RAMMING AN ENEMY CRUISER

As I said, we will confine ourselves to something quite sane and

simple which does not involve more than half-a-dozen different

reports.

When the German fleet ran for home, on the night of May 31, it seems

to have scattered--"starred," I believe, is the word for the

evolution--in a general _sauve qui peut_, while the Devil, livelily

represented by our destroyers, took the hindmost. Our flotillas were

strung out far and wide on this job. One man compared it to hounds

hunting half a hundred separate foxes.

I take the adventures of several couples of destroyers who, on the

night of May 31, were nosing along somewhere towards the

Schleswig-Holstein coast, ready to chop any Hun-stuff coming back to

earth by that particular road. The leader of one line was Gehenna, and

the next two ships astern of her were Eblis and Shaitan, in the order

given. There were others, of course, but with the exception of one

Goblin they don't come violently into this tale. There had been a good

deal of promiscuous firing that evening, and actions were going on all

round. Towards midnight our destroyers were overtaken by several

three-and four-funnel German ships (cruisers they thought) hurrying

home. At this stage of the game anybody might have been

anybody--pursuer or pursued. The Germans took no chances, but switched

on their searchlights and opened fire on Gehenna. Her acting

sub-lieutenant reports: "A salvo hit us forward. I opened fire with

the after-guns. A shell then struck us in a steam-pipe, and I could

see nothing but steam. But both starboard torpedo-tubes were fired."

Eblis, Gehenna's next astern, at once fired a torpedo at the second

ship in the German line, a four-funnelled cruiser, and hit her between

the second funnel and the mainmast, when "she appeared to catch fire

fore and aft simultaneously, heeled right over to starboard, and

undoubtedly sank." Eblis loosed off a second torpedo and turned aside

to reload, firing at the same time to distract the enemy's attention

from Gehenna, who was now ablaze fore and aft. Gehenna's acting

sub-lieutenant (the only executive officer who survived) says that by

the time the steam from the broken pipe cleared he found Gehenna

stopped, nearly everybody amidships killed or wounded, the

cartridge-boxes round the guns exploding one after the other as the

fires took hold, and the enemy not to be seen. Three minutes or less

did all that damage. Eblis had nearly finished reloading when a shot

struck the davit that was swinging her last torpedo into the tube and

wounded all hands concerned. Thereupon she dropped torpedo work, fired

at an enemy searchlight which winked and went out, and was closing in

to help Gehenna when she found herself under the noses of a couple of

enemy cruisers. "The nearer one," he says, "altered course to ram me

apparently." The Senior Service writes in curiously lawyer-like

fashion, but there is no denying that they act quite directly. "I

therefore put my helm hard aport and the two ships met and rammed each

other, port bow to port bow." There could have been no time to think

and, for Eblis's commander on the bridge, none to gather information.

But he had observant subordinates, and he writes--and I would humbly

suggest that the words be made the ship's motto for evermore--he

writes, "Those aft noted" that the enemy cruiser had certain marks on

her funnel and certain arrangements of derricks on each side which,

quite apart from the evidence she left behind her, betrayed her class.

Eblis and she met. Says Eblis: "I consider I must have considerably

damaged this cruiser, as 20 feet of her side plating was left in my

foc'sle." Twenty feet of ragged rivet-slinging steel, razoring and

reaping about in the dark on a foc'sle that had collapsed like a

concertina! It was very fair plating too. There were side-scuttle

holes in it--what we passengers would call portholes. But it might

have been better, for Eblis reports sorrowfully, "by the thickness of

the coats of paint (duly given in 32nds of the inch) she would not

appear to have been a very new ship."

Sea Warfare · 第 63 / 83 题