Such was the usual method of construction of a Roman highway. Where the

natural surface of the ground passed over was hard rock, the two lowest

layers, or _strata_, were dispensed with; but where no safe natural

foundation existed, the labour was increased by the driving of piles

into the soft ground to afford this.

Over hill and down dale were constructed these wonderful roads. No

obstacle save an impenetrable marsh or an unbridgeable river baulked the

Roman engineer; and the outward distinguishing mark between the Roman

road constructed sixteen centuries ago and its modern successor is often

the fact that whereas the latter goes round a hill, and thus makes

things easy for the traveller, the former climbs in a straight line

right over the summit.

What engineering skill the Romans must have possessed to build their

roads! Straight from one military station to another miles distant over

the hills did they succeed in driving their road. How did they judge its

direction so accurately? We know not. And what immense labour was needed

for the construction of their roads! Think of the cohorts of Roman

soldiers engaged in building them, and of the slave-gangs of Britons

toiling under the lash of the task-master as they quarried the materials

for the use of the soldiers working many miles away. So hard was the

work of the Roman soldiers in Britain, we read, that they ‘wished for

death to relieve them from their insupportable toil.’

But human life stood for little in those days. What Roman engineer cared

whether thousands of lives were spent in the making of his road? His one

concern was to build it in such a way that for centuries to come the

Roman legions should be able to march, and the Imperial Post to ride,

along its hundreds of miles at the greatest possible speed. One hundred

and sixty-five English miles were covered by Caesarius, a Roman

magistrate, in the space of one day on a journey from Antioch to

Constantinople, the whole distance of 665 miles taking less than six

days. There is little wonder that Rome had become ‘Mistress of the

World.’

* * * * *

Let us now see what the Roman road-makers did in East Yorkshire.

Stretching north from Londinium ran the military highway known in later

times as ERMIN STREET. At Lindum Colonia this branched in two

directions, both branches meeting eventually at Eboracum. Skirting the

impassable marshes around the meeting-places of the Yorkshire rivers and

the Trent, one branch reached Eboracum by bridges or fords across the

Trent, the Don, the Aire, and the Wharfe, where now stand Littleborough,

Doncaster, Castleford, and Tadcaster. The crossing-places were protected

by military stations which have since grown into these towns.

But directly north from Lincoln the second branch reached the Humber at

Winteringham, whence the river was crossed by ferry to Brough, where

also was a military station, named Petuaria. From Brough to York the

road passed through South Cave, South Newbald, Houghton Woods, Thorpe le

Street, Barmby Moor and Stamford Bridge. Along this second branch would

travel the Roman Emperors and Generals, the Imperial Post, and the

slave-carried litters and chairs of the Roman aristocracy; round by the

former would march the foreign troops drafted to Eboracum to replace the

wastage in the Sixth Legion, and the British levies on their way to

fight and die in other parts of the Roman world.

At South Newbald this Roman road branched to the right, passing by

Londesborough, Warter, Millington and Acklam, to a camp at Old Malton.

From Stamford Bridge eastward ran another road by Garrowby, Fimber,

Cottam and Kilham to a Roman station on the cliffs at Sewerby. Higher up

on the Wolds ran an alternative route by Fridaythorpe, Sledmere, Octon

and Rudston. These two roads are to-day known as the Low Street and the

High Street.

Smaller roads ran from Stamford Bridge to Old Malton, and from the

latter to Fimber and possibly farther south in the direction of

Beverley. Round the coast from Bridlington there was probably a

road—long since washed away—to a military station on the headland which

then existed about a mile to the east of the present Kilnsea.

In North Lincolnshire Ermin Street is a typical Roman military road, and

for the greater part of its course it is to-day the ‘king’s highway.’

But its northerly portion has, since the establishing of the Ferry at

New Holland, been disused, and is now but a green lane, whose very

surface is lost to view as we approach the Humber.

When we enter the territory of the Brigantes the road is not so

distinguishable, and its course is in some parts uncertain. But even

then the name of ‘Street’ given by the successors of the Romans to the

Roman paved way—the way made of _strata_—survives; and on the map of the

East Riding we shall find Garrowby Street, Humber Street, Wharram le

Street, and Thorpe le Street, each name being significant of a Roman

road. In some instances the road itself has been uncovered, as in the

building of Drewton Bridge 60 years ago, and in building operations at

Londesborough Park, where it was found to be 24 feet wide, and to show

plainly the marks of wheeled carriages.

* * * * *

At many places in the East Riding have been discovered evidences of

Roman commerce and domestic life. Bronze and silver coins buried in

vases or boxes have been unearthed at Cowlam, Warter, Nunburnholme,

Skerne, Wetwang, and Brough. At the first-named place more than 10,000

coins had been buried in a large black vase, the finds at Warter and

Nunburnholme numbered about half that at Cowlam, and the Copper Hall

Farm at Skerne owes its name to a similar find.

So also Roman coins have been unearthed at Hornsea, Aldborough,

Withernsea and Hollym, on the line of a coast road from Bridlington to

Kilnsea, though the road itself has long since been washed away.

[Illustration: ROMAN ROADS AROUND THE HUMBER]

Of particular interest, as pointing to the fact that the road leading

southward to Brough was an export trade route, is a ‘pig’ of lead

weighing 9 stone 9 lbs. discovered twenty years ago in a field adjoining

the road at South Cave. This bears in raised letters an inscription,

which, written in uncontracted form as

CAII IVLII PROTI BRITANNICUM LVTVDAE EX

ARGENTO

would mean in our tongue [The lead] of Caius Julius Protus, British

[lead] from Lutuda, [prepared] from silver.

[Illustration: ROMAN PIG OF LEAD FOUND AT SOUTH CAVE.]]

The lead mines of Derby were famous in Roman times, and much lead was

exported from Britain to Italy; so we may easily suppose that this

particular pig was lost in transit to the place of shipment.

As evidences of domestic life we have _hypocausts_, or underground

heating-chambers for the supply of hot air and hot water to the rooms of

Roman villas. These must once have been numerous—for no wealthy Roman

could do without his warm bath—but so far only a few have been

discovered. Again, we have examples of the Roman writing-implements,

_styli_ by name, two of which, found at Brough, are illustrated below.

[Illustration: ROMAN ‘PENS’ FOUND AT BROUGH.]

When a Roman wished to write, his implements were very simple—a tablet

of wax and a _stylus_. With the pointed end of the latter he scratched

his letters on the surface of the wax; and if he made mistakes he had

only to smooth them out by using the other end, which was flattened for

the purpose. The Roman schoolboy probably found the stylus a very

convenient instrument.

[Illustration: RELICS OF ROMAN FEASTS FOUND AT EASINGTON.]

Humbler evidences of domestic life have been discovered in the ‘kitchen

middens,’ or refuse heaps, which the incursions of the sea have exposed

at Easington and Kilnsea. From these have been obtained numberless

oyster shells and fragments of pottery, the relics of dining-room feasts

and kitchen breakages. The former are very interesting, because they

show the method by which the Roman cook overcame the natural reluctance

of the creatures within them to ‘come out of their shells.’

* * * * *

How very curiously such discoveries of ancient relics may be made is

seen in the recent case of an inhabitant of South Ferriby. A half-witted

man, by name Thomas Smith, but known locally by the more familiar name

‘Coin Tommy,’ made it his practice for several years to walk along the

shore of the river just after the periods of high tide, and to pick up

all metal objects which he happened to see. Whether horse-shoe or

brace-button did not matter to ‘Coin Tommy.’ Into his pocket went

everything of metal which he found; and on his reaching home after each

of these expeditions, his ‘finds’ were transferred to a stock of tin

canisters, and packed away on the shelves of his cupboard never again to

be looked at by their finder.

Now it was known by Coin Tommy’s associates that his finds were not all

horse-shoes and brace-buttons. But few of his friends expected that

after his death would-be purchasers of these finds from distant parts of

the country would vie with one another for their possession. Yet so it

happened; for Coin Tommy’s miscellaneous collection included no fewer

than 3000 Roman coins of gold, silver and bronze, and bronze brooches,

finger-rings, bracelets, tweezers, spoons, earpicks and styli

innumerable.

The explanation of the occurrence of all these objects along this

portion of the south bank of the Humber is that there had been at this

spot a Roman cemetery, and that changes in the currents of the Humber

have caused each high tide during the last few years to wash away some

portion of the bank, and thus bring to light treasures buried sixteen

centuries ago. And though South Ferriby is not in East Yorkshire, Coin

Tommy’s finds may fitly be mentioned in the story of the East Riding;

for it is probable that many of the owners of the bracelets and brooches

and finger rings had lived at Petuaria, on the Yorkshire side of the

river.

Very interesting are the _fibulae_, or brooches, here discovered. Some

have engraved upon them the name of their maker, AVCISSA, and one,

having blue enamel let into the bronze surface, is constructed in the

form of a fish.

[Illustration: A ‘SAFETY PIN’ SIXTEEN HUNDRED YEARS OLD.]

This may be taken as evidence of its wearer’s being a Christian, for in

early days the fish was an emblem of Christianity. In other cases the

brooch is made of a single piece of bronze wire, twisted to form a

spiral spring, and having one of its ends flattened out and bent over to

form a catch for the pin—an illustration of the oft-quoted saying ‘There

is nothing new under the sun’; for here is an exact model of the

safety-pin invented, or rather re-invented, in the nineteenth century.

[Illustration: DESIGN OF THE PAVEMENT OF A ROMAN VILLA DISCOVERED AT

HARPHAM.]

To come back to the East Riding, our last mention of relics of Roman

times shall be that of the mosaic pavement which was discovered in a

ploughed field at Harpham in 1904. This pavement formed the floor of the

_atrium_, or square hall of a Roman villa, and was in use probably about

the year A.D. 300. It is constructed of small _tessarae_, or cubes, of

red sandstone and chalk, with a few others of dark blue clay, red clay,

and yellow limestone in the centre-piece of the design, and makes an

ingenious piece of work in the form of a maze.

This Roman pavement has been removed to Hull and reconstructed in the

Hull museum. On it when found lay the flat sandstone slabs which had

once formed the roof over it. Many iron nails with large flat heads were

also found, and in one instance the nail remained fast in position

through a hole in one of the slabs.

VI.

OUR ANCESTORS.

From the time when Roman soldiers first penetrated into the territory of

the Brigantes, the land which we name Holderness was troubled by the

piratical attacks of a people from the other side of the North Sea; and

in the early years of the second century the low-lying marshes of this

district were inhabited by a tribe whom the Romans called PARISII. In

our language they would be called FRISIANS.

These early Frisian settlers have left us evidence of the places they

chose for settlement in the village names Arram, Newsom, Hollym, and

Ulrome. Their settlements would probably be peaceful, for the lands

taken would be unoccupied pieces of ground rising just above the level

of the surrounding marsh.

But as time went on, the eastern and southern shores of Britain were

assailed by numerous other bands of plunderers and would-be settlers;

and in the later Roman times we find that, beside the army stationed at

York under the command of the _Duke of Britain_ to repel the Picts and

Scots of the north, there was an army under the _Count of the Saxon

Shore_ whose duty it was to defend against invaders the coast from the

Wash to the shores of Sussex.

* * * * *

Under Roman rule Britain as a whole prospered exceedingly. Agriculture

and commerce were extended, so that we find the lead-merchants of Derby

exporting lead to Italy, the chalk-merchants of Tadcaster exporting

chalk, and the corn-merchants of the Rhine provinces importing corn from

Britain in large quantities.

But beside the export of lead and chalk and corn, another export of

trade was going on—the export of the warlike youth of the country, who

went to furnish with men the Roman armies in Spain and Gaul and Germany.

Those left at home were forbidden by law to carry arms; so there is

small wonder that when the Roman legions were withdrawn from Britain

Roman towns were sacked and burnt, and Roman civilisation blotted out by

hostile invaders. ‘Tragedies can still be guessed at from heaps of ashes

and from skeletons of men, women and children found ... in crouching

attitudes in hypocausts and other places of concealment; and the human

bones frequently discovered at the bottoms of wells ... enable us to see

the ruthless savage removing the traces of a murderous raid.’

Petuaria, Praetorium, Derventio—all were sacked and burnt by the hosts

of ENGLE who sailed up the Humber and the Derwent, or landed at

Bridlington Bay. Roman houses were generally one-storied buildings

roofed with tiles or thatch, and the destruction of a town by fire would

be complete. It was also, in most cases, lasting; for the destroyers

were men who cared not for a life passed within walls and

fortifications. ‘They liked better to hear the lark sing than the mouse

squeak.’ So the Roman cities, towns and camps ‘remained in ruins, to be

haunted by the owl and the fox.’

But an exception was made by the invaders in the case of the greatest of

the Roman cities. Eboracum, Londinium and Lindum Colonia became the

chief centres of life for the tribes that captured them; and thus the

EBORACUM of the Romans became the EOFERWIC[6] of the Angles—a

dwelling-place in the haunts of the wild boar. Smaller towns were

blotted out; and their sites are known to us only by the finding of the

family store of coins, or the personal treasures once placed for safety

in a little recess in the wall or buried in a vase under the floor—to be

overwhelmed with debris, and to remain undiscovered for many centuries.

Footnote 6:

Pronounced almost as _Yóv-er-wik_.

* * * * *

The hostile tribes who invaded Britain during the fifth and sixth

centuries in such numbers as to conquer the whole country from the Isle

of Wight to the Firth of Forth, except the mountainous districts of the

west, were known as the _Engle_, the _Seaxe_ and the _Iute_.[7] Angles,

Saxons and Jutes these are to us. The IUTE landed on the shores of, and

established colonies in, Kent and the Isle of Wight, the former of which

developed into a kingdom; the SEAXE established three kingdoms

distinguished from one another in name by the adjectives South, East,

and West; and separate bands of ENGLE formed the kingdoms of East

Anglia, Mercia, and Northumbria.

Footnote 7:

_Eń-gla_, _Sék-sa_, and _Yóo-ta_, in pronunciation.

It is with the last-named of these ‘Seven Kingdoms’ that we are most

particularly concerned. The huge kingdom of Northumbria stretched

northwards from the Humber to the Forth, and was at different times

either ruled by one king or divided into two separate kingdoms—Deira,

from the Humber to the Tees, and Bernicia, from the Tees to the Forth.

How complete was the conquest of Britain by these invading tribes is

seen in the account written by Bede, the eighth century monk of Jarrow:—

They burned and harried and slew from the sea on the east to the sea

on the west, and no one was able to withstand them.... Many of the

miserable survivors were captured in waste places and stabbed in

heaps. Some because of hunger gave themselves into the hands of

their enemies, to be their slaves for ever in return for food and

clothing; some departed sorrowfully over the sea; some remained

fearfully in their native land, and with heavy hearts lived a life

of want in the forests and waste places and on the high cliffs.

The completeness of the conquest may be seen also in the fact that the

language of the Britons was replaced by that of the invaders. The

Angles, Saxons and Jutes spoke a language entirely different from the

Keltic language of the Britons; but except in the Highlands of Scotland,

in Wales, and in the Isle of Man—the parts to which the invaders did not

penetrate—the language spoken to-day is ENGLISH and the name of the

country itself is ENGLA-LAND, the land of the _Engle_.

* * * * *

Very definite evidence of the places chosen by the Angles for settlement

can be found on the map of the East Riding. Where the head of the

household decided to ‘pitch his tent’ a piece of land was enclosed with

a _tūn_,[8] or hedge, and the dwelling erected within it became his new

_hām_,[8] or home. Such was the origin of our numerous towns and

villages whose names now end in the syllables _ton_ and _ham_. In many

cases the name of the family is enshrined in the name of the settlement.

Thus the Locings—the sons of Loc—the Essings, the Brantings, the

Eoferings, and the Hemings gave their names respectively to Lockington,

Easington, Brantingham, Everingham, and Hemingbrough.

Footnote 8:

Pronounced, respectively, _toon_ and _hahm_.

Besides the endings _ton_ and _ham_, others which tell of Anglian

settlements are _worth_ and _bald_ (a dwelling), _cote_ or _coate_ (a

mud cottage), _stead_ (a place), _brough_ or _borough_ (a fortified

place), _wick_ (a village), _wold_ (woodland), _field_ (a place where

trees have been felled), _ley_ (an open place in a wood), _mere_ (a

lake), _fleet_ (the mouth of a river) and _ford_. Examples of all these

can be found on a map of the East Riding.

* * * * *

In their burial customs the Angles were little different from the

peoples whom they dispossessed. Like them they often cremated the bodies

of their dead, afterwards collecting the charred bones and burying them

in earthen vessels, accompanied with the weapons or personal treasures

which were to be used again in the life to come. A man was buried with

his spear and shield, or with the long one-edged knife whose

name—_seax_—gave rise to the tribal name of the Saxons; a woman with her

knife, shears, bronze box containing thread and needles, and beads of

glass and amber; a child with his toys, such as the tiny tweezers, knife

and shears found with a child’s bones in a burial vase at Sancton.

[Illustration:

IRON KNIFE AND BRONZE SPOON FROM AN ANGLIAN CEMETERY

NEAR GARTON GATE HOUSE (1/2).

]

Not always, however, did the Angles cremate the bodies of their dead.

More often they buried them near the surface of a British burial mound.

From one of the mounds at Driffield, known as ‘Cheesecake Hill,’ was

taken a necklace consisting of 219 beads, of which 141 were of amber,

two of glass, three of carefully cut crystal, and five of cowrie shells.

[Illustration: CHILD’S TOYS FOUND IN A BURIAL VASE AT SANCTON.]

Not very far from Garton Gatehouse, and near the memorial to Sir Tatton

Sykes some three miles farther north, were accidentally discovered two

Anglian cemeteries, one of which contained more than sixty bodies of

men, women and children. Here all but a few had been buried not with

their limbs bent, as was the custom among the Britons, but with their

limbs stretched out at full length; and all but one had been buried with

their heads to the west. Probably these were Christian burials.

[Illustration:

‘FINDS’ IN AN ANGLIAN CEMETERY NEAR GARTON

GATE HOUSE.

A. Bronze ring (1/1). B. Silver brooch (1/1). C. Bone comb (1/2).

]

From this Anglian cemetery at Garton were obtained many implements and

personal ornaments—iron knives and bronze spoons, bronze ankle-rings and

buckles, necklaces of glass, amber and amethyst, silver ear-rings, a

gold button set with a precious stone, and, luxury of luxuries, a bone

comb. What a great advance is thus shown to have taken place in the

centuries between the British burial at Garrowby and the Anglian burials

at Garton! With the former were weapons of flint and bone; with the

latter, implements of bronze and iron, and personal ornaments of silver,

gold, and precious stones.

VII.

HOW THE MEN OF THE NORTH BECAME

CHRISTIANS.

During later Roman times the worship of God had been introduced into

Britain, and the discovery of the Roman bronze brooch figured on page 38

shows that Christianity had reached the shores of the Humber.

But the invaders who were to give a new name to the country and to

become our ancestors were heathens, and chief among their gods was

Woden. We of the twentieth century still preserve, the names of Wōden,

Tīw, the god of war, and Frīg, the wife of Wōden, in our ‘Wednesday,’

‘Tuesday,’ and ‘Friday’—the _Wodenesdaeg_, _Tiwesdaeg_, and

_Frigedaeg_[9] of our Anglo-Saxon ancestors.

Footnote 9:

Pronounced, respectively, _Wóh-den-ez-dag_, _Tée-wes-dag_, and

_Frée-ga-dag_.

In the passage from Bede’s _Ecclesiastical History of the English

People_ which was partly translated in the last chapter, we are given an

insight into the way in which the heathen Angles and Saxons despoiled

the worshipping-places of the Christian Britons:—

Everywhere priests were slain and murdered by the side of the

altars. Bishops together with their people were slain without mercy

by fire and sword, and there was none to give the rites of burial to

those who were so cruelly murdered.

Thus Britain became again a country entirely pagan, and it was not until

the closing years of the sixth century that Christian missionaries from

Rome once more set foot in it.

* * * * *

To understand the events leading up to the arrival of these

missionaries, we must bear in mind that among the Angles and the Saxons

slavery was a common custom. Social ranks of life were very marked, and

all men belonged to one of three distinct classes. He who could trace

back his descent from the gods ranked as an _eorl_,[10] or man of noble

birth, and all others were divided into two classes—the free and the

unfree. A free man, who had the privilege of owning land by virtue of

his freedom, was known as a _ceorl_[10]; but he who was, body and soul,

the property of another was called a _theow_,[10] or slave.

Footnote 10:

_É-orl_, _ké-orl_, and _thái-ow_ in pronunciation.

Slaves must have been very numerous in our country during Saxon days;

for wars were constantly being waged between the different tribes, and

prisoners of war naturally became the slaves of their captors. So also,

a man who had fallen into debt and who could not release himself became

the theow of the man to whom he owed money; and when he became a slave,

his wife and children became slaves likewise, and could be sold by his

master. Worst of all, a free man had the right to sell his own children

into slavery until they reached the age of seven.

Now it so happened that this horrible custom of selling children as

slaves was the direct cause of Christianity’s being re-introduced into

our country. A regular export trade in English children was carried on,

and about the year 580 there were one day standing exposed for sale in

the market of Rome some boys of fair complexion and beautiful hair.

Along the market chanced to pass a monk, who was struck with their

light-coloured hair and blue eyes, so different from the dark hair and

brown eyes of the South European peoples. On his asking the slave-dealer

from what country they had been brought, he was told that they came from

Britain, and that the people of that island had fair complexions.

Unsatisfied with this information, he asked of what race they were, and

was told that they were Angli.

The Story of the East Riding of Yorkshire · 第 2 / 19 段