CHAPTER VI

FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS AND CERTAIN ENEMY MACHINES

The earliest experiments in the construction of aeroplanes were, as we

have seen, to a considerable extent made in France. The United States

have also played an active part. Meanwhile England had not been idle.

Mr. Henry Farman, the inventor of the Farman Biplane, was the first

to apply the now famous Gnome motor, in which seven or more cylinders

revolved. The influence of this motor in facilitating flight generally

has been remarkable. The early forms of aeroplane engines had proved

unreliable, owing to the great speed demanded. Indeed, it is said

that if the aeroplanes of the great European War were flying over the

enemy’s line with old-fashioned engines they would drop down into

hostile hands as quickly as dying flies from the ceiling on the first

winter day.

Side by side with the efforts of Mr. Henry Farman in the construction

of biplanes, M. Bleriot gave his attention to the construction of

monoplanes. After attempts, which unfortunately brought disaster

and disappointment, he produced a machine which astonished by its

remarkable performances the whole aeronautical world.

Simplicity was the keynote of the Bleriot monoplane. The machine in

which M. Bleriot flew over the Channel in 1909 has been described by

a well-known member of the Aeronautical Society of Great Britain as

‘stretching like the wings of a bird on either side of a tubular wooden

frame partly covered with canvas and tapering to the rear, with two

supporting planes, rounded at the ends. At the front was placed the

motor, geared direct to a 6 feet 6 inch wooden propeller, and on a

level with the rear end of the planes. Immediately behind the engine

was a petrol tank, and behind that the aviator’s seat. Near the end

of the frame and beneath it was the fixed tail, with two moveable,

elevating tips. The act of moving a lever backwards and forwards

actuated the tips of the fixed tail at the back of the machine, and

caused it to rise and fall. Moving the same lever from side to side

warped the rear surfaces of the supporting planes. The act of pushing

from side to side a bar on which the aviator’s feet rested put the

rudder into action and steered the machine.’

Still fresh in the memory is the flight in which the Bleriot monoplane

carried M. Prior from London to Paris, covering 250 miles in three

hours and fifty-six minutes. Later, a Bleriot monoplane carried M.

Garros up to a height of 5,000 metres. At this height the engine broke

down, but in virtue of wonderful gliding powers the machine was landed

safely. It was this same type of machine that flew over the Alpine

peaks, and later carried the first aeroplane post, flying from Hendon

to Windsor in seventeen minutes.

Another monoplane which calls for special reference is the Latham

Antoinette monoplane, which enjoyed the great distinction of being

the first to fly effectively in a wind. Before the invention of this

machine, aviators had only dared to fly in favourable conditions. It

consisted of large, strongly constructed wings. The motor was about 60

h.-p. At the rear of the machine were fixed horizontal and vertical

fins. At the end of the tail there were hinged horizontal planes

for elevating or lowering the machine. The machine, with its ability

to withstand high winds, gave great impetus to the adoption of the

aeroplane for military purposes. Latham, the inventor, performed some

remarkable feats, and must be accounted an heroic pioneer in the more

recent history of flying.

Progress continued on the lines indicated. But it is impossible, for

obvious reasons, to touch upon the modern types of machines employed

by Great Britain and her Allies. We may, however, deal briefly with

certain outstanding types of enemy machines.

One of the most familiar German machines is the Aviatik biplane. The

vital parts of this ‘fighting dragon’ are fortified with metallic

‘capot.’ The rest of the fuselage is also armoured. In the forepart of

the fuselage a space is provided allowing the observer free movement

for scouting, photographing, &c. The machine can be quickly erected and

dismantled. The supporting surface consists of two planes of unequal

dimensions, the upper plane being the larger. Stability is assured by

a fixed plane prolonged by a rudder. Two ‘ailerons’ at the back of the

upper planes give lateral stability. Steering is effected by means

of a vertical rudder placed between the two portions of the horizontal

plane rudder.

[Illustration: REDUCED REPRODUCTION OF A DIAGRAM ISSUED AT THE EARLY

PART OF THE WAR BY THE FRENCH WAR OFFICE, BEARING THE WORDS: ‘GERMAN

AEROPLANES, FIRE ON THESE MACHINES.’]

Another familiar type, the Etrich monoplane, is on the lines of the

German bird-shape design. The wing-shaped supporting planes have

upturned wing tips at the back, which are flexed up and down for the

purpose of lateral stability. The back part of the tail planes is also

moveable, and can be flexed for elevating.

The Germans also have large numbers of the well-known Albatross

biplanes and various monoplanes of the Taube design, and also many

waterplanes of the Albatross type. An interesting feature of these

machines is the fact that they are all double seated with the exception

of the Argo type of monoplane.

The swiftly dashing scouting monoplane did not at first find favour

with the enemy, but the war has brought many sudden and sweeping

changes, and, following the much-vaunted Fokker, we learn of a German

machine able to attain the astonishing speed of 120 miles an hour!

The Albatross, a much used type of German machine, was first made at

Johnnisthal, near Berlin (about 200 of these machines were made in

1913). Mercedes motors are fitted, capable of attaining a high speed.

In the Rumpler monoplane, another well-known German type, the wings are

again in the shape of a dove’s wings, the ends being flexible. ‘The

stability of the apparatus,’ writes a well-known authority, ‘is assured

both by the shape of the wings and their flexibility. It is at once a

combination of the inherent stability type and the depending on the

warping of surfaces.’

The Rumpler biplane, as in the case of the Aviatik, is remarkable for

the space provided for the pilot and observer. In this case also the

fuselage is strongly protected. The upper plane varies from that of

the majority of German machines; it is not made to move in the centre.

There is a short moveable central plane, attached to the fuselage by

four tubes. The other planes are fixed to this central plane.

The Rumpler monoplane is shown, together with other German designs,

including the Gotha monoplane, in a diagram issued in the early part

of the war by the French War Office, bearing the words: _German

Aeroplanes. Fire on these machines._ (See page 41.)

Heroic airmen and their exploits · 第 6 / 35 章