c.

The whole production consists only of ten leaves, 4to., and the Latin

portion, which has the subsequent separate title-page, occupies four of

them:--

"AD REGEM

HISPANVM.

Cum tua non fuerint heroica facta, Philippe,

Risu digna cano carmine ridiculo."

I shall not here introduce any part of the English version, because one

or two long quotations will be found in the introductory portion of the

Rev. A. Dyce's excellent edition of Skelton's Works (2 vols. 8vo. 1843).

Respecting the Latin portion I have been more particular, because the

learned editor was not aware that the production had come from the press

of Barnes of Oxford, nor that a Latin version was appended to it.

I may take the liberty of adding here a mention of Skelton which escaped

notice, and which is from one of the tracts against Thomas Nash,

produced by Gabriel Harvey, the friend of Spenser. He couples Skelton

and Scoggin together, in no very respectful manner, and completes the

triumvirate by Nash, whom he here calls Signor Capriccio:--"And what

riott so pestiferous as that which in sugred baites presenteth most

poisonous hookes? Sir Skelton and Master Scoggin were but innocents to

Signior Capricio."

This quotation is the more noticeable, because it recognises the sacred

character of Skelton (however unworthy of the gown) in the prefix "Sir,"

which, as most people are aware, was then generally given to clergymen:

Scoggin, on the other hand, is only styled "Master Scoggin."

Notes and Queries, Number 02, November 10, 1849 · 第 2 / 57 题